7/10
Like the first, only formulated differently... and pretty longer
21 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I first saw the Harry Potter films on television during the seven-day marathon (Deathly Hallows I watched both films in one day) and after watching the first film (which was very good for me) I saw the second film and I could notice that it was the same director (as opposed to the third that was darker than the first two), the film was childish , innocent, naïve, as entertaining as it should be given that the literary template is the same. But unlike the first film the second is longer and has a more complex plot, the very path to Hogwarts is quite long, there are some books through which He Who Must Not Be Named communicates with Harry Potter, some depiction that kills cats and their blood writes some creepy words on the walls, a potion with which the main heroes turn into other people, a big spider that that lovable fool Hagrid breeds , some whiny spirit (I forgeted her name) who talks about a snake and again that snake that makes the children wonder and much more. As for other newcomers, there's also Dobby who's cute and likeable, but can be incredibly toxsic, especially when banging her head in the closet. By the quality of the film is there somewhere like the original, therefore, the level of entertainment is still very high, should be watched.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed