The Sealed Room (1909) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A classy mix of horror and melodrama
jluis198420 July 2007
After not having much luck at selling his screenplays to the new movie industry during the first decade of the 20th Century, in 1908 playwright D.W. Griffith got the job that would make him a legend: he was hired by the Biograph Company as a director of movies. It wasn't really what Griffith had expected when he decided to enter the movie business, but he accepted the job, and in less than a year he became Biograph's most successful director thanks to his original approach to film-making and the wild inventive of his narrative. Many years later, he would direct "The Birth of a Nation" in 1915, the movie that would revolutionize film-making and make him one of cinema's first recognized authors; however, a lot of what would make him a great filmmaker can be found in the many short films he made for Biograph Company in the early years of his career. 1909's "The Sealed Room" is one of those, and also one of the few horror movies of that very first decade of the 20th Century.

"The Sealed Room" is a story set in the 16th Century in which a Count (Arhtur V. Johnson) has built a windowless room in his castle. It is a small yet nice and very cozy room, as it is meant to be used to enjoy the love and company of his wife, the Countess (Marion Leonard) in a more private way. However, the Count doesn't know that his wife is not exactly faithful, as she is infatuated with the Minstrel (Henry B. Walthall) at Court, with whom she is having an affair. As soon as the Count gets busy with his own business, the Countess calls the Minstrel and both lovers go to enjoy the Count's new room. When the Count returns, he discovers she is missing and begins to suspect, finally discovering the two lovers in his room; but instead of making a scene, he prefers to remain hidden as he decides that there is a better punishment for his unfaithful wife: to seal the windowless room with the couple inside.

Written by Griffiths' regular collaborator Frank E. Woods, "The Sealed Room" takes elements from Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" and mainly Honoré De Balzac's "La Grande Breteche" to create a haunting Gothic melodrama based on the themes of treachery and sadism. Despite having a runtime of 11 minutes, Woods' screenplay develops the story in a very good way, and plays remarkably well with the horror elements of the story. While a melodrama at heart, Woods focus on the character of the Count and his sadism creates one of the best horror characters of these early era. "The Sealed Room" is definitely a very simple and basic story, but Woods handling of the dark and morbid thematic of its plot makes the story a very entertaining film that was very different than most Griffith's melodramas.

In "The Sealed Room", Griffith uses his talents to experiment with tension and suspense in a different way than his usual. While he often played with editing to create thrillers that excited his audience, in this movie his focus was to create desperation and horror, playing with the inherent feeling of claustrophobia that the source stories had. It is interesting how the story starts as another of his melodramas and slowly the pacing becomes faster as the horror themes begin to dominate the plot, culminating in his great use of editing for the final scenes. Not being a movie where camera tricks are essential, what shines the most in "The Sealed Room" is Griffith's talent to direct his actors, as the legendary filmmaker manages to bring the best out of his cast with his usual natural style far removed from the staginess that was the norm in his day.

As usual, the cast was comprised of usual collaborators of Griffith, starting with Arthur V. Johnson as the Count. Johnson gives a great performance and truly conveys the character's transition from loving husband to sadistic monster. His performance is not without a touch of overacting, but actually that adds realism to the character's exaggerated personality. As the Countess, Marion Leonard looks very good and is also very effective in her acting, conveying a natural charm that makes hard not to sympathize with her in her treachery. Finally, the legendary Henry B. Walthall appears as the handsome Minstrel, and while far from being one of his best performances, he manages to give a proficient acting that also adds a nice touch of comedy to the film. While not of real importance to the plot, it's nice to see other members of Griffith's stock company in the background, like his wife Linda Arvidson and a young Mary Pickford as nobles at Court.

While not exactly a masterpiece, "The Sealed Room" is a notable exercise of editing to create suspense and tension like Griffith used to do in those days. The movie has very good set design and while of a very low budget, Griffith's care for details makes it look very convincing and works perfectly along with his directing style. The change of focus to horror makes it to stand out among other of his films from that era, and Johnson's performance as the sadistic Count makes it worth a watch. While Griffith will always be remembered for his highly influential (and controversial) "The Birth of a Nation", the early short films he made before it really give a good idea of the development of the techniques and the style that would make him a legend. Simple yet elegant, "The Sealed Room" is a fun movie to watch and one of the few horrors of the first decade of the 20th Century. 7/10
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A historic look into early film making.
kfo949413 October 2013
When viewing this short film remember that this is 1909, the infancy of movie making, where they filmed most films in two days with one set camera. The movie making industry is about to boom and by 1915 this film will look ancient compared to the way the movie will be made in just a few years.

In this short and simple film, a king sets out to make a private room for him and his queen to have private time from everyone. It was a room that was constructed in the corner of a hall with no windows and only one entrance. But it seems that the queen has eyes for the court minstrel and when the king accidentally finds them in the private room being sweet on each other he sets up on sealing the only entrance to the room.

While watching there will be things you have to take for 'film-sake'- like when the wall is being sealed yet the queen and her lover seem not to hear the commotion that is only a few feet away or when they fall to the floor and they go out of sight due to the fix camera shot. These are all part of 1909 regular film making. Watch the film for the historic value and also see the progress movies made in just a few short years. A well preserved film, by D W Griffith, that will not disappoint.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Some Famous Names In The Background
ccthemovieman-130 April 2008
I found it interesting that two very famous silent film stars, actress Mary Pickford and director Mack Sennett, had supporting roles in this D. W. Griffith silent film. To add another famous name to the mix, the screenplay was based on an Edgar Allen Poe novel.

Yes, this short film looks creaky but it's one year short of being 100 years old, so you can't expect much as far as a big-budget film. It's hard to relate to much at all, actually, because movies were only 10-20 minutes long at that time anyway, and since there was no sound, the actors acted more like mimes.

Since "talkies" were still almost two decades away, even the silent actors hadn't quite got their acts down yet. You can see the result: insane overacting and wild, crazy facial expressions - actually laughable at times. But, hey, it was 1909. I find it amazing we still have the opportunity to look at a movie this old, and appreciate the fact it's available.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An early lesson in claustrophobic cinema
Steffi_P30 May 2008
This period melodrama is one of Griffith's earliest claustrophobic films. Characters trapped within a room are prevalent throughout his work and, as time went by, he would become increasingly adept at portraying their helplessness and involving the audience in their terror. In the bluntly titled Sealed Room there is one major difference to the normal plot line, in that there truly is no escape.

Griffith achieves the claustrophobic effect here in two ways. First is his use of space. While the typical Biograph short might utilise a dozen or more sets, The Sealed Room features only two adjoining rooms – the king's court and the dove cote that becomes the eponymous tomb. The set design in these shorts is rarely referenced, but here it is crucial. The court is a large interior, with a backdrop hinting at greater depth and showing us a window and a staircase. Actors enter and leave from various directions, suggesting the room is not only spacious but also free and open. By contrast the dove cote's back wall is very close to the camera, and the angles in it suggesting a hexagonal or octagonal shape make it seem even more confined.

The second technique on display here is the cross-cutting. Anyone with an interest in Griffith's work will probably know about his heavy use and development of cross-cutting to build excitement or tension. Many will also know that strictly speaking it wasn't his invention. However what makes Griffith's cross-cuts so effective is the way he paces the opposing images so they complement each other. The Sealed Room contains a good example of what I mean. The shots of the masons shifting the heavy bricks have a slow, step-by-step pace to them, with tension building as the wall gets higher. This movement is matched by the shots of the blissfully unaware lovers, in which Marion Leonard tears off flower petals one-by-one. As the couple realise their predicament, their rising panic is complemented by the opposing shot of the king madly thrashing his sword against the wall.

At this point, Griffith was yet to realise that the action could be heightened further by introducing a third strand to the cross-cut. The dramatic "ride-to-the-rescue", here absent, was later to become a standard climax to Griffith's pictures.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Decent Rendering of the Familiar Idea
Snow Leopard5 August 2004
There are enough positives to this short feature to make it a decent rendering of the idea of "The Sealed Room", familiar from a number of horror stories. The leading performers all give plenty of energy to their performances, and for the most part they are believable. Among its best aspects are the scenery and the costumes, which make the general atmosphere convincing. The physical limitations of the sets and the fixed camera field do, though, somewhat hinder how well the "sealed room" effect can work.

The story is simple, and at one or two points its plausibility is rather strained. But it is the kind of macabre tale that holds your attention in spite of yourself. There have probably been other versions that were more effective, but this one tells the story clearly and efficiently, and it works reasonably well.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Griffith masters the art of suspense
ackstasis25 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
By 1909, D.W. Griffith had been directing films for the Biograph Company for about a year, and – working at a rate of two or three per week – was rapidly beginning to develop his skills as a filmmaker. 'The Sealed Room' is a very interesting 11 minute short, a fascinating piece of Gothic melodrama that even drifts slightly into the realm of early horror. The simple narrative was probably inspired by Edgar Allen Poe's 1846 short story, "The Cask of Amontillado," and concerns a powerful king who conceives a deliciously sadistic form of revenge to punish his wife's infidelity.

Set in medieval times, 'The Sealed Room' begins with the king (Arthur V. Johnson) overseeing the construction of a windowless room from a sequestered dove-cote, the idea being that he and his wife (Marion Leonard) will have a completely private place to enjoy each other's company. He is obviously very much in love with her, always showing his affection, this latest act the crowning achievement of his endearment. However, unbeknownst to the king, his wife has fallen in love with the royal minstrel (Henry B. Walthall). During one romantic liaison inside the specially-built room, the wife and the minstrel are discovered, and the heartbroken king conceives a means of getting his retribution on the ignorant couple. Silently, he orders his workmen to seal off the only doorway with stone and mortar, slowly descending into cackling insanity as each new stone is placed down.

D.W. Griffith always had an eye for acute detail, and 'The Sealed Room' is an excellent early example of this. The lavish medieval century costumes lend the film a sense of reality, and the castle interior looks authentic enough to be believable. At the time, the director was also pioneering methods of creating suspense, and I must admit that, as the film progressed, I became fixated on finding out what would happen to the hapless young lovers. In the early minutes, Griffith restricts his shots to lengthy long-takes from a stationary camera (as was usual at the time), but soon – parallel to the progressively darker subject matter – he alters his editing tactics in a fascinating way. Though he may not have invented the technique, Griffith was crucial in popularising the use of "cross-cutting" – that is, alternating between different events occurring at the same time. Not only does this create a sense of continuity, but it also maximises the level of suspense, since we, as the audience, are well aware, not only of the king's ghastly actions, but also that the wife and the minstrel are oblivious to it all.

Despite these innovations, 'The Sealed Room' suffers from many of the shortcomings typical of the era. The entire film takes place in just two rooms, with footage captured from a total of just three positions, and so it is prone to become dull and monotonous at times. The acting performances are greatly exaggerated for extra effect, however, at least in the case of Arthur V. Johnson, his overplaying actually contributed to recognising the escalating madness of the betrayed king. A moment that I thought particularly effective was when the two lovers attempted to exit the room, only to find their only doorway replaced with a wall of solid stone. Their panicked reactions, accompanied by the silent maniacal cackling of the king, serve very well to create an impending sense of claustrophobia. I did think, however, that their supply of oxygen was exhausted surprisingly quickly.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Early Horror Flick
JoeytheBrit2 September 2010
This is quote an enjoyable early Griffith film in which he once more makes good use of cross-cutting to create an escalating feeling of tension. Based on an Edgar Allan Poe story, the film efficiently sets the scene as we see a deliriously happy king having all but one of the doors to his love nest sealed so that only his beloved can gain entrance. However, all is not quite as blissful between the king and his beloved as we might expect. Just look at the way the minstrel's lute playing becomes increasingly frenetic each time the king and his squeeze embrace. Sure enough, the moment he's out of the room, his girl and the minstrel are in each others arms.

It's quite interesting to chart the increasing sophistication of films as the 20th Century approached the end of its first decade. The sets are still stagy, but they are more realistic than only a few years before, and the costumes in this period piece are surprisingly realistic. Future stars are also beginning to make an appearance: Arthur V. Johnson, who plays the King here, was one of Griffith's first, and Mary Pickford, who has a bit part in this film, would soon replace Florence Lawrence as the Biograph Girl.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Jealous
jeff-2016 November 1999
One of Griffith's early Biograph films about a king who becomes enraged upon seeing his lover with another in her room. Clever, and mostly interesting for its historical value, this short film is quite entertaining and should not be passed over if you a get a chance to see it.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sealed with a Kiss
wes-connors19 August 2007
Early film directed by D.W. Griffith; it features a gloriously happy King (Arthur V. Johnson) and his Queen (Marion Leonard) - but, wait! When the King leaves the scene, his Queen makes music with the palace's Minstrel (Henry B. Walthall). When the King discovers the lovers, he decides to enact a horrific Edgar Allen Poe-type revenge. It's difficult to believe the lovers can't hear those plotting against them; although the actors are trying to look alternately noisy (the lovers) and quiet (the cement mixers). The sets make "The Sealed Room" look very staged. The performances are okay, and the story is easy to follow.

*** The Sealed Room (9/2/09) D.W. Griffith ~ Arthur V. Johnson, Henry B. Walthall, Marion Leonard
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Look ma, no dialogue intertitles!
AlsExGal25 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
There are a few title cards saying what is happening, but the actors do everything by pantomime. There is no dialogue transmitted to the audience. The credits talk about a count and countess, but the opening title says it is a king preparing a room for his "favored one", I assumed mistress. The initial room has windows, and the king has the masons brick in the windows, and yet the mistress seems thrilled. Why no windows?

The next title says "after the festivities", with no clue as to what those festivities are. The mistress is quite brazen. She is flirting with the minstrel when the king and a bunch of witnesses are in the room. When he discovers them together in the room he bricked in for her, the king brings in three of the quietest masons in the history of the world, because as the mistress and minstrel are carrying on in her special room, he has them brick in the only exit and yet they hear nothing. Then the king does something weird. He has the masons executed. It is rather like the slaves who carried the princess to her tomb in "The Mummy" being killed so they could never say where the tomb was.

The dying scene has got to be seen to be believed. The mistress and minstrel discover that they are trapped and in a matter of minutes are dying of asphyxiation. The minstrel dies last, gulping like a fish. So they are both dead even though the candle that they brought into the room is still burning, so there IS oxygen in there!

You'd never guess that the director of this, D.W. Griffith, would direct Birth of a Nation just a few years later and revolutionize the film industry. But then we all have to start somewhere. The only actor of note today is probably Henry B. Walthall as the minstrel, who had a career into the talking picture era. There are a couple of legends among the extras. There is Mack Sennett, producer of early comedies, as well as Mary Pickford, and her future husband Owen Moore.

On costume design - the king's mistress has a dress on that is similar to contemporary styles of the time, rather than the medieval dress that the men are wearing. You can certainly spend some time going through this and looking at the art design. I'd recommend it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cool variation on the Poe tale
planktonrules12 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Had this movie been made a few years later, I would have given it a lower score. However, for 1909, this was a dandy little movie and still stands up pretty well today. Just don't try to compare this silent film to later silents--the industry changed so radically that the shorts of the first decade of the 20th century don't look at all like movies made in the 1910s and beyond.

This movie is 11 minutes long (about average for most films back then) and is a variation of the Edgar Allen Poe story, THE CASK OF AMONTILLADO. While many are familiar with the story, I won't elaborate further as I don't want to ruin the film. Just suffice to say that it's very creepy!!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good pedigree and worth a look
russjones-8088714 April 2020
The king constructs a windowless love nest for himself and his mistress only to discover her there with the court minstrel.

Based on a novel by Edgar Alan Poe and directed by D. W. Griffith, this short has an interesting pedigree. Add in an early uncredited appearance by the teenage Mary Pickford, if you can spot her, and an uncredited appearance by Mack Sennett and it's worth spending 11 minutes watching it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Campy and fun Early Biograph short
overseer-323 May 2004
This early Biograph short was so much fun to watch. The second on disc one of D.W. Griffith's "Years of Discovery" DVD set (highly recommended) it features three excellent performances by the main leads, and interesting to see Henry B. Walthall (The Little Colonel, Birth of a Nation) as a campy musician giving a Countess the eye (and other things).

The Countess' husband goes berserk at his wife's betrayal and has her walled into a little room with her paramour. It's kind of incredible that they wouldn't hear the wall going up, but hey, maybe the wine had something to do with it. Here Mr. Johnson (father of silent player Raymond Hackett) gesticulates wildly and this adds to the melodrama, but in an unexpectedly comical way. The best moment comes at the end. As the lady passes out from shock and fear, once she realizes she's doomed, Henry picks up his instrument and "fans" it over her. The way he did it was so unexpected and in a strange way kind of sexy, and I just lost it, and laughed my head off. The expression on his face! From that moment I was charmed by Henry B. Walthall.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Griffith and Poe
Michael_Elliott27 February 2008
Sealed Room, The (1909)

*** (out of 4)

D.W. Griffith's version of Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Cask of Amontillado' has a King learning that his wife is cheating on him so he seals her and her lover behind a brick wall. This short film manages to have some nice suspense as well as some very good direction from Griffith who gets everything he can out of the story in such a short running time. The ending is wonderfully wicked as well.

You've got several options when viewing this title. Image, Kino, Grapevine and a couple public domain companies have released it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Well-Done Movie!
marlene_rantz30 August 2016
I loved this movie, and I loved Arthur V. Johnson's performance in it. I have seen him in several movies, and he was always excellent in them. He is described as a "pioneer actor and director of the early American silent film era", but an even better description would be "the first great actor in silent films", and he was certainly great in this movie! I do not think he over-acted: he was required to play a man outraged by his woman's infidelity, and that is how he acted it. Much credit should be given to director D.W. Griffith, and to co-stars Marion Leonard and Henry B. Walthall, who both turned in excellent performances. Considering this movie was made in 1909, I would say it is a superior movie, and I definitely recommend it!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Pretty Colossal Spectacle Showcasing One of the Greatest Actors
IMDBcinephile22 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
D.W Griffith's "The Sealed Room" basically is a variation on Griffith's interest on French-esque settings inspired from his obsession with French Film D'art School.

... Even with that in mind, I personally feel that it had his calibre in concentrating with emotional turmoil and his blueprint of heart filled vignettes in a great state of pandemonium. The human condition is seldom analysed, but the real external floods of it are definitely overt.

Henry B Walthall, famous for the Confederate he played subsequently in "Birth of a Nation" plays a grandiose man and owner of a castle. He is in love with another woman and is in conflict with an interloper who is trying to raid his castle; he is sealed from any physical contact, surviving through hope, love and courage - However way they are integrated, it leaves on an open ending notwithstanding that.

To me this is a quintessential movie to be viewed; the delicate and careful readiness of costume design and interiors, while very worn out, feels valuable to me and every bit of architecture in the movie.

Albeit it lacks suspense, the movie ventures into an amazing Period and Foreign type of Genre, with elements that revive the early cinema novelty.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
And the King makes Three...
mrdonleone8 April 2020
Just the perfect example of an old DW Griffith movie of a king and everything and it returns to add movie history and then you scratch yourself and you wonder what is your doll about the time Billy it's beautiful and things everything done the magnificent behind scenes and you think it's somewhere else adjusting a small thing but you don't know where the king who is listening to music and all those things and it's play It's a wonderful but his great thing that the camera work is wonderful even though it doesn't move much and you still have your alarm and set in dynasty but at the same time you have this is Royal all great things and then the acting is great and wonderful gives the image of a king and all these beautiful things how they should behave and how they behave in all these things to do it intentionally Rita Thorne and all of a sudden we don't know and then all of a sudden of course it is so incredible what we are seeing here right now and then the lack of music makes you want to scream but then for the rest is definitely so that you love your child in the flipping coin of Medusa near so why didn't you don't know if them people making love on this movie and of course and you said what is going on indefinitely and then you have all the intrigue and everything that the great ew Griffith maiden DW Griffith in the town of champion and champion and DW Griffith you don't know they ever play together. The point is of course it's beautiful how this all different kinds of layers work together then of course you can tell it's gone clue that it's a beautiful things with birds flying outside and all this beautiful to set up vendor the props and and all this beautiful about this movie and of course then you come to the conclusion that it is just playing radius in sha Allah Allahu Akbar
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed