I have always say that 6 matches is not enough, but this PPV was little better that last Summerslam and Survivor Series. In many last WWE PPV is so that 2 matches have PPV quality and rest is really decent, sometimes boring. WWE need a revolution story like NWO in WCW, need a icon like Stone Cold or The Rock, need more matches at PPV with good quality. What of it Batista is entertained champion when he is average wrestler in ring. I don't now maybe Brother Of destruction reign in WWE is not bad story (Taker champion in Smackdown, and Kane in Raw). ECW have such a great wrestlers like Sandman, Dreamer (they have ECW gold), more other talented wrestler from Raw and Smackdown and WWE don't now what do with guys like Carlito, Masters, CM Punk, London, Kendrick, Benjamin and Haas, Kane, Matt Hardy and Jeff too, Shannon Moore, RVD, Sabu, Cruiserweight division they all are in my opinion material to a big champion, maybe not entertaining buy for what are writers and story. I hear that Monty Brown name in WWE is Marcus Cor Von - this is a joke or what? Royal Rumble 2007 1. Hardy Boyz vs MNM 7,5/10 match in December was better 2. Bobby Lashley vs Test 4,5/10 boring and decent, and this was ECW title match 3. Batista vs Mr. Kennedy 6/10 when not Kennedy this match could be boring 4. John Cena vs Umaga 7/10 nothing fresh in match but overall really nice feud 5. Royal Rumble match 7,5/10 entertaining like always, really good to watch but nothing special, end was great. And this is end only 5 matches.
Review of Royal Rumble
