Graffiti & Marginalia
6 February 2011
Nick is a young graffiti artist that spends his days painting in the streets, stealing food and aerosol sprays, and escaping from the police. He has no home, no family, no responsibilities. His whole world is contained and expressed in the elusiveness of graffiti.

Nick has no choice but to eat frugally and sleep on the streets; and neither the constant threat of being captured by the police dissuades him of his ways. As a decentered subject he fits in the role of what Spivak calls the subaltern. The marginal and the subaltern, after all, share much traces in common, chief amongst them the peripheral reality in which they thrive.

When Nick meets Jesse, a boy who is also a graffiti artist, he discovers he may not be doomed to be alone all the time. As one can observe, Nick is the subaltern not only because of his marginalized and maligned passion for graffiti, but also because he lacks a sense of center, he is devoid of those social rules deemed indispensable by most people, he couldn't care less about the law or the symbolic order. Jesse, on the other hand, is still tempting the waters, he breaks the law by painting walls, but he also obeys the law by paying for everything he needs, whether it is artistic supplies or food. Jesse's behavior thus contradicts Nick's imperatives, but despite the differences, or perhaps because of them, the two kids get along fine.

Throughout the film James Bolton provides the viewer only with the most essential visual information, as a result, one can only try to elicit the motivations behind the characters. Why would Nick spend all his waking hours breaking the law and living in miserable conditions to paint a graffiti that will only get erased? What does he truly pursue? When he smiles for the first and only time it is when he shares that which he loves the most, painting, with the only person that has treated him kindly and respectfully. And it is out of respect that Nick restraints himself: he watches his young friend's naked body after he steps out of the shower but stays away from it.

However, one steamy night Jesse tells Nick that they can sleep in the same bed. Jesse gets closer to Nick, and while kissing him proceeds to place his hand under Nick's underwear. This is not only an intense moment in which Jesse masturbates and kisses Nick, but also a statement about the characters. It's Jesse who takes the initiative even though Nick had been interested in him since the beginning. Nonetheless, this reckless act will have serious consequences. Can the two boys remain friends after this experience? And more importantly, should they remain as friends or move onto something else entirely? Is rupture the only possibility? Perhaps Jesse embodies the symbolic castration that is the condition sine qua non to be fully inserted in the symbolic order. Nick, on the contrary, doesn't give a damn about society's demands. He paints because that's what he loves doing and he won't let anyone tell him how to live his life. One can almost feel the sadness and silent despair of the protagonist. What force drives him to keep on doing that which could bring about his downfall? Perhaps it is that as a subaltern he has nothing to lose, while Jesse couldn't possible take so many risks. The final minutes of the film are most revealing about the true nature of the character. Bolton manages to subdue the fierceness of this first homosexual encounter while emphasizing in the elusive beauty of graffiti. A truly notable film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed