A man who gave all and lost everything :when you return from WW2 and you suffer from amnesia ,what does life lay in store for you?
There are four possible identities, thus the movie is roughly divided into four parts; the film does not pass over in silence the sufferings the amnesiac soldier leaves in his wake: the scene in the restaurant where friends seem to recognize Sally 's husband , the little boy (young Bobby Driscoll ,a child actor who was also featured in the excellent 'the Sullivans") who needs a father so bad ....the fourth part restores balance:The soldier ,who delivers a superb speech , comes to the rescue of the old couple about to sell their house because dad cannot stand the place where his dead son used to live (a deeply moving performance by Sarah Padden as the mother who would like to keep memories of this house so much).
In my book ,the third part in Chicago is less gripping and there's a slight sag in the tension and emotion in "Johnny March's" search ; but by the segment in the Anderson 's house, it's back for good. And the denouement is not what one expects : besides ,considering Johnny's childhood, it's thoroughly plausible.
The following year ,Joseph Mankiewicz would do "somewhere in the night" with an amnesiac in search of his past ;the budget was bigger ,but it was a film noir whereas "identity unknown" is a simple drama.
There are four possible identities, thus the movie is roughly divided into four parts; the film does not pass over in silence the sufferings the amnesiac soldier leaves in his wake: the scene in the restaurant where friends seem to recognize Sally 's husband , the little boy (young Bobby Driscoll ,a child actor who was also featured in the excellent 'the Sullivans") who needs a father so bad ....the fourth part restores balance:The soldier ,who delivers a superb speech , comes to the rescue of the old couple about to sell their house because dad cannot stand the place where his dead son used to live (a deeply moving performance by Sarah Padden as the mother who would like to keep memories of this house so much).
In my book ,the third part in Chicago is less gripping and there's a slight sag in the tension and emotion in "Johnny March's" search ; but by the segment in the Anderson 's house, it's back for good. And the denouement is not what one expects : besides ,considering Johnny's childhood, it's thoroughly plausible.
The following year ,Joseph Mankiewicz would do "somewhere in the night" with an amnesiac in search of his past ;the budget was bigger ,but it was a film noir whereas "identity unknown" is a simple drama.