Lawyer Man (1932) Poster

(1932)

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Just a small-time mouse trying to be a big-time rat."
utgard1410 August 2014
William Powell plays an ambitious bush league lawyer who goes to work for a high-class law firm, taking along his trusted secretary Joan Blondell. It isn't long before Powell's clashing with a corrupt political boss and getting involved with the wrong women. When things come crashing down for him, Powell vows to become successful no matter what tactics he has to use.

Enjoyable Pre-Coder from Warner Bros with nice work from Powell and the always dynamite Joan Blondell. She's great here, throwing in one snappy rejoinder after another. Kinda hard to believe anybody would look twice at another woman if they had sexy young Blondell as an option, but perhaps that's more my personal taste. The supporting cast is nice. The script is fun, though nothing groundbreaking. It's all pretty simple and familiar stuff but well-done and entertaining.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
With "bad girls" Claire Dodd and Helen Vinson - what more could you ask!!!
kidboots17 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Tony (William Powell) is a lawyer of the people with an eye for the ladies. Olga (Joan Blondell) is his secretary and conscience. Granville Bentley (Allan Dinehart), a corporation lawyer, sees him in action and offers him a partnership. Babs (Helen Vinson) Granville's sister is also interested. Gilmurry the D.A. (David Landau) wants Tony to come into his organization as well.

Ginny (Claire Dodd) needs help - "that's what happens when a smart lawyer gets mixed up with a dumb blonde" - she has love letters from a certain doctor - she wants to bring a breach of promise suit against him or at least sue him for thousands of dollars or does she???? Of course she calls on Tony and plays him for a sap. Bentley, meanwhile urges him to leave it alone and dissolves the partnership, Babs refuses to see him and Gilmurry thinks he's a "washout". He is determined to prove them wrong - he is going to play "dirty" - no job will be too demeaning. "a small time mouse planning to be a big time rat"!!!

An elderly man comes to see him - he has a case against Gilmurry but no lawyer will take it. Tony does and wins a settlement out of court. Gilmurry is impressed and makes him Assistant District Attorney. Tony then gets some information on the doctor - he has been defrauding the city. The end of the movie sees Tony going back to where he started - to the little people that need his help.

Helen Vinson was on hand as Babs Bentley, the sister of corporation lawyer Granville Bentley. She was always at her best in brittle, society "bad girl" roles - occasionally she would play a warm hearted "good girl" like Helen in "I Was a Fugitive From a Chain Gang" and proved she could handle these roles easily as well.

Claire Dodd, in my opinion, was the most memorable bad girl of the 30s. She started out as a showgirl in films such as "Our Blushing Brides" (1930) and "Whoopee" (1930). For me her two stand out films are "Footlight Parade" (1933) where she plays Joan Blondell's old "friend" and "Roberta" (1934) as Randolph Scott's snooty fiancée. Both films have some classic one liners. In "Lawyer Man" she plays Ginny.

Sterling Holloway also has a small scene as Olga's bar buddy who tells her exactly how things are. Allen Jenkins and Jack La Rue play two of Gilmurry's henchman who can be bribed with cream cake!!!!

The music is nice too, including hits of the day - "Say It Isn't So", "I Guess I'll Have to Change My Plans", "If I Could Be With You" and "You've Got That Thing".

Recommended.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Corruption uptown
TheLittleSongbird27 March 2020
Really liked 'Lawyer Man's' premise and thought to myself quickly that this had potential to be a great film. Have loved Joan Blondell and especially William Powell in other films and was interested to see how Powell would fare in a role quite different for him. William Dieterle wasn't one of the greatest directors in my view and some films were better (much better in a few cases) than others, but his best work was absolutely great.

'Lawyer Man' was not quite great. Two thirds of it actually to me was great and extremely entertaining, one third not so much when things got less plausible. Dieterle did do better, as well as worse, films but 'Lawyer Man' is a solid representation of him. Same goes for Blondell, who was nearly always was a bright spot in her work, and for Powell, who always gave it one hundred percent and had a commanding presence in everything he did.

Both Powell and Blondell are great here. Especially Powell, whose suave charisma, easy-going charm and intensity really shines in a type of role that people wouldn't usually associate him typically with. Blondell is pert, lovely to watch and has a good deal of energy. They gel very well together. The supporting cast are solid too, although generally the supporting characters themselves could have been better fleshed out. David Landau plays his crook with a heart sort of character without over-playing or looking bored. Dieterle makes sure that the energy and intrigue doesn't slip.

It has a slick, professional look and much of 'Lawyer Man' goes at a lively pace, having a good deal of content without cluttering and it doesn't feel padded. Two thirds of the story is hugely compelling with lots of tension and intrigue and little obviousness, further benefitting from a sharp script with a surprisingly cynical edge on politics and legal ethics handled thoughtfully and not in a preachy way.

Sadly didn't think that the final third was as good, where credibility is pushed and strained to the limit. The pace also didn't feel as tight.

Also felt that the film ends a little too patly and pretty predictably and it is a shame that the supporting characters are not developed enough, most being there as mainly plot devices.

Overall though, well worth seeing for namely Powell. 7/10
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I guess I'll have to change my plans
blanche-225 August 2011
That song, mentioned above, played throughout the film. William Powell is "Lawyer Man" in this 1932 film also starring Joan Blondell, Allen Jenkins, Helen Vinson, and Claire Dodd.

Powell plays Anton "Tony" Adam, a lower east side attorney with a small practice. He comes to the notice of a higher-priced attorney who invites him to become a partner. His secretary (Joan Blondell) of course goes with him. But Adam runs into trouble almost immediately when he takes a breach of promise case. The case is merely a setup by the corrupt political machine to frame him. Adam is thrown out of the partnership. On the face of it, he decides that if he can't beat 'em, join 'em. Actually, he has something else in mind.

Powell is very good, but he's too uptown to be a lower east side lawyer. The role was more suited for other contract players, such as Jimmy Cagney or Humphrey Bogart. Blondell is great as a secretary who's smarter than her boss, in love with him, and can see his mistakes before he even makes them.

William Powell is worth seeing in anything, even something he's not quite right for, and Joan Blondell is always a delight. This was probably a B film as it's pretty short.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
He's A Moving Way Uptown
bkoganbing24 August 2011
Lawyer Man casts William Powell as an attorney with a storefront practice on the Lower East Side of New York where he makes a living of sorts defending indigent or close to indigent clients for meager fees. But he's got talent and white shoe lawyer Alan Dinehart invites him into his firm even though Powell has gotten on the wrong side of political boss David Landau. Helen Vinson who is Dinehart's sister also takes a shine to Powell.

But Powell also has actress Claire Dodd doing a number as well on him with a phony breach of promise suit that lands Powell in one big jackpot. Only faithful secretary Joan Blondell stands by him.

This to me was obviously a film that was meant for James Cagney and Cagney probably turned it down. Powell was a guy who did belong on the Upper East Side with the white shoe firm, Cagney would have been perfect casting as the fish out of water.

Joan Blondell is always good and there's a nice performance by Allen Jenkins as a hood who Powell defends and who later comes through for him in an hour of need.

Despite miscasting Lawyer Man is still a decent film though it will never be on the top ten list of films of William Powell.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Joan Blondell Is A Highlight
atlasmb30 August 2021
"Lawyer Man" pairs William Powell and Joan Blondell. That, in itself, is enough reason to see this film about a downtown attorney, Anton "Tony" Adam, who aspires to something bigger, but is unfocused about exactly what he wants. Joan Blondell, in one of the ten film releases of 1932 that list her in its credits, is a real joy as Olga, the secretary who tries to keep Tony on track and out of mischief. She has her hands full, because Tony has an eye for the skirts and a good left hook.

When Tony's natural talents as an attorney land him in an uptown office, he still struggles to keep his nose clean. And he never notices Olga's personal feelings for him.

In 1932, Blondell was not married yet, but only four years away from her second marriage, to Dick Powell. Seeing her in this pre-Code film is a real treat, though she could have used more on-screen time.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amusing
gbill-7487731 December 2019
Just an average pre-Code film, this one about corruption in New York politics and the legal system, but elevated because of William Powell (the streetwise lawyer who isn't afraid to take on the system) and Joan Blondell (his plucky secretary who isn't afraid to chastise him for his various indiscretions). Part of the amusement is Powell's wandering eyes; he ogles women walking by, unwittingly leers at Blondell's legs while she's getting her shoes shined, and even seems to admire the backside of a small statue of Lady Justice after turning her around on his desk. While admiring the svelte form of a beautiful actress sitting in front of him with her plunging neckline (Claire Dodd), he slowly tilts his cigar upwards in his mouth in a mock erection, which for 1932 cracked me up. Blondell is adorable, showing her frustration and devotion to Powell and tossing out lines like "I smelled trouble the minute that long blonde started throwing those bedroom eyes on you," but she isn't given enough to do. The setup to the film was decent enough, but it meanders around while trying to pit Powell against the corrupt local boss (David Landau), a character who isn't strong enough considering his position. There isn't enough edge in the plot relative to the depiction of corruption, and not enough clarity to make it a strong drama or romance. It's mildly entertaining though, and of special interest because it was the only time Powell and Blondell worked together, two actors I'm fond of.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent film made all the better by another solid performance by William Powell.
planktonrules2 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is a pretty good little picture from Warner Brothers. However, it's a good bit better than it should have been thanks to another solid and thoroughly enjoyable performance by William Powell.

The film begins with Powell playing Tony Adam--an attorney who works in the poorer section of New York with the common folk. However, he's very ambitious and have visions of power and fame--and this seems reasonable as he's a very, very good lawyer. However, he gets on the wrong side of the wrong guy and soon his career is on the skids. When Tony is eventually able to rebuild his practice and is actually hired as the Assistant District Attorney, he's ready for a bit of justice--and revenge. But can he buck the same political party that appointed him? And what of the hoods that no doubt work for these folks? And, on the personal side, what about his long-suffering secretary who is head-over-heels for him (Joan Blondell)?

In addition to Powell, Blondell is quite good. However, the highlights of the film involved Powell's interactions with two thugs, Allan Jenkins and Jack La Rue--and you just have to see these portions of the film to see what I mean. Enjoyable and well worth seeing.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good legal precode in the Warner Brothers tradition
AlsExGal18 June 2011
This film moves too fast for introspective angst or art design to be an issue, so if you want that go watch an MGM or Paramount film of the period. Instead the film focuses on rapid fire dialog and keeping the plot moving. What makes this one a cut above most films of the early 30's are the players, in particular the dapper and charming William Powell as East Side lawyer Tony Adam and brassy Joan Blondell as Olga, his secretary who wants things to be more than they are between herself and Tony. Sparks do fly from time to time, and when they do it just doesn't quite work on the romantic level - rather like picturing James Cagney and Myrna Loy as romantic leads in a film.

When the film opens Tony is a lawyer with a hole in the wall office on the East Side of New York City. He's defending neighborhood hoods and ripped off struggling businessmen, but he wants more - he wants to be a big shot. He gets what he wants and then some and the film shows his trek through the ups and downs of an uptown practice, his run-ins with the corrupt political boss of the city that can't decide if he wants to hire Tony or rub him out, and the high society ladies who use him and lose him along the way.

The final speech by Tony as he makes a crucial career decision will have you going huh?? where did that come from?? as there has been no indication that Tony is learning anything from any of this up to the last two minutes. Still it's enjoyable to see darts flying from Joan Blondell's eyes and William Powell unruffled in the the face of bullets, ballots, or blackmail. I'd recommend this one to anyone who enjoys the precodes, and in particular the fast moving WB precodes.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting because of William Powell; better than the typical 1932 flick
vincentlynch-moonoi8 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I have mixed feelings about this film.

On the negative side, it seems to wander around for a very long time before we get any idea of where it's heading.

On the positive side -- William Powell. There are a few actors (Jack Nicholson and Clark Gable are examples) who are interesting to watch...even in bad movies...although this is not a bad movie (it's not great, but better than the typical film in 1932). William Powell is another of those actors. Someone truly special. And it's interesting to watch him here. Another thing interesting here are the scenes of New York City...real scenes...not staged.

One thing to watch for, sort of early in the film, is what he does with his cigar when he meets a lovely lady. Definitely pre-code! However, there is also a sense that in today's standards, Powell's character would be considered uncouth in the way he looks at women.

Another thing notable about this film -- particularly if you are familiar with traditional pop -- is the score. Quite a few familiar tunes throughout the film.

Joan Blondell is quite good as Powell's sdcretary...who is clearly also in love with him...and wins him in the end. David Landau is fine as one of the crooked bosses, albeit one with a heart.

The question really is -- does this film truly make sense. The ways things go back and forth between good and evil and Landau being sorta good and sorta bad...well, I'm not quite sure it all makes sense...but it is fun!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK if you don't care too much about making sense
RickeyMooney29 December 2021
William Powell is a brilliant small-time lawyer on the Lower East Side who seems to specialize in defending sleazy characters. You pretty much have to take his brilliance on trust since although in the courtroom scenes we're treated to shots of clocks ticking, calendar pages dropping, and anxious faces of the participants, we never actually hear any legal oratory. Imagine, say, a Perry Mason show where we don't hear any witnesses or legal arguments, just the verdict.

When Powell gets small-time punk Allen Jenkins off for some unspecified misdeed, to blaring front-page headlines of course, his legal adversary, wealthy Park Avenue lawyer Alan Dinehart, is so impressed he asks Powell to become his partner. Why this crook was being prosecuted by Dinehart rather than the D. A. is a bit of a mystery.

Powell, whose moral compass seems to swing 180 degrees every few minutes, is bitterly opposed to crooked political boss David Landau, who seems to run all New York City but does nothing to Powell but whine, grovel and beg him to join his team. A bit less ruthless than you'd expect.

There are various twists and turns ahead but by now you get the idea. There's not so much a plot but a string of episodes supposed to convince us of Powell's legal genius which we never actually see on display in the courtroom.

There's also Joan Blondell in a familiar role as the loyal secretary whom everyone in the world but Powell can see is madly in love with him, and both Claire Dodd and Helen Vinson, a bit of overkill, in their typical roles as amoral sexy blonde man-traps. For a two-fisted cynic who worked his way up from the streets, Powell's character has all the savvy of a five-year-old in dealing with women.

Strong cast, snappy dialogue, fast pace, but a bit hollow at the core. Slightly racy in parts but not real hard-core pre-code. You know the type.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Perfect Storytelling
1930s_Time_Machine16 November 2022
You are actually there in the shabby but vibrant and welcoming streets of late 20s New York. This film makes you feel at home there. It's a beautifully crafted movie filled with warmth and likeable characters you can care about.

The story isn't one which will make you think about the meaning of life or question the point of your own existence, it is a simple straightforward piece of entertainment. Although on paper, a story about an idealistic lawyer almost getting corrupted by the big bucks but trying to stay loyal to his principles to fight the absolutely shocking corruption in the local government might sound a bit heavy, this manages to keep it light, positive and will put a smile on your face.

1932 was such a strange year for movies - there's this with its natural, realistic performances - people you can believe in and feel you could get to know whereas there are others - many of which are much more well-known with the biggest stars in Hollywood acting like cardboard cut-outs with the vocal eloquence of your sat-nav. No such issues with this, it's no great piece of art but it's great entertainment. There's even a couple of minutes featuring the guy who eventually became Winnie to Poo!

Joan Blondell's part in this is quite small but because Powell is so charismatic and commands the screen, even her biggest fans wouldn't actually mind. Although she doesn't have any real impact on the story, she is the vital ingredient adding sunshine and exactly the right amount of smiles and wisecracks. Her heart must have sank when she got this script: Oh no, she must have thought, not another wisecracking, sexy secretary again.... but nobody else could do what she did with such innocent charm and saucy sweetness.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sometimes the mouthpiece goes a little too far, and in this case, he swallows his words.
mark.waltz21 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The dashing William Powell was hot in 1932, and with this as well as two classic romantic teamings with Kay Francis, all was right at Warner Brothers for him. It's a shame that his roles seemed to be more of the Warren William variety than what he would find later on at MGM, and what seemed promising for him at the start ended up being only a very short stay at the Hollywood studio known for making some of the grittiest films in the business.

Like movie lawyers of the time, he's a sharp cookie who gets a bad reputation for winning practically every case, so his enemies all gather around him to tear him down. Secretary Joan Blondell is there by his side every step of the way, obviously so in love with him to the point where she basically mothers him. Dinner partner Sterling Holloway reminds her of how he warned her about falling in love with the boss, but that doesn't stop Ms. Blondell from being jealous of practically every female client who comes in. His enemies utilize a beautiful actress to destroy him in a false breach of promise suit, and before long, Powell is persona non gratta. He's found drunk in a bar, but before long, he's back on his feet again, obviously having more than just luck and the talent of fighting a good argument. Has he really learned anything? Probably not!

Even if the story really isn't so hot or truly believable, this is Warner Brothers precode at its raunchiest, filled with witty lines and an excellent script. So having style over substance in this case does make it better, as does the presence of a fabulous array of Warner Brothers' best talents. Helen Vinson and Claire Dodd add gritty beauty to the proceedings, while Blondell's eye-popping close-ups make her unforgettable. This year alone, she had ten films out, and as a result, was considered one of the hardest working actresses in Hollywood. She doesn't have her usual share of wisecracks, but she's still excellent. David Landau is also a memorable villain. While this is far from the champagne that Powell would find in his MGM roles, it ain't quite Schlitz, either.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
lawyer man
mossgrymk24 May 2023
This is one of SIX films director William Dieterle churned out in 1932 and it shows. The whole thing has a hurried, slapdash quality, perhaps to hide the fact that there's not much going on beyond William Powell's charm. Subsidiary characters beneath Powell and Joan Blondell are either stock or dull or both while the story is on the slim side. There is alarmingly little explanation given in the occasionally amusing but mostly empty screenplay as to why Powell would fall for Helen Vinson's padded lingerie (the female version of a stuffed shirt) or why he would suddenly see the light at film's end and renounce his corrupt Tammany Hall sinecure. And in perhaps the biggest of the film's lapses the great Blondell, easily Powell's equal as a comic actor of genius, is given little to do beyond slow burns, a stray wisecrack or two (basically Powell's leavings) and the even rarer sexy smile. Give it a C.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining WB 30's film
Dfree5220 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I just saw this in a local theater retro series of Pre-Code Hollywood films. I always liked Warner Brothers films of this era, be they hard hitting gangster or social dramas or fun musicals. Though there are serious issues touched on here (political corruption in the judicial system) it's handled with a light touch. William Powell is good as the title character Anton 'Tony' Adam and Joan Blondell is bubbly as his secretary/love interest Olga.

Since the movie is a scant 72 minutes, things move along well, but you do get an episodic feel overall. Another 10 minutes could have fleshed out or explained a few plot points. And is it me or were Helen Vinson and Claire Dodd, two gals the skirt chasing Tony tangles with, twins? They kept popping in and out of the plot and it took me a few seconds each times to figure out who was who. Both were blonds, which doesn't help matters.

For the Pre-Code curious there are two comical suggestive bits. One being Tony's case of mistaken identity as he's gam watching. Another, how his cigar reacts to a prospective tryst with Dodd.

Possible Spoiler Alert....

One reviewer mentioned here a lack of chemistry between Powell and Blondell and I lay the blame of director William Dieterle, who did a fine job overall. Olga pines for Tony, warns him of his womanizing but waits hopefully for him to make the first move. One kept waiting for her to storm into his office (as she does often) hop onto his lap and let him know how she feels. She never does.

When last seen, Tony and Olga go back downtown, so Tony can champion the cause of the downtrodden. And they are happily arm in arm. It suggests they are now a couple...but one passionate kiss would have made their relationship clearer.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Powell light court drama
SnoopyStyle30 July 2021
Anton Adam (William Powell) is a little guy lawyer in a poor part of New York with his secretary Olga Michaels (Joan Blondell). Most of his clients don't even speak english. He is surprised when rich lawyer Granville Bentley offers him a partnership in his firm. He gets entangled with devious actress Virginia St. Johns in a case against Dr. Gresham.

There is a lot of plot going on with an hour long movie. That's the length in those days but the flow feels rushed. I want more chemistry between Powell and Blondell. They need time to develop. They need more time for everything. It's a lot of twist and turns. It's also all Anton's own fault falling for a pretty blonde when you already have a pretty blonde. It's a fine pre-Code light drama but it's not excelling.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
William Powell Leaves The Lower East Side
boblipton29 July 2021
William Powell is a Jewish lawyer on the Lower East Side -- he speaks to someone in Yiddish briefly in his orotund stage tones -- who makes the transition uptown (?), along with loyal secretary Joan Blondell. He's a great court room lawyer, but hasn't learned that you can't fight city Hall.

I don't think Powell is well cast -- I have the feeling that it was originally planned as a vehicle for Edward G. Robinson -- but he acquits himself well in this role as he almost invariably does. Director William Dieterle does his usual fine job, and cameraman Robert Kurrie, who was the regular cameraman for Powell's Warner Brothers starrers, does his usual job, with a lot of side lit womens' calves on view. Kurrie had become a lighting cameraman for Metro and Louis B. Mayer in the late teens, but shifted to First National in the middle of the 1920s, pausing to shoot RIO RITA for the fledgling RKO. Adept at the dark lighting and odd camera angles that would evolve into film noir, his career was cut short when he died of meningitis later in 1932, at the age of 42.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
POWELL SHOWS HIS LEGAL METTLE...!
masonfisk5 February 2022
An early William Powell quickie from 1932. Powell is a lawyer trying to make ends meet working alongside his acid tongued assistant, played by Joan Blondell. When a high end law firm makes an offer to him to become partner, he jumps at the chance & soon starts bringing in the money w/his gift for gab & his penchant for winning cases. Trouble then comes in the form of an actress who claims she was abandoned causing her prenup to be in jeopardy (she provides Powell w/love letters to buttress her case) but when he's sued for filing a fraudulent case, after the actress, via a phone call, pleaded for him to drop the suit (the letters going missing doesn't help either). Luckily Powell gets a hung jury & as he builds himself back up, he gets a berth as an ADA but when he brings charges against the ones w/framed him, a judgeship is dangled for him to drop the suit. What will he do? As w/another of Powell's 1930's output, the film suffers from a surfeit of plot stuffed into a 70 minute sausage which commands the viewer's undivided attention but since everything is quickly brought up & carted away, the whiplash of the narrative soon starts to wear one down. Look for Sterling Holloway, the future voice of Winnie the Pooh, as a drunk at a bar.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This film is carefully crafted by the always eponymous Warner Bros. . . .
oscaralbert14 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
. . . to warn America of her final Death Throes due in January, 2020. LAWYER MAN shows viewers that the so-called U.S. "Justice" system is riddled with loopholes, exceptions, and contradictions chiseled into "settled law" to solely protect the interests of Corrupt Fat Cat Communist Corporate One Per Centers. Initially "honest" attorney (what an ironic oxymoron that is!) "Tony" starts out representing the "Little Guy" against "The Machine" during this offering from the prolific Warner Bros. prophetic prognosticators, However, the local mob boss (pulling all the puppet strings of the region's government) "Gilmurry" immediately co-opts Tony's brains, just as the current White House occupant has done on the national level Today. Then, as Now, anyone drawn to the "legal" profession, "law" enforcement, or military "service" knows that they are just a KGB President's pardon away from being excused for any blatant Crime against Humanity which gives them personal jollies to commit. (Occupations which once were passed down many generations with pride are now an international laughing stock and source of ridicule for their empty hypocrisy.) Just as next month's U.S. Senate Kangaroo Court "show trial" will be a meaningless exercise in blathering, LAWYER MAN warns young Americans to steer clean of the criminal-creating "legal" profession!
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Double takes galore in this early look at city politics and the law
SimonJack17 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
William Powell was a master of the double take. I can't think of any actor who used it more often or better for comic effect. In "Lawyer Man," he must have done a dozen or more double takes. They range from the obvious scene stoppers of a knowing look on his face and turn of the head, to more subtle light pauses with a stern or amusing look as if to catch a breath. We see the first big one in the opening scene when he is stepping out of his office building onto an open market street on New York's East Side.

An iceman is delivering a block of ice and is entering the building with it over his shoulder. Powell's character, Anton Adam, says, "Good morning, Jake. How's the ice business?" Iceman, "Not so hot." Powell pauses a second and turns his head toward the iceman who has passed him in the doorway. There's no way the audience could miss the humor of the dialog with Powell's double take that allows just enough time for it to sink in. One might say the double take multiplies (doubles) the comedy of the lines.

This movie isn't billed as a comedy, and one can see why. It's one of the earliest films about city machine politics and corruption, and shady aspects of a political justice system. But, this drama and crime movie has a good dose of comedy. It's mostly in Powell's character, rather than situations. This is the story about a New York East Side (of the 1930s) lawyer who makes good and moves up to Park Avenue.

Adam has been in the East Side defending the poor and the down and out for some years. He is well known and liked in the neighborhood, and by the cops and by others in his profession. He then tackles a case that beats the political machinery. That starts him on a rise and track of prominence. After a double-cross by the machine connections, his reputation is hurt among the high-class set. So, he starts over defending low-life criminals and others. But now he takes some shady cases and charges them accordingly. He has become a shyster, in his own words. There's nothing in the film that indicates he did anything illegal himself, but that he was defending a lot of people who were shady operators and getting them off. He wins and builds himself back up.

When he gets appointed assistant district attorney, he comments about being back on the right side of the law. Indeed, Anton Adam's character seems to have high ideals about justice. In a very early scene, he turns down a case from a man who he says must come to justice. When the man leaves and Adam's secretary comes into the office, Adam says of the guy, "Just a small-time mouse trying to be a big time rat."

Joan Blondell is Olga Michaels, Adam's long-time and faithful secretary and confidant. She's crazy in love with the guy, but keeps her composure, and he doesn't know it until toward the end of the film. Adam has one weakness, which we see in his glances at pretty women. It's likely more in his head than in practice, though, because when he gets with an attractive stage performer, he is shy and awkward.

Olga knows his weakness, and some of the humor of the film is when she brings him up short for it. An exchange between the two sums up the situation. Olga, "I worked for a successful man once, and you know why he was a success?" Anton, "Sure, because you worked for him." Olga, "No! 'Cause he left the dames alone." After the double- cross, Olga says to Anton, "That's what happens when a smart lawyer gets mixed up with a dumb blonde."

The supporting cast in "Lawyer Man" are all very good. David Landau is especially good as John Gilmurry who runs the local political machine. Alan Dinehart plays Granville Bentley, the Park Avenue attorney whom Adam beats in a big case and who then invites Adam to be his partner. Claire Dodd is very good as Virginia St. Johns and Allen Jenkins plays a usual heavy or hooligan role as Izzy Levine.

This is a very good film that most adults should enjoy. Here are a couple more favorite lines from the movie.

Olga, "Who's gonna take your case?" Anton, "I am. I know. I have a sap for a client."

Olga, "Remember, I told you about taking these cases against those big uptown lawyers. They got too much pull." Anton, "Yeah, well I got a lot of push."

On a historical note for younger generations, the iceman was a common site in America before the mid-20th century. In the years before electric refrigerators, the iceman delivered blocks of ice to homes that had iceboxes. The lady of the house would use an ice pick to chip the ice block into pieces to fit in the top of the icebox. The term "icebox" continued to be used for decades, referring to the refrigerator. More than a few early crime movies had murders committed with ice picks. I doubt if one could be found in a 21st century home.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fighting the Good Fight
view_and_review12 November 2023
William Powell is best when he's involved with the law, whether it's as Philo Vance or William Foster ("For the Defense").

In "Lawyer Man" Powell plays Anton 'Tony' Adam, a smalltime lawyer on the Eastside in New York. He represented everyday folks who didn't have much money. He was honest, upright, and he was really good. His biggest flaw was his weakness for women, and his secretary Olga Michaels (Joan Blondell) told him as much.

Tony rose to prominence by winning some high profile cases. As a result he was made a partner with Granville Bentley (Alan Dinehart), a big shot lawyer downtown. He was on top of the world and could've remained there so long as he didn't cross the wrong people. His undoing would occur after he won a case and humiliated John Gilmurry (David Landau), a bigwig in the political machine. Crossing Gilmurry was risky business. One could do it, but then he'd have to be very careful from then on.

Tony wasn't careful. He took a case from Virginia St. Johns (Claire Dodd), the beautiful mistress of Judge Gresham. She was setting him up and he didn't know it because he couldn't see past Virginia's legs and plunging neckline. She double crossed him and he fell hard. His name was mud. He lost any and all respectable clients and was forced to represent the shadiest characters. He'd have to start over from the bottom and avert his gaze from pretty legs if he was to ever climb back to the top again.

"Lawyer Man" was a righteous movie showing the lasciviousness of the political machine and the potential pitfalls of lusting over women. Both things are an issue, but I'd say the former is far worse than the latter.

The movie features two of my favorite actors from that era: William Powell and Joan Blondell. William Powell grew on me. The first movies I saw him in I couldn't stand him. I'd only seen him playing the ladykiller ("Ladies' Man," "Man of the World," and "The Road to Singapore"). It wasn't until I saw him play Philo Vance and some other non-playboy characters that I liked him. He and Joan carry this movie and do a fine job.

2.99 on YouTube.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
POWELL IS JUST FUN TO WATCH
tcchelsey28 July 2021
No matter what character he was assigned to play, William Powell was truly the actor's actor. LAWYER MAN came a few years before the iconic THIN MAN series he was to star in, but the mechanics of a fine actor were already in place. Here Powell plays an up and coming attorney with his eyes on the prize, and the age-old message attached, 'be careful what you wish for..." Joan Blondell, likewise a versatile actress, and well used by Warner Brothers throughout the 1930s, plays Powell's 'devout' secretary and gal pal. Their teaming was exceptional as they played off each other quite well, and it makes you pause for a moment... had it not been for Myrna Loy, how Blondell would have done in the THIN MAN films. Bottom line, one terrific actress. All the other Warners alumni are here, if not all the familiar faces, including Allan Jenkins. A must see for all of us movie buffs who have to catch a real oldie every now and then. Habit forming, too!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Was this before our Mr. Powell learned to be likeable & filmmakers learned about character consistency?
zacdawac13 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
William Powell's character, Anton Adam, is a noble lawyer, working to help the poor and oppressed. Then, he's an opportunist, doing what's necessary to advance himself, regardless of morality. Then, he's a would be gangster's would be puppet. Then, his nobility, coupled with his need for revenge, compel him to turn on the gangsters. Then, he becomes a gangster's lawyer again. Then he heads back to his world of being a noble attorney for the poor. Not once do we see a traumatizing reason or driving motivation for these character alterations.

In between, Anton presumably jumps on every attractive female that breathes, while his loyal and doting secretary, who is admittedly in love with him, looks on and accepts. It's not openly stated that he has intimate relationships with the women he encounters but it was a pre-code film and all the implications were there.

The head presumed gangster hates Anton. Then he loves him. Then he hates him again. Then he embraces him. Then he looks the other way while Anton moves on.

The girlfriend of another would be gangster seduces Anton so he can help her get a breach of promise settlement. Then she returns to her boyfriend and helps him set up Anton for a huge fall.

I give the film six stars because of some quick, witty dialogue, because it is essentially enjoyable to watch if you don't examine it too closely and because Joan Blondell was never so adorable and loveable. Of course, Joan's character was also rather inconsistent. While she was sharp, funny, smart, tough and right on top of things, she also sat there and watched the man she loved pursue every other woman that walked in his site. I was going to say every beautiful woman but there weren't any unattractive women in this film, even in the background. I guess every woman in New York looked like a model, in 1932. Too bad hardly a man is now alive who can relish in these sweet memories.

Overall, I'd say watch this film if it's there and you have eighty minutes to kill but don't expect much beyond the superficial. And some funny lines. And Joan Blondell at her sweetest.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Breezy And Unconvincing
GManfred17 October 2012
A Pre-Code movie that would be G-rated by today's standards, "Lawyer Man" is entertaining and good fun but should be billed as a drama/comedy, if you can imagine such. It moves very quickly as its star, William Powell, goes from honest, hard-working lawyer to shyster and back in 72 easy minutes. The problem is that, apart from Powell, all the other characters are two-dimensional, and are seemingly there for Powell to bounce lines off. David Landau, especially, was criminally wasted (no pun intended) as the 'big boss' and king-maker. Despite his role, he was likable while enduring endless insults from Powell. Most men in his position probably would have had Powell 'rubbed out' early on.

That said, there is a lot to like in this picture. First off, there is Powell himself, elegant and dapper while miscast as a lower East Side lawyer representing lower class shlubs. There is also Joan Blondell, in her customary role as the torch-bearing secretary overlooked by Powell. There is Alan Dinehart, an excellent 30's character actor with a part that was too small for his talent. Despite the seriousness of the plot, much of it is played for laughs. In one amusing scene, two hit men turn soft in a goofy confrontation with Powell. Throw in some laughs via Blondell wise cracks, and you have a basically good-natured movie which I would rate a seven.

P.S. Do you like old standards? This picture has some of the best you can hear nowadays on the soundtrack, played in the background by a 30's band.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strong Cast Makes Film Worth Viewing
Michael_Elliott9 September 2011
Lawyer Man (1932)

*** (out of 4)

Nice little "B" movie from Warner about lawyer Anton Adam (William Powell) who moves up the ladder once he shows he's not afraid to take on a crooked political man (David Landau). At first Adam is riding high but he's double-crossed by an actress (Claire Dodd) secretly working for the political man and soon he loses everything but he's got one shot at redemption. LAWYER MAN isn't anything ground-breaking and you're certainly not going to spot it on any lists of the greatest films ever made but if you're a fan of the cast then there's quite a bit here to enjoy. I think the best thing going for the picture is the performance by Powell who once again comes off very believable in the part. He certainly comes across smart enough to where you can believe he's this intelligent lawyer but he also got a certain charm that makes you like him and there's just a dignity that the actor brings to the role. He's surrounding with a great supporting cast including Joan Blondell who plays his secretary who also has a crush on him. Landau nearly walks away with the film as only he can. That certain toughness that he brings the character but he isn't tough in the same way Cagney or Bogart was. Instead, he's more laid back and quiet about the whole thing. Dodd is nice and sexy in her few scenes in the picture and Allen Jenkins is his usual fun self playing a tough guy. The screenplay itself really doesn't offer us anything we haven't seen before but I think it builds up a nice character with the main lawyer. There's a certain integrity that the character turns out to have and this here really makes it all the more fun to see the events play out.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed