The interviews are ruining an otherwise decent approach.
It's unfortunate that this documentary, like many others, is using staged interviews to add superficial depth.
Those interviews are disruptive, their content anecdotal at best, but mainly utterly meaningless.
Tell the story, report what's happended, but spare us the fake personal touch.
It's unfortunate how self-declared documentary creators can't refrain from going for a cheap sympathy vote.
It renders the series unwatchable from a viewing perspective, and dubious in terms of credibility.
Stick to facts, relevant commentary, and relevant interviews where necessary, ideally contemporary.
It's unfortunate that this documentary, like many others, is using staged interviews to add superficial depth.
Those interviews are disruptive, their content anecdotal at best, but mainly utterly meaningless.
Tell the story, report what's happended, but spare us the fake personal touch.
It's unfortunate how self-declared documentary creators can't refrain from going for a cheap sympathy vote.
It renders the series unwatchable from a viewing perspective, and dubious in terms of credibility.
Stick to facts, relevant commentary, and relevant interviews where necessary, ideally contemporary.