What a Woman! (1943) User Reviews

fun, upbeat war-time flick

[ksf-2 · 7/10 · 19 October 2010]

W.A.W. opens up in a magazine publishing office, where they are discussing how to interview the latest best-selling author, who no-one has ever met. Flash to Carol Ainsley (R. Russell, nominated for four Oscars), who is the agent for the un-seen author. She is determined to track down the author (played by Willard Parker), and doesn't realize the can of worms that revealing him may open... Brian Aherne is "Pepper", a magazine editor who is writing a story on Ainsley, and keeps popping up where-ever Ainsley goes. For most of the film, he is sitting in chairs, waiting for Ainsley to go through the doorway, or come back from where-ever she has been.

Keep an eye out for some fun supporting characters - Carol's assistant is played by Grady Sutton is a few years after making those hilarious W.C. Fields films. The office secretary is played by Norma Varden, who was so great as Lady Beekman in "Gentlemen Prefer Blonds". The mens dormitory clerk is Chester Clute, who looks and sounds just like Mel Blanc. Unfortunately, all these actors have very few lines; given a few more lines, they could have spiced the film up a bit. Russell does a great job, and carries the film well. It's a lot of fun to watch, although it's more plain and simple than I was expecting; after seeing her in "Friday", I was hoping for more plot twists. She has the same, strong, fast-talking personality that she had in "His Girl Friday". It was refreshing to watch an upbeat, war-time movie without a single mention of the war. Directed by Irving Cummings, who had directed Shirley Temple in four films in the 1930s. I hope Turner Classics starts showing this more often.

If you can write it, you can emote it

[bkoganbing · 6/10 · 17 August 2017]

Rosalind Russell stars in What A Woman in one of her career girl parts, that of a literary agent and one high powered agent she is. She's the daughter of a US Senator Edward Fielding.

That's enough to get free and easy free lance writer Brian Aherne interested enough to do a profile. Especially since Russell has a new project. She wants to get one of her authors reserved English professor Willard Parker to shed his pseudonym from the steamy romance novel he's written and become an actor.

She operates under the thesis if you can write it, you an emote it. As it turns out beneath the shy exterior of the professor lies a budding Errol Flynn.

Russell's high powered agent complements beautifully the slow paced and unhurried pace of Brian Aherne. Her big problem is she might just have fallen for her own creation in Parker.

The ever wise Aherne realizes that Roz will inevitably grasp they are meant for each other.

It's all a bit silly, but the leads do carry it off. After over 70 years What A Woman still holds up beautifully.

Agreeable fast-moving trifle

[AlsExGal · 6/10 · 30 January 2023]

In this romantic comedy from Columbia Pictures and director Irving Cummings, Rosalind Russell stars as high-powered talent agent Carol Ainsley. She's after the mysterious author of a recent bestseller to try and get inspiration for finding the lead actor in a movie adaptation of the book. She tracks him down, only to discover that he's a college teacher named Michael Cobb (Willard Parker) with no interest in further fame. Carol becomes convinced that Michael himself would be the perfect man for the film role and sets out to woo him to the job. Meanwhile, world-weary reporter Henry Pepper (Brian Aherne) has been tasked with writing a profile article on Carol which requires him to shadow her on her daily rounds, eventually leading to romance.

This is a basically agreeable trifle, fast-moving and with good performances from Russell and Aherne. I'm not familiar with Willard Parker, and his role could have been recast with a stronger personality. Shelley Winters can be glimpsed briefly in her second film role as a secretary.

seductive

[Vincentiu · 10 January 2015]

seductive against the air of period. Rosalind Russell as axis of a nice comedy about success , a project and love in a mixture who respects classic rules of romantic comedy. that could be all. but it has a special dose of charm and that does it interesting in not ordinary manner. the strong woman, the charming , wise, sarcastic reporter and the innocent Prince Charming, the chaos and the silence, the feelings and the duty as ingredients of a story, like many others, about the metamorphose and real happiness. the mark of period, the brilliant Russell, the splendid performance of Brian Aherne are pillars of a film who , far to be memorable is an inspired choice for remind the flavor of a lost time.

"The Condemned Staff Ate a Hearty Breakfast"

[richardchatten · 7/10 · 30 September 2022]

The title is highly misleading although it aptly describes the glamorous Miss Russell in the sort of nonsense Doris Day was making her own by the end of the next decade.

Playing an East Coast career girl wearing a succession of killer outfits with enormous shoulders and smoking endless cigarettes (it's no surprise that Rosalind eventually succumbed to cancer), we first see her secretary fielding calls from Walter Winchell, and like the fifties Doris is gratifyingly older than love interest Willard Parker (who's actually quite good as Hollywood's idea of a scholar of Elizabethan history who gets more full of himself as the film goes on).

Typically we never actually see the film that all the fuss is about, just as Brian Aherne as the cynical reporter is never seen at a typewriter, simply confining himself to constantly arriving unannounced looking pleased with himself.

The 10% agent is a big success until two men enter her life

[SimonJack · 7/10 · 18 October 2020]

Carol Ainsley is on top of the world as the best 10% agent for authors, musicians, artists, actors, etc. But after selling the movie rights to her latest hit author's book, her whole staff are in a quandary trying to find the right man to play the lead. Meanwhile, across town, the publisher of Knickerbocker Magazine assigns its associate editor and top writer, Henry Pepper, the job of doing a profile article on Miss Ainsley. That's in lieu of one on the hot author of "Whirlwind," Anthony Street, whom no one knows but his publisher. That's because it's a pen name of the author who wants to remain anonymous.

But, when Ainsley sees a picture of the handsome author, she decides that he's the guy to play the lead in the movie based on his own book. So, she wrangles the his true identify out of the publisher and boards a train for Buxton where he's a college professor. Pepper follows her because his way of writing a profile is by shadowing his subject to see what her work day is like and what makes her tick. But when Pepper and the anonymous author, Michael Cobb, meet and become friends, the top 10% agent has her hands full. And a complex comedy of personalities develops around these three people.

The film has a good plot idea, with a smattering of clever or witty lines. But, a better screenplay with more humor would have boosted it considerably. And, it should have had some inkling of World War II that was happening at the time. As is, it's a fair comedy romance. Rosalind Russell is Ainsley and Brian Aherne is Pepper. They made a few movies together - all comedies, that were fair to good. But they each made a number of comedies with other leading actors, including some that were great comedies. Among Russell's best comedies were "Rendezvous" of 1935 with William Powell, "His Girl Friday" of 1940 with Cary Grant, "They Met in Bombay" of 1941 with Clark Gable, and "Take a Letter, Darling" of 1942 with Fred MacMurray. Aherne made three smashing comedies - "The Great Garrick" of 1937 with Olivia de Haviland, "Merrily We Live" of 1938 with Constance Bennet, and "A Night to Remember" of 1942 with Loretta Young.

The supporting cast are all good, though few of them are among the better-known supporting players of the day. Willard Parker plays Anthony Street/Michael Cobb. He played in many Westerns of the period. Ann Savage, Alan Dienhart and Edward Fielding lead the rest of the cast.

There's always something missing and strange to me when movies made during World War II and set in that time don't have anything to even hint of what's happening in history at the time. Most movies made then - comedies, dramas, crime pictures, etc. that had little or nothing to do with the war nevertheless had signs of the time. If nothing else, men and women in uniform would be apparent on the streets. So, to have this film set in 1943 with no sign of anything else going on in the world - that would surely affect the people in the story, seems odd. It's another minus for the film.

The top box office movie for 1943 was "This is the Army," a comedy musical war-time film set on the home front. It far outdistanced all others in ticket sales at $24.3 million. The fourth-place finisher at the box office was the biggest Academy Award winner - "The Song of Bernadette," with a box office of $13.4 million. In the top 20 films, a dozen were war or wartime related stories; and more than two-thirds of the top 50 films were war related.

"What a Woman" did fair at the box office, coming in 53rd with $5.2 million in U.S. ticket sales. But several comedies finished higher for the year. I don't know that any other characters would have made this film better. It just needed a better script.

Here are the best lines from the film.

Dillon, "Oh, and by the way, Pepper, Miss Ainsley doesn't permit her female clients to have babies."

Carol Ainsley, "Any soap?" Pat O'Shea, "Not a bubble."

Carol Ainsley, on the phone with an actress client, Monica, "Oh, but there's no such thing, angel, as a small part - just small actresses. Wh... Oh, you get killed in the first reel? Oh, but darling, think how they're going to miss you throughout the rest of the picture."

Michael Cobb, looking at the gifts that Carol has received but told Pepper that they are appreciations from members of a quartet that's a client of hers, "There's one more." Henry Pepper, "One more what?" Mike Cobb, "Gift." Pepper, "Oh, did you send these?" Mike Cobb, looking at Carol, "Oh, he didn't know?" Carol Ainsley, "No, he didn't know, but he knows now."

Carol Ainsley, "Uh, Michael, have you any idea how this happened?" Michael Cobb, "Well, darling, I spoke to the press tonight, but it was strictest confidence." All the dinner guests at her father's house laugh. Unidentified woman, "Strictest confidence!" Unidentified man, "With the newspapers." The group continues to laugh.

Henry Pepper, "Hello, everyone." Carol Ainsley, "Well, what are you doing here?" Pepper, "Me? I'm the best man."

Pat O'Shea, "Look, Pepper, how long has this been going on between Carol and Buxton?" Henry Pepper, "All the time. From the first moment she laid eyes on him. She's mad about him. Go to bed, Pat."

Miss Timmons,, "I can't understand it, Pat." Pat O'Shea, "She's mad about him. Always was. Go to bed."

Carol Ainsley, "Everything went blank, and suddenly I'm a bride to be."

***1/2

[edwagreen · 9/10 · 23 August 2017]

What a whirlwind of a movie! Rosalind Russell portrays a fast-talking movie-agent who discovers that a meek college professor wrote a racy book and that he looks like the major character depicted in the book and she gets him to try out for the part in the film.

While this is going on, Brian Aherne, as a magazine writer, pursues Russell continuously.

The best part of the film is when after being at a Turkish bath with Aherne, the college professor experiences a total change in personality and goes after Russell since he has really fallen for her.

Movie made during World War 11. What a great way to get everyone's mind off,if but temporary, from the real world.

Not much of a stretch for Rosalind.

[planktonrules · 4/10 · 7 November 2010]

Rosalind Russell seemed to play a bazillion roles over the years in which she played high-powered yet rather sexless ladies. So, when you see her in "What a Woman!" playing exactly this sort of character once again, you have a strong sense of déjà vu. This means if you are an old movie fan like me, this film seemed rather clichéd because this topic has been done too often...and done better.

The film begins with Rosalind playing an executive at a major publishing house. She has a very successful author working for her and there is talk of making a movie of the man's book---yet no one has seen him or knows anything about him. So Rosalind is determined to track down this guy--who turns out, oddly, to be nothing like you'd expect. While the book is apparently some sort of romance, he's a bookish and rather asexual professor (Willard Parker). Inexplicably, Rosalind has the crazy idea of bringing Parker back to New York and molding him into the character from his book so he can play him in an upcoming movie. Why? This is never explained.

Parker turns out to be pretty awful, but still Russell pushes him....again, I asked 'why?'. But, when she kisses him and coaches him, he suddenly turns into a love-sick puppy. He very, very ardently pursues her and she shows as much interest as a person looking forward to a root canal--and it's obvious to everyone except Parker.

At the same time, a reporter (Brian Aherne) has been floating about throughout the movie--as if he has no job or is on an extended vacation. It's obvious that he, too, is interested in Russell. This and the Parker romances make no sense, as neither man has any reason to even like her--she is 100% asexual and about as alluring as boiled turnips. Yet, you know by convention that by the end of the film she will become a 'real woman' and marry one of the two male leads.

I'd say this film was in need of a massive re-write. Although it starts off promisingly (even though it has a lot of familiar elements), midway through the film it totally loses direction. The characters begin acting inexplicably and you wonder if ANYONE could behave this way. In movies, yes...in real life, absolutely never! In addition, the characters don't do a whole lot other than act kooky--mostly because the writer has given them nothing more to do. And the ending comes out of no where!! A time-passer and nothing more.

Roz at her Best

[gudpaljoey-78582 · 8/10 · 18 August 2017]

I don't know how anyone cannot like 'What a Woman.' I thought it was a very funny, delightfully insane romp, made possible by the wonderful Roz Russell playing the role of a powerful comedic woman, a role that she plays better than anyone else, and that included Mss. Shearer, Harlow, and Stanwyck. The rest of the cast had a hard time keeping up with her, but mostly did. I had to suspend belief over the rush to the wedding near the end of the flic, and I needed a few more hints as to why Mr. Ahearn was falling in love with her. There were enough good lines for all concerned to make me give a hoot about the writing of a genre film hat had not quite become a genre.

Drags a bit

[HotToastyRag · 4/10 · 17 August 2020]

Of all four movies Rosalind Russell and Brian Aherne made together, you're best off starting with My Sister Eileen or Hired Wife. What a Woman has some fun moments, but the story is a little lacking, and it drags on a little.

Brian is a reporter sent on an assignment to interview a literary agent because no one knows who the author of a best-selling novel is. Naturally, I thought the continued mention of a pen name lent the plot's direction towards a certain path: I thought Roz, the literary agent, was secretly the author who thought no one would take her seriously if she used her own name. Instead, the real author is found fairly early on, and Roz and Brian travel to a prestigious university to track him down. Turns out, it's Willard Parker, a professor who wrote passionately but has no idea how to live it. When Roz tries to train him to become as three-dimensional as his books so he can star in the film adaptation, her idea blows up in her face.

Where does Brian Aherne come in? This really isn't his movie, and I don't know why he was cast in the role of "irritating reporter." Willard's character is supposed to catch every woman's eye when he walks in, and he's supposed to be six-foot-four with brains and brawn. Brian is incredibly handsome, and he's also six-foot-four! Why wasn't he cast as the lead? If you want more Brian, check him out in The Song of Songs or My Son, My Son! Roz is also a bit irritating in this movie. For a more endearing performance, check her out in She Wouldn't Say Yes.

A neglected romcom from the war years

[ilprofessore-1 · 27 October 2018]

Irving Cummings, a contract director best known for his long tenure at Twentieth Century Fox where he directed Shirley Temple and many musicals, did this fast-paced, well-staged romantic comedy for Harry Cohn at Columbia. It's quite an achievement. Not only do the actors move as they deliver the dialogue, but the camera directed by Capra's favorite DP, Joe Walker, moves as well. The performances from the smallest to largest are perfect. One wonders, for example, why Williard Parker who plays the innocent professor never went on to stardom. He's both handsome and believable as is Ahern. This film is an ideal example of the Hollywood studio system at its best. Rosalind Russell in a star turn is surrounded by a superb supporting cast, and looks wonderful, lit by Walker. Was this picture ahead of its time? Did it lose money?

Don't They Know There's a War On?

[boblipton · 4/10 · 19 October 2010]

This mildly preposterous riff on the by now standard Rosalind Russell comedy -- high powered woman executive meets easy-going, mildly contemptuous bohemian and falls into frilly love by the end of the fifth reel -- winds along its well-greased way in a mildly bemused fashion. Long-time pro, Irving Cummings directs this well enough, but only Miss Russell puts any oomph into her role and the visuals mainly seem concerned with her head, making sure that she has an odd looking hat or hairdo that seems to change with every scene. She wears some dynamite dresses also; credit Travis Banton for the dresses. He seems to have specialized in gowning Carole Lombard in her movies.

Everyone seems to be giving it the old college try, but by now the formula had grown pretty tired, sustained only by war time movie attendance and some hope that all those Rosies out there, busy riveting together planes and battleships would be able to spend their times in silly hats once the war was over and men like Brian Aherne would be free of the restrictions of bow ties.

Not head over heels in love with this film

[TheLittleSongbird · 5/10 · 1 May 2020]

Am saying this with regret. 'What a Woman' may have sounded quite silly in concept, which was not unexpected as romantic comedies and comedies at the time were not the type to be seen for their stories. Saw it anyway, being someone who likes Rosalind Russell and being someone that likes romantic comedy and films from the 30s. Haven't seen enough yet of Irving Cummings' work to say what my overall stance is on him as a director, what has been seen of his (and there is a lot more to see) has been variable.

'What a Woman' left me very mixed. It is a truly great showcase for Russell, in terms of performance that is, because without her or if her role was performed by somebody not as talented or as experienced in this type of role, 'What a Woman' would have been a dud most likely in my view. It does have things that are good, but it does have its fair share of frustrating failures that could have been avoided. A silly premise executed in an even sillier way.

Russell is the reason to see 'What a Woman' and she is a sheer delight all round. Her comic timing soars, even when the comedy itself flounders, she is really charming and easy to engage with. Brian Aherne is more mixed for me generally, have known him to be bland, but he here has a likeability about him and doesn't come over as dreary, he even amuses at times and suitably insensitive when needed. His chemistry with Russell is sweet and tense and it is not hard to see what they see in each other. Willard Parker has a more reserved character, one that isn't as interesting, but gives it a good go.

It looks great, Russell looks luminous in her clothes, the glossy style of the photography isn't gaudy or drab and the lighting is atmosphere. There are very amusing and witty moments in the banter between Russell and Aherne and the more romantic parts have moments of not too sentimental charm.

However, the story is very silly, sometimes straining credibility to the limit, is quite paper thin at times and has very few surprises. It could have done with a tighter pace, clearer character motivations as the final decision was not very easy to buy and the ending comes out of the blue and doesn't feel rounded off enough. The supporting cast are more competent but nobody stands out in sketchy roles, the most interesting being a debuting Shelley Winters. Cummings' direction similarly is far from inept but feels undistinguished.

The script has moments but could have done with more spark, and there isn't enough generally of the sparkling wit and sophistication associated with the best romantic comedies from this period. Funny moments come in spurts, at other points there is a try too hard feel, and the romance is predictable and more complicated than it needed to be.

Summarising, watchable for Russell fans but nothing special. 5/10

Roughly speaking, she's still a woman of distinction.

[mark.waltz · 4/10 · 25 September 2017]

The Rosalind Russell stereotype of the high hat business executive/lady boss gets probably its most tiresome plot. There's the macho man she despises (Brian Aherne), the cultured man she respects (Willard Parker) and the one she falls in love with. Who could that possibly be? It takes over 90 minutes for her to get to the final choice, and along the way, she cracks wise, dresses glamorously and fights the stereotype of what a war era woman should be. Even if women got to run things while the men were "over there", something tells me that the Rosalind Russell archetype was an overachiever long before women on the swing shift flexed their muscle and insisted, "We can do it!"

Russell works as a publishing executive who discovers that mild mannered college professor Parker is a best selling author using a pseudonym. Fellow publisher Aherne keeps stalking them, gives Rosalind the worst of times, and makes smoke come out of her ears due to his insensitivity. But where there's smoke, there's fire, reuniting the stars of "My Sister Eileen" and keeping them working in the same industry. So Aherne and Russell talk fast, fight over the silliest things, and yet as well intended as it is, it just isn't all that funny, proving that lightning doesn't always strike twice. Roz has a great outburst towards the end, but that doesn't change the fact that the story is stale, unbelievable and mostly dull