IMDb > Who Do You Think You're Fooling? (1994) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 6 reviews in total 

3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
reviewers seem to be missing the point?, 26 May 2011
7/10
Author: PKazee from New York

Of course, filmmakers borrow from each other, but that's not White's gripe. The issue here is that QT was being heralded as the most creative director on the planet at the time, and though he credited several people (including one of the stars of City On Fire) for having served him as inspirations, he failed to give credit to Ringo Lam, the writer/director of the film that he borrowed the most from during the making of Reservoir Dogs.

Is QT talented? Absolutely. It just would have been nice if he had been confident enough in his talent to share credit where credit was due. But... this was very early in his career and he had not yet developed that confidence. He does appear to have it in spades now though, and that is a very good thing.

Was the above review useful to you?

8 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
From someone who finds some of Tarantino's work interesting..., 30 April 2006
6/10
Author: Grann-Bach (Grann-Bach@jubii.dk) from Denmark

I don't like Reservoir Dogs. Matter of taste. Call me an ignorant film aficionado if you must, but I simply don't see what all the fuss is about with that film. I've later enjoyed several of Quentin's films, though. Anyway, when I heard of this 10+ minute long(or should I say, short) documentary comparing it to another movie, I was intrigued. I must say, it's hard to deny that White has a point. There are frighteningly obvious and clear similarities between the two films(though there is no doubt; even from someone who doesn't care in the least for the film - such as yours truly - Tarantino definitely improves on the original), and I'm not certain that Mr. T acknowledges his source. If he does, there is no grounds for the allegations put forth here... if not, Mike is a man who goes against the herd, one that is not afraid to stand up and tell the rest of us(though a few have made similar claims, few, if any, have gone this far with it) that the emperor has no clothes(or, at the very least, he's embarrassingly under-dressed). I recommend this documentary to anyone who's seen Reservoir Dogs... regardless of whether they love it or not. Keep an open mind. You might be surprised. 6/10

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Nothing wrong with inspiration, 13 March 2006
2/10
Author: minik_dj from Sweden

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I watched these movies last week and I don't really know what to say... the whole idea is to somehow make it breaking news that Quentin Tarantino are reusing parts and ideas of old movies, to fit them into his own. We get to see examples of Reservoir Dogs and the Hong Kong 'original movie', City On Fire, mixed together - This sure is an interesting idea, and I'd really like to see more films of the same kind; but it feels like there's some kind of a negative sub-tone in this picture. To me, reusing old ideas, scenes, movie characters and such things, whatever - it's just an total obvious thing - everybody does that, I mean, that's creative! It's called INSPIRATION. Without getting any inspiration, it would be impossible to create something new!

To make it clear: this movie is OK. I just don't like the creators opinion of film-making (they're actually calling QT a 'plagiarist' on their web page - not cool.)

Was the above review useful to you?

12 out of 31 people found the following review useful:
Well I just saw it and all i have to say is: You are one sad little boy, Mike., 23 December 2005
4/10
Author: Danny-Rodriguez from Norway

OK so maybe Tarantino took two scenes and a few shots out of City on Fire and put it in his movie. WHO THE HELL CARES??? All of Mike's arguments a so so justified except for one in which he compared Mr. Orange getting shot with Ko Chow (the cop in City on Fire) getting shot in the belly. That was completely taken out of context and it made the movie lose its credibility. One thing i did like about it though was an added song that was put in during the car chase in City on Fire. I have seen both Reservoir Dogs and City on Fire so I am able to make an informed opinion about this. And my opinion is as follows.

Get a life, Mike White!

Was the above review useful to you?

4 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Who Cares?, 27 July 2006
Author: tbrainerd from Texas

Interesting short film. I see the director's point about how Tarantino's story for Reservoir Dogs is similar to City on Fire... but who really cares? Everything these days is a remake or a re-imagining of something that's already been done before. Just watch Swingers; they have a great conversation about the issue in that movie, and they go on to re-enact a scene (fittingly) from Reservoir Dogs.

Other than that, the editing was sort of amateur. It was a cool idea to overlay the audio of one film with the video of the other film, but the timing was sort of bad. There were some parts of the film that went for too long, that could have been trimmed down.

Was the above review useful to you?

5 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
Worth a look, 29 November 2000
5/10
Author: Spagged from Here

This isn't the best film I have ever seen and it has nothing on Reservoir Dogs. It does have some good parts to it and in parts it was almost as good as Reservoir Dogs. If you liked Reservoir dogs then this is worth a watch if you are little bit bored one day. ** out of ****

Was the above review useful to you?

Add another review

Related Links

Ratings Official site Plot keywords
Main details Your user reviews Your vote history