Most of the passengers on an airplane disappear, and the remainder land the plane in a mysteriously barren airport.Most of the passengers on an airplane disappear, and the remainder land the plane in a mysteriously barren airport.Most of the passengers on an airplane disappear, and the remainder land the plane in a mysteriously barren airport.
- Nominated for 1 Primetime Emmy
- 3 nominations total
Featured reviews
Langoliers" when I saw that it would be on USA the next two
nights. So I said to myself, "Self...why don't you watch it and see
how it compares?" As an adaptation, this movie is just about as faithful as you can
get. Some minor changes were made for time (for example, an
entire character was dropped from the plane...he didn't do much or
contribute ANYTHING to the plot, he just slept the whole time), but
all in all, it was pretty much like an abridged audiobook with visual
images. Virtually nothing was changed in the transfer from page
to screen. As a result, the weaknesses in the movie mostly stem from
weaknesses in the book. I really like Stephen King's style, though
I haven't read very much by him. The most interesting thing about
the story is the horror of the unknown, and each character's
different reactions to it...hysteria, anger, disbelief, etc. My problem
with the story (and the movie as well) is that the Langoliers are a
bit of a letdown. Visually, they looked like computer-generated
images, not like real monsters. But even in the story, their
presence seems unnecessary. The most frightening parts of the
story are when the passengers of Flight 29 have no clue what's
going on. Wouldn't the Langoliers have been more interesting if
we never saw them, but knew they were there...i.e., seeing the
disappearance of the world, hearing the sound of the Langoliers,
but never seeing them...possibly a brief glimpse as the plane
takes off or as one of the characters gets eaten. Acting wise, the movie was a mixed bag. Some people really got
into their roles. I though Bronson Pinchot was great as Craig
Toomey, and I also think he's pretty underrated as an actor since
he was Balki in Perfect Strangers. Other people, I thought were a
little flat. I've never been too fond of David Morse (the pilot), and as
much as I like Dean Stockwell (Al from Quantum Leap, whoo-hoo),
he didn't seem to fit the role of the mystery writer Bob Jenkins. The special effects were pretty miserable. It all looked like pretty
low-tech computer effects - the plane, the Langoliers, the time rip.
Not too impressive. But hey - TV movie, what do you expect? Overall, this is an excellent adaptation of a pretty good story. Some
changes should have been made in the transfer, but that's my
opinion.
This made-for-TV movie was based on a Stephen King novella and was originally shown as a two-part miniseries on network television back in the mid 90s. The acting is about what you'd expect from a TV movie, the dialogue is slightly corny at times, and the special effects aren't great, to say the least.
However, I thought the Langoliers succeeded in doing something that you rarely see in horror films in that it successfully took that slow-building feeling of fear and dread that you get when you read a scary novel and transferred it to the screen. Generally speaking, horror movies these days tend to rely on shocks and scares, but the Langoliers is a slow-paced mystery thriller, kind of like a really creepy Twilight Zone episode, where our heroes spend much of their time trying to piece together the clues in order to solve the mystery of their predicament, all while an ominous feeling of oncoming danger just grows and grows. Overall, I thought it was pretty good. 7/10
Immerse yourself in the film's story, not in the acting, or the music, or the plot holes that may or may not exist. In the case of this movie, it almost has to be watched in whole to get the effect.
Just my own opinion.
As soon as I read the novella "The Langoliers" by Stephen King, I knew it would make an amazing movie. It was by far the scariest piece of writing I have ever read and I was delighted to see that it had already been made into a TV movie. It took me over a year to find a copy, but it was worth it.
People complain about the crappy computer FX and the bad acting, but if you pay attention to the amazing storyline and the logic and thinking that went into this story, you'll find that it is an enjoyable movie that will keep you glued to the screen.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaIn the novella, there is no wind, not even a light breeze when they are in Bangor. Since this was virtually impossible to execute for the movie they simply created dialogue to explain that even with a wind down here the clouds are not moving.
- GoofsWhen approaching LAX, Laurel notes that everything looks the same and there's no one there. Except there are cars driving around.
- Quotes
[Engle informs the remaining passengers that they are diverting to Bangor]
Craig Toomy: I have an important meeting in Boston at nine O'clock! And I forbid you... From flying to some whistle-stop Maine airport! DO YOU HEAR ME?
Laurel Stevenson: Can you please quiet down? You're scaring the little girl.
Craig Toomy: Scaring the little girl? SCARING THE LITTLE GIRL? LADY! We've been diverted to some tin... pot airport in the middle of nowhere! And I have more important things to think about than scaring a little girl!
- ConnectionsEdited into The Timekeepers of Eternity (2021)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Stephen King's The Langoliers
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime3 hours
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
