"American Playhouse" The Gershwins', Porgy & Bess (TV Episode 1993) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Exceptional Production of an Exceptional Work
jhgiles16 August 2010
This production is a collector's item. Stage or other productions of Porgy and Bess are rare.

I concur in the reviews above except the first, which I find a bit too demanding. The production, due to the curious solution regarding the casting, really can't be considered as "perfect," but it is truly remarkable. It is otherwise as good as a television adaptation of an opera can get. Will anyone ever attempt Scott Joplin's Treemonisha?

To answer one concern, that it is overly romantic? Well, yes, the story is indeed romantic --- the essence of the story is a romance. One could remark that the setting is "romanticized," not truly representative of the Low Country Gullah culture, but this interpretation seems too limiting and unappreciative of the contributions of Gullah culture which Heyward and the Gershwins sought to reflect. The wonderful stories of The Song of the South (which are based on Gullah stories) have been basically lost due to the virtual "blacklisting" of that production. It does thankfully seem that Porgy and Bess has avoided this obstacle.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gershwin's best?
didi-516 May 2004
Gershwin's fully-fledged opera, 'Porgy and Bess', had of course been filmed in the 1950s (in a version my generation, born later, has never seen due to restrictions in making it available for re-release or home video), but this TV version goes some way to putting a definitive record in images as well as music on the screen.

The performances of the two leads are top-class - Willard White, a singer/actor so versatile that he has also played the lead in Shakepeare's 'Othello' (brilliantly) for the Royal Shakespeare Company; and Cynthia Harmon, a beautifully-voiced soprano. Also in fantastic form are Gregg Baker as Crown (he can also be seen in a version of 'Carmen' taped a year or so later), and Damon Evans as Sportin' Life. As as been noted elsewhere, the late Bruce Hubbard can be heard as Jake but was replaced for this film by Gordon Hawkins (who plays the role well); while Harolyn Blackwell sings while Paula Ingram plays the doomed and delicate Clara.

The strength of this production is Trevor Nunn's sympathetic direction from his original Glyndebourne staging some years before. All the songs are done with class (my favourites, 'Bess You Is My Woman Now', 'Summertime', 'I Got Plenty Of Nuttin', and 'It Ain't Necessarily So' coming off particularly well). A valuable record of a ground-breaking crossover between grand opera and the modern musical.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
At last a faithful, well-done version of Gershwin's classic comes to video
critic-223 February 1999
It didn't happen for a VERY long time, due to the pickiness of the Gershwin estate in sanctioning an official TV broadcast and home video of this masterpiece. The widescreen 1959 film, which the Gershwin family hated, still has not come to video. And the Metropolitan Opera version never made it to "Live From The Met".But at last we can see "Porgy and Bess" at home instead of just hearing it on radio or recordings. Thankfully, the music is presented in pretty much its original form (although a few lines have been changed, notably Porgy's "I must go" instead of "Bring my goat", due to the fact that Porgy uses crutches in this version rather than being pulled around on a cart by a goat). The original recitatives (unrhymed singing) are used in between the "big numbers" rather than being turned into spoken dialogue as in the 1959 film. While this may try the patience of those not into opera, it adds greatly to the power of the work. And Gershwin's original orchestrations are used, rather than being slicked up by an arranger, as in the 1959 film. The words are not difficult to understand if you listen attentively.

This version was made under very odd circumstances, however. It is the Glyndebourne production done in England in the late 1980's with American singers. However, rather than having his singers record the opera afresh so that they could lip-synch to their own singing, director Trevor Nunn used the already existing, highly acclaimed 1989 recording of that version for the soundtrack. Four members of the supporting cast were unable to repeat their roles on screen, so we hear THEIR voices while the roles are played by other singers! The rest of the cast does its own singing.

This shouldn't deter you from seeing this excellent production, though. Trevor Nunn, former director of the Royal Shakespeare Company, again proves his skill by getting these singers to give performances as good as any given by non-singing actors. The ambiance of Charleston, South Carolina is very effectively and far more realistically suggested than in the glamorized, prettied-up Samuel Goldwyn 1959 film. The only false touch is a near-disastrous decision by Nunn to provide a ridiculously symbolic,almost offensive "Big Moment" in the final, heartbreaking aria,"Oh, Lawd, I'm On My Way". Otherwise, this is a beautifully sung, definitive "Porgy and Bess".
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautifully done and faithful version of the Gershwin classic
TheLittleSongbird8 February 2010
There is no denying that George Gershwin's opera "Porgy and Bess" is a classic. With an engaging story and full of memorable tunes like the haunting and difficult-to-sing "Summertime", the sublime duet "Bess you is my woman now", "It ain't necessarily so" and the heart rending "Oh Lawd I'm on my way", it is a delight to start to finish. This 1993 version not only benefits from this great score, but also from Simon Rattle's energetic conducting, the top class performances and Trevor Nunn's sympathetic direction.

The production values are terrific as well. While there is nothing too fancy, the costumes and sets are really nice to look at, and the lighting is very well done too. The production is also very faithful, and the main goings-on in the story are very effectively done. The performances as I have stated already are top class, with the versatile Willard White making a brilliantly dignified and noble Porgy and Cynthia Harmon a glamorous Bess and the chemistry between the two is positively luminous. Gregg Baker is very impressive as Crown and Damon Evans is a fine and almost over-the-top Sportin' Life. Overall, this version is beautifully done, well sung and faithful. 10/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Guess I is a Nunn fan now
Gyran3 October 2005
This keeps happening to me. I re-watch an opera that I had previously found worthless with the intention of writing one of my sarcastic reviews for IMDb: then I find myself totally captivated by its magic. The latest work to have this effect on me is Trevor Nunn's 1993 production of Porgy and Bess with Glyndebourne Opera. What is more amazing is that the singing is dubbed: something that I detest in opera films.

As a 14-year-old, I enjoyed the 1959 film which, essentially, did Porgy as a Hollywood musical. In the ensuing 45 years or so I have become more critical about the idea of two white, Jewish men writing a black opera, although a similar criticism could be levelled at practically the entire 20th century output of American popular song.

That 1959 film had spoken dialogue and big tunes such as "Summertime" and "It ain't necessarily so". I say tunes deliberately: they do not even qualify as songs because their structure is completely strophic. What is so striking about this operatic version is the musical complexity of the recitative and arioso; the Gershwins punctuated this complex music with the simple numbers in order to emphasise its folk and blues roots. So, in dismissing Porgy and Bess as just a collection of big tunes, I was ignoring most of the best music. Trevor Nunn's 1993 film uses the recording of the 1989 Glyndebourne production. In the intervening four years, Bruce Hubbard had died and several other cast members were not available. It is not surprising, therefore, that some of the performers in this film seem to have only a passing acquaintance with the lyrics they are supposed to be singing. This would normally make me chew the carpet with rage but the reason why it does not bother me is that much of the important music in this work is given to the chorus. I particularly enjoyed "Oh Doctor Jesus" and "O dere's somebody knockin' at de do'". The Glyndebourne chorus is superb even though it seems likely that the actors we see on stage mouthing their words are not the people who did the singing four years earlier.

While the black characters have sung recitatives, the white characters only have parlando or spoken parts. If you have seen 'Jerry Springer the Opera' you will know how this works. It emphasizes the point that the black and white characters seem to inhabit a different world, physically and mentally.

Willard White is very impressive vocally as Porgy and gives the character great dignity. Cynthia Haymon is a glamorous Bess and gives a moving rendition of "I loves you Porgy". As Sportin' Life, Damon Evans effectively erases one's memory of Sammy Davis Jr's performance. Harolyn Blackwell singing, but not acting the part of Clara does a haunting 'Summertime' and Cynthia Clarey as Serena does a beautiful 'My man's gone now'. Simon Rattle's account of the score is an exciting roller-coaster ride. The biggest credit must go to Trevor Nunn for the clarity and intelligence of this production. He even manages to stage a realistic crap game. There has always been some doubt over whether this piece works as an opera, Trevor Nunn proves emphatically that it does.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The decolonialization of African American minds
Dr_Coulardeau6 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The story is entirely enclosed in a black community that lives on the coast of South Carolina next to a fishing harbour. They are fishermen and they till some land for cotton. They live in some kind of a fort that is closed by a metal and monumental gate and that is entirely turned inward onto its own courtyard. The only outside people are the police that comes when a crime is discovered and that is only to make a token arrest since they never get any testimony about who committed the crime. There will be two murders in the "fort". The other visitors are peddlers. The strawberry lady, the honey man or the crab man do not represent a danger in any way. But the drug peddler known as Sportin' Life is another can of worms. He is dangerous and his role will be dramatic in the story.

The drug peddler has it right when he says that two men for one woman always end up with one man dead and the other in prison, and the woman having no one at all. Porgy kills Crown, is arrested with no testimony against him but under the pretext that he is supposed to identify Crown's dead body, which he refuses to do, even when in front of the body. He is sent to prison for contempt of court. Hence Bess ends up alone, an easy prey to Sportin' Life who manages her so that she goes back to drugs and then goes away with him to New York. When Porgy comes back with presents for everyone, since he played dice in prison and made a little fortune, the community is friendly with him but does not want to tell him where Bess is. He finally gets it out of them and he decides to drop his two crutches and go to New York after Bess.

But this opera is a lot more interesting than this dramatic love affair and this surprisingly effective love quartet, one woman and three men. As long as the black community lives closed up on itself it can survive more or less decently though poor but proud of what they can make on the very edge of the white society outside, the society of the buckras. When you get out of this cocoon, you run all kinds of dangers: fishermen are killed by hurricanes when they go fishing. Women are exploited into selling themselves to anyone, into drug addiction and even slavery of some kind when they get out and follow a man out of their community. And it is from outside that the drug peddler comes to bring into the community what may destroy that community. And yet this community is totally pervaded by gambling with dice, alcoholism with whisky and moonshine alcohol, and even common brutality among the members. What saves them is their solidarity in front of the outside white society. They even have a fringe of black exploiters like the undertaker, the divorce dealer, the drug peddler and some others that ransom their own black community for any mostly illegal reason.

Solidarity cannot do anything against that kind of easy exploitation.

The opera was composed in 1935 and represented a revolution in itself. The action concerned a black community that was depicted as containing normal human feelings and passions and that was under the perversion imposed onto them by the white society outside that both victimized the community with systematic suspicion and made that community close up onto itself into some autarchic functioning that made them accept to be exploited by some black crooks and accept the violence of some of their members even when it became criminal. In other words their minds are totally colonized, under the domination from an outside, surrounding and seen and felt as superior group that dominates them. In 1935 there was yet no way out of this colonized situation except hard work to make a better living in that system but that did not change it, no matter whether they were fishing or growing cotton. Their lot was to be fishermen or sharecroppers. We were at the time still a long way from the education and then civil rights transformation, the main two ways for these communities to open up on the world, for the individuals in these communities to find their way up in society by conquering an equal, or at least as equal as possible position in the surrounding white society. But this opera showed that the situation was becoming highly explosive inside and in the relations with the outside world. It could not last very long indeed because presents, beautiful dresses, new hats were wanted and there would come a time when these people would say: we want them and they will finally do what they can to get them without selling their bodies, drugs or fake divorces, not to speak of coffins and funerals.

And yet the composer is not black which means the Blacks are not in 1935, though they are some of the greatest musicians in America already at the time, accepted on Broadway yet. It will take a long time before the Blacks are accepted as equal in showbiz as composers, authors and artists. But this quasi-all-black opera is a very important precursor of "Guess who's coming to dinner" that was only to come out in 1967, thirty two years and one World War later.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Too Many Transitions
tedg23 April 2005
This starts with what is now called the Black experience. From whatever the reality of that was, we (with the active help of bad blacks) have abstracted a highly romanticized notion, in the same manner we've burdened Native Americans.

From both the real and idealized emerged jazz, the real jazz. That was refined and incubated in the larger society to become the basis of American music. Out of that came Gershwin's music.

On that was built a stage show, an opera. From the opera was extended a TeeVee staging. And from that presentation, we are clearly intended to see the original layer, the real Black experience.

Well, that's a lot of translations, and few of them are done artfully and consciously. What we end up with is a jumble of visions, each coherent but chopped into discrete pits and served up as a stew.

You are forced to focus on any one level, be it the staging, the dive into the idealized society, the music, the performance, the images... The only way in my mind to get the best experience from Porgy is without images, because that's the only presentation that can be conceived and delivered as a coherent thing.

These images, this staging, these evocations of a society are rather clever and are interesting enough to keep your eye occupied. But they cannot engage your imagination.

Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
3 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed