49
Metascore
33 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 88Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertIt's not the kind of movie that depends on the certainty of an ending. It's more about how things continue.
- 70The Hollywood ReporterMichael RechtshaffenThe Hollywood ReporterMichael RechtshaffenMoore and Neeson beautifully underplay their roles, lending screenwriter Erin Cressida Wilson's ("Secretary") dialogue an unexpected, palpable poignancy.
- 63ReelViewsJames BerardinelliReelViewsJames BerardinelliFor those who remember Egoyan at the top of his craft, there's no way to represent this as anything less than another disappointment.
- 60EmpireAnna SmithEmpireAnna SmithStrong turns from its female leads and Amanda Seyfried elicits more sexual tension from proceedings than "Jennifer's Body" ever managed.
- 50VarietyTodd McCarthyVarietyTodd McCarthySexual suspicion and game-playing spiral down from the exotically intriguing to outright silliness in Chloe.
- 50Village VoiceJ. HobermanVillage VoiceJ. HobermanThanks to Egoyan's trademark mix of detachment and prurience, the fun is more cheesy than queasy.
- 50Entertainment WeeklyOwen GleibermanEntertainment WeeklyOwen GleibermanThe film is Moore's story, and she acts the hell out of one sexy scene, but most of Chloe is plodding and drab.
- 30The New YorkerAnthony LaneThe New YorkerAnthony LaneThe movie--directed by Atom Egoyan, who should know better--is closely adapted from “Nathalie,” a French film of 2004, with Gérard Depardieu and Emmanuelle Béart, but what seemed like standard practice for Parisians comes across here as unsmiling porno-farce.
- 20Time OutJoshua RothkopfTime OutJoshua RothkopfThis sex thriller is trapped in a tepid zone between quality trash and pretentious psychodrama.