The Decks Ran Red (1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Brisk if uninspired old dark house story set aboard a freighter
bmacv13 May 2003
The Decks Ran Red flaps as the title under which sets sail a tense and focused movie that takes place aboard a freighter. The Berwind sails into port in New Zealand because its captain has mysteriously died. Awarded his first command, James Mason flies in to take over as skipper of the troubled ship. He finds a slovenly and insubordinate crew, and his officers tell him that mutiny may be in the wind.

Since some of the hands have jumped ship, Mason has some holes to fill. The only cook available will sign on only if he can bring his wife, Dorothy Dandridge (as a Maori whose command of the English language encompasses even the future-perfect tense). This sultry native, the only woman on board, doesn't cool down the smouldering unrest, but the arsonist is Broderick Crawford, who fuels the fires in order to advance his own half-baked scheme: To murder all the crew but a few henchmen, making it look like desertion and mutiny, then scuttle the ship and sell it and its cargo as salvage for $1-million.

It's basically an old dark house story taken to the high seas, with murders aplenty and the briny deep to swallow up the corpses. And, despite Mason, Crawford and Dandridge, its production values are not those of The Titanic. Still, it sails brisky along (slackening a bit toward the stretched-out ending) under Andrew Stone's competent if lackluster direction.

Stone and his wife Virginia were Hollywood's answer to the mama-papa candy store: He wrote and directed, she produced and edited. Their long career resulted in many forgettable films and some embarrassments as well (Song of Norway, for one). But there were a few modest successes, too: Highway 301, The Night Holds Terror, Blueprint for Murder. The Decks Ran Red can join them as a decidedly not luxurious but still seaworthy vessel.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Forget the advertising tagline!
George-1421 May 2000
Forget the advertising tagline (although Dorothy Dandridge is beautiful to look at)! This is a crisp little thriller, apparently fact-based, about a couple of malcontent seamen (Crawford and Whitman) who try to foment a mutiny against new captain Mason as a cover for a scheme to kill the entire crew and bring in the ship as salvage. Except for a rather abrupt ending, nicely done by the Stones.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Full Marks for Shipboard Authenticity, But Somewhat Less for Tension
robertguttman21 May 2014
A new captain takes command of his first ship only to find himself confronted with numerous problems. First there is hostility from his Chief Mate, who feels that he has been passed over for command, and from some of the crew who agree. Then there is the inflammatory presence of a woman steward, signed on at the last moment to replace a crew member who jumped ship. Worst of all is a somewhat ludicrous mutiny plot perpetrated by a couple of the engine room crew to murder the entire crew and take over the ship.

Although the plot is supposedly based on a true story the tension fails to the level that it might have done, which is probably attributable to the director rather than the cast. However, give the film full marks for it's shipboard atmosphere, which is certainly highly authentic, thanks to the fact that it was filmed aboard a couple of real merchant ships. The scenes on the bridge of Matson Line's old SS Mariposa are played pretty much as they would have been in real life, as are the subsequent scenes shot on board the freighter, which is almost certainly a Liberty Ship, of which many were still around at the time this film was made. Perhaps the only detail of the freighter that doesn't ring true is the fact that she is riding much higher in the water than she normally would have been because, since the ship was being used as a movie prop, she was obviously carrying no cargo or ballast, and very little fuel.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty brutal for its time.
rmax3048237 July 2004
These two merchant sailors -- Broderick Crawford and Stewart Whitman -- get a crazy idea aboard a freighter. They're going to kill every officer and man aboard, waterlog the ship, radio for help, claim there was a mutiny and everyone left the ship but them, and claim the ship, worth a million bucks, for salvage.

Granted, the idea is slightly askew, but these guys are snipes, working down in the engine room and the temperature there runs around 116 degrees and sounds like the deepest pits of hell. That environment will drive anyone nuts. Besides, it's like the old joke. "How's your wife?" "Compared to WHAT?" If you put Crawford and Whitman next to the Manson Family or al Qaeda they look like paragons of rationality. So, okay, let's leave them some leeway, so to speak.

I'll skip the plot, I guess, because it doesn't require much in the way of explanation. The dialog lacks verve and credibility. "Anything can happen!" "Whoever destroyed the radios must have had a PURPOSE." And when the officers find three corpses in the engine room, someone says to Mason, "Do you realize the ENORMITY of this?" The acting doesn't require much comment either. Everybody involved delivers about what you'd expect. Mason is smooth, Crawford plays a junk man, Whitman is a little ratty, and none of the others stand out -- except Dorothy Dandridge. She can't act very well, but -- wow! What a dish. I don't know about "a million bucks" but Dorothy Dandridge could start a genuine mutiny alright.

I vaguely remember seeing this when it was released and, it may be hard for a contemporary viewer to understand but, like "The Sniper," which was released about the same time, it was shocking in its brutality. The theater suddenly went kind of quiet when Crawford deliberately picked off one of the crew members from a few feet away with a high-powered rifle. The sexy Dandridge was memorable too, although I don't recall that she quieted down the audience.

The Perrys, who produced, had a habit of using real locations for their shoots. "Cry Terror," another suspenser with James Mason, made good use of New York locations. And they actually sunk a liner for one of their movies, something like, "The Last Voyage." I'm glad they never made a movie about the end of the world.

The story isn't really a grabber and the acting is no more than routine but this is worth seeing, if only because it gives you a chance to feel what it's really like to be on a ship, not a mockup of the kind that John Wayne sails through with such ease. The ship, by the way, is pretty ship shape and not at all a rust bucket. She's also high in the water because she's carrying no cargo.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Striking Violence and Visuals at Sea
LeonLouisRicci8 August 2014
This B-Movie has a Few Things Going. First it is Off Beat and Surprisingly the Violence is Up Close and Disturbing for a Fifties Film. The On Location and On Board Filming is Authentic and Adds to the Realism. Director Stone seems to be Warming Up for His Masterpiece, The Last Voyage (1960) as it has the Same Setting and Crisp Camera Work and Hypertension.

The A-Listers James Mason and Broderick Crawford, along with Sexpot Dorothy Dandridge (revealing Her charms more than typical for the Era), are OK, but the Rest of the Cast from Stuart Whitman on Down do some Pretty Bad Acting.

This is a Film that is Stark and Quite Different in Tone than Most of the Films from the 1950's and has an Atmosphere of Dread that Works and there are some Scenes at Sea that are Extremely Well Done. Worth a Watch as a Tense Low-Budgeter and to See James Mason doing some Slumming and Swimming. Great Title.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-made, and watch it for Dandridge
gbill-748773 July 2021
This is certainly a smaller film and it's not without its problems, but it has a certain appeal in its cast, as well as how it was shot. It's a mutiny film, supposedly a true story (more on this in a bit), and it really puts us aboard the ship, highlighting its interior and machinery, something that was very well done. James Mason plays Captain Rumnill, who comes aboard a ship with morale issues, Dorothy Dandridge plays Mahia, a Maori woman hastily brought on board with her husband to serve as steward and cook, and Broderick Crawford plays Henry Scott, the mastermind of an evil plan to kill everyone aboard and collect a reward for bringing the ship in, with Stuart Whitman playing his accomplice.

Dandridge was the reason I watched in the first place, and I have to say, it's depressing to think that these were the only kinds of parts she was offered after the Oscar nomination for 'Carmen Jones' and that inexplicable three year absence from the big screen. It was frankly beneath her. Early on she has very few lines and is mostly hooted at by the lusty crew, including Whitman who tries to get physical with her. As she serves breakfast the captain ogles her cleavage and says "I suggest that while you're on this ship, you wear something a little less revealing." With a small smile she says, "Does it bother the Captain?"

Dandridge seems confined to being eye candy for the viewer (damn fine eye candy at that), but in the second half she has a scene where she really lets her emotions loose, and another where her character is given some power. Interestingly enough, even though it's not a romantic kiss, she does have a pretty passionate one with Stuart Whitman's creepy character, which film historian Donald Bogle pointed out was a milestone in such interracial displays. So, while it's not the greatest part in the world, it is worth seeing if you like Dandridge, and it's of course incredibly sad to think that she would be dead just seven years later.

Unfortunately, while the second half of the film has a few moments of interest for Dandridge, how the mutiny is portrayed is clumsy at times. That's no fault of Broderick Crawford, who is quite good as the insidious sociopath, bringing real darkness to the film. It just seems a little forced and not always authentic, which took away from some fine shots in the lifeboat and ensuing heroism.

I wondered/doubted if this could possibly be the true story of the S. S. Berwind, despite the assurance of the opening title shot that says this was that ship's story, which "actually happened." From newspaper articles in October, 1905, it turns out that the Berwind's mutineers, led by Henry Scott, were actually black, that Captain Rumnill was among those killed, and they were brought to justice by a passing ship which saw its distress flags. There was no woman on board, and there was no grand rescue starting with a perilous rope climb. So no, it's not very truthful.

It's ironic but not surprising that the filmmakers replaced the potentially incendiary aspect of a black crew rising up and killing its white officers and one dissenting black seaman with the Maori characters, one exuding "exotic" sex appeal. Whether you believe that was all America was ready for in 1958 or not, it's unfortunate. Watch it for Dandridge though, it's worth the 84 minutes, and was actually pretty well made.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
They're about as Maori as the Mario Brothers!
planktonrules10 November 2022
Back in the day, films often featured actors playing races other than their own. Charlie Chan was played by a Swedish-American and Boris Karloff played the Chinese detective Mr. Wong. All of these are pretty silly when you see them today due to the casting (though they both still made some terrific series films). Such is how I felt as I watched "The Decks Ran Red", where two Maoris from New Zealand were played by Black Americans! Black people and Maoris simply don't look like each other...and I especially laughed because Dorothy Dandridge of all people played one of them. I've been to New Zealand a couple times...and never saw ANYONE who looked like her! It's a shame, as it's not a bad story...it's just incredibly poorly cast.

Along a similar vein, I read up on the ill-fated S. S. Berwind. The mutineers in the actual 1905 incident were black men...though everyone in the film is white (aside from the two 'Maoris'). A lot of other changes were made in the original story...such as placing it in the 1950s as well as in the South Pacific. I'm not sure why these changes were made....but so many were made it's best to regard the film as fiction.

When the story begins, the captain of a merchant ship has died and Edwin Rummill (James Mason) has been hired to command the ship. However, when he arrives in New Zealand to take command, he can easily see that its crew are disgruntled and perhaps mutinous. Instead of refusing the assignment or getting a new crew, Rummill makes the disastrous choice to go ahead anyway, as the ship is already three days late.

Aboard the ship, you soon learn that Henry Scott and Leroy Martin (Broderick Crawford and Stuart Whitman) have hatched a truly evil plan. They have been fomenting dissent...and their ultimate goal is to get everyone but themselves on the ship to either kill each other OR they'll do it to them. Then, when the ship is derelict, they' plan to claim the boat as salvage and get rich. Does their plan work? Well, as I watched I had no idea since the film diverged so much from the 1905 incident...and I know how the 1905 incident went down.

The story is quite taut and certainly is never dull. The acting was good, though Dandridge's character wasn't needed in the film and she was just added as eye candy (after all, a merchant ship would NOT bring a woman along...especially back in 1905). Worth seeing...just don't think it has much to do with the REAL Berwind incident...which, incidentally, ended MUCH differently as well! Well worth seeing, but seeing the ACTUAL story probably would have been more exciting.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mis-appropriation of names and facts
Marlburian13 March 2022
I'm a fan (in a modest way) of James Mason and Broderick Crawford, so quite enjoyed this film. Plus points were Dorothy Dandridge and the shooting of many scenes on board an actual ship (that appeared better-maintained than was suggested by Mason's critical assessment on taking command.

But the plot - and I mean both that of the film and that hatched by the two main conspirators - was far-fetched, not least the attempt to enlist an obviously-reluctant young crew member. And when Dorothy made her spectacular entrance I thought that there was almost certainly no woman like that on board for the real events.

In fact, Googling after seeing the film revealed that the only things that fact and fiction had in common were the names of the captain (who was killed in the real incident in 1905) and ship (which in reality was a schooner) and there being deaths on board. So hardly the "true story of one girl on a crime ship", as proclaimed in one publicity poster.

The IMBD cast list includes Hanna Landy as Doris Belger. In the version of the film I saw, courtesy of the free streaming service Fast32, she did not feature.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lame And Impossible, but Dorothy Dandridge Sizzles
bkoganbing30 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Andrew and Virginia Stone produced this low budget thriller that hung on an unbelievable premise and an impossible turn of events. No way the good people in the plot should have survived and some didn't.

James Mason stars as a professional merchant seaman and gets his first command after serving on passenger liners with the captaincy of a tramp freighter. It's a beat up old tub with a surly crew and a sizzling Dorothy Dandridge the wife of cook Joel Fluellen who no way in God's green earth should have been on the ship. Not too many could have controlled their hormones with Dandridge around.

Broderick Crawford and Stuart Whitman don't even try to keep things in check and in addition they've got a truly horrible plot to seize the ship and are the instigators of unrest. Whitman has it bad for Dandridge and he's claiming her as part of the salvage.

As this situation is laid out when you watch I have no doubt that you will think it impossible that anyone could have survived. And the sea would tell no tales.

The Decks Ran Red is just lame and impossible, but Dorothy Dandridge is always worth watching. James Mason didn't think much of this film according to The Films Of James Mason from the Citadel Film Series book on his work. And Broderick Crawford must have really been on a bender to sign for this one.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
SoSo Suspense But No Mystery At Sea
dsmith60683 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The Decks Ran Red (also called Infamy) is a 1958 MGM seagoing suspense drama based on the book Infamy at Sea. The film received generally poor reviews, but received wide viewership for Dorothy Dandridge's role. Filming took place in southern California aboard the Chios, Greece-registered SS Igor (originally the Philip C. Shera), a World War II Liberty Ship owned by the Los and Pezas shipowning families. (from Wikipedia)

James Mason as Captain versus vicious Broderick Crawford as a too smart for own good engineer out to pirate an old cargo ship for insurance money. You know Mason will win in the end. Just a matter of how.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
audacious
RanchoTuVu4 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
When the first officer of an ocean liner (James Mason) finally gets a chance to captain his own ship it turns out to be the one on which crew members Broderick Crawford and Stuart Whitman are plotting to kill the ship's entire crew and somehow collect a million dollars in insurance. Entirely claustrophobic setting of the ship goes well with the plan to kill everyone. The overall sense of cold-blooded cruelty is a natural fit for Crawford, but Stuart Whitman's character turns out to possess a surprising degree of sliminess. How the great James Mason deals with this is but one of the great aspects of this under-appreciated masterpiece. Dorothy Dandridge, the cook's attractive wife, should have never been on the ship in the first place, but her presence is just another bit of the film's overall audacity and quality.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lame, predictable, except for Dorothy Dandridge
pakhuntz7 July 2004
Lame and predictable film with James Mason incredibly miscast as captain of the ship. you know immediately that Broderick Crawford will be the instigator of trouble as he always was and the outcome shows no surprises.

The best part of the film is the voluptuous Dorothy Dandridge who displays her charms that would make any crew mutiny for her. As as the custom in the 50's, she is married to a man who is twice her age which also makes the film sadly lacking.

Better to see James Mason in his other films in which he portrays a much more realistic person.
12 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Cast Ran Ragged....
Poseidon-320 August 2002
Whether it actually is or not, this claustrophobic suspense yarn seems like a 'B' picture. Though Mason and Dandridge were in the midst of their best years career-wise, this seems like a step down...like something that one would do if there was no more quality work. The story (supposedly based on fact) concerns a ship Captain's (Mason) attempt to thwart a murder for riches scheme envisioned by Crawford and Whitman. The pair of thugs plan to make the crew seem like they're planning a mutiny so that it will be entered into the Captain's log. Then they will kill the crew, pretend to be the only survivors and bring the ship in for salvage worth over a million dollars. Crawford lumbers through the film with his usual style, but does present a threatening persona. Whitman struts around and poses in the world's clingiest jeans, his hair all '50's Bryll cream. It's hard to believe he was just three years away from a Best Actor nomination. Mason is believable as a Captain, but not as an action hero as he is later forced to become. A dash of feminine sex appeal is supplied by Dandridge who plays the wife of the ship's cook. She feels the need to serve the men on the boat while wearing snug dresses with deep necklines, which causes it's share of problems. Eventually, the opposing sides must play a cat and mouse game while running all around the ship. (And since it is a black and white film, the decks run grey!) The film has going for it some surprisingly stark moments of violence (for that time) and some creative camera-work in the confined bowels of the ship. Drawbacks include the bland settings, the fact that there's too much talk about what's happening in the story rather than letting the audience see it (crewmen keep coming back to the saloon to tell what's happening outside!) and a feverish, unintentionally hilarious performance by Cross as a third party in the scheme. Also, Bard, as Mason's wife, gives a bizarre performance, nervously looking at the floor through most of her brief scenes and swallowed up in an ugly coat. Still, it's a fairly tight little film with some degree of interest. TV fans may recognize old salt Patterson from "Green Acres".
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dreck
Panamint20 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film is pure dreck. Obviously made to be beyond the shock (or nausea) level allowed on TV thereby competing to get some viewers into the movie theaters and make the producers a few bucks. There is no story, no plot. Just some senseless slaughter that even one of the characters says is not necessary!

Its too bad that tired lines like "these men are on the verge of mass hysteria" are typical. Dorothy Dandridge gives a poor performance, tarnishing her Oscar-nominee status. And this is definitely one of James Mason's all-time worst films. His performance is wooden and the lines he is given are embarrassing. His character is supposed to be courageous but really only calls for an actor (Mason) to feign desperation. No real acting is required of Mason or anyone else in this.

Former Oscar winner Broderick Crawford's role is as one-dimensional and predictable as any ever written. His character is a cardboard caricature. No wonder this helped nail the lid on the coffin of his career.

A complete waste of your time if you choose to watch. Don't bother.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
decks ran red
mossgrymk19 October 2020
Surprised the cast and crew didn't stage their own insurrection and make writer/director Andrew Stone walk the goddamn plank if, for no other reason, placing them in such a leaky, dull vessel Hell, even James Mason is boring, and that takes some doing! Give it a C minus. PS...Dumb title for a black and white film but then again everything about this movie is stupid.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fortunately in this black-and-white film you don't see any red blood and hardly any blood at all.
clanciai3 August 2022
Dorothy Dandridge is magnificent, and she is the only lady of the drama, although James Mason has a wife ashore, who desperately urges him not to take the assignment of a captain for a doomed ship. Of course, he can have no idea it is a doomed ship, although he immediately gets his misgivings, as he is to take over the job of a dead captain, who no one knows what he died of. It is unusual to see Stuart Whitman for once in a villain's role, while Broderick Crawford as usual is the perfect villain - he must have enjoyed acting overbearing bully villains like this, since he did it soo often, even once for Fellini as a fake cardinal cheating poor people of their money. The drama is a nail-biter - you can never guess what will happen next, as everyone sneaks on each other, expecting to get a dagger in the back or getting shot from the dark at any moment. Of course, the scheme is absurd - the villains were crazy enough to believe they could carry it through by a massacre of the entire crew, and of course they reached no further than to a bloody beginning, starting with hurling an innocent coerced partner over board. It's a horribly cruel film and story, but James Mason makes the best of it, and he is always worth watching - I never saw him making a bad job, as his mere name usually warrants a great film. Andrew L. Stone made quite a number of outstanding films, including several musicals, like "Stormy Weather" and "Song of Norway", while he also was an expert on making great films on realistic gruesome true stories.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mildly Entertaining
billcr1222 October 2020
I watched this on Turner Classic Movies because of the beautiful Dorothy Dandridge. The problem is that she has a minor role and is on screen too seldom. James Mason is the star here. Broderick Crawford is the villain who plans to mutiny the ship and somehow sell it for a million dollars. The plot is extremely weak. The acting is fine but in the end it is just an average old black and white film with a story that is not very believable.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Would like to know what ship(s) were used in the filming.
simmonsjo8 July 2004
First time watching and I was captivated throughout. I'm not sure why attention was given to Dorothy Dandridge as hers seemed like a small part. Very brutal but believable plot given that anything could happen on the open sea. I especially liked the scene of the ship intending to ram the lifeboat. It was a great camera angle and one actor uses sailor jargon like, "she's really got a bone in her teeth". I was also amused by the hip lingo used by the actors. Crawford reminds me of a ratpacker no matter what film he is in. I was wondering if anyone could tell me what ship(s) was used in the film for the interior and exterior shots? It looks like a Liberty Ship I took a cruise on, the S.S. Jeremiah O'Brien.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very painful to watch
capt_cleere29 September 2020
I have seen very few movies that are this bad with big name stars in it, it was so bad that it almost seemed like a SNL skit or something, nothing redeeming about this movie, if you watch the whole thing like I did you are going to feel like you were robbed of your time......
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
...And so were the box office results of this trashy adventure yarn.
mark.waltz6 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps Louis B. Mayer was giggling from beyond with MGM's string of trashy flops like this, "The High Cost of Loving" and "Night of the Quarter Moon" in 1958 and 1959 in spite of the fact that they won the Academy Award for those years. The touch of class of the Mayer years was dissipating the release of films like this even though there were a few prestigious films here and there. Even an Andy Hardy return didn't bring back the glory days as the last of the big MGM musicals were put into production and sinking audiences having turned to television and drive-in movies didn't go to the theaters as much.

With a cast led by James Mason, Broderick Crawford, Dorothy Dandridge and Stuart Whitman and a shipboard setting, this should have been at least an interesting B film. But it's a confusing mess of a film dealing with a mutiny that could never happen (or if it did, not done as stupidly as it is in this led by Crawford playing the bully of all bullies), and the presents of the world weary Dandridge aboard, looking tired and far from sultry like she was four years before as Carmen Jones.

I blame the mediocrity of this movie on the structure and direction, particularly the weak narration provided by Mason. It sounds like it was filmed on an antique tape recorder, and does not at all add to the tension of the story. The characters are very one-dimensional, either very good or completely rotten, and Crawford bellows his way through his performance even more so than he did in his oscar-winning performance in "All the King's Men" and his follow-up in "Born Yesterday'. In those films, he knew the moments when to turn it down, but he is completely over the top and comes off foolishly. The fact that anybody would follow his orders is beyond belief because his scheme is ridiculous. Definitely a curiosity though, and I give thumbs up for Dandridge allowing herself to look much less glamorous than other leading ladies of the time.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Poorly conceived and made, this film deserved better treatment
tr-834954 April 2019
Everything about this movie is poor. Its plot construction destroys any attempt to portray this apparently true story realistically. This one is never suspenseful: you always know what's going to happen next. In fact. it's fairly boring because you know right from the beginning that two crew members are intent upon destroying the ship.

There is nothing exceptional in the acting: James Mason is always James Mason and Broderick Crawford is always Broderick Crawford. No one walks out of their skins and becomes another character.

Does this even qualify as a B movie? This is certainly worse than most others of this genre. Everything here is off-kilter and mismatched, and there seems to be no direction given, and no post-production afterthought to anything, leading one to think that the studio was just churning out potboilers for the cash -- and the quality of the film meant nothing.

This shows. The workmanship put into this film is meagre and it is a film that deserved a better fate. Worse than B movie fare, this feature provides only fractured glimpses of the real incident. A poorly conceived and poorly made film.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Low-key actioner evokes visceral response
Sleepy-1722 December 2001
I agree with the previous comments 100%, but I just wanted to add something about the magnificently evil Broderick Crawford and Stuart Whitman (!!). When Stuart gets his hands on Dorothy the second time, the suspense was so strong that I involuntarily started screaming homicidal epithets at the small screen. Be sure to watch this one alone so you can let it all hang out without being embarrassed.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The script didn't match the setting
steiner-sam27 February 2024
It's a mutiny-at-sea drama set in the Pacific Ocean off of New Zealand in the 1950s. The captain of a trouble freighter, S. S. Berwind, has suddenly died under suspicious circumstances on a ship already known for a troubled history. Ed Rummill (James Mason), a career sailor and First Officer on board another vessel, accepts the position as a career move against the advice of his wife, Joan (Katharine Bard).

As soon as Rummill arrives on the Berwind, trouble has begun. The cook and assistant have suddenly quit. Rummill hires a local aboriginal man, Pete (Joel Fluellen), and his strikingly beautiful wife, Mahia (Dorothy Dandridge), as cooks.

We soon learn of a plot by two of Berwind's sailors to take over the ship and eliminate all the crew while making it look like an abandoned vessel and leaving them to get the salvage money. Henry Scott (Broderick Crawford) and Leroy Martin (Stuart Whitman) are experienced seamen and begin to foment trouble immediately. Sporadic violence breaks out.

The film follows Scott's and Martin's efforts to carry out the plot and the response of the ship's officers, especially Captain Rummill.

"The Decks Run Red" is the definition of a B-movie. The script is underwhelming, and the plot is laughable for its improbabilities. The film is known for its rare feature of an African American woman as the lead female actor in a Hollywood movie in the 1950s. Dorothy Dandridge does fine, and finally, is not just eye candy. James Mason is earnest; Crawford and Whitman are villainous. The ship's machine room is the main feature, as Stone lovingly shows all many levers being turned and pulled in a multilevel machine room. Too bad the script didn't match the setting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hideous
drednm16 May 2005
Despite Oscar winner Broderick Crawford and nominees James Mason, Dorothy Dandridge, Stuart Whitman, and Jack Kruschen, this 84 minute amateurish production is excruciatingly long and dull and badly acted. This may be based on a real story but this production is among the worst films I've ever seen---and I've seen thousands of films. And all the acting is dreadful. It seems like they're making is up as they go along. Stupid dialog, ridiculous situations, and dumb characters make this a total waste of time. Laughable from the very opening, this turkey goes on and on and on until the foolish ending. I cannot believe such good actors as Mason and Crawford got stuck in this bilge. Dandridge comes off like a cartoon and Whitman is witless. David Cross, Hank Patterson, Barney Phillips, and Katherine Bard also appear to no advantage. This project should have been scuttled before the cameras started.
11 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed