IMDb RATING
6.9/10
757
YOUR RATING
From cold, rock-strewn moors to comfortable suburban estates, award-winning writer Ruth Rendell explores the dark fissures between friends and family members that motivate murder.From cold, rock-strewn moors to comfortable suburban estates, award-winning writer Ruth Rendell explores the dark fissures between friends and family members that motivate murder.From cold, rock-strewn moors to comfortable suburban estates, award-winning writer Ruth Rendell explores the dark fissures between friends and family members that motivate murder.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
We read the reviews and thought it would be a great series. The first story was carried over 4 episodes. Could have been done in an hour and still not with it! After the first episode, we were stunned and underwhelmed. However, we continued to watch (and FF where possible) to get to the merciful conclusion of the storyline. The worst "police" we've seen in any series. No focus. No passion except when they overacted. We read that Ruth Rendell based Wexford on herself. Passionless (except when overacting), no real ability to reason or solve crimes - so how was she able to write if she's like her character??? We will not waste our time on the remaining 44 episodes.
I saw "Master of the Moor and it was very poorly done many respects except for the acting and I wasted my time viewing it. Fortunately it was the only bad experience I have had with Netflix. I just thought Ruth Rendell was a better writer.
I can't believe I actually watched 2 episodes. I love Colin Firth, so I thought it might get better. It's not only terrible, it's a travesty. I'm sure Colin in embarrassed by it. I would be. Not only is the directing terrible, so is the acting! How anything so terrible makes it to the final screen. It has to be the worst I've ever seen. And the writing ... no one speaks like that. It makes me angry that something so beautifully visual could be that bad. Such potential. And for what? I'm moving on & will try to forget that I even considered watching the 3rd episode of this disaster. Sorry Colin! I think you're a great actor, but I guess we all have to have our failures. It's how we learn to move on!
Wow,I am amazed at how bad this series is
I bought a dvd of this and was bored to death
This is supposed to be a murder series,but there is no urgency,no thrill, just old English people plodding along with their customs and traditions
I'm sure George baker is a decent actor, but he's miscast In this role, it would have suited someone tougher and smarter, not this old guy that was regularly seen taking naps and mumbling
The direction is terrible They show entire scenes that have nothing to do with the murder just to drag the time out
There was a long drawn out dinner party scene in which nothing remotely interesting happend, this went on for ages
I haven't never seen this on another TV series,it's shocking and an insult to viewers.
This is supposed to be a murder series,but there is no urgency,no thrill, just old English people plodding along with their customs and traditions
I'm sure George baker is a decent actor, but he's miscast In this role, it would have suited someone tougher and smarter, not this old guy that was regularly seen taking naps and mumbling
The direction is terrible They show entire scenes that have nothing to do with the murder just to drag the time out
There was a long drawn out dinner party scene in which nothing remotely interesting happend, this went on for ages
I haven't never seen this on another TV series,it's shocking and an insult to viewers.
I love a good British mystery, especially of the pre-2000 variety. Hence I was excited when YouTube suggested I watch a few episodes of Ruth Rendell.
But boy, what a disappointment. What could be a reasonably entertaining (and even then, hardly more than that) 30-minute story gets shamelessly dragged out into four (4) episodes of 50 minutes each. Someone's getting married? Great; let's show the church; the guests arriving; the brides sashaying down the isle; the ceremony; the 'Just Married'; the couple driving off on their honeymoon. Etc. Etc. Never mind that it serves no purpose in the story whatsoever.
I can see how a lonely old person in the 1980s, with a total of two programs on their black-and-white telly, might give it a go. But for today's viewer, this show is the definition of boring.
But boy, what a disappointment. What could be a reasonably entertaining (and even then, hardly more than that) 30-minute story gets shamelessly dragged out into four (4) episodes of 50 minutes each. Someone's getting married? Great; let's show the church; the guests arriving; the brides sashaying down the isle; the ceremony; the 'Just Married'; the couple driving off on their honeymoon. Etc. Etc. Never mind that it serves no purpose in the story whatsoever.
I can see how a lonely old person in the 1980s, with a total of two programs on their black-and-white telly, might give it a go. But for today's viewer, this show is the definition of boring.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaDavid Jason is a big fan of the show and other detective series, which inspired him to play a detective in A Touch of Frost (1992).
- ConnectionsFeatured in Drama Trails: 'The Fixer' to 'Trial and Retribution' (2008)
- How many seasons does Ruth Rendell Mysteries have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Los misterios de Ruth Rendell
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

Top Gap
By what name was Ruth Rendell Mysteries (1987) officially released in India in English?
Answer