198 reviews
This film isn't fantastic, but it is far from dismal as many people here have made it out to be.
Sure, the premise of the movie is silly, but most of these types of comedy movies are. The film is entertaining and Martin Lawrence shows his comedic talent again.
If you think this film deserves one or two stars, you probably haven't seen enough movies. For a true 1-star film, go see "Going Overboard" with Adam Sandler---I bet you won't be able to watch it until the end.
Black Knight is a pretty good film and I recommend you see it if you get the chance.
Sure, the premise of the movie is silly, but most of these types of comedy movies are. The film is entertaining and Martin Lawrence shows his comedic talent again.
If you think this film deserves one or two stars, you probably haven't seen enough movies. For a true 1-star film, go see "Going Overboard" with Adam Sandler---I bet you won't be able to watch it until the end.
Black Knight is a pretty good film and I recommend you see it if you get the chance.
This is overall a good movie. If you like Martin lawrence you will like this movie. Maybe it was ahead of its time?
I watched this movie as a kid and loved it. Still love it as a 30 year old. The premise is silly, so expect a silly movie. That's what trailers are for.
C comedy movie about A dude from the 2000's who goes back in time to midevil times.... you get what you watch.
I watched this movie as a kid and loved it. Still love it as a 30 year old. The premise is silly, so expect a silly movie. That's what trailers are for.
C comedy movie about A dude from the 2000's who goes back in time to midevil times.... you get what you watch.
- pattie_cakes
- Apr 11, 2018
- Permalink
I actually paid $4.20 to watch this movie, and the only funny things were a few cute lines and that was it. Martin Lawrence tried his best, but he's made far better movies.
And the time. This movie hardly lasted 90 minutes (which is actually a fortunate thing). Usually, movies that short have poor plots and little humor. This movie is no exception.
The idea is so silly. Jamal falls into a pond, trying to retrieve a necklace, and he appears in 14th century England? That sounds like a day dream to me. I guess it doesn't matter to Lawrence, who only wants to degrade people and show how much better he is than others.
Kevin
And the time. This movie hardly lasted 90 minutes (which is actually a fortunate thing). Usually, movies that short have poor plots and little humor. This movie is no exception.
The idea is so silly. Jamal falls into a pond, trying to retrieve a necklace, and he appears in 14th century England? That sounds like a day dream to me. I guess it doesn't matter to Lawrence, who only wants to degrade people and show how much better he is than others.
Kevin
- Kevin Burciaga
- Aug 13, 2002
- Permalink
More annoying than funny, I am hoping that I was not supposed to take Black Knight seriously because it just doesn't make any sense. (I won't even attempt to mention the plot holes because there are just too many, and I think they must have been intentional.) It is all about a black man who mistakenly travels back in time to the middle ages, and while he is there, he makes a mockery of everything. If he was not so annoying, it might have been a decent and funny film. Instead, it just became a film centered around the jokes and antics of a clueless black man playing 'dumb' and doing his best to ridicule everything about the middle ages. It's just too annoying to be funny.
A ridiculous and insulting movie to the Old English History!
At first i found it funny, but then it only Got Worse!
Marsha Thomason's talent is wasted on this Movie. Thomason's "inability" to "adapt" to her "role", is shown throughout the movie when she "seems" totally "uncomfortable" with her role.
Martin Lawrence for his standard, was overall ridiculously awful, Old moves and Old Jokes.
And not even good "Old Jokes"!
And "The Ali Schuffle" wasn't made Anymore special in some of the, "Fightscene's". His performance was Joke, and the Hole Movie was a Joke.
I really Felt sorry for Marsha Thomason ho had her Talent wasted.
In my eyes Laurence learned a big lesson : "Do not bring America in to British History!
Because if you do, the jokes must be a lot better!
The Plot seemed alright but the movie failed Big Time!
I think Lawrence must Find "New Idea's" Or at least "Funny Old Jokes".
This Movie overall was a Shambolic "Joke"!
Because this was an awful movie that i wouldn't recommend anyone to see!
My Score : 1.0
Groeten Gerrit
At first i found it funny, but then it only Got Worse!
Marsha Thomason's talent is wasted on this Movie. Thomason's "inability" to "adapt" to her "role", is shown throughout the movie when she "seems" totally "uncomfortable" with her role.
Martin Lawrence for his standard, was overall ridiculously awful, Old moves and Old Jokes.
And not even good "Old Jokes"!
And "The Ali Schuffle" wasn't made Anymore special in some of the, "Fightscene's". His performance was Joke, and the Hole Movie was a Joke.
I really Felt sorry for Marsha Thomason ho had her Talent wasted.
In my eyes Laurence learned a big lesson : "Do not bring America in to British History!
Because if you do, the jokes must be a lot better!
The Plot seemed alright but the movie failed Big Time!
I think Lawrence must Find "New Idea's" Or at least "Funny Old Jokes".
This Movie overall was a Shambolic "Joke"!
Because this was an awful movie that i wouldn't recommend anyone to see!
My Score : 1.0
Groeten Gerrit
- Gerrit-KvdH
- Sep 23, 2005
- Permalink
I don't think that this film was even one tenth as bad as many of the reviews I've seen. First, it should be taken in the spirit of which is was obviously made, fun, light comedy. Certainly, it didn't break any "new ground," and I doubt that it will be remembered along with "Some Like It Hot." As much as I initially wanted to HATE this film, I thought it was a noble effort by the star, who was wise enough to surround himself with supremely talented British actors (many from the legitimate stage) who both accurately embodied the realism of the time, and possessed the chops to pull it off. Yes, it used all of the typical ghetto dialogue and Hollywood plots, but it did it with such clever wit and attitude that I wound up being quite charmed by the film. Again, if you're looking for "Malcolm X," don't bother. But for an afternoon's amusement, good, clean fun. I have no qualms about saying that I enjoyed it.
- robert-259-28954
- May 10, 2014
- Permalink
Finally got around to seeing this one on D-TV.
I believe most know the plot: man from South-Central LA is teleported to the days of Knights and becomes involved in a rebellion to oust the evil King and restore the good Queen.
In general, it was disappointing because the screenplay did not allow Martin Lawrence to be as funny as he normally is. It seemed forced and weighted down. Unlike other Lawrence films (i.e. Bad Boys, Blue Streak, Big Mama's House) we were not able to see the Martin that we all know and love (or hate). Instead of the impulsive, quick-witted Martin we expect, what we actually saw was Martin that struggled with a poor, predictable script that runs out of fuel in the first twenty minutes and leaves Martin to try to make something out of the remaining hour. As funny as he can be, he is no miracle worker.
All in all I give it a mediocre to low rating. The worst thing is that when I see that Martin Lawrence is going to be in a film I expect certain level of funniness from him. I was disappointed. I feel gypped out of one hour-twenty-minutes of my Saturday.
I believe most know the plot: man from South-Central LA is teleported to the days of Knights and becomes involved in a rebellion to oust the evil King and restore the good Queen.
In general, it was disappointing because the screenplay did not allow Martin Lawrence to be as funny as he normally is. It seemed forced and weighted down. Unlike other Lawrence films (i.e. Bad Boys, Blue Streak, Big Mama's House) we were not able to see the Martin that we all know and love (or hate). Instead of the impulsive, quick-witted Martin we expect, what we actually saw was Martin that struggled with a poor, predictable script that runs out of fuel in the first twenty minutes and leaves Martin to try to make something out of the remaining hour. As funny as he can be, he is no miracle worker.
All in all I give it a mediocre to low rating. The worst thing is that when I see that Martin Lawrence is going to be in a film I expect certain level of funniness from him. I was disappointed. I feel gypped out of one hour-twenty-minutes of my Saturday.
A cool mix of historic times with a perfect amount of Martin Lawerence losing his mind with glorious humor! I've enjoyed Black knight even when I was younger, slapstick delight that isn't for everyone. Almost as if David Benioff collaborated with Gil Junger and decided to goof around, I love it! The music is great fun too.
- UniqueParticle
- May 27, 2020
- Permalink
Martin Lawrence didnt do that bad of a job on fliming this movie, it was just the idea and concept of the movie itself, it was predictable, very very un funny, and just stupid, no one thats innocent should have to sit through that movie.
- ShortCuteBlonde
- Dec 25, 2002
- Permalink
I am a Martin Lawrence fan- I thought Bad Boys and Blue Streak where excellent comedy/action fare. However, I found Black Knight to be totally predictable and boring. The jokes are stale retreads and missing is Martin's crude but lovable humor. I would have found this movie slightly amusing though, if I was twelve years old. Here's something I never thought I would say about a Martin Lawrence movie: this is a good one for the kids.
If you want a film with a history lesson, hook into national geographic channel. If, however, you have 90 odd minutes to spare, have a good old fashioned belly laugh or ten with this. Corny jokes? tick. visual humor? tick. couple of eurrgh moments? tick. Try and be in a mellow mood before you view, and you won't regret spending time with this one. Also, a nifty soundtrack, though not all over the film, and some great (although there is a bit of a theme) olde worlde talking gags. There's some great looking maidens in it as well. Considering it was made in 2001, it has aged quite well, but some sports references could leave you scratching your head. I loved it, and seeing as it didn't hurt anyone else, i don't care who knows it! There was a ready made set up for a sequel, but as far as i know, it never happened. If anyone knows different, please let me know, as i wouldn't hesitate to watch it!
- dphill-76688
- Dec 21, 2015
- Permalink
To be completely honest I am not a fan of Martin Lawrence, although I LOVED "Bad Boys" and thought he did an awesome job in that film...but this review isn't about THAT film ("Blue Streak" was pretty good too). Anyhow, I have to say that I had EXTREMELY low expectations for "Black Knight", the previews were barely funny, the story looked god-awful, and just over-all nothing even remotely great. ...BUT...I watched the movie anyway. I thought the movie was just HORRIBLE, but there were a few things that I thought were pretty funny.
I really can't believe that a movie like this would get green-lit. I can't believe that someone would read this story and say "Yeah, let's make this into a movie!" You gotta be kidding me?!?!
I really don't have much else to say about the film. If you are a fan of Martin Lawrence, then there's a possibility that you may like the film. If you've got some free time, and have an opportunity to see it for free (or really cheap) go ahead and check it out. Otherwise, spend your money on a different movie.
Thanks for reading,
-Chris
I really can't believe that a movie like this would get green-lit. I can't believe that someone would read this story and say "Yeah, let's make this into a movie!" You gotta be kidding me?!?!
I really don't have much else to say about the film. If you are a fan of Martin Lawrence, then there's a possibility that you may like the film. If you've got some free time, and have an opportunity to see it for free (or really cheap) go ahead and check it out. Otherwise, spend your money on a different movie.
Thanks for reading,
-Chris
- LebowskiT1000
- Jun 27, 2002
- Permalink
This was a more toned down version of Martin Lawrence, which to me isn't as funny as his usual raunchy self. His TV show was very good and his comedy specials are funny, but I haven't enjoyed any of his movies except Bad Boys. This was tolerable at best but his best jokes were racial ones. You can't have a movie solely depend on that. Not to mention the weak plot.
This movie was tolerable at best. Not bad considering the circumstances behind Martin Lawrence traveling back in time. That was a little unimaginative. This one makes A Knight's Tale seem like a medieval masterpiece.
(3 out of 10)
(3 out of 10)
I cannot stress the fact that this film has been overplayed and recycled through Hollywood more times that I can count. While I have read some reviews that claim that this is one of Lawrence's more creative roles yet, I can only laugh and gag simultaneously at these words. Lawrence was a major contributor to the downfall of this film. He provided no character analysis, no development, and definitely no humor to the entire story. It was as if we were watching a dress rehearsal in progress before the final script arrived with all of Lawrence's funny bits. From the quick introduction at the beginning of the film (a mere 7 minutes of character introduction), until the incoherent ending that was trying to monopolize on the popularity of Gladiator, we never see Lawrence's character of "Jamal" or "Skywalker" (depending on the care of the actors) emerge from the film. This was merely Martin Lawrence cashing in on his already overplayed self, stretching no further than his comfortable limits and never exerting anything "fresh". He has fallen into the cracks of the Hollywood recycling bin and Black Knight reinforces that idea.
Sadly, Lawrence isn't backed up with any better acting or story. Tom Wilkinson has done some amazing films during his career, but apparently was looking to buy a new car with this film. It required no "real" acting from him, just sloppy drunkenness with clichéd moments near the end that could have been pulled from any other film like this one. I think that was my major problem with this film (beside the lackluster Lawrence) was the story. There wasn't any. It felt like we were forced from the beginning to all of our different places and events just to fill time. There wasn't any redeeming value from the story. In fact, I would go so far as to say that whomever wrote this screenplay may have gasp plagiarized from nearly every other film like this one out there. The structure was nothing new, the formula literally had dust on it, and nobody seemed to care. Lawrence obviously didn't from the performance that he gave, but I expected more from Mr. Wilkinson who has impressed me in the past. This was not the best showcase for his talent, or for anyone's talent to say the least. We must always remember that it begins with a story, and if it doesn't sound good on paper than it isn't going to translate well onto the screen. This is a rule to live by for everyone involved with the Black Knight debacle.
Finally, I normally don't mention this in my reviews, but with this film it just stood out more than any other that I have seen, but the production of this film was horrible. The costumes, the sets, and even the way the shots were framed seemed "cheap" in so many ways. The costumes are the first that come to mind because Lawrence always seemed like he was wearing something that was made with haste. How could he have quickly made this garment in the time that he was in this land? Who knows, but it was "cheap" and only lowered this film further into the muck pit. If the story is going to be bad, and the actors are not going to give their full potential by actually doing what they are paid to be creative than at least give us something to look at Production Team! Unfortunately, there was nothing ravishing to even glance at. The entire Medieval World that Lawrence works at from the beginning is "cheap" and obviously a set. I want a film to take me away from Hollywood and give me my dollar's worth, not rob me blind. The cinematography was done by a two-year old. Nothing spectacular, nothing worth writing about.
Overall, this was a very poor film. Would it have hurt anyone working on this project to use a little something I like to call "imagination"? Creativity was not being used or welcomed in this film. You could tell that the director wanted to make the film, edit out what didn't work, finish, and relax at home while thinking of all the different ways that he could spend his Hollywood money! I blame two major players in this film for the overall poor quality. The first is Mr. Lawrence. If he does not expand his acting potential and bring something new to the screen, I don't think his Hollywood stay will be very long. The second player that I blame for this befuddling mess is the writer. Again, creativity and imagination went backseat to the infamous Hollywood recycling bin. This was a truly disappointing picture.
Grade: * out of *****
Sadly, Lawrence isn't backed up with any better acting or story. Tom Wilkinson has done some amazing films during his career, but apparently was looking to buy a new car with this film. It required no "real" acting from him, just sloppy drunkenness with clichéd moments near the end that could have been pulled from any other film like this one. I think that was my major problem with this film (beside the lackluster Lawrence) was the story. There wasn't any. It felt like we were forced from the beginning to all of our different places and events just to fill time. There wasn't any redeeming value from the story. In fact, I would go so far as to say that whomever wrote this screenplay may have gasp plagiarized from nearly every other film like this one out there. The structure was nothing new, the formula literally had dust on it, and nobody seemed to care. Lawrence obviously didn't from the performance that he gave, but I expected more from Mr. Wilkinson who has impressed me in the past. This was not the best showcase for his talent, or for anyone's talent to say the least. We must always remember that it begins with a story, and if it doesn't sound good on paper than it isn't going to translate well onto the screen. This is a rule to live by for everyone involved with the Black Knight debacle.
Finally, I normally don't mention this in my reviews, but with this film it just stood out more than any other that I have seen, but the production of this film was horrible. The costumes, the sets, and even the way the shots were framed seemed "cheap" in so many ways. The costumes are the first that come to mind because Lawrence always seemed like he was wearing something that was made with haste. How could he have quickly made this garment in the time that he was in this land? Who knows, but it was "cheap" and only lowered this film further into the muck pit. If the story is going to be bad, and the actors are not going to give their full potential by actually doing what they are paid to be creative than at least give us something to look at Production Team! Unfortunately, there was nothing ravishing to even glance at. The entire Medieval World that Lawrence works at from the beginning is "cheap" and obviously a set. I want a film to take me away from Hollywood and give me my dollar's worth, not rob me blind. The cinematography was done by a two-year old. Nothing spectacular, nothing worth writing about.
Overall, this was a very poor film. Would it have hurt anyone working on this project to use a little something I like to call "imagination"? Creativity was not being used or welcomed in this film. You could tell that the director wanted to make the film, edit out what didn't work, finish, and relax at home while thinking of all the different ways that he could spend his Hollywood money! I blame two major players in this film for the overall poor quality. The first is Mr. Lawrence. If he does not expand his acting potential and bring something new to the screen, I don't think his Hollywood stay will be very long. The second player that I blame for this befuddling mess is the writer. Again, creativity and imagination went backseat to the infamous Hollywood recycling bin. This was a truly disappointing picture.
Grade: * out of *****
- film-critic
- Jan 6, 2005
- Permalink
This movie was bad. Not of the "so-bad-it's-good" types, it was just bad. This "going back to the Middle Ages" stuff has been done a million times before. Okay, it tried to be a politically correct movie so no one was surprised when a black guy appeared in Medieval Europe, but political correctness soon chickened out and rather than letting Lawrence have a white girlfriend, they came up with a far-fetched explanation of how can a medieval king have a black lady-in-waiting. Also, in American movies time travel is always combined with a travel to Europe, usually without explaining how did it happen. (the same thing messed up the Americanised version of Jean Reno's "Les Visiteurs", even though the original movie was so good that even the American ripoff couldn't be bad.) I've seen only about the first half of the movie 'cause I've realised that I've got many better things to do than watching this, so it's possible that after the first half the movie suddenly became interesting, but I seriously doubt it.
- Annie_the_Boss
- Feb 1, 2005
- Permalink
When I went to leave a rating for this show, I was once again frustrated that the lowest you can give a movie is 1. Giving this movie a 1 out of 10 is like giving the pizza guy a two hundred dollar tip, it's being VERY nice. This show was so horrible I really don't know where to begin. What confuses me the most is that this movie was actually made. Anyone working on this set with any morals and values in their life would have quit and rather to make a living sweeping up garbage or cleaning bathrooms. I didn't laugh once in this movie, I didn't even smile...I think I heard somebody chuckle in the back of the theatre once, but it may have just been an echo of laugh from the movie playing in the theatre nextdoor. If you happen to go see this movie, and the curtains malfunction and won't go up, you can go home and tell all your friends that you witnessed a miracle.
- essentialflow
- Nov 28, 2001
- Permalink
This is a 7? This movie is a 7?
Yes. Yes, it is.
Maybe it's because in the 2020's we are in a comedic desert landscape.
Maybe time brings certain undeniable truths to the surface, though this truth I have always known and held close.
Martin Lawrence is a comedy genius.
A generational talent and icon.
Even with material as thin and silly as this, he shines.
And he has help along the way with likely and unlikely pairings.
This movie isn't trying to be anything it's not. It is exactly what it is trying to be.
Tom Wilkinson, a brilliant actor having a brilliant year with the incredible, In The Bedroom, costars as Sir Knolte.
He would also go on to a lifetime performance in Michael Clayton in 2007 among other roles.
Daryl Mitchell, himself a comedy heavyweight in Galaxy Quest and Home Fries prior to this film has a small but decent role here as an amusement park co-worker.
Are there ridiculous scenes regarding the difficulties of horseback riding and such?
Certainly.
Are there likes aplenty like, 'Tis roadkill?
Lol. Yes. But that's so silly it just cracks me up.
I laughed out loud quite a bit here.
And there's a Beanie Man song on the soundtrack.
What else can one asketh for?
Yes. Yes, it is.
Maybe it's because in the 2020's we are in a comedic desert landscape.
Maybe time brings certain undeniable truths to the surface, though this truth I have always known and held close.
Martin Lawrence is a comedy genius.
A generational talent and icon.
Even with material as thin and silly as this, he shines.
And he has help along the way with likely and unlikely pairings.
This movie isn't trying to be anything it's not. It is exactly what it is trying to be.
Tom Wilkinson, a brilliant actor having a brilliant year with the incredible, In The Bedroom, costars as Sir Knolte.
He would also go on to a lifetime performance in Michael Clayton in 2007 among other roles.
Daryl Mitchell, himself a comedy heavyweight in Galaxy Quest and Home Fries prior to this film has a small but decent role here as an amusement park co-worker.
Are there ridiculous scenes regarding the difficulties of horseback riding and such?
Certainly.
Are there likes aplenty like, 'Tis roadkill?
Lol. Yes. But that's so silly it just cracks me up.
I laughed out loud quite a bit here.
And there's a Beanie Man song on the soundtrack.
What else can one asketh for?
- RightOnDaddio
- Jun 18, 2023
- Permalink
- Nick_J_S_86
- Jan 8, 2002
- Permalink
With Martin Lawrence you can't expect too much, even when he's teamed up with Will Smith. Lawrence's Black Knight shows that the man has talent but it also shows off some of the weaknesses in his comical approach. Basically I have low expectations for almost any film concerning time-travel (except for Time Bandits) but to a degree the film actually produced some rather believable scenarios (considering the stupidity of the over-all concept).
The problem is that the film is composed with the classic over-the-top zaniness as being the main priority. Had this been a crazy-comedy it would have worked, but as is, it's rather half-hearted. Particularly the final battle was nowhere as convincing as I would have hoped.
The film has a bit of a conflict in deciding if it is supposed to be aimed at kids or adults. Is it supposed to be crazy or real. Because it falls to the middle it doesn't deliver as well.
On a positive note, the stunts were rather fine, costumes were good and the ending was also pretty fun.
The problem is that the film is composed with the classic over-the-top zaniness as being the main priority. Had this been a crazy-comedy it would have worked, but as is, it's rather half-hearted. Particularly the final battle was nowhere as convincing as I would have hoped.
The film has a bit of a conflict in deciding if it is supposed to be aimed at kids or adults. Is it supposed to be crazy or real. Because it falls to the middle it doesn't deliver as well.
On a positive note, the stunts were rather fine, costumes were good and the ending was also pretty fun.
A perfect example of all the bad things people tend to think about Americans. Uncultured, boorish, unsophisticated, the list goes on.
There was much gnashing of teeth while sitting through this movie.
There was much gnashing of teeth while sitting through this movie.
This movie is so funny. "White man down" joke is a little racy, but I enjoyed this movie from beginning to end. Loosen up everybody, and enjoy. Although, in the beginning he was driving a mustang, and I thought there was going to be some dialog about it. Something about how he rides a mustang... I thought the jokes were hilarious. I think the marketing of this movie needed work, the movie would have done better. It didn't represent the naive element and the fun around it. I honestly don't think there's one bad scene in that movie. I think Martin was the only one for this movie, I can't see anyone else, and the actress was an excellent pick also. This is a great movie and I highly recommend it to everyone.
I'm no particular fan of Martin Lawrence, but I've just seen Blue Streak and Black Knight, and they were both quite a bit better than I'd expected. While not enormously funny, they were still pretty entertaining, and more importantly, generally tasteful. Far, *far* superior to horrid crap like Scary Movie (and esp. the horrendous sequels), American Pie or anything with Leslie Nielsen in it.
I must voice some concern about this movie (Black Knight) getting *600* "1" ratings. That's absolutely unfair. Without having any kind of interest in Lawrence's career, I still have to say that it smacks of a legion of less than level-headed Lawrence-haters having given the movie a "1" rating just to give it a bad rap (and possibly without actually having seen it). It's quite simply the only explanation. No way that many people could honestly say this movie deserves a "1" out of 10.
My rating: 6 out of 10.
I must voice some concern about this movie (Black Knight) getting *600* "1" ratings. That's absolutely unfair. Without having any kind of interest in Lawrence's career, I still have to say that it smacks of a legion of less than level-headed Lawrence-haters having given the movie a "1" rating just to give it a bad rap (and possibly without actually having seen it). It's quite simply the only explanation. No way that many people could honestly say this movie deserves a "1" out of 10.
My rating: 6 out of 10.
No plot, No jokes, No budget, No script, No actors
A complete waste of 89 minutes of my life. The film was utter agony in parts, and the only good thing about the evening was that the theatre was absolutely empty so I was able to shout at the screen without disturbing anyone.
There is no single scene within the film without Martin Lawrence in, and the only time he is not on screen is when the camera flicks momentarily to whoever he is talking to.
I really believe that some of the film is un-scripted and they simply gave Lawrence intermittent periods to be "funny" and act stupidly.
From the annoying teeth cleaning scene at the start, right through to the pathetic ending, the film was awful. The middle third really really dragged.
I went, expecting the movie to be very bad, it was worse.
A complete waste of 89 minutes of my life. The film was utter agony in parts, and the only good thing about the evening was that the theatre was absolutely empty so I was able to shout at the screen without disturbing anyone.
There is no single scene within the film without Martin Lawrence in, and the only time he is not on screen is when the camera flicks momentarily to whoever he is talking to.
I really believe that some of the film is un-scripted and they simply gave Lawrence intermittent periods to be "funny" and act stupidly.
From the annoying teeth cleaning scene at the start, right through to the pathetic ending, the film was awful. The middle third really really dragged.
I went, expecting the movie to be very bad, it was worse.
- trevor.hickman
- Aug 29, 2002
- Permalink