A man has had his family wiped out by a group of nine assassins and their evil boss. However, you do not see any of this take place in the movie nor do you have any idea what's going on with the missing arm--at least until very late in the film. So, one by one our hero takes on the jerks and their many minions in order to exact revenge (a very, very common theme in the genre). The film is very scant on plot and offers practically non-stop martial arts action.
This was a very big disappointment. While the American title is ONE ARMED SWORDSMAN VS. 9 KILLERS and it does feature Yu Wang, the film should not in any way be considered a sequel to the wonderful 1967 ONE ARMED SWORDSMAN film. The only sequel is THE RETURN OF THE ONE ARMED SWORDSMAN (1969). The differences are many between this 1976 film and the original. First, this guy's left arm is missing--not the right. This was the dead giveaway at the start, though it would have been pretty funny if they had just switched it and kept the original character! In addition, the killer is NOT a swordsman--only using swords on occasion. I think they called him the "one armed swordsman" to cash in on the prior films and I assume the film makers did NOT try this when the film was originally released domestically. The man's primary weapon of choice is instead the "bad martial arts chop"--consisting of a kung fu strike that obviously misses his foes!! In other words, this film is the standard not especially good martial arts techniques film--not a transcendent film from the genre like the original film.
Another huge disappointment was that unlike the brilliant 1967 film, this 1976 film was packaged by an organization that could have cared less about the film or audience. Instead of offering BOTH the dubbed and subtitled versions, this film from VideoAsia only has the crappily dubbed English version and was made directly from a degraded videotape!! Several times, the picture skips and shakes and no effort appears to have been made to bring a decent copy to the customer--making me glad I only rented this thing. Viewers should insist on subtitled versions, as they are almost always better and lack the stupid sound effects and crappy dialog films like you'll find in this film (unless you are looking for a good laugh).
Now if you don't compare it to the original One Armed Swordsman and only compare it to other crappily dubbed American versions of any martial arts film, this one actually is better than average. None of the fighters offer stupid gimmicks (except for the HUGE sword, though such stupid things as fighting gorillas, giant tongues or other amazingly ridiculous weapons are otherwise absent from the film) and while the martial arts used aren't great, they really aren't that bad either. Plus the story is reasonably engaging, there's a funny fight scene with four idiots, it has MANY twists and features a cool surprise at the end. So it isn't all bad news for the martial arts film fan. Just don't show this one to anyone you want to get hooked on the genre--they'll probably laugh at some of the dialog and fighting.
This was a very big disappointment. While the American title is ONE ARMED SWORDSMAN VS. 9 KILLERS and it does feature Yu Wang, the film should not in any way be considered a sequel to the wonderful 1967 ONE ARMED SWORDSMAN film. The only sequel is THE RETURN OF THE ONE ARMED SWORDSMAN (1969). The differences are many between this 1976 film and the original. First, this guy's left arm is missing--not the right. This was the dead giveaway at the start, though it would have been pretty funny if they had just switched it and kept the original character! In addition, the killer is NOT a swordsman--only using swords on occasion. I think they called him the "one armed swordsman" to cash in on the prior films and I assume the film makers did NOT try this when the film was originally released domestically. The man's primary weapon of choice is instead the "bad martial arts chop"--consisting of a kung fu strike that obviously misses his foes!! In other words, this film is the standard not especially good martial arts techniques film--not a transcendent film from the genre like the original film.
Another huge disappointment was that unlike the brilliant 1967 film, this 1976 film was packaged by an organization that could have cared less about the film or audience. Instead of offering BOTH the dubbed and subtitled versions, this film from VideoAsia only has the crappily dubbed English version and was made directly from a degraded videotape!! Several times, the picture skips and shakes and no effort appears to have been made to bring a decent copy to the customer--making me glad I only rented this thing. Viewers should insist on subtitled versions, as they are almost always better and lack the stupid sound effects and crappy dialog films like you'll find in this film (unless you are looking for a good laugh).
Now if you don't compare it to the original One Armed Swordsman and only compare it to other crappily dubbed American versions of any martial arts film, this one actually is better than average. None of the fighters offer stupid gimmicks (except for the HUGE sword, though such stupid things as fighting gorillas, giant tongues or other amazingly ridiculous weapons are otherwise absent from the film) and while the martial arts used aren't great, they really aren't that bad either. Plus the story is reasonably engaging, there's a funny fight scene with four idiots, it has MANY twists and features a cool surprise at the end. So it isn't all bad news for the martial arts film fan. Just don't show this one to anyone you want to get hooked on the genre--they'll probably laugh at some of the dialog and fighting.