Dead on Arrival (2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
34 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Average movie
steven-simon26 March 2018
Watched it because of the high rating, then I realised it was obviously the cast and crew artificially bumping the IMDB score up.

Very average movie all around from actors, casting, premise, dialogue, setting, story progression etc etc

Not worth a watch unless you are really bored!
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
HEYDAYS IN LOUISIANA
ops-5253526 March 2018
I give this film a max of 4 stars,because its a non-impressive and low cost production,with below average acting cast, a complex plot that is rather simple,but it kills itself because its too slow. what i really miss from this louisiana based d-riller is the lack of lousiana dialect in the dialouges,not a single person speaks the good ol' southern sway.not even the local police, nor even the hookers or gangsters does.that is a lousy job. its a film of money,vaccines,poisoning,hookers,fine boats and cars,blood,deceift,crooked police and shadow hals.. whats the 4 stars for? well,nice cinematography and well driven musical score (although not my taste), and some parts of the storys locations are good. wanna see it again,definately not
13 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
You have 24 hours to live, unless the film goes longer
nogodnomasters2 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Sam Collins (Billy Flynn) sells vaccines and is at a debauchery New Year's Eve party of Dr. Alexander (Billy Slaughter) a rich Louisiana client. We know from the first scene he is poisoned and we quickly find out the host was murdered. Sam attempt to find out what happened during what the doctor claims is his last day of life.

Sam wasn't charismatic. He has a family in California which doesn't weigh on his mind. He walks around holding his stomach, not really finding things out, rather the plot unfolds around him. We know the who, but the why was not that clear. Not a well constructed story.

Guide: F-word. Implied sex. Stripper nudity.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible terrible
mickotoole-7746931 March 2018
Plot was week, acting poor. I watched it for the high rating but this movie is muck
22 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No No No No No
contactmaz17 April 2018
Well guys and gals... I usually only post a review if the film is truly awful or really good, never in between. So to give you a clue, this film was not good at all!! The script was crap, the plot was crap, the jokes were bad, the acting was truly bad. I regret wasting my time watching this rubbish and think it's pretty 'fishy' for it to have a current rating of... wait for it... 7.2 (shock, horror). Something is defo wrong here. Maybe 2.7, but no way 7 point something.

Oh yeah, the accents were crap as well!
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No minus ratings on this site.
cliffvose12 April 2018
Gawd what a horrible mess this 'movie' is. After 4 minutes I was hoping everyone died a horrible death. I know I did by watching for six minutes. It has nothing going for it at all. The editing is execrable and the music nauseating. Don't even get me started on the greasy lipstick.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
solid indie
toddrowlestr28 March 2018
Im a fan of the original DOA, the 1950 one. There's nothing like the original really but it kept my interest. I laughed a few times at the bumbling gangsters and DB Sweeney. I thought for an indi it was well done. The swamp shots brought me back... i lived in New orleans for 2 years. Nice camera work and music.
16 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Awful
dwrdnrth16 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This film does not deserve its current rating of 6.5/10. It is awful. The acting is poor the scenario is unbelievable and any attempt at portraying relationships between the characters is totally unconvincing. There is no menace from characters who should be menacing because the script is thin and in any case the acting is not up to the job. It is a waste of an hour and a half
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent Watch
heysallymally30 April 2018
Not so original storyline but good cast and funny punchlines.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Impressive Bayou country visuals and frenetic pacing subsumed by stock Mafia types and less than clever plot resolution
Turfseer26 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Stephen C. Sepher, writer/director and actor in his own film, based his screenplay on the original 1949 D.O.A. starring Edmund O'brien-about a man who's been intentionally poisoned and only has a day to uncover who's responsible for his murder. Sepher wrote the original script for Heist (2015) starring Robert De Niro, but significant portions of it were changed by a subsequent writer-here, however, the script is all his so he'll now have to swim or sink in the face of honest criticism.

The story begins with Sepher's protagonist, one Sam Collins (Billy Flynn), a pharmaceutical salesman who pulls over on a highway outside of New Orleans, in obvious great distress. He's taken to the hospital by a state trooper where he's informed that he's been poisoned with some kind of botulism which has no cure. We then flashback to 12 hours earlier when Collins has been invited to a party thrown by the sleazy Dr. Alexander, who Collins has been trying to obtain a contract with involving his company's newly minted vaccines.

The action turns up a notch when Alexander turns up dead and Collins is suddenly the prime suspect. The good news is that Sepher has done a number of things right including filming in the visually impressive Bayou country, introducing an ensemble cast of colorful characters (the most successful being a psychopathic sheriff's deputy played by a harrowing Tyson Sullivan), utilizing some comedy to flesh out his investigative detectives (the boss continually busts his subordinate's chops over his Armenian heritage) and keeping the pace frenetic which leads to the uncovering of the murderer's identity (which is not completely apparent despite the relatively small number of suspects).

Nonetheless, Sepher's script is not as clever as it could have been. It was explained at a recent Q&A that the Italians have some roots in the New Orleans area which still (I don't think) is enough to introduce a few stock Mafia types to spruce up the action. Here a mafia tough (Anthony Sinopoli) becomes irate over Dr. Alexander's apparent misplacement of his $2 million investment; he's aided by two quirky hit men (played by Lillo Brancato and Sepher himself), who provide some familiar Sopranos-like comic relief.

The plot becomes more convoluted with the introduction of too many female prostitute characters to keep track of. One of them brings Sam to a voodoo priestess who makes an unsuccessful to cure him using an herbal liquid concoction. Both the priestess and the prostitute (the one with the heart of gold helping Sam), meet the same fate at the hands of the psycho sheriff's deputy. A few others get bumped off including a transvestite and another prostitute (whose name I can't recall) who has been having kinky sex with Dr. Alexander's insurance man, Hans Dunkel (an effective Chris Mulkey).

I won't reveal who's responsible for Sam's poisoning and all the carnage, but to suffice it to say Sepher's explanation as to who double-crossed Alexander and the Mafia guy and why, is not all that clever. Furthermore not much is done with the Collins character for that matter either, as we find out little about his backstory (he's mainly seen being chased and collapsing all over the place due to the poison he's ingested earlier).

A further opportunity is lost when Sepher fails to criticize the pharmaceutical industry for its many excesses, particularly in regards to the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Good old Hans questions Sam at the beginning of the narrative about the potential dangers of vaccines but Sepher later leaves us with the Mafia boss's false admonition: "Vaccines don't kill people, people do." Tell that to mothers who receive pennies to the dollar in government created "vaccine courts," following fatal accidents involving their helpless children, forced to undergo vaccine shots infused with a myriad of toxic substances.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
SEE IMDB EXTERNAL CRITICS REVIEWS FOR THIS FILM
gene_boss12 April 2018
This film caught my attention on my cable provider for on-demand. So I looked it up on IMDB and checked out the user reviews and noticed some nasty comments about the film. I decided to also look at the external cretics reviews for the film and noticed twice the apposite critical reviews on the film. I checked out the sources behind the critic reviews and they all checked out legit. I saw the film last night and actually enjoyed it very much, so I guess the critics were right about the film and I have no idea why some people are talking nasty about it. I think I It was an entertaining ride.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Vibrant Colors, Cool Movie
percia-0381310 April 2018
The acting was good, production was well done, good soundtrack. overall good movie
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Really, really bad movie
jeannenora8 April 2018
Terrible acting and stupid, senseless story.
10 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mediocre, that's the best way to describe this
deloudelouvain22 April 2018
If there is one thing certain about the reviews for this movie is that the people that scored it the highest possible are members of the staff that worked on this movie, or at least know somebody that did. Dead On Arrival is just an average movie. The story could have been something if they had put a bit more effort into it. But what brings this movie really down is the acting. Poor if not mediocre, that is the least you can say. The movie starts good though, with some intriguing things happening, but the more you get to the end of it the more you can see that at one point they didn't care that much anymore about making a good movie. So to me it had potential but in the end it failed due to a lack of talent and bad acting.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just awful
darren-abraham22 April 2018
I'm writing this about half way through the movie. It's time I'll never get back. Terrible acting and stupid story. Off it goes.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Intriguing concept marred by a weak script
ginocox-206-33696814 April 2018
Dead on Arrival (2017) has an intriguing premise. An innocent man learns he has been poisoned and has less than twenty-four hours to discover who poisoned him and why. This was the premise of D.O.A. (1949), starring Edmond O'Brien, and D.O.A. (1988), starring Dennis Quaid and Meg Ryan, and has been used in a few other minor productions.

The original film, which I haven't seen, won several accolades. The 1988 remake received mixed reviews, but I agree with Roger Ebert, who liked it. Unfortunately, DoA suffers from a weak script which repeats the superficial elements of the earlier films, but fails to incorporate the elements that made them memorable. Quaid's Dexter Cornell was poisoned because he knew something of no apparent significance. While searching for the truth, he learns that his life is actually much more intertwined with that of a second victim than he imagined. He must work essentially alone, because he becomes a suspect in a murder investigation, but manages to solve a series of crimes which baffled the police. In his final day of life, he experiences more passion than he had in the prior decade.

DoA has none of these deeper elements. Billy Flynn's Sam Collins is poisoned to advance a sinister plot that doesn't seem to have much chance of success. While the bodies pile up all around him, he has no relationship to most of them, other than having met them briefly the prior evening. He doesn't manage to solve the crime. Instead the dots are connected for him by another character. While there is a suggestion that he might survive the poison, he doesn't grow or mature during his final day.

For a film that seems to have been produced on a modest budget, the production values aren't bad. The actors do as well as can be expected with the material they're provided. The performances are probably the strongest element in a disappointing film.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beware of Trolls
cargully1 May 2018
Good movie. Don't decide to watch solely from reviews. Trolls from competition are negatively reviewing to lower rating. Watch for yourself!
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
No plot, no nothing.
S_Saf25 April 2018
Seriously, a Youtuber can make a much better movie these days than this useless thing. It is definitely not a movie, it is just a thing. A useless boring one.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beautiful Scenes
anidemalyal30 April 2018
Loved the locations! Man in the boat was probably the most Louisiana relatable character.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
shyamentdoc3 May 2020
Wasted 1 and half hour of my life watching this crap. F... All movie
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
SURPRISINGLY GOOD
stevefergusonsf26 March 2018
Caught this last night. The ending didn't sit well with me but other than that I thought it was a good movie. I was actually expecting less. My girlfriend is Armenian, love the Kardashian jokes.
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ehhh
rizztotheoh30 April 2018
Storyline kind of drags on with too many plot twists, but that also keeps you guessing on who did it. Nice scenery and music.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uneven Film.
redrobin62-321-20731126 February 2020
Is this a must watch? Not really. There are moments where the film redeems itself with good acting and direction directly followed by poorly scripted and questionable scenes. In the end, it made for an uninspiring drama. Too bad. There were some things to be liked, like the plotting. What really destroyed an otherwise "7" film, though, was bad acting. That element is so important to indie films that it could cause a movie to rise from the "Ho-hum" pile to the "Must See" lists. Unfortunately, as prophetic as it seems, "Dead On Arrival" was dead on arrival. Too bad.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The film is the real poison!
linerider19 June 2020
This film will make you wish that you were dead on arrival! Low budget, C grade trash! The acting is bad, really, really BAD! The story line is lame, unoriginal and as cheesy as it gets! But most of all, it's painfully BORING! What was the point of making such lame trash!?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I created an account to vote this movie
gokhnguler17 April 2021
It's absolutely awful. Senseless story, aimless protagonist, aimless bad guys and so on and so forth.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed