Ok. So you know how movies can be so bad they're good? This isn't one of those. It's just such a bad movie. I'm from Albuquerque and I wanted to like this movie. After watching it I thought to myself "how could anyone have produced that garbage? How did anyone pay to make that movie?" That writing is lazy and just full of clichés. The plot makes no sense. I mean that in the "real world" the plot makes no sense. There are so many unanswered questions. Why does this drug dealer Rios pay to relocate people? Why is he made about the relocater guy making money on the side by relocating for
Other clients. Why does the relocater just let Deangelo's boys put the girl in the trunk? Why the hell was that girl jogging, in the hood, in Albuquerque, that late during that robbery or whatever? Why the hell does the Florist just kill and not stop? Why was the ending left open for Furthest-est Witness?
This movie is bad. I should give it -3 stars but I like Albuquerque so I gave it 3 stars based on location. The acting is bad, like middle school play bad. Though I suspect it was the script being so horrible, that made the acting terrible too. Maybe the directing was bad.
Please watch the movie and tell me if I got anything wrong in this review. Actually just watch it so I can read other hilarious reviews of it. That movie was a dumpster fire, on a collision course with ten thousand stomped in swamp boxes, on top of a mountain of stink bait. Honestly if this movie was shot found footage style it would have been the worst movie I could have ever imagined. So that is the one good thing. It wasn't shot all artsy and dumb.
Review of Furthest Witness
