The Sea Wolf

Two evergreen actors Charles Bronson and Christopher Reeve.

This movie does Jack London's sailing yarn Sea Wolf real justice for an average budget attempt.

One thing that strikes me is how far away we are from the history of the sea in our modern world, and how great London's writing really is in this story, weaving the rawest tenets of human struggle into what was then one of the primary economic engines of the world, the commerce of the ocean-going fishing, whaling, or here, sealing ship. Of course, the sea tale is such a romantic notion, ironic in that it was so tough to actually live, and offers a writer so much because the characters are all stuck together in a constant state of peril from without, and this magnifies the sense of the peril between them.

Reeve is brilliant as an educated man of position facing the rawest of worlds far from where he was raised. He runs into another intellectual of sorts, a captain who has scrambled from poverty to occupy a position of pure power, which he holds in purely Machiavellian ways. Reeve's true sensitivity comes out in the role, acting as foil to the pure cynicism of Bronson's Captain Larsen, begging for mercy for others and for good when possible. I kept being struck at how strong, virile, and yet kind and warm Reeve seemed in the role, and the strength he would need as his own life took such an awful turn not long after this movie.

Bronson also gets his licks in as a man who has seen empathy repaid with betrayal so many times, he sees empathy only as weakness and vulnerability, and considering his surroundings, he makes an excellent case. The story sets these two forces, two approaches to life against each other, and basically never resolves them, which is good, because a resolution would be too facile. Both men stick to who they are. There are times when Bronson seems less than on, but his previous persona lends itself well here, lending him the previous strength, but I can tell he approached the role in a different way than his other tough guy roles. He created a real weakness in the rigidity of this character and conveys a fairly broken man who still knows how to be a brutal and effective leader. He isn't a wisecracker, here though. He's a weakening man in a tough shell. Bronson is past his peak here, but still rivets the viewer, especially a fan. I would've pegged Bronson for 60 here, but he was 70 when he made this film.

THe supporting cast runs the gamut from great to average, with a couple given exceptional moment in London's story. I enjoyed seeing two actors 20+ years later, now both gone. They really were both great.

I guess TNT had a little Christopher Reeve tribute this past weekend. Caught the end of "Superman 2" and then got sucked into this slightly better than average "tv movie." Good acting from Reeve and Marc "Beastmaster" singer. Bronson wasn't very believable though and his acting was as lousy as ever. All and all, not bad for a flick made for tv, but there's a reason it's just that -- "made for tv." The ending was particularly unnerving - seems that they said "hey we've only got 5 minutes left of tv time - let's wrap this up with 4 different plot points." I gave it a 7 of ten but more along the lines of 6 and a 3/4 (my ratings are like school grades 7= C) -- check it out if you're a Reeve fan, but Bronson is no Lex Luthor.

I would strongly recommend to those, who haven't read the novel by Jack London yet, to do so. It is only about 1500 times better than this movie. Despite its good intentions, the movie is a very light, short and mediocre version of the book with significant changes and cuts. It's watchable but easily forgettable. Charles Bronson is one of my favourite actors, but he is not convincing as Wolf Larsen who is supposed to be a fascinating and gracious predator, a tiger in human flesh at the prime of his physical strength. The character growth of "Hump" (Humphrey Van Weyden) here is just skimming the surface, while the book provides much more graduate, believable and interesting transformation of his personality. The love interest is also entirely different from the one depicted in the movie.

The film narrates how a cocky young (Christopher Reeve) and a beautiful girl (Catherine Mary Stewart) are shipwrecked and picked up by a ship called ¨the Ghost¨commanded by captain Larsen (Charles Bronson) , a ruthless but clever seaman , reader of Shakesphere , Nietzsche , Darwin and Milton (The lost time). The couple become themselves in accidental passengers confronting wits and taking on brutal sailors (Clive Revell) and only helped by an alcoholic doctor (Len Cariou) and a good seaman (Mark Singer).

The picture is a fine television adaptation of the famous homonymous novel by Jack London scripted by Andrew J. Fenady (producer too , along with Ted Turner). The film has intelligent character studio , showing on the various main-support roles and stunningly playing the tale . Thus , Charles Bronson is magnificent as the obstinate and brutal captain who's really obsessed to track down his brother . One of the few times Charles Bronson performed a villainous person since he became a top international star in the early 70's , at the time he generally played vigilantes in Michael Winner and J. L. Thompson films . Christopher Reeve (recently deceased) as his contender with too much wishes to escape is splendid . Catherine Mary Stewart is enjoyable and enticing . Special mention for secondary cast, Len Cariou as the kind boozy doctor is excellent and Clive Revell as the nasty cook who mistreats to Reeve is outstanding. The black and white classic version novel is the greatest and was directed by Michael Curtiz in 1941 with Edward G. Robinson (Larsen), Alexander Knox (Reeve's role), Ida Lupino (Catherine Stewart's role) and John Garfield (Singer's role). The flick will appeal to seafaring adventure genre enthusiasts and of course Bronson and Reeve fans. Rating : 6.5/10 . Well worthwhile seeing.