7/10
A misfire, but Bruce is cute so it's not painful
31 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I generally like music documentaries, and I generally like Bruce Springsteen, but I don't know a lot about his Darkness album.

I still don't.

This is a documentary about nothing. You get a lot of clichés like the legal dispute over control, and the young angsty artist. What you don't get is even a track list of what's on the album, or any more than one complete song. The film closes with a recent performance of the title track, but that's the high point.

You do get some old film of half-serious performances of songs that apparently were cut from the album (perhaps released later?) but beyond that there's very little else to place this album in context. There's not a history of the era. There's not a history of the man or the band. You don't get an aural comparison of the sounds of Born to Run and Darkness -- you're just supposed to take people's word for the difference. You don't get a comparison of this music with punk, or country, or rock, or pop, or even the follow-up albums.

Here's just one aggravating thing, for example. They go on for a long time talking about the drum sound on the album. They apparently wanted just the drum sound, with no sound from the stick hitting it. But there's nothing to help the audience understand why that's good, or what the difference even is, or whether they achieved it.

If I'm being totally fair, this film is a 6/10, but I think the 1970s-era Bruce is a hottie, so the eye-candy makes up the extra point for 7/10.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed