The Brink's Job (1978) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Working Class Heroes.
rmax30482313 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Peter Falk leads a gang of small-time thieves (Peter Boyle, Paul Sorvino, Warren Oates, Allan Garfield, et al) who pull off the biggest robbery of the century, get caught, and go to jail.

The director, William Friedkin, and the screenwriter, Walon Green, do a fine and delicate job of balancing the three elements of the story -- comedy, drama, and tension.

Mostly it's comic, and the laughs are due not so much to the imposition of obvious gags (though there is some slapstick) as to the ludicrous nature of the thieves themselves and the job they undertake; not an armed robbery but a pasquinade. The amusing lines somehow ring true because the setting is working-class Boston, its brick tenements and skeletal wooden porches and staircases, and its stone streets and old cars and dilapidated clothing and its spent values. "Look at dis coat," brags Falk, as he hands his wife a garment of shabby fur bought with some stolen money. "Dat's genuine muskrat. It says so right on da label. I don't want to tell you what it cost because it's a gift and dat ain't right, but here's da receipt in case somebody asks you where you got it." The drama comes later, after the robbery is successfully pulled off and Peter Boyle is holding the $1.5 million until "the statue runs out." Boyle has already disposed of an easily identified fifty grand by flushing it down the toilet, enraging the others, and now he refuses to divvy up the remainder.

The tension is generated during the robbery itself. (Will they get the money? Will someone be killed in the getting of it?) And there is additional tension when Warren Oates and his co-conspirator Kevin O'Connor are arrested and given ten times the usual sentence for minor crimes, the FBI hoping that the pressure and the beatings will cause them to squeal.

That's a plot hole. The FBI is involved on a pretext and spends $25 million to solve a $1.5 million robbery because the director, J. Edgar Hoover, is absolutely convinced that the crime represents a link between organized rackets and communist subversives. Okay. That's understood. Hoover was a notorious bonehead and was always grabbing headlines.

But hundreds of louche Bostonians are being yanked in for questioning, and nothing involving any of the real gang stands out. Cut to Oates and O'Connor, having a meal in a diner in Tonowanda, Pennsylvania, on their way to Pittsburgh. A couple of state troopers walk through the door and arrest them. Well -- why? Oates is convicted of an infraction involving the carrying of firearms and gets a sentence of 20 years instead of the usual 18 months. The FBI is sitting in the audience, smiling with satisfaction. And O'Connor is given several years for equally small-time infractions and is beaten all to hell to get the story out of him. But how did the FBI -- or anyone else -- know that Oates and O'Connor were involved? And how did they know where to locate the pair during their peregrinations?

But, that aside, it's an entertaining story. Friedkin doesn't make the same mistake as Arthur Penn did in "Bonny and Clyde." Nobody is romanticized. One of the robbers has a loving family but that's about as far as it goes. When Falk is leaving for a job, his wife, Gena Rowlands, reminds him to take his screwdriver and gives him a wrapped sandwich, saying, "Take this in case you get hungry later." They don't STAND for anything. They aren't sucked into a life of crime. They're not giving society the finger. It's just something they've chosen for a profession. And despite their occasional clumsiness and pratfalls, they're good at it too. It's "The Asphalt Jungle" but the jungle is Boston and the gang is made up of goofballs.

There's something to be learned from it too. Brinks, the most prestigious cash-transport business in the world, was left virtually unguarded. We are continually rediscovering that security is never as tight as it's thought to be, and our infallible organizations are elementally vulnerable. If the Department of Homeland Security sends 100 explosive- and weapon-laden agents through airport check points, about 18% get through. Security is a very serious business and it mystifies most of us with its high technology and the expertise of its technicians, yet, as the sociologist Erving Goffman remarked with regard to primitive rituals, often the real secret behind the mystery is that there is no mystery at all.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A bit uneven but still enjoyable
kenneth_mac24 January 2019
Would never go as far as saying this film is a forgotten gem ! .... but it is still enjoyable and that is down to the likeable cast and the easy going feel of them film ... Recommended for a one time watch , pretty forgettable but it has a certain charm to it which leaves a smile on your face !
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"....you are perpetrating a gross miscarriage of injustice..."
Brucey_D10 December 2018
A group of small-time crooks in Boston successfully rob millions of dollars from an inept and complacent security firm, only to get their collars felt.

This film's script is based on real-life events in 1950 and many hundreds of hours of interviews with surviving members of the gang. The film is played part action, part for laughs.

The FBI were convinced that this was the work of organised crime and/or communists, spent a fortune trying to crack the case, and only ever retrieved a small fraction of the loot. Some of the local population treated the crooks as folk heroes, which the authorities were not at all keen on.

The film is basically not at all bad but it is slightly unevenly paced and of course rather slow by modern standards, being (for a movie) fairly realistic. Also whilst Falk is a pretty good actor rather than a one-trick pony , it is difficult to look past Lt Columbo and see him as a small time crook here.

So overall with caveats (I.e. bearing in mind what the film is about and how it is made), I give this 7/10.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A classic heist
onsitewelding_20031 September 2008
I remember when this movie was filmed back in 78. yeah its dating myself. The movie was filmed at MCI ( Massachusetts Correctional Facility) Concord, Concord Mass. My father while actually working there was an extra. I had a chance to meet Mr.Falk and a few others as a kid ( I was ten). We had free tickets to the opening. I thought it was an awesome movie about bungling thieves. Most folks expected a serious thief/heist movie. Although based on an actual event. I found the movie comical. Although it didn't have Mini coopers jumping through a European city. It did serve its purpose as a good funny movie. A good buy as a bargain.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Crackers
Prismark1025 May 2019
William Friedkin directs this period heist black comedy based on true facts and it is very different from the rest of his output.

Peter Falks plays Tony Pino a small time Boston petty crook. Even after being released from jail he and his bumbling gang which includes brother in law Vinnie (Allen Garfield) struggle to pull off a decent job such as robbing a bubble gum factory.

Pino notices that the local Brink's warehouse has lax security. When he cases the joint he notices that Brink's is too stingy to spend money in having a decent security system and he can just walk in. Their promotion of having an impregnable fortress is just baloney.

In 1950 Pino and his men stole over a million dollars in cash. FBI director J Edgar Hoover (Sheldon Leonard) took a personal interest in the robbery thinking it was the work of communists. He spent $25 million to try to apprehend the gang.

Friedkin displays a lightness of touch but the script has paper thin characters. The comedy and the heist needed more emphasis such as in the Italian film Persons Unknown, later remade by Louis Malle as Crackers. The casting of Peter Falk and Gena Rowlands harks back to the John Cassavetes dramas.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
THE BRINK’S JOB (William Friedkin, 1978) **1/2
Bunuel19764 July 2008
After the dismal box office and critical reception of SORCERER (1977), William Friedkin went for a change of pace with this light-hearted piece which, however, proved that his previous misstep with was no fluke: in fact, his career never really picked up after that costly bit of self-indulgence (even so, I’ve only just acquired the director’s fair update of his own THE FRENCH CONNECTION [1971], namely TO LIVE AND DIE IN L.A. [1985])!

Anyway, this concerns – in a somewhat uneasy comedic vein – the famous January 1950 robbery from the Boston branch of the titular depository of payrolls destined to various key firms; incidentally, the same events had previously been depicted in the 1976 TV-movie BRINKS: THE GREAT ROBBERY. Its coup is in the meticulous period reconstruction (which earned production designer Dean Tavoularis, already responsible for BONNIE AND CLYDE [1967] and “The Godfather” films among others, an Oscar nod) – Friedkin himself had earlier demonstrated his prowess in this area with another comedy about an equally notorious incident i.e THE NIGHT THEY RAIDED MINSKY’S (1968).

Interestingly, too, the cast of daring crooks here comprises several reliable character actors of the era – Peter Falk, Peter Boyle, Allen Garfield, Paul Sorvino and Warren Oates; 1940s Hollywood veteran Sheldon Leonard turns up towards the end as J. Edgar Hoover(!), but Gena Rowlands is wasted in the role of Falk’s wife. The comedy revolves around Falk and Garfield’s bumbling duo – the former is the mastermind and the other his often resentful relative/underling. After a number of ‘jobs’ go wrong (with Falk even doing a 6-year stretch in jail) or the ‘funds’ don’t last (one amusing sequence has them following a payroll van around and lifting a handful of money bags with every stop it makes – since the officer left to ostensibly guard them is apparently in continuous slumber!), they set their mind on robbing the Brink’s warehouse.

After studying the place from the outside (such as time of arrival and departure of the various employees, and their toilet habits!), Falk manages to get inside the building to get an idea of how it’s set-up; with the place left unguarded during the night, he’s able to break in with relative ease to look for possible alarm systems and determine the model of the safe – the former is an ancient device, but the latter is up-to-date and unassailable. Oates, a war veteran, proposes to dent its surface with a bazooka fired from the roof of the opposite building(!) – however, saner heads prevail and they organize a good old-fashioned stick-up (complete with the gang putting on grotesque masks). Eventually, the sum they make off with is over $1.5 million – which, at the inflation rate of the day, was considered the biggest haul in U.S. history…thus bringing the F.B.I. in on the case.

I’m not familiar with the facts of the real case but, here, the denouement is rather unexciting as Oates is brought to justice for another (minor) theft and, since he has a very sick sister and can’t possibly make the whole jail-term, he spills the beans on The Brink’s Job! Still, the gang apparently had the last laugh as, in spite of Hoover’s promises, a very small percentage of the money was retrieved over the years (as per the postscript) – and, following the lapse of their individual sentences, one assumes each picked up where they had left off… Ultimately, the film is O.K. (though curiously undistinguished among the spate of heist pictures made during this cynical era) – and especially disappointing given the intriguing subject matter and the welter of talent involved (including a script by THE WILD BUNCH [1969]’s Walon Green).
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Light treatment of the big robbery of 1950
SimonJack25 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"The Brink's Job" is a comedy caper film based on a real crime. The January 17, 1950, Brink's robbery in Boston was called the "Crime of the Century." This movie is a light treatment of the event, and the characters who pulled it off. The movie implies that none of those involved in the incident "squealed," and it omits anything to do with killing. In reality, the gang tried to kill Specs O'Keefe who was imprisoned for anther petty robbery after this one. O'Keefe was mentally unstable and the gang thought he might talk. But after their attempts to kill him failed, he apparently talked to the FBI and named all involved.

While the movie just shows seven people involved in the heist, there actually were 11. Except for three who died, all who were convicted and sent to prison were out within 14 years – by 1971. The $2.7 million heist included $1.2 million in cash, and the rest in bonds and checks. Just $53,000 was ever recovered to this day.

The acting is good by the entire cast in this film. It was shot in Boston. The robbery was two years in the works – with careful casing of the Brink's place. Considering the first 40 years of the 20th century with so many bank robberies, the very low level of actual security measures by Brink's in 1950 is astonishing. But, as Peter Falk's Tony Pino says in the movie, the Brink's people were so cheap they didn't want to spend money on real security. Instead, they lied in their advertisements about the great security they provided.

The movie notes how the gang members were idolized by some youth of the day. This romantic and light-hearted treatment of crime is fun, but I wonder about it when it involves real crime.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"To Brink's Tony"
bkoganbing12 July 2007
Words almost fail me in talking about how much I love this film, this very funny, very stylish portrayal of what was considered the robbery of the last century.

First of all it could never have been done earlier. J. Edgar Hoover was not a figure to be satirized before May of 1972 when he breathed his last. Sheldon Leonard who plays him here and has him get it all wrong about who pulled the Brink's Armored Car Robbery, would not have taken the role, neither would any other actor. No one wanted to be on that man's bad side. Hoover was not quite the figure you see Leonard play here, though Leonard is fine in the part. Books and films subsequent to his death still really haven't got it quite right about him.

For all of J. Edgar's fulminations about the great Communist conspiracy at work in the Brink's job, the whole point of The Brink's Job is who actually did it. Six very ordinary street criminals, none of them violent felons in any way and one fence who declared himself in on the job.

The group is headed by Peter Falk who should have been Oscar nominated for his portrayal of Tony Pino, the group's leader and planner. You see The Brink's Job, Peter Falk will remain with you forever. A man without complications and hangups, he's a thief because it's his profession. He does have pride in how good he is though.

Some of Falk's best scenes are with his wife Gena Rowlands. She too is a woman who stands by her man. No doubt they came from the same hardscrabble background in Boston's Italian North End and she's completely supportive of him and his work. In particular I love the scene where she's bidding him off to work just like any other wife who's husband had a night job. Don't forget your screwdriver, here's a sandwich in case you get hungry, the scene is priceless.

I also love the scene in the restaurant where he takes her after a nice score. Falk is at the height of his considerable talents as he tells Rowlands of his plans for the Brink's Armored Car Company.

What everyone will love when they see this film is how comparatively easy it was for these knockabout guys from Boston to accomplish stealing over 4 million dollars. This score was so big, it HAD to be the work of a master criminal mind. The thing is it was, the mind was just not in a body where you would expect it to be found.

The others in the mob are Paul Sorvino, Kevin O'Connor, Warren Oates, Gerard Murphy and Peter Boyle who plays the fence. But my favorite in the mob and in the film is Allen Garfield who plays Falk's brother-in-law and sidekick who Falk keeps around for laughs. They have an Abbott&Costello like relationship with everything Garfield touches turning to waste product. My favorite scene in the whole film is when they decide to rob a gum factory payroll. Poor Garfield accidentally presses the wrong switch and he's awash in gumballs. Falk's and Sorvino's differing reactions are priceless.

A lot of the film was shot in Boston which in many ways is a city that tries more than most to keep it's traditional look. I haven't been in that city in about five years, but I daresay you could remake The Brink's Job today in the same area.

But if you did it wouldn't be as good, that isn't possible.
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Little-known Friedkin comedy
Leofwine_draca15 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
One of the least well-known films in William Friedkin's illustrious career, THE BRINK'S JOB is a comedy caper based on a real-life heist that took place in 1950. The strong cast is headed by a thoroughly engaging Peter Falk, taking a break from COLUMBO, and ably supported by the likes of Peter Boyle and Warren Oates. This is very much a character-based comedy with the occasional bit of slapstick and pratfall to see it through. If you're looking for a fast pace and lots of hijinks then you'll be disappointed. However, it's likeable enough and has a great sense of time and place, so there's that to recommend it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Brink's Job
henry8-33 December 2018
A group of career criminals plan and rob the Brink's payroll depository in the 1950s NY.

Despite a to die for cast who are a real pleasure to watch - Falk, Garfield, Oates and Sorvino, this is a strangely forgettable heist movie. The first half is a straight comedy, even straying into out and out slapstick and here the great pleasures are to be found. Thereafter it gets pretty serious, which is fine, but after the fun of the first half, it doesn't quite hold the attention as much.

So worth a look for the performances and the initial comedy, but tonally a bit of a muddle.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
the impressive is achievable
lee_eisenberg8 April 2018
What's impressive about "The Brink's Job" is that it's a true story that also manages to be a lighthearted comedy. I had never heard of the Great Brink's Robbery until watching this movie, but William Friedkin managed to turn it into a fun story. Peter Falk, Peter Boyle, Warren Oates, Gena Rowlands, Paul Sorvino, Sheldon Leonard* and the rest of the cast turn in fine performances. It was a pleasant surprise to see Malachy McCourt (the brother of "Angela's Ashes" author Frank McCourt) in a supporting role. It so happened that I had watched this just a few hours after watching the horror-fantasy flick "Q", which also featured him in a supporting role. It was a pure coincidence that I rented two movies that happened to star him.

All in all, a good movie. I suspect that they had fun filming it. Really different turn for Friedkin after "The French Connection" and "The Exorcist".

*Put another way, the movie stars Columbo, Frankenstein's monster, one of the Wild Bunch, the woman under the influence, Henry Kissinger and the producer of several TV shows (and namesake of the main characters on "The Big Bang Theory").
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A piece of infamous Boston history - I mean the movIe!
dan-13157 September 2023
Dino DeLaurentis' "The Brinks Job" actually holds an infamous place in Boston's cinematic history. In an attempt to distance itself from a cheap TV movie quickie (made to capitalize on the announcement of the big-budget film) director William Friedkin decided to shoot his version in Boston at the actual site of the crime -- the Brink's building -- long since converted into a neighborhood parking garage and available to rent out.

There had been a few movies shooting mostly exteriors in Boston in the 70s including the still locally remembered "The Friends of Eddie Coyle" in 1973. But "Brinks" was the largest production ever mounted with Friedkin completely shooting it in the Boston area. And because of what happened during the production, Hollywood avoided shooting anything of this size in Boston for 20 years!

When the movie trucks rolled in, the privateers descended. Suddenly, anything the movie company needed to buy was more expensive and the crew had to conceal who they were when purchasing goods and services. But the worst was what the Teamsters did.

The production wanted the key people of the film to be picked up by limos in the morning and brought back to their hotels in the evening. But the local Teamsters insisted that their drivers be paid to be standing by 24-hours a day, seven days a week which added $1 million to the film's budget. Two Teamster leaders were found guilty of racketeering and mail fraud and sentenced to jail time because of this shake-down. It was learned the Teamsters had been doing this to films shot in Boston for the previous 10 years.

Additionally, the film's Boston production office was held up by armed gunmen who made off with 15 reels of film which were held for $600,000 in ransom. The thieves later lowered their demand to $500,000, but were told over the phone by Friedkin that the footage was duplicates and they could keep them.

Word filtered back to Hollywood to avoid Boston and for nearly 20 years major productions skipped the city and used other places like Philadelphia to stand in for Boston. "A Civil Action" in 1997 represented a turning point and since then the city and the state of Massachusetts cleaned up their act and even sought out film productions by offering an unlimited 25% tax incentive.

Today, Boston and Massachusetts are bustling with more than 30 productions a year with three sound stage facilities and more planned for the area. But in the '80s and most of the '90s, the city was a no-man's land for movies as it paid the price for profiteering off "The Brinks Job."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Likable cast, fine detail, a big heist--but too familiar; why Friedkin was attracted to this story one may never know
moonspinner5525 June 2017
William Friedkin directed this period piece/caper-comedy, adapted from Noel Behn's non-fiction book "Big Stick-Up at Brinks", chronicling the 1950 robbery of Brink's headquarters, which netted the crooks some $3M. Often-filmed heist gets a joshing tone this time out, cast with actors comfortable with each other and familiar to audiences in these particular characterizations. There are no surprises; everything has been preconceived for a safe, nondescript entertainment. For his part, Friedkin displays a light, casual touch, but the broader moments of comedy don't really come off (slapstick doesn't seem to be this director's thing). Peter Falk heads up the amateur squad of thieves; he's right at home here, and his repartee with Peter Boyle, Allen Garfield, Paul Sorvino and Gena Rowlands as his wife is smooth...so smooth, in fact, that the film slides right out of the memory. ** from ****
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
some good bits of a caper
SnoopyStyle18 November 2017
In 1938 Boston, petty criminal Tony Pino (Peter Falk) and his robbery gang get caught. In 1944, his friend Joe McGinnis (Peter Boyle) picks him up after getting released from prison. He rejoins wife Mary (Gena Rowlands). He gets a new crew which includes idiot brother-in-law Vinnie (Allen Garfield), disturbed war veteran Specs O'Keefe (Warren Oates), and Jazz Maffie (Paul Sorvino). The bumbling crew struggles to rob a candy factory. Tony passes by Brink's and is enticed by the cash. He talks into the warehouse and copies a key. The crew starts stealing from the trucks but no one seems to catch on. They realize the careless security and robs the vault for $1 million. The large amount and notoriety draws in J. Edgar Hoover (Sheldon Leonard).

It's a fine period heist movie from William Friedkin. There's a bit of fun. This is not a high functioning crew. It could easily turn into a more slapstick comedy than it already is. There are some great idiocy like Specs suggesting blasting the vault with a bazooka. There are bits and pieces of goodness but I'm less enamored with the last section. It becomes a muddle as the crew is gathered up. The action is lost and I can't figure out each character. Normally, the action would go bigger into the climax. I do have respect for going the other way including Mary casually making dinner for the cops.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Classic Caper Movie
Jakealope17 July 2002
Compared to the hyped up, over violent fare that passes for crime movies, this movie is no contender. But it's a warm, funny, well paced caper flick about some North Boston Italians who stumbled on to the fact that the great Brink's was a paper tiger.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
pretty weak
moviedougie4 May 2002
As far as HEIST movies go, this one is pretty weak. Continuity is pretty lousy, there isn't enough character continuity to really feel like you understand any of the characters. Peter Falk is great, and he is one of the reasons its worth watching. Falk has some great lines, like "he'll be right back, he goin' buy to some saugages" or something like that... there are a few nice scenes, although they are entirely due to the efforts of the actors. Direction, script, and editing is pretty lousy.
9 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worth The Fare
willab26 March 2007
I've been trying to pick up a VHS of this flick for 2 years and finally won it on an auction. It was on AMC a few years back and I caught about 30 minutes of it. I was so intrigued that I started to look for a chance to buy it.

I thoroughly enjoyed this film, a great cast with a young Peter Falk leading the way. Peter Boyle was realistic in his portrayal of the money launderer. Used VHS tapes are out there and although this robbery occurred in the 50's there is enough suspense and a ton of surprises for you. Sometimes a true story beats the best fiction a writer can come up with.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Falk's Foul Mouth Ruins This
ccthemovieman-15 July 2007
When you look at this now and hear all the language in here, it's amazing this was rated "PG," but that's the 1970s rating system for you. Peter Falk spews out the Lord's name in vain six times in the first ten minutes alone in this movie! Yet, few people consider that offensive, and certainly not the scumbags who make movies nor the people who "rate" them.

The cast is a clue to how profane this film can be: Falk, Peter Boyle, Allen Garfield, Warren Oates, Gena Rowlands and Paul Sorvino aren't exactly actors you wouldn't find in "The Sound Of Music."

I like heist movies, and a lot of films by director William Friedkin, but this script doesn't deliver and it just has way too much of the "Sleazy '70s" feel to it, visually and audibly. For those who loved Falk in TV's "Columbo" it must come as a shock to hear him use as much profanity as he did in films. This is far from the only case.
17 out of 133 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
As into a wind mill....
searchanddestroy-11 January 2021
For the first part at least, this movie is more a comedy than a gritty crime movie, as were Jo Pevney, Marvin Chomsky or Jerry Hopper's features. The second part, on the other hand, is not a comedy anymore. But that was a choice from gifted director Bill Friedkin, no doubt about it. How could it be something else than a joke? See for yourself, Brink's security complex facility where any one can enter to as in a simple bakery. As we say in France, as easy as into a windmill. It is purely laughable. In France, and I guess in any country in the world, such places are as strong places as a submarine base or an atomic bomb shelter, with armored entry locks every where, two meters thick concrete walls, hundreds of video cameras and I don't even speak of the number of armed guards....But that remains a good time waster, pulled by an excellent Peter Falk at his best.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I enjoyed it!
EW-321 February 2000
A neat little crime caper, and I wonder why we never see it on any of the cable networks. Falk was great, as were Peter Boyle and Warren Oates, and believe or not, Paul Sorvinio was in this one too! Realistic, and pretty honest.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of my All Time Favorites!
rcpcguru31 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I remember watching this as a kid. I love the way these guys conduct themselves after they've just committed one of the biggest heists of the century. It appears that they will get away scot-free right up until the very end. Even after the entire gang gets nabbed, they're still portrayed as local heroes. Everyone loves them, especially Tony (Peter Falk). "The greatest thief that ever lived".

FACTS: On January 12, 1956, just 5 days before the statute of limitations was due to run out, the FBI arrested Baker, Costa, Geagan, Maffie, McGinnis, and Pino. They apprehended Faherty and Richardson on May 16 in Dorchester, Massachusetts. O'Keefe pleaded guilty January 18. Gusciora died on July 9. Banfield was already dead. A trial began on August 6, 1956. Eight of the gang members received maximum sentences of life imprisonment; except for McGinnis, who died in prison, all were paroled by 1971. O'Keefe received only 4 years and was released in 1960. Only $58,000 of the $2.7 million was recovered.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Character Actor Smorgesborg (smorgesbord?)
angels_egg129 December 2004
Whatever that word is, this movie is it. A who's who of nineteen seventies character actors. Peter Boyle was churning them out like crazy in the seventies, appearing in Slither, Hardcore, Where the Buffalo Roam etc. Alan Garfield and Paul Sorvino in one movie together!? Alan Garfield who was in Mother, Jugs and Speed, Slither, Busting ... and Paul Sorvino who was in Where's Poppa, The Gambler etc. And then Warren Oates as well!? The most recognizable character actor of the decade!! Warren Oates was the Steve Buscemi of the 70s. Cockfighter, Race with the Devil, Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia, The Border, Dillinger etc. etc. etc. The Brink's Job is funny and tight, with a once in a life time cast for 70s movie buffs.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A job well done
videorama-759-85939113 August 2018
It's amazing how many WF films creep in among his others. Only seeing this movie for the first time, the other week, I only knew beforehand, from reading the cover, Friedkin directed this cute little crime flick. The movie which has a inventory of topline actors, who all give wonderful performances is based on fact, another thing I didn't know, about the two bid crooks, who pulled off the greatest bank heist in history, a few hiccups, prefore, as blundering their way to their objective, in some quite hard to believe blunders, which I'm frightened to believe this is fact too. This robbery had attracted much notoriety, the public praising and admiring the robbers, who are much suspect than the usual suspects, and are brought in, and I think you can gather what results, or might not result, where some astounding and approving facts revealed later, as if rooting for these guys,which is hard quite not too, despite, their illicitness. Falk is just super fantastic in this, an acting force to be reckoned with, while I liked Allen Garfield a lot in this too. The film is patchy here and there, and takes a while to get to where it's going. I was actually quite disappointed for the first third of it, but it picked up. For me, it's one of those films, where earlier in the peace, you really don't know where it's going, but as I said, it's a cute little film, and worth the rental fee. Don't snub it. My recommendation.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Friedkin directs another winner
pmtelefon11 July 2021
Director William Friedkin had a hit and miss career. But when he hit the ball, he hit it out of the park. Freidkin does another great job with "The Brink's Job". It looks great and feels real. The cast is great with one solid performance after another, especially from Peter Falk and Warren Oates. Oates should have been nominated for an Oscar. I first saw "The Brink's Job" in the theater (Bellerose, NY). I've seen it quite a few times since. It never fails to hit the spot.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
As amusing as a "Dick Tracy" comic strip.
mark.waltz16 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Funny faces and tough, delightfully cliched voices (minus the face plaster of the later Warren Beatty box office hit) aides this comical viewpoint of a real life Boston crime that took place in the 1950's. Peter Falk leads the cast in a fabulous way, committing a crime that would have befuddled Columbo. "This robbery could be the missing link between communism and organized crime" barks J. Edgar Hoover (Sheldon Leonard), a funny statement considering the tough image of the veteran character actor and revelations about the real Hoover discovered after his exit from the post of head of the FBI.

The 1970's had a great love of nostalgia, and this has the atmosphere and lighthearted pastiche of a "Happy Days" episode, minus mom and apple pie. Falk is joined by a fabulous cast including Peter Boyle, Paul Sorvino, Allen Garfield, Warren Oates and Gena Rowlands as Falk's wife who goes gaga over a muskrat coat. The color photography has a hue to it that is very attractive to the eye. Definitely one of the best movies of 1978 (a year filled with gems) that builds in tension that gets funnier as it goes along. Falk is absolute perfection in the lead, and the direction by William Friedkin is as perfect as his Oscar winning work for "The French Connection".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed