The only VHS this documentary explores are basically less than a dozen classics and most the filmmaker and associates' own post-2000 indie movies, including literal trailer and promos!
It's rather shameful and shameless, focusing on a very limited set of people complaining about politics - net neutrality (which in reality concerning prior recent law was a lose-lose scenario and not much to actually do with the topic). This political point was simply a perspective unrelated by any meaningful form or discussion to greater topic.
I felt like I was watching a promo for a handful of super-indie film makers from New York extolling their opinions on political issues (without an sufficient knowledge or discussion on what the net neutrality actually entails). There's even a literal end screen text - hammering a call-to-action to 'Write your congressman and ask them to support net neutrality.' In reality Net Neutrality was not a clearcut simple superficial proposal - at the time is had two serious downsides of the coin, each bad - bad proposal in general. But none of this, the: what, how, where, why of net neutrality (or how it even relates) were discussed, just repeated and focused on in agenda in 'documentary' that is only relevant to the actual filmmakers given air time in their own perspective sans rational discussion or data.
The rest was half-baked filler to seem credible, self-promotion of participants own films and 2 inserts of two celebrities.
Lloyd Kaufman, the most experienced super-producer of trash or lowbrow indies (many that I admittedly enjoy) actually counters much argument of others and provides very logical and rational perspective at a few points on meaningful distribution, file-sharing etc - from an older man, certainly shared wisdom and reality in context. But again, this hardly has much to do with the actually replacement or 'massacre' of VHS. The whole setup was a complaint against and prmo piece for the film's own makers and just another piece of 'net neutrality' promotion at the time. So does this documentary have any lasting, wider objective value - very very little. Very limited maybe 2 points of minor interest.
Does not have intent to seriously focus on topic, but instead spray their own self-promoting media interest. Bad form.
Speaking of the VHS films actually discussed here you basically get some gratuities of Troma (an inclusive attempt to instill credibility and payback Kaufman participation), some early mentions of early 2000s phenom like The Room (2003) and footage of Blockbuster and Hollywood video as a crux of end of videos, which is true. And some basic detail otherwise on a limited scope or genre of VHS.
Again, Joe Bob Briggs is another celebrity harnessed who at one point try to display 'intelligence' and expertise about film stating, to paraphrase, "What is film? What are we talking about here? It is films of the late 1800s? The ethic neighborhood films of the early 1910s(??) or the Lumiere films, or quote "the RIDICULOUS films of 1930-1935 before they had sex in film?"
This last portion of statement shows extreme ignorance (and exposure) of Briggs to the wider pantheon of film! But is also displays the range of this 'documentary,' which speaks of nothing but a very very extremely limited set of VHS media and film - zero international, classic Hollywood or other non-niche horror product, which represented collectively the bulk of movies actually rented or sold to the public. Emperor wears no clothes.
It's rather shameful and shameless, focusing on a very limited set of people complaining about politics - net neutrality (which in reality concerning prior recent law was a lose-lose scenario and not much to actually do with the topic). This political point was simply a perspective unrelated by any meaningful form or discussion to greater topic.
I felt like I was watching a promo for a handful of super-indie film makers from New York extolling their opinions on political issues (without an sufficient knowledge or discussion on what the net neutrality actually entails). There's even a literal end screen text - hammering a call-to-action to 'Write your congressman and ask them to support net neutrality.' In reality Net Neutrality was not a clearcut simple superficial proposal - at the time is had two serious downsides of the coin, each bad - bad proposal in general. But none of this, the: what, how, where, why of net neutrality (or how it even relates) were discussed, just repeated and focused on in agenda in 'documentary' that is only relevant to the actual filmmakers given air time in their own perspective sans rational discussion or data.
The rest was half-baked filler to seem credible, self-promotion of participants own films and 2 inserts of two celebrities.
Lloyd Kaufman, the most experienced super-producer of trash or lowbrow indies (many that I admittedly enjoy) actually counters much argument of others and provides very logical and rational perspective at a few points on meaningful distribution, file-sharing etc - from an older man, certainly shared wisdom and reality in context. But again, this hardly has much to do with the actually replacement or 'massacre' of VHS. The whole setup was a complaint against and prmo piece for the film's own makers and just another piece of 'net neutrality' promotion at the time. So does this documentary have any lasting, wider objective value - very very little. Very limited maybe 2 points of minor interest.
Does not have intent to seriously focus on topic, but instead spray their own self-promoting media interest. Bad form.
Speaking of the VHS films actually discussed here you basically get some gratuities of Troma (an inclusive attempt to instill credibility and payback Kaufman participation), some early mentions of early 2000s phenom like The Room (2003) and footage of Blockbuster and Hollywood video as a crux of end of videos, which is true. And some basic detail otherwise on a limited scope or genre of VHS.
Again, Joe Bob Briggs is another celebrity harnessed who at one point try to display 'intelligence' and expertise about film stating, to paraphrase, "What is film? What are we talking about here? It is films of the late 1800s? The ethic neighborhood films of the early 1910s(??) or the Lumiere films, or quote "the RIDICULOUS films of 1930-1935 before they had sex in film?"
This last portion of statement shows extreme ignorance (and exposure) of Briggs to the wider pantheon of film! But is also displays the range of this 'documentary,' which speaks of nothing but a very very extremely limited set of VHS media and film - zero international, classic Hollywood or other non-niche horror product, which represented collectively the bulk of movies actually rented or sold to the public. Emperor wears no clothes.