Shoe Shine Boy (1943) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A product of its time
planktonrules18 February 2017
I noticed on reviewer completely hated the film and talked about racism in America. Well, I could understand some of their feelings though to only dismiss the film for racism would also ignore the nice performance by its star, Mel Bryant (who I assume also played the trumpet in the film...and amazingly well).

The film is set during WWII and a young man (Bryant) is trying to guy a bugle...though he doesn't have enough money. So, he sets out begging folks to let him shine their shoes so he can earn the needed $4 before the business closes. He isn't very successful until he gets a chance to play trumpet with a band...and he is amazing. So why does he need a bugle and why now?

Okay...the film does have some offensive content. Calling this man 'boy' throughout the film (as well as in the title) is not right, nor is some of the patronizing style of the film. But, it's a product of its times...and the conclusion especially so. Worth seeing...just understand that in 2017 it is bound to offend, though the film is well made and the trumpet solo is amazing.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Who was that trumpeter?
SHAWFAN29 May 2012
I was disappointed to discover that IMDb had no information as to the identity of the excellent trumpeter who performed on the soundtrack. Any way to retrieve this information at this late date? The silliness of this plot was that if this kid was such an expert performer on a valve trumpet (which he was) then why was he so interested in getting a simple bugle with no keys? Well, you could say that army bugles are keyless and that this was his ambition. But still, where had he ever learned to play so well, anyway? As to the racial prejudice in putting down black males as noted by another reviewer, the best answer to that was a comment I heard on another TV network about the famous Polish artist Arthur Szyk, who specialized in anti-fascist propaganda pictures during WWII. In one of his pictures (drawn about the same time this movie was made) a white soldier and a black soldier are walking side by side and the white soldier asks the black soldier what he would do about Hitler? The black soldier replies, "I would turn him into a Negro and put him down anywhere in the United States." That about sums up race relations in the US when this movie was made.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A goofy piece of WWII propaganda
zetes6 January 2002
A black boy, obsessed with buying a horn at a local pawn shop, tries to earn the final $2 he needs by shining the shoes of rich white men. They are musical scouts, and when they find out that he wants the $2 to buy a horn, they ask him to demonstrate his abilities. He does so in a wonderful musical number. When they offer him a million dollar contract, he becomes upset and says he can't possibly do that. His family would be devastated. The white men are perplexed, but the black boy reveals that he wants to horn so that he can be the bugle boy in the U.S. Army. One of the white men then gladly hands him $2 and delivers the amusing line: "Blow one right in Hitler's face for me, kid!" I saw this between movies on TCM tonight.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice Short with a Message
Michael_Elliott25 April 2010
Shoe Shine Boy (1943)

*** (out of 4)

MGM short about a black kid (Mel Bryant) who goes around town trying to find enough shoes to shine so that he can raise an extra $2 to buy a horn from a pawn shop. The boy meets a couple music agents and they let him blow a horn where they see how great he is. The offer the kid a big contract but he doesn't want it and instead just wants the $2. This short is certain another WW2 propaganda piece but it's harmless enough and moves well enough to make it worth viewing. I think it's pretty obvious as to why the kid wants the money but the final shot is still a good one and especially when you consider what was going on in this country at the time. I thought Bryant was extremely effective as the kid and the music stuff was very good as well. Another major plus is getting to see a black character that isn't some sort of stereotype or some negative image. Looking at the title you might be expecting something bad but it's actually a very well-meaning story.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A bugle boy needs $2 to buy a horn...forgettable trifle from the '40s...
Doylenf20 July 2008
Harmless short subject from the '40s has a bugle boy story as inspiration when a black boy wants to buy a horn from a pawn shop but needs an extra $2 to cement the deal.

When WALTER CATLETT and SAM LEVENE hear him actually play the horn, they think they've discovered a goldmine and offer the kid a lucrative contract. But it turns out, he only wants to get the two dollars so he can play the horn before joining the army the next day.

As the end credits say: "He only loved two things--his horn and his country!" Film ends on a flag-waving note as the boy plays the bugle while we see a montage of soldiers training and in battle. This is the sort of cornball exercise in propaganda that audiences probably accepted in the early '40s but today's viewers will be a bit baffled by it.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great musical short.
Dick-4226 April 1999
The inane story is no worse than typical for a musical -- better than many: unknown kid wanders in off the street trying to earn a few bucks to buy a horn at a pawnshop, borrows a trumpet from a bandman and astounds everyone with a marvelous blues jazz number. The music would be worth the price of admission for a full feature film. You can even forgive the sticky flag-waving finale. (We tolerated, if not applauded, those things in 1942, but even those of us who lived through the era can recognize it as overdone now.}
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Example of Hollywood producers obsession to humiliate the Black male
EMBXS13 January 2006
Yet another sad example of how far the Hollywood executives go to make Black males look stupid, without basic knowledge or understanding about life, in other words, the low of the low in society. They seemed determined to convince average hardworking Americans that Black males really are totally different and more inferior than every other race of American male, therefore no guilt should be felt for any treatment past, present or future is put upon them. Look at the attention given to Snoop Dog, Jay-Z and 50 cent compared to educated articulate Black males who are primarily ignored by the mass media. And yes, Black Entertainment Television is owned by Viacom. Thank God the Canadian and European movie producers of the same period and today treat Black males equally and do not seem to hold this bias.
3 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Symbolic for its time, but other than that it's not really worth watching
Horst_In_Translation9 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"Shoe Shine Boy" is an American 15-minute live action short film from 1943, so this one has its 75th anniversary this year and you probably won't fins any known names in the casg and crew here really by today's standards. For Mel Bryant who plays the title character, it was the first performance apparently. Same for director Walter Hart. Elick Moll is one of surprisingly many writers for such a brief movie and he was nominated for an Emmy at least. But back to this one here. It is a black-and-white movie by MGM about a young African American who wants to make a few bucks by shiningb people's shows, so he can buy a horn and live his dream as he really enjoys making music. When he meets two talent agents, there is qucikly a lot more in store for him than 2 bucks. A pretty simple story given the running time I suppose and the music we get to hear is maybe the one thing for which this one should be seen the most, but there are weaknesses too. I understand it was the days of World War II at that time, but the military/army inclusion did not feel right at all and just for the sake of it. And "it" in this context means the way in which they promote patriotism. Especially the very last lines by the narrator feel cringeworthy. So yeah, it's kinda tough to find anything except the music in the second half (and also not really the beginning, but more the orchestra performance) where I would say this is the reason why you really want to watch this movie. Sure there's many worse ways to spend a quarter of an hour, but still. I also would not say it is a racist video really, the story felt somewhat authentic and really just mirrored things the way they were back then and honestly these two men were actually really helping the Black guy in fulfilling his dream. Why should they not get something for that. All in all, still a thumbs-down here and I suggest you skip the watch and listen to some trumpet concert performance instead.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed