Was this supposed to be a film celebrating 100 years of Indian cinema or just a way for commercial film makers to totally write complete crap?
Starting off with Karan Johar's disaster. Dude please stick with the culture. How the hell is this 100 years of Indian cinema? You have a story of a gay boy who beats up his father and ruins a marriage to get to the spouse. Throughout his short film there are numerous sexual references. Like I don't even know why this film was even allowed.
Now Dibakar Bannerjee's story is worth watching. Enough said. You have to see it.
Sheila Ki Jawani was a good story about a boy who just loves dance. Nothing to special.
Murraba is not the best. I mean Mr. Bachan has to eat half of the murraba so the dad can eat the other half? Really?
Overall bad film.
Starting off with Karan Johar's disaster. Dude please stick with the culture. How the hell is this 100 years of Indian cinema? You have a story of a gay boy who beats up his father and ruins a marriage to get to the spouse. Throughout his short film there are numerous sexual references. Like I don't even know why this film was even allowed.
Now Dibakar Bannerjee's story is worth watching. Enough said. You have to see it.
Sheila Ki Jawani was a good story about a boy who just loves dance. Nothing to special.
Murraba is not the best. I mean Mr. Bachan has to eat half of the murraba so the dad can eat the other half? Really?
Overall bad film.