Dark Town (Video 2004) Poster

(2004 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
34 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Dark Town
Scarecrow-8810 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Suburbia is inflicted with vampirism once a slumlord(..who is bitten by vampires when he finds them lodging in one of his buildings)poisons his family with tainted blood(while also biting his younger daughter). A chain reaction of new vampires ignites when those unaware, such as Rakeem(Delpano Wils), his sister Tisha(Kobina Wright)and his other friends who show up at the slumlord's house to cause a ruckus due to the death of a young child thanks to a fire. That fire was indeed in the slumlord's building and Rakeem wants retribution, but instead finds himself in a pretty scary situation..the slumlord's family are out to get their blood. Jen(Janet Martin)seems to be the only member bitten who can control the evil raging..at least enough to assist Rakeem in his goal to kill as many vampires as he can. But, the main goal is killing the slumlord who seems to be in control of the carnage that has emerged. We get a glimpse of how bad the vampire plague has spread through the scurrying shadows that often pass the houses outside..there seems to be no hope in Rakeem and Jen's cause to end the vampire disease that's spreading quickly and endlessly.

Gory micro-budget flick from director Desi Scarpone suffers from unoriginality. He really brings on the vampire feeding and never holds back on the bloodletting. When he focuses on the violence, it's quite effective. It's the other problems that surface such as a plot that really has nowhere to go. It's basically an endless supply of vampire attacks and one-liners from those infected who praise being inflicted with their disease for they say it has changed them for the better. The black characters represented here are mostly gangster stereotypes or those very nervy about being in a suburban white neighborhood. There is an obvious array of profanity and irrational behavior as if they can't think for themselves and are clueless as to how to get out of their situation. Rakeem is really the only fully developed character of the bunch, but Wils doesn't have the kind of talent to bring life to him. The film, interesting enough, mostly has females doing the biting and such. That alone makes this an interesting little watch regarding vampire mania. But, it follows the basic vampire formula and the single location of one of two suburban homes really stifles the ambition of where Scarone wishes to take his film.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Man oh man, these Vamps suck
movieman_kev16 March 2006
What do you get when you throw in "Leprechaun in da hood" minus the leprechaun and mixing in vampires that are pretty fang-less, and adding a pinch of lesbians for no good reason other than to have lesbians in the mix (I'll bet dollars to donuts that the producers dictated that they be in there somewhere)? Well i'll tell you what you get. Pure unadulterated crap. Not even good crap, the kind you could enjoy if properly inebriated. But the kind of filth that is just hard to watch on account of the overly melodramatic acting, loopy stunted dialog, and illogical storyline. Notice how I didn't particularly go into the plot line of this putrid number. There's a reason for that, this being that I'd rather not think back on this wasted hour and a half that I will NEVER get back from my life no matter how hard I try. And the sad thing is that there actually are worse movies dealing with vampires out there. And that, my friend, is a sad state of affairs indeed.

Where I Saw it: Starz on Demand

Eye Candy: Janet Martin, Claire Mills, Ariana Fronti, and Meghan Stansfield all get topless

My Grade: F
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrid, absolutely horrid
biohazard1258916 June 2005
I rented this, expecting what should be expected from a b- movie, but all that thought preparation couldn't do enough.

The best description I could use for this...thing is excess.

Almost everything is done in excess. The gore went way too far. I can deal with vampire-blood-sucking, but cannibalism is pretty much where I draw the line. The constant violation of physiological laws kind of bothered me too. In any other movie, someone will rip out someone's heart at most 1 or 2 times. I think anyone will agree with me in saying that stabbing a pocket knife repeatedly into someone's sternum will not cause all of the ventricles, aortas and chambers to remain intact, AND have all of the veins and arteries removed very meticulously.

The lesbianism, was gratuitous and offered no character/ plot development, but it didn't really bother me.

The acting...whoa. It helped us further the stereotypes of how black people (gangstas specifically) talk. Everybody either over-acted or obviously put forth no effort. Vampires are extremely difficult to act and write I guess. Making them poetic, articulate, and realistic seems like a bit much for many writers/actors, as this film shows.

Character development was very weak, especially in reference to the father character, whom we were led to believe change because of the vampirism, but we couldn't understand who he was before.

The whore of the movie had a very inconsistent french/transylvanian(Count Chocula rip-off) and English accent that kept changing.

The baby... the baby reminded me of that...thing on the short lived TV show "That's My Bush" Cinematography was excessive and an obvious attempt at something original, but the director deserves a little recognition for that.

Horrible, don't waste your money, if you plan on spending your money on this, you might as well give it to a bum, so he can go buy some vodka.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So, What is IT?
bear9013 August 2006
Well, the short version is the vampiric version of Romero's "Night of the Living Dead". The spreading infection. The group of dysfunctional family members. The house under siege (granted from within instead of from without). Add a solid dollop of Edward Albee's "American Dream" crossed with Lynch's "Eraserhead" and you MIGHT get the idea. It is gorilla film-making. Have no doubt about that. Overall, I still can't decide if I liked it or not. There is no adherence to mythology (in any universe I've seen vampire films from) so you kind of have to suspend disbelief over a deep pit of boiling lye. But, if you can, you might find it interesting. And, even if you can't, it has a certain "Train Wreck" like charm.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst vampire movies out there.
repo2817 December 2005
I have seen plenty of vampire movies in my day. And this one goes from bad to worst. The acting is horrible with all of the performances reminiscent of a bunch of five year olds during a Christmas pageant. The plot line makes no sense offering no explanation for why any of this is happening and showing us that there is no consequence for evil taking over a neighborhood. I kept waiting for there to be some redeeming quality to this movie. Something to make it seem like I didn't waste an hour and thirty minutes of my time. Alas, even lesbian sex could not pull this one out of the gutter.

Maybe this is meant to be a parody. In which case...it still sucked (no pun intended). So do yourself a favor, if you see Dark Town at the video store, don't rent it. If it comes on cable, don't watch it. We have to send a message to these people that bad movies will not be tolerated.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Energetic and Nervy
moviemanic0728 January 2006
A callous slumlord brings a vampiric infection home to his dysfunctional suburban family on the same night that some of his tenants show up to teach him a lesson. Much bloodshed ensues. When someone asks me to a recommend a genuinely entertaining low budget, straight-to-video gore fest, this is one of the few that gets the nod. Director Desi Scarpone and writer David Birke manage to deliver some genuine humor and chills in this film. It is energetic, nervy, and often gratuitous – in both gore and nudity. The father is a fun character who revels in his corruption and evil. He's one of the few memorable characters I've seen in a recent DV horror film. Is this film for all tastes? No. Is it a shining example of film-making? No. Is it always coherent? No. But let's face it, if you're reading this review, you must already be a fan of bad horror films. You could certainly do worse than this.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dark Turd
ghoulieguru27 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Lesbian vampires and the background extras from Boyz in the Hood get together for this Troma-esquire debacle. Added to the list of worst vampire movies ever, along with Dracula 3000 and Bram Stoker's Way of the Vampire.

The storyline is pretty disjointed, but I guess the basic premise is that there's a bunch of these gangstas who stumble into a - wait for it - drug deal gone wrong! The gangstas (who all hold their guns sideways like the Gangstas they are) escape to the Club and start talking about how there's this white chick who lives nearby who keeps all kinds of drug money in her bedroom.

Being OG, Gangstas go to rob her. Only they didn't plan on stepping right into the middle of a Vampire Surprise Birthday Party! Turns out White Girl's dad is vampire, and it's his birthday. By the time the Gangstas show up, Vampire Dad has already infected like everybody else in the family. The family is all dysfunctional and stuff, which I guess means that there's an older sister who's a lesbian.

The dysfunctional family vampires infect the gangstas. It turns into an All- Vampire ho-down. The only thing that's missing is the Stevie Wonder/Paul McCartney soundtrack. Ebony and ivory sucking in perfect harmony. In the end, they all stand in front of the skylight and get turned into ash. I don't know what else to say about this thing, and to be honest, I don't want to waste any more of my time or yours talking about it.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Half and half.
Ky-D7 June 2005
'Dark Town' rides that dangerous line between worlds. Almost a fun gore flick and almost a cheap piece of crap. How much you enjoy it depends on how demanding a viewer you are.

A group of gangsters get caught up in a vampire out break when they attempt to rob a suburban home. It seems the father of the house has (for reasons barely explained) contracted vampirism and has decided to infect his family. Much blood letting ensues.

First the good: as already stated there is oodles of blood spilt. All kinds of vampire biting, feasting (almost like a zombie movie really) and other assorted human dismemberment are on display. Hearts are torn out, heads are lopped off, people are stabbed, shot, one woman even takes a broken bottle are carves up her bare chest. Which brings up the films other saving grace; an abundance of bared flesh. I am actually surprised the film got away with an R-rating. In summation, the film is watchable thanks to much fan service.

Now the bad: it is extremely low budget and not very well made. The locations and lighting either look bad or don't match. The script starts nowhere and ends nowhere, the acting is more like un-acting, and the director shows only limited flare for unique techniques. In short, it's technically defunct.

Gore hounds will be able to enjoy themselves, but expecting quality or uniqueness will only leave you disappointed.

5/10
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Suburban dysfunction plus vampires meets inner city gang violence.
suite921 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Slumlord Curtis Armstrong Sr goes to collect from his properties. He gets more than he bargained for from his tenants. He returns to his calm, safe, suburban home for his birthday. Then he starts the blood bath after being very creepy. He bites Heather, which turns her.

Heather has a Latino gangster boyfriend, Cinque, who is a drug dealer. Some black youth decide to liberate Cinque's money stash, which he keeps in Heather's room. Rakeem gets two men and Kisha to go with him to do the theft.

The neighborhood watch stops the black group, but Rakeem pulls a pistol on them when they were distracted. One of their party gets shot by the watch; they hide at the Armstrong house. Cinque shows up too, to get his cash. Heather kills him.

The vampire monster status transfers in perhaps 20 minutes, which accelerates all the proceedings.

The gang violence just serves as feeding sources for the new vampires, or whatever they are. There's a small amount of drama in whether a person can fight off the change or not.

Jen and Rakeem fight if off somewhat, and try to kill all the other vampires. When that does not work too well, they take another exit. That they survived at all is just ridiculous. ----Scores---- Cinematography: 4/10 Soft focus. Too much darkness. Too many home movies that are total garbage in terms of visuals.

Sound: 6/10 OK, but not great. The loud parts are way too loud, and the soft parts too soft.

Acting: 1/10 Would someone please stay in the same accent? How did Rakeem go from being low on courage to being able to fight off being a vampire?

Screenplay: 2/10 The first 25 minutes were almost opaque in terms of motivation. The rules for dealing with the supernatural seemed to change every so many minutes. Some consistency might have been nice. The ending was unlikely at best.

Special Effects: 3/10 Horribly bad. Cheap, poor, stupid.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
hmm. no
oxgoodbyesxo1 October 2005
oh my.. this movie is not worth your time. its not even cheesy to the point of being funny. it was a waste of a video rental in my opinion. the lesbians were pretty cute, and the over done "urban black youths" were funny.."yoz fool..we gots to get up outta here and kill us some foolz!" i definitely would not recommend this movie to anyone...it makes no sense, the acting is absolutely terrible..and the vampire makeup is very 2nd grade halloween party-ish..ugh... i'm a very big horror fan and this really disappointed me..and now for my seven year old sisters review " amber..i thought this was supposed to be scary..its just a bunch of flashes and ulgy girls with fangs and blood..can we watch something else..?"
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sweet, merciful Christ.......
sxdrr20 March 2007
Allrighty, then. Where to begin? I am a fan of cinema, I believe it to be the highest form of art that exists. I enjoy all types of cinema, the ones that redefine popular culture and the ones that make us contemplate how awful our popular culture has become. When I am relaxing and having a drink (or two) I even enjoy watching horrible movies to laugh at while I grow steadily more intoxicated. Dark Town was something beyond what I previously defined as bad. Here are some highlights without spoiling (lol) the movie for anyone intending to watch it.

1)The prosthetic teeth that the vampires use are so bad that they garble the actors' voices, so that their atrocious delivery is even more incomprehensible 2)You get to see a vampire lick blood off the floor in a manner that would put most adult film stars to shame (but your friends will imitate it until the joke loses all humor, which was minimal to begin with) 3)A vampire who loses her baby in the creepiest mock-abortion recorded on film proceeds to breast feed another grown woman by slicing off her nipple and making her suckle on the wound (in detail) 4)One of the vampires is decapitated, then pulls his shirt up over his head to complete the special effects and suddenly become a foot taller than everyone else in the shot.

Anyhow, I was drinking gin and doing cocaine while watching this movie. Normally, I really get into the bad movies and laugh along while my friends make jokes about what is happening in the film. Dark Town made me angry at the TV screen. There is no word for it besides complete vomit. If you are looking to pinch a huge loaf on your entire evening, ruin it with this piece of garbage. I am appealing to the public to find some way of legally preventing this movie's producers from continuing to work in the film industry. Kind of like that appeal to Uwe Boll.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Cool, unique B movie about vampires, lesbians and the hood!
devilsreject1981-123 January 2006
Now this is honestly not the greatest movie but it's definitely refreshing to see a horror movie that comes from someone who has been taking notes. Lesbians are a must in these movies but since WB has taken over the Hollywood horror game, we'll only see lesbians in B movies. Is this as good as Near Dark? Of course not, not even close. But does this movie have some cool images, sexy lesbians, and fun fake looking blood? Yes. Naked lesbians? Jackpot! I can't stress enough to you that this movie has girls kissing and actually looking like they like it. People who rip this movie like their horror t.v. friendly and slick with a big budget. Fans of low budget fare will love this. Is the acting great? Not really but there are a few people who stick out. The guy who played the father and the angst ridden daughter who has been missing in action while sleeping with her sexy girlfriend both come through. There is some confusion with what this movie wants to be but it's still pretty ambitious considering the budget is probably around 500 grand. This movie kind of meets in the middle, it has suburbia America meets the ghetto. There are even a few new attempts at disturbing imagery and it works okay. It's always fun to see a vampire cut open her breast and feed her newly turned baby. Haha... classic.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very interesting, refreshing--a vamp movie with a message
plegowik12 January 2008
Okay, this isn't the greatest vampire film ever made, but it does have something. Though the early part of the story seemed very unfocused, it did draw all the strings together to create a film that was satisfying, one whose characters did interest me. What I found most refreshing was that the people were people I could relate to--a middle class family and kids who loiter on street corners. The story wasn't typically clichéd, leaving me waiting eagerly to see what happened next. I also liked how free will and self-control emerge as the film's message. I'd almost suspect that this film inspired the new television Moonlight series.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
SO boring and bad and stupid and worthless
Horrorible_Horror_Films19 December 2005
If you like bad movies don't watch this, it wont keep your interest. This is such a stupid movie, the ganstas in this movie are so incredibly stupid, the vampires are really lame, I've seen protazoa with better acting skills.

I think there was supposed to be 'drama' in this 'film' and I swear, what passes for 'drama' here will either make you fall asleep or spit at the screen for the filmmakers and actors being so stupid. There are worse movies than this - titanic for instance (that movie sucks) - but this still shares the bottom of the pile with all the other mountains of crap that is out there. I hope thats 10 lines.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cannibalistic Slum-Lord Lesbian Gangsta Vampires.
drhackenstine19 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
A bunch of gang-bangers invade a suburban home, where the father has contracted some sorta weirdo cannibal vampire disease. Everyone in the house, and a few others turn into flesh ripping sicko monsters. I was very in between with this film, and I still don't know if I liked it or not. I can say it was at least average. Gore and violence is aplenty in this picture. There are a lot of sick and twisted scenes through out the running time to keep fans of gory horror interested. Some are original. I like gore so I was able to get through it. However, everything in between is very irritating. The characters are all shallow clichés of every stereo-type thats been stuck into a stupid movie like this. And not one character in this is likable or original. Or believable, since the acting was completely low-rank. Plus, this movie is filled with annoying flash-cut scenes and flashbacks that usually take place in complete darkness, which only adds confusion to the story. The setting is boring and the creepy atmosphere that usually adds to a movie like this is non-existent. If the setting was better, or matched the tone of the horror on display here, this could have been better. Still, there is a high level of gruesomeness and a nice portion of T and A (which adds nothing to the story) to make this an okay view. Some scenes are truly sick. Features a father tearing a fetus out of his daughters belly, mother/daughter feeding frenzy on a dismembered body, gut-munching, chopped off heads, torn out hearts, etc., etc. Good gore, bad everything else. Catch it if it's on cable. Two Stars.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another direct to video piece of crap
nuclearsnow1 January 2006
Dark Town is like so many other direct to video movies, bad..OK not bad.. HORRIBLE, it's a low budget (and I mean low budget), has no real script, and looks like it was made by some film school student, you will see these type movies at your local video stores all the time made by these no-name studios looking to make a buck by cranking out these crap low budget movies and slapping them direct to video.

They are pretty easy to spot just be looking at the low end DVD box, most of these you can catch on cable real quick, like I did with Dark Town, save your rental money on this if you see it in your local Blockbuster.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Godawful movie in every sense.
lostdreamscapes11 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Its a good thing my dad rented this for free, or Id storm my local Hollywood Video and demand a refund. I knew it was a B movie just by looking at the name and the cover. Now, I love all movies, I do. I even have a small soft spot for Manos Hands of Fate (the MST3K version!). But this was so horrible, I turned off the DVD player when the crazy vampiric father decided to try and change his lesbian daughter.

At first, I thought, hey, maybe this will be a GOOD B movie. After I saw the gangsters and lesbians though, I knew it was already down the toilet.

As a vampire movie, its bad and just caters to people who like watching bloody messes (not that I don't, but geez, the vampire effects were horrible!) or little Goth kids who think every vampire movie should win an Oscar.

As a piece of cinema, its just a downright shame. The acting was barely mediocre (to be expected from a B movie I know...but I hate those screams. So unreal and hollow of real terror). The lighting was too dark and the way the flashbacks were shot, I didn't really get any of it. All I got was that they all share memories or something. Like I said, I didn't watch the entire movie, but I'm sure it got worse. Plus those flashbacks gave me a headache.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not good
Concord00727 July 2005
Vile refuse of a film. Yes, as a previous review said your money is better spent on a bum's vodka. Or better yet, give him the script and let him rewrite it - anything would be an improvement! As for the acting - there isn't any. The head vamp is a hack. The supporting cast is a joke. The direction bites. Meaningless gratuitous sex. Bad lighting (I guess to hide poor production values). I am truly sorry I rented this. That's the problem with I-Control, it offers up really bad with the good. And this is really bad. BTW, I wish they could screen out reviews from people obviously connected with the movie. Nick Faust. Ya know?
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It was a great movie... until it went to HELL
Duffman51286 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
By far the worst movie I have ever watched. How this movie was made remains a mystery to me. I wouldn't really classify it as a horror movie, actually, I wouldn't classify it as a movie at all. Its like a mix between Vampire/Gang Banga/Lesbian Porno.

The acting is a joke, the dialogue is a joke, the plot is non-existent. There's no excuse for making a movie this poorly. I mean, its awful. Its such a bad movie, its hilarious at times. My brother went to Blockbuster to rent a movie and was told to rent the worst looking movie he could find, and let me tell you, he did it. This movie is a joke, and watching it the first time made me almost kill myself laughing. Actually, I wish it did kill me. Thats just how bad this movie is. Giving this movie a 1 is generous. The scenes change from lesbian vampires getting it on, to Ganstas shooting each other, and then to vampires eating each other with no transition or explanation. If you want to watch this movie, I cant stop you, but let me suggest putting some trash cans next to your TV, because you may want to throw-up after watching this. Its also a good idea, because then you can throw away the DVD after you have watched it. (Thats assuming you haven't already killed yourself after watching this cinematic disgrace). Actually in most cases, your DVD player will kill itself if you try to play DarkTown in it, so I'll give you a summary of the movie in case that happens: Dead Cat with no eyes... random man does a bad parking job on a dark road, walks into empty dark warehouse apparently looking for immigrants... sees shoes in hallway, shines light in dark room. Loud noises annoy you as a girl with some weird Japanese mask is revealed by the flash light.

After that stupid and unexplained introduction (If thats what you want to call it) The next scene is in a dark room where 3 family members are preparing for someones birthday. The person finally arrives, who happens to be the guy from the introduction. He is acting strange... (Not sure if there's something wrong with the character... or if its just bad acting... probably both) The family awkwardly exchanges meaningless dialogue that explains nothing. The birthday guy is drinking something from a thermos, everyone assumes its alcohol. When asked what it is, he replies (with a dumb face and voice) "Just a little PICK me up!". Then the guy grabs the lady (who is pregnant) and drives off with her, everyone else is like... whatever. Then for some unexplained reason, we see the man ripping the undeveloped baby from the womb, and says "It has your eyes". Then two lesbians are having sex. Then there's a scene with a bunch of gang members saying a couple lines (Each using the S word about 5 times) and then they start shooting each other. Then vampires start killing gang members, and the two lesbians become lesbian vampires. Lots of blood. Then a gang member and lesbian semi-vampire hide in a house and find another semi-vampire neighbor who wants to exchange blood with the semi vampire, they fight each other. Then they all become vampires. Then the gang member and lesbian come out of their vampire trance and kill vampires, and it ends with them looking at the sunlight coming out of a hole in a roof.

Reading other comments, I read one comment where someone actually approved of Darktown. Nick Faust it was. He called it a "Low Budget Gem". I hope he was joking.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A new low in American cinema
harbeau26 September 2006
There is bad. Then there's really bad. Then there's 'Warriors of the Wasteland' bad.

This movie falls in the last category.

One wonders if there was EVER a script for this movie, or if the director was just winging it as he went.

I make no secrets about liking vampire movies. But this one...I'm not sure it gets much worse than this.

The acting was bad. The plot was non-existent. The directing was bad. The production made no sense.

How was this movie ever made?

And worse, released?

Luckily, I rented this movie basically for free. Because I'm so glad I didn't pay money for it.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst Vampire movie ever
Chad15_7228 August 2005
I have been a fan of Vampire flicks for many years, I have seen some good and some very bad (Modern Vampires comes to mind). This one makes Vampire in Brookyln look like an academy award winner.

This was the worst movie I have ever seen. Plot - non-existent. Story - What is that. The ending was so bad I almost crushed my T.V. Summary of this dreadful tale, Slum Lord gets bite by a Vampire girl (the best actress in the movie because she didn't speak), He comes home and turns his entire family into Vampires, along with this the entire block is turned into Vampires (no idea how this happened). There is no one in this movie that does not turn out to be a Vampire at some point, but the heroes ( if you can call them that) can fight being Vampires even though they have feed (huh??). SO they try to kill a bunch of other Vampires. This goes no where, I am less of a Vampire movie fan after seeing this film. Anyone on here who previously wrote this movie was good has to be one of the actors in it. DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME WITH THIS. Rent lost Boys or Wes Cravens Vampires.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
They Tried - I Guess
Rainey-Dawn19 January 2017
I guess they tried to create a vampire film. It fails on every level you can think of: from acting to make-up to cinematography to the story. Everything just fails. So badly I couldn't watch it, I had to fast-forward through it to finish "watching".

They bring us nothing new except a few new people becoming vampires. It's one of those "wannabe" films, it wants good and the actors are wannabe vampires. I wannabe a Hollywood vampire too but I don't create stupid films to fulfill that fantasy. Why can't they just leave vampire films to the "big boys", ya know the well-seasoned filmmakers? Just because you know how to work a camera and can dress up in a Halloween costume does not mean you are good at film making and acting.

1/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best bad movie I've ever seen! LESBIAN VAMPIRES A-GO-GO!
DaKwittik7 November 2007
Crazy plot, good (considering the material) mixed with bad acting (listening to some of the "gangstas" urban accents fade in and out was particularly painful) and the last few minutes would be better left out (IMHO). That said, if you are a heterosexual male (such as myself), and find such things entertaining (as I definitely do), it contains bucketloads of gratuitous lesbian vampire sex with more genuine an attempt at a plot than I've seen before in such genre blending titles. Every time you see a beautiful woman in this movie (lots) it isn't long before she's intertwined with another one in inappropriate fashion. And if you can enjoy the occasional "B" movie but always wish they had more hot lesbian vampires then this is freakin' Citizen Kane. It's a touch strange - not too much blood for a vampire movie but an awful lot for softcore porn.

This movie was totally enjoyable and it made me want to hi-five the director. I'll buy a copy if I see it in a video store for sure.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great. Sort of.
Isau14 April 2007
This is an unusual movie to say the least. We'll start with the bad: the acting's pretty spotty, the plot mostly incoherent, the film stock sort of cheap looking. The editing, especially, is bad.

But there's a lot going on here, and some of it calls into question the border between bad film and high art. Have you ever had an incoherent nightmare? One which followed no plot, but which seemed to telegraph events, characters, and ideas to you? Parts of this film can be summed up as such: "I was in my house with my family, and for some reason we were celebrating a birthday. But there was a blackout, and then when my dad showed up, he was a acting strange. Then there were these gangsters..." And throughout there is a lingering since of doom, no escape from the vampires/zombies.

It's hard to say how intentionally the director is reaching beyond purely escapism. But I think 'Dark Town', although overall not a success, is better horror than 'Urban Legend', 'I Know What You Did...', 'Wrong Turn' or any other number of teen slashers, if more for the ideas than for the execution.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dysfunctional vampires ...
parry_na10 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A family in fear of the man of the house, gangsters, lesbian sex, a pregnant girl and pretty soon, vampires - are all presented to the viewer in quick succession, interrupted by occasional fast-track shots of nudity, blood and gore. The acting is varied, the characters are thinly sketched - we realise the dysfunctional family have a vampire at their head - but there are so many people vying for attention, we're not sure who is who. Are we? Not to worry, however: I don't think clarity is the intention here.

This seems to be deliberately made to fit the so-bad-it's-good mould. Clearly, the budget is clearly very low. Director Desi Scarpone keeps things moving quickly, and there are moments of tension. And if you can see through the cheapness of it all, there is occasional gory enjoyment to be had once the vampires are unleashed. But it isn't really well made enough to be the joyous blood spattered free-for-all it would like to be.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed