IMDb RATING
5.5/10
5.9K
YOUR RATING
A university research scientist, about to lose funding and status, has a lab accident and discovers he can see people's true intentions -- making his situation even worse.A university research scientist, about to lose funding and status, has a lab accident and discovers he can see people's true intentions -- making his situation even worse.A university research scientist, about to lose funding and status, has a lab accident and discovers he can see people's true intentions -- making his situation even worse.
- Awards
- 7 wins & 6 nominations
Sridhar Maruvada
- Ram Tambel
- (as Sid Veda)
J. Michael Silver
- Van Tromo
- (as Michael J. Silver)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaWhen Dr. Redfield (Paul Statman) pulls Ram (Sid Veda) aside to be sure he will cooperate, Ram's co-worker Medina (ShaiFali) asks what he wanted. Ram responds, "Directions to NAMBLA." Sid and ShaiFali improvised the exchange and it such an unexpected dig on the film's antagonist, the director decided to keep it in the film.
- Quotes
Dr. Jack Sutree: For a minute there... I lost myself.
- Crazy creditsThe end credits celebrate the entire cast utilizing their likeness along with their name and role. Even though the end credits are among the shortest in modern film history, every single person who worked on the film is credited, even the extras.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Starfilm (2017)
- SoundtracksSlavonic Dance No. 12 in D-Flat Major, Op. 72. No. 4
Composed by Antonín Dvorák (as Dvorak)
Courtesy of Naxos of America
Featured review
I enjoyed it
Sure it has a lot of the flaws you expect from this type of low budget film. The dialogue makes you wince a few times as the writer was going for clever and it just sounded clunky coming out of the mouths of the actors. But the acting was fairly solid (with a few notable exceptions, but not where it counts). The cinematography was quite good, and even the "special effects" weren't too distracting. The editing was magnificent, and in many cases that's the key difference between good and bad in films. You don't notice it unless it's done poorly, and in this case, it was pretty much seamless.
Despite is flaws, there was something about the story, and the developmental arc of the characters, that kept me fascinated. I watched it more like I was watching an art project than a movie, and I was able to really appreciate what they were trying to do.
I watch a lot of indie films, and some are definitely horrific (although many of them have some merit buried in there somewhere. This one was definitely worth a watch. Someone had a pretty clever idea, developed it, and managed to work in some thought-provoking philosophy along the way.
Despite is flaws, there was something about the story, and the developmental arc of the characters, that kept me fascinated. I watched it more like I was watching an art project than a movie, and I was able to really appreciate what they were trying to do.
I watch a lot of indie films, and some are definitely horrific (although many of them have some merit buried in there somewhere. This one was definitely worth a watch. Someone had a pretty clever idea, developed it, and managed to work in some thought-provoking philosophy along the way.
helpful•114
- kay_rock
- Oct 30, 2017
- How long is 96 Souls?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- 96 душ
- Filming locations
- Los Angeles, California, USA(Loyola Law School)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 52 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content