Meshes of the Afternoon (1943) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
59 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Nightmare Captured In Film
Eumenides_06 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I had the pleasure of watching Maya Deren's Meshes of the Afternoon just minutes after watching Luis Buñuel's Un Chien Andalou. And although Buñuel's movie is the most famous and most influential of the two, I not only enjoyed Deren's more but I also found it more intelligent and better made.

Although Buñuel's movie rejects any narrative and interpretation, Deren's movie is a little narrative of a nightmare, plunging the viewer deep into a dark, intimate world full of symbols, scary figures and elliptic storytelling. All in all, it's much more dreamlike than Un Chien Andalou.

A hand leaves a flower on a pathway. A woman picks it up. Enters a house. Objects are out of place. She falls asleep. The narrative begins anew, with small differences. Then it starts again, each time oddly familiar but always with differences. At one point the viewer asks himself if the woman isn't just dreaming about herself in an endless loop? Maybe she is, maybe she's not. The movie doesn't explain anything, it merely presents a situation and invites the viewer to think about what it means. The tone of the movie is depressing and austere, and was originally made without sound. I enjoy weird movies, and I can say I've seldom seen one that so easily captured the nature of a nightmare, by being terrifying without really showing anything terrifying. Like a painting by Escher or a short-story by Jorge Luis Borges, Meshes of the Afternoon is a work of art that transcends reality and touches the viewer on a level above language and reason.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sombre surrealist nightmare
RomanJamesHoffman10 July 2012
'Meshes of the Afternoon' is the first and best-known film of experimental film-maker Maya Deren, whose surrealist tinged movies explore time, space, self, and society and have had a lasting influence on American cinema. 'Meshes…' begins with a hand reaching down, as if from Heaven, leaving a flower on a pathway which a woman (Deren) picks up on her way to her house. When she arrives she ascends some stairs, gets her key out, unlocks the door and enters the house. Already an ominous absence is present, and a subsequent tour of the house shows us a bread-knife, a telephone off the hook, and up another flight of stairs we see an empty bed. After the woman falls asleep, these domestic objects' double life as Freudian symbols is revealed and charged with increasing potency with each repetition of the cyclical narrative until the films catastrophic denouement.

In using Freudian symbology and a cyclical narrative, 'Meshes…' certainly has a dream logic which is reminiscent of surrealist films likes Cocteau's 'Blood of a Poet' as well as Dali and Bunuel's 'Un Chien Andalou'. However, Deren actively rejected the "Surrealist" tag and the difference between 'Meshes' and these seminal surrealist works is marked. Firstly, despite the repeating narrative, objects suddenly transforming into something else, and a lead character that splinters into four, the dramatic structure of 'Meshes…' is quite tight and even though the viewer is challenged in regard to interpretation it struck me as quite straightforward compared to some of her later films. Secondly, the dreamscape of 'Meshes…' is not a celebratory realm liberated from reason, but rather a more claustrophobic and sombre world inhabited by a Grim-Reaper like image with a mirrored face, and the splintered identities of the protagonist who at one point congregate around the kitchen table.

Since it was made, the film has had an immense impact both cinematically (in inspiring a new generation of film-makers to pick up the camera) and culturally given that the most favoured interpretation is that it is a feminist commentary on gender identity and sexual politics in an era when the role of women was changing dramatically. One might think that, in an era when David Lynch is mainstream and woman are arguably liberated, 'Meshes…' would feel dated. However, this is not the case, and remains fresh and engaging to a modern viewer in addition to its (deserved) status as a fascinating and influential piece of early experimental film.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amalgam of Traditional Narrative and Surrealism
jazzest16 November 2003
While the opening sequence of a woman following a faceless figure with a flower is persistently repeated, images of key and knife intensify their vividness, and then dream and reality permeate into each other's realms. Maya Deren's first and probably best film, Meshes of the Afternoon, is an amalgam of traditional narrative and European-imported surrealism. It is also one of many triumphs in the film history that fearlessness and youthfulness conquer the lack of expenses and experiences.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Most unusual use of transition devices; even to date today
El Norte15 October 1999
Like "Un Chien Andalou" by Bunuel & Dali, "Meshes" might appear to hold some psychological symbolism, dream imagery, hidden significances or inside jokes. Where Bunuel & Dali insisted that all they filmed was to make "no sense at all," Deren's could have a hidden commentary on the woman's role in the home; time spent alone, to be drawn out is to fall deeper into oneself. The overall look of the film (shot over several years) is one of a camera experiment; one which carries the viewer scene to scene via strange footfalls on shifting soils, stairs, paths and floors. The sense of continuity is held through reoccurring imagery, and this film uses a mask to give the appearance of multiple Mayas at a table VERY effectively. Some of the stop-action (disappearing/reappearing objects) is rough, given the complexity of her camera, but given these limitations the film is a technical feat as well. Mesmerizing, re-watchable.
52 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Through the meshes of your mind . . .
Chris_Docker14 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Meshes Of The Afternoon Meshes, according to Deren, is "concerned with the inner realities of an individual and the way in which the subconscious will develop, interpret and elaborate an apparently simple and casual occurrence into a critical emotional experience."

Have you ever stopped to wonder, when you see and touch a flower, what happens inside? Unless you are in purely botanical mode, it may very likely spark off something in your subconscious. The breath of spring. The beauty and harmony of nature. Perhaps something given with affection and gentleness. Maybe even a token of romance?

Maya Deren's wildly seminal work, Meshes Of The Afternoon, begins when a rather artificial looking hand places a flower on a pathway. The hand (and attached arm) pop out of existence, immediately alerting us to the fact that this is not a work of literal storytelling. The symbols of the next 14 minutes drill holes into our subconscious, where images speak louder than words, creating one of the most famous short films of all time.

A woman picks up the flower on her way home. At her doorstep, she drops her key. Once inside, she falls asleep in an armchair. Her dream-self sees her former self approaching the house. But the flower is being carried by a hooded figure whose only face is a mirror. Giving chase brings her no closer to the hooded figure - it just brings her to her doorstep. This time, when she ascends the stairs, we see her expression. No longer carefree, she is watchful, slightly suspicious.

A breadknife, previously cutting bread, lies on the steps. A phone off the hook, and the knife hidden in the bed. She sees her sleeping form and a gramophone playing endlessly with no sound. Through the cracked window she sees herself giving chase to the hooded figure and takes the key from her mouth. We look again. It become a knife with which she confronts two other images of herself. Eventually a man enters the picture.

The sight or touch of a flower reminds us that the subconscious mind works in symbols. Like images from a dream, the flower can bring certain feelings to the surface. Similarly a knife may be just an implement, or an implement with which we can feed ourselves, or hurt ourselves. Meshes Of The Afternoon soon evokes Freudian implications. Is the man coming home from work the fulfillment of her romantic dreams or their frustration? As an outside force, he can be a blessing or a threat, just as a mirror can show oneself or a reveal a hidden person. But Deren hotly denied it was surrealist. Whereas the surrealist is parodic, Deren is deadly serious. To her, their work was like doodling with symbols. Her polemics castigated surrealists for 'abnegating the agency of consciousness.' The role of the artist, she said, had degenerated. "His achievement, if any, consists in a titillating reproduction of reality which can be enjoyed in air-conditioned comfort by an audience too comatose to take the exercise of a direct experience of life."

The music (by Deren's third husband, and added 16 years later) adds to the sense of rising paranoia and dread. Its ritualistic feel has persuaded some commentators to suggest that the double characters and constantly changing identities stem from Deren's interest in Voodoo (her writings on the subject are still a leading authority - she was later initiated as a Voodoo priestess). Yet it wasn't until 1947, four years later, that Deren received a Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship that enabled her to begin visiting Haiti to study Voodoo. More likely they are indicative of an early grasp of psychology, a deep interest of hers and one which she shared with her father.

To signify the hooded figure as the Grim Reaper is also to trivialize and pigeon hole a symbol capable of many equally valid interpretations. Some feminist readings centre on the frustration of a woman left at home all day. Yet we can also look at it in the sense of someone coming to know themselves and risking their sanity in the process.

On a technical level, Meshes Of The Afternoon, shot on a miniscule budget, has almost non-existent production values and may fail easily to engage modern audiences. It has total disregard for Hollywood convention (the word 'Hollywood' in the opening titles could even be read as frustration with the barrenness of the industry there). There is an superficial similarity with works by Shirley Clarke or the early surrealism of Bunuel. Structurally, we can see its influence in Lynch's Lost Highway, where no explanation is given or needed for one thing (or person) turning into another (though some of the explicit symbols are explored more thoroughly in Lynch's later works, Mulholland Drive and Inland Empire). By understanding Meshes Of The Afternoon, such 'populist' surrealism becomes child's play. As a journey of self-discovery with deep overtones, it follows a similar (though less tragic) theme to Nina Menkes' Phantom Love.

Some commentators have cast doubt over whether Deren was the primary artistic force in the film, saying it is largely the work of her husband Alexander Hammid. Deren's biographers disagree. Certainly it is her most famous, complex and mature piece of cinema, although her next film, At Land, maintained some of the enigmatic structure of Meshes Of The Afternoon. Later, her works would focus more on dance-film (except, perhaps, for her documentary on Voodoo, Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti). But whoever was behind Meshes, there are few segments of 14 minutes that remain so disturbing, so infinitely re-watchable, and so influential to this day.
51 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
When You Wake You're Still in a Dream...
Xstal30 January 2023
The networks of a mind, who really knows when it reclined, started to consume and dine, before untangling what's been; a head of conjuring confusion, a state of light refract diffusion, with a knife to cut illusion, and a key to lock fate in; as it gazes into cycles, that deceive the daylight vitals, and revisits past disciples, replicas queue to begin; like a self-devouring snake, you can't be sure who is awake, if they want to pull the brake, and find a way to stop the spin.

Those moments of drift, that consume and confuse, as the world wraps around, and the visions all infuse, take you to abstract illusions, to unsettled taut contusions, are they dreams or just intrusions, that play out throughout a snooze.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Way ahead of its time!
NateManD14 August 2006
Maya Deren's "Meshes of the Afternoon" is an amazing 15 minute journey into the subconscious. It's like "Un Chien Andalou" seen through the eyes of a woman. In the film it's hard to tell when Maya's character is awake or dreaming. This film is chock full of bizarre and creepy surrealist images. The protagonist drops her key and it bounces like a ball. A knife moves from a loaf of bread, then the key turns into a knife. She carries a flower with her, which she holds upside down. She sees death, who where's a black hood and has a mirror for a face. She see's herself dreaming. In her dream she seems to foresee her own death. Deren seems to have a subconscious fear of knives, or being killed by a knife. This is one crazy little short film that almost puts you in a hypnotic trance with it's creepy Avant-Gard sounds and images. It's very poetic and disturbing, as nothing is what it seems. This is a must see for fans of David Lynch and Bunuel.
28 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A woman fighting with identity
ShellyShock2 October 2002
Laden with symbolic imagery, this short film focuses on the struggle of a woman to find her identity independent of men, emotional baggage and societal expectations. Constantly chased by a doppelganger, Maya is confronted with the many aspects of herself at the dinner table. One of her personalities must commit murder to free her. Is she saved from the flower of womanhood or die without expectations?

I suggest watching the movie a few times through to catch all of the imagery and keeping Freud in mind when distilling the symbolism. This film is very interesting and beautiful independent of theme. Definitely worth a look!
36 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surrealism with a Narrative
invaderJim15 August 2015
I do not think this is one of her best works, as it is often cited to be. It's technically astounding, filled with interesting shots and effects. But for all her attempts to embrace surrealism she clings to the necessity of the narrative, an experiment that (for my taste) has only been successfully attempted by Bunuel and Bergman, and to a lesser degree Tarkovsky. There are also a lot of interesting images, the cloaked antagonist with a mirror for a face stands out, but it remains a sort of Frankenstein's monster of cinema, halfway between the real and surreal without the necessary components to integrate the two. Still quite enjoyable though.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Succeeds even where other famous dreamscapes do not
Polaris_DiB23 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The concept of using cinema to reflect dreams isn't very new; the concept of cinema as "dream-vision" is a little less well known, but still has a strong impact upon critical writings involving film; many avant-garde and cult filmmakers from Luis Bunuel and Salvador Dali to David Lynch and Robert Altman have attempted to create dreamscapes in one or most of their films; still, one thing filmmakers have been mostly unable to do is to provide the sense of motion that occurs during dreams.

Except Maya Deren. Maya Deren's experience with dance combines with a rich visual sense in all of her films, but it gets no better than in Meshes of the Afternoon, a movie that literally moves with the same form of surreal contemplation as a body moves through dream space. The visual/symbolic elements of the flower, the mirror-faced figure, the blade, the key, the windows, and the door themselves are all aspects of association which have been highly regarded in Deren's film, but even things as simple as the slightly slow-motion shot of Deren walking up the stairs has a strongly dreamlike impact.

Editing is another aspect of Deren's film-making which has rightly received praise. She literally takes the rhetoric of "Un Chien Andalou" one STEP further by changing the surreal transitions from cuts between different rooms to cuts between footsteps. The land and space traveled both outdoors and indoors in "Meshes of the Afternoon" can be felt the same way dream-motion can be felt in an oddly extrasensory way.

Many films have been based off of the filmmaker's dreams, but Maya Deren actualizes her dreams like no other. "Meshes of the Afternoon" stands as one of the most successful avant-garde films of all time, and is a must for anyone interested in cinematic topics or form.

--PolarisDiB
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
40's experimentation
SnoopyStyle7 October 2020
A woman with no name returns home and falls asleep. She dreams of a hooded figure with a mirror face. There are repeated ideas and items. There are the drums and the strings that are reminiscent of eastern chanting. It's an experimental short film of a nightmarish dream.

Wartime Hollywood is not a time that screams film experimentation. It feels more like a 60's film trying to respond to the French New Wave or an Ingmar Bergman film. Only this isn't a response or a copy of anything in particular. One may see something of a silent era avant-garde film in this. It's strange. It's intriguing. It's hypnotic. It's 14 minutes of odd visuals and it's over.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Our Unfortunate era
kruttik-a24 May 2006
Its just so unfortunate to not have 'Maya Daren' with us today. Her exemplary direction with perfect length of her movies makes her a legend in short film category.

Meshes of the Afternoon has everything that no one has ever seen before, in terms of abstraction, philosophy, movie making.. everything is just so beautiful. Her movies cannot be categorized into any available genres, cos' no on e really makes movie of her sort.

A girl entangled into a recursive event which by the directorial pattern looks like a figment of her own imagination. It seems like she is waiting for her lover or something like that and then she finds her replicas all around her haunting her and finally killing her. It also seems that Maya's other short film 'At Land' is a sequel to 'Meshes of the Afternoon' for she keeps alive the same passion and abstraction and romance in 'At Land'.

All in all, its one of the best attempts I have seen. If you believe in movies you cannot miss it.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Meshes of the Afternoon
jboothmillard12 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The only reason I saw this film was because it appears in the book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, I personally can't see why. Basically The Woman (Maya Deren, also directing) a woman picks up a flower, picks up a falling key, unlocks her door, and inside there is a knife in a loaf of bread, and the phone is off the hook. She soon naps, and supposedly dreams of a hooded figure with the face of a mirror going down the driveway, the knife on the stair, then on the bed with her. The figure puts the flower on the bed, then disappears, and this is all repeated again. She goes downstairs to nap in the chair, waking to see The Man (Alexander Hammid, also directing) upstairs with the flower, putting it on the bed, and after a mirror breaks, he enters the house again. One of the final shots sees the woman sitting at the table with two replicas of herself. This may not be as gory or disturbing, this dreamy film is certainly just as original as Un Chien Andalou or Eraserhead. It may be just under twenty minutes, but the camera angles are certainly effective, the study of psychological and physical reality is quite interesting, and even though I was confused throughout, that I guess is the point, it is an experimental film. Good!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Much Ado About Melodrama
jromanbaker30 January 2023
I was intrigued, perhaps like a lot of people to see this short film so highly rated by ' Sight and Sound ' that it got sixteenth place as one of the best films ever made. Thanks to invaluable YouTube I have watched it, and frankly I was disappointed. That it maybe there for female creativity is valid, but stepping back from that and after watching seemingly endless shots of keys coming out of a mouth, and a darkly veiled figure with a blank face ( an all too obvious mirror filling the blankness ) I wondered why this horror/psychodrama/melodrama has received so much attention. No spoilers but the ending could be seen a mile off, and the one virtue of the film for me was that it was short. I do not deny certain images of beauty, but sixteenth place as the best of all time is in my opinion an exaggeration compared to Bunuel's ' Un Chien Andalou ' which richly deserved that prestigious place. Or come to think of it Kenneth Anger's outstanding ' Fireworks ' made when he was a teenager. I maybe wrong about this film, but in all honesty I do not want to see it again. As for the use of a knife endlessly seen Bunuel would have used it once and it would have been a shocking revelation. I had no such revelation with ' Meshes of the Afternoon. '
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Experimental Revelation
BottleGourdPlant12 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Postwar American experimental cinema was primarily founded on the creative endeavors of Maya Deren. Her psychodramatic narratives highly influenced works of the era and continue to influence contemporary filmmakers.

Deren and her husband, Alexander Hammid, collaborated in making MESHES OF THE AFTERNOON (1943, written by Deren), the preeminent experimental film of the day (and arguably today). With a "nonrealistic spatial and temporal continuity"* and an innovatively skewed narrative, Deren and Hammid produced a film radically different from the traditional Hollywood narrative, forcing viewers to defamilarize themselves with perceptions of what movies "should be" and delve into the vast unexplored terrain of unconventional cinematic expression.

Unlike most surrealist or avant-garde films that present many unconnected images and non-linear strings of events, MESHES OF THE AFTERNOON wields a solid narrative despite repetitions, temporal lapses, and ambiguity. While the images and events in the film are indeed subjective, the film unfolds whilst producing cumulative meanings.

Topically, the film might appear pretentious and self-indulgent; however, when looked at closely, it presents rich commentaries on the duplicity of persona, self-reflexivity and the constraints of femininity as a nameless woman (Deren) travels through various subjective interludes. These interludes build off each other and are understood in their entirety when juxtaposed with what was seen previously (like a narrative). For example, two props are continually displayed, a knife and a key. Upon deeper (psycho)analysis, one might see the knife-like phallus as a symbol of power, and the key – an object that is "stuck" into a hole to "open" something – a symbol of discovery. The woman's manipulations of these two objects can be seen as her frustrations with her reality as a wartime woman where the privileges of power and discovery were limited by the default of gender. The eventual death of the woman at the end of the film is her penalty for experimenting with forbidden masculine privileges, a scenario reminiscent of the systematic exclusion of women from the work place after men returned from the war. Deren's almost prophetic understanding of this situation is brought to light in MESHES OF THE AFTERNOON.

Deren's experimental narrative approach to film-making is arguably one of the most commonly explored facets of cinematic experimental possibility. When it is realized that these types of films were virtually non-existent in the United States prior to the 1940s, the magnitude of influence Deren imposed upon American avant-garde film-making is understood in its entirety.

*Bordwell, David and Thompson, Kristin. Film History: an Introduction. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautifully horrific.
andysevenfold2 April 2020
Meshes of the Afternoon (1943) is a 14 minute short film directed by Maya Daren, who also stars as the film's lead. It is a surreal horror movie that tells the story of a woman who comes across a flower, deliberately laid in her path by a hooded figure. She takes the flower home with her and smells it, breathing in its poisonous aroma. The unnamed woman then falls asleep and starts to experience vivid dreams that may just well be reality. Who was the person who gave her this flower? What was their motive? This short film is one of the best short films I have personally seen up to now. It was creepy and the imagery was, at times, terrifying. I'll definitely be watching more of Maya Deren's filmography.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Enthralling
Her-Excellency12 October 2020
I generally do not watch pre-1970 films. Simply, FOR ME, the ones I have watched do not live up to what I have been assured to expect from them. Mashes of the Afternoon, however, was simply enthralling.

One of the major, and jaw-dropping revelations to me, was how a 1943 film had such small, but sublimely sensual parts in it; and the way they were meshed with a reverberating sense of dread, was just genius.

While some who have reviewed it seem to believe it is practically seamless in its continuity, this is the only area where I found fault in it. I find it choppy at times and wish so ardently that the married duo who created it would have fine-tuned it JUST a tiny bit more so that instead of being the practical masterpiece that it is, it would have been perfection. Then again, everyone's a critic, right?

A must-watch, and clocking in at ~15 min., there are not many films like this.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a key to something
Quinoa19847 May 2015
What does the key mean in this movie? That may sound like one of those questions your film professor would (smugly?) ask of you after seeing it in class, but I'm serious - what might this mean? Or does it mean anything? The thing with surrealist films, especially when they're short like this, is the matter of: do you question what you're seeing, interpret them, or let the images wash over you? Meshes of the Afternoon has a little more narrative than some other avant-garde short films - compared to Brakhage it has the formalism of John Ford - but there's plenty of mystery and wonder to be seen here, even with the filmmaker pointing out: 'Hey, it's just a dream... OR IS IT?!'

A woman comes home (Deren, also the co-director), and falls asleep on the chair. We know this, and that she is likely dreaming, because of the way the camera pulls back from looking outside and seems to be inside of a circular tube. It's a fascinating device to bring the viewer into a dreamscape. Even with the knowledge that we're in surrealistic terrain from here-on out, the opening of the film still carries an eerie, abstract quality to it - we really don't get a good look at the woman's face at all, just her feet in the sandals walking up to the house and going inside, her legs and body, but not her face.

I have to think that this is intentional and goes towards what others have pointed out, with Meshes being a movie about identity, about who a person (or especially what a *woman* is supposed to be). But like all strong and masterful surrealists, Deren and her collaborator also know that they shouldn't have to, and should not really, tell anything what is really going on. Sure, it could be about identity. It could also be 'about' any number of things: what does a dream 'mean' to you, if you are seeing multiple you's, or crawling up a wall, or holding a knife, or suddenly, when all seems to be "back to normal", crashing away the image of a husband with the knife into shards of glass on a beach. Yeah, that happens here.

So much to take in in just under 14 minutes, and Deren fills the frame with deliciously shot, terrifying images. There's reason this has been touted over the years (and even preserved by the Library of Congress), since it deals in rich textures of the Home (in capital 'H'), and Deren herself is quite a figure to behold, with her big hair and face that is confused and kind of sexy (intentional or not, though there's also big black clothes, a correlation with the 'Figure in Black' with the Mirror face as well). There's certainly, if one can read anything concrete, feminine about the experience of Meshes of an Afternoon, and maybe it's just so personal an experience that it may mean different things to men and women alike.

The wonder of the film, why it lasts, is that you can leave it open to interpretation, and a figure in black or seeing yourself on a couch, or being on a beach with a knife, these are striking images that are rich enough to be impactful. At the same time, the filmmakers are cognizant of how to compose a shot, and more importantly how to keep shots moving along. Unlike some other avant-garde/experimental/surreal shorts, this is not a chore to sit through, and it's not "pretentious" either. It's bizarre, awesome art.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Forays into the Subconscious
Screen_O_Genic19 June 2020
A woman enters her domicile with lots of shots of her nice manicured feet as she witnesses a knife, vertigo, a shrouded phantom with a face of glass, a strange man, the sea, falling asleep in her couch, sensual arousal, etc., as dream and reality blur into a finale of tragedy and summation. Shot in black and white this is one of the better and successful shorts from the wartime period that touches on Freudian immersions with a storytelling flair for drama and enigma. Maya Deren's most noted artistic effort the film assured her place among experimental female directors and is an interesting historical artifact in avant-garde cinema.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Like a dream: weird and short
AvionPrince1616 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The short in my opinion is open to theories and reflexions. I think all people who watched it have an idea or imagine about how the short is all about . I found the visuals pretty good and really make us feel in the character 's mind and desire . I found it pretty good and really like the "mise en scène" . A nice short movie anyway.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant
gbill-748776 April 2021
Dreamy, poetic, and enigmatic. It's stunning to think this was made in 1943; it feels decades ahead of its time. The shrouded figure with the mirror visage is an all-time great image, and the soundtrack to this film fits its mood perfectly. For just 14 minutes, it's remarkable to me that I can watch this again and again and see different things, or better put, endlessly interpret it. It's just a stunning piece of artwork.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Self-sabotage, guilt, and regret
rwbeee67491 March 2016
Cinematic art like "Meshes of the Afternoon" has no single definitive meaning, but rather scores of meanings that differ from viewer to viewer.

To me, the most telling symbols in the film were:

  • the bread knife, a possible phallic symbol which moves seemingly on its own and evokes a feeling of encroaching danger


  • the ominous black figure with a mirror for a face (part of the subject's consciousness, perhaps her future self, like the Ghost of Christmas Future)


  • the phone left off the hook (desires and intentions left unsaid and unfulfilled)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mysterious and wonderful.
punishmentpark22 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A wonderful short film that I stumbled upon via a little gif on Tumblr (the key turning into a knife). This a dark, artful piece about a woman who is / gets caught in a time-loop. The outcome is that she is finally found dead (suicide, probably) by a man, most likely to be her lover. One could interpret her going round and round in circles in more than one way, I suppose. My main idea is that, while she is dead, her soul / ghost is trying to figure out where it / she is. Or what it / she is, namely dead. Just my two cents, though. It also reminds me of the later giallo genre, at certain moments, especially when Maya Deren's face is reflected in the blade of the knife.

Even without a perfectly reasonable explanation, one can still enjoy all the wonderful and mysterious, but at many times quite eerie, imagery of some Hollywood apartment block (inside and outside) knives, stairs, (broken) mirrors, black robes, keys, and such. The soundtrack, the original one by Teiji Ito, is just as wonderful, with some soothing acoustic guitars here and there, but also with a lot of haunting voices and percussion.

For now, a big 9 out of 10. Note to self: watch more work by Maya Deren (and what a beauty she is, by the way)!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A view of marriage
pontifikator7 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Meshes of the Afternoon

There are spoilers in this review/analysis. I'm not sure that's a fair statement given the nature of the movie, but I do give away the ending.

This is an experimental movie by Maya Deren and her then-husband Alexander Hammid. It was made in 1943 and has no recognizable plot or symbols. Much of the action is repeated with some changes. Generally, a woman goes into a home, looks around the rooms, and seems to commit suicide. It's hard to tell, though. We see her repeatedly enter the home, but there are differences each time. She appears to chase a figure that is cloaked in black and has a mirror for a face, but she fails to catch the figure and goes into the home instead. The woman repeats certain actions with a key, but the actions are varied. There are views of a knife, first in a loaf of bread, then on a bed. A long-stemmed flower (which seems to be fake) is placed into various scenes, once by a manikin arm, once by the figure cloaked in black, once by a man. We see the woman fall asleep in a chair, but sometimes her eyes open and she sees the figure in black, sometimes her eyes close. She may or may not attack the man; she may or may not kill herself. All in all, we may guess that she's dreaming the repetitive scenes but there's no clear demarcation between what's real and what's a dream, and there's no clear explanation of what any of it means.

What does the movie mean? We don't know. I think it's clear that Deren and Hammid vested the movie with themselves, that the film is an autobiographical self-portrait, but I think they've purposefully used symbols that are not clear. This is an interesting approach to art, because I think it reflects that we can never fully know another person, and perhaps we can never fully know ourselves. So by purposely refusing to use recognizable symbols, the artists here have hidden themselves from us, leaving us room to explore the work with our own fund of experience.

My take on the figure in the black cloak is that it represents death. With a mirror for a face, when you look into the face of death, you see your death. The man who puts the flower onto the bed is less obvious. He goes upstairs as we've seen death do, so the repetition may tie them together: the man represents death, but not necessarily physical death. The man awakens the woman, and she has the knife in the bed with her, placed there by death.

Other scenes deal with a key. There's a key necessary to gain access to the home, but the key is in other scenes as well. There is a series where the woman is seen sitting at a table; two other versions of her come in, so we see three versions of the woman at the table. Each version picks up the key, shows it in her palm, then the key reappears on the table for another version of the woman to pick up and display. However, the third time the scene is played, the version picking up the key has a palm painted black, and the key becomes the knife. Is the key the knife or is the knife the key? I can't tell.

Ultimately, we come to the scene where the man comes home and instead of heading upstairs to where the wife is sleeping he finds her in a chair with blood shown on her throat, which appears to have been cut. Is the man death? Her death? Is her relationship with the man literal death or figurative death?

The man is portrayed by Hammid, and the woman is played by Deren. Is the movie a reflection of their marriage? Of all marriages between men and women (at least in 1943)? Does the woman give up her life for the man? That will be my interpretation. That the home represents the place where the woman dies, figuratively speaking. That the man represents the death of that woman as an individual. The key to the home represents the knife with which she ends her life -- the key to the home is the instrument of her death as an individual. There's an old saying that through marriage a man and a woman become one, and that one is the man.

This is an interpretation which is personal, and I think "Meshes of the Afternoon" not only invites personal interpretation but requires it. The viewer must bring his or her own fund of experience to the viewing and must use that experience to fund the ambiguities purposefully put into the film. "Meshes of the Afternoon" ensnares us into providing our own meaning if we are to find any meaning at all. Others will surely disagree with my interpretation because they bring a different fund to the film. I'm not sure Deren and Hammid would have a problem with that. And neither do I.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Experimental not my cup of tea
Horst_In_Translation16 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first short film from notable experimental film maker Maya Deren. She was still in her 20s when she wrote, directed and starred in "Meshes of the Afternoon" and got help from her then husband Alexander Hammid in all these areas except writing. It runs for 14 minutes and is entirely black-and-white. Nobody's talking, but it is not a silent film. It's obviously a story about dream and reality and the boundaries between these two not being always very clear. To me, the most interesting thing about it is probably that it was made in the US during World War II. Now if you know a bit about film history, you will know that, at this point in time, especially the American cartoon and war documentary industries were really booming. So these 14 minutes are something entirely different compared to the latest trends in movies back then. However, I have to say I found it boring and don't have the slightest need to rewatch this anytime soon. The depiction of death was pretty nice and so were Deren's look. Still not enough, not recommended.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed