To impress a boy while on vacation with her divorced father, Veronique pretends that her father is her lover.To impress a boy while on vacation with her divorced father, Veronique pretends that her father is her lover.To impress a boy while on vacation with her divorced father, Veronique pretends that her father is her lover.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Éric Berger
- Julien
- (as Eric Berger)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I had been searching for this film I saw on the BBC years and years ago every so often, when people began chatting about films, I would ask everyone, "It stars Gerard Depardieu and he goes somewhere with this girl who's stunning and uses her beauty and, urgh! I can't remember what it's called but it's amazing!!". Everyone looks confused and no-one knows the title. I eventually gave up. Then thanks to the internet, I recently found it! And I bought it. And it is even better than I remembered! The story is simple but perfect. A middle class divorced father and his beautiful daughter (who he dotes on but as with most teenagers doesn't appreciate it much) go to a resort and she quickly pretends he is her lover who is only claiming to be her dad. She gets the attention and sympathy from cute guys nearer her own age and the whole story just develops brilliantly. She is stunning and he has his typical charm and so the whole thing is completely believable from start to finish. Of course, the story has more than that, including some nice little subplots, but I don't want to spoil it. The highlights are Gerard Depardieu's wonderful acting and the fast- paced script. With those excellent sarcastic comments and funny expressions as he deals with his little girl pushing him to the edge of sanity (plus people occasionally trying to hurt him, and once almost kill him) the moments for the highlight real count up fast. Apart from some of the known French classic films this movie is a total gem way above the rest within the French film industry. It's that good, really. I'm not sure this is the very, very best comedy ever but it's definitely in my top 3 for sure. Constant laughs and father-daughter dynamics which are totally accurate make sure of that for me. Even my mother, who is rarely impressed by French films, fell in love with this as much as I did again after all these years.
After brushing up on my French for a few weeks, I decided to brave this movie without English subtitles. I own a copy of the 1994 remake and know it like the back of my hand, but just to make sure I'd have the dialog practically memorized, I watched it the night before. Luckily, for the first half of the movie, the French and English version of My Father the Hero are nearly identical! The mother-daughter squabble in the apartment, the voicemails on a faceless girlfriend's machine, driving up to the hotel in a jeep and complaining that the guests are all old people, the moon going behind a cloud after he yells at her to come outside and look, forbidding her from dating musicians, the thong bathing suit, the older man at the bar offering to photograph her-as you can see, the list is extensive. I was able to understand everything they said until the last twenty minutes, and even then, I was able to piece together words, phrases, and context.
Gérard Depardieu stars in both, as the father of a fourteen-year-old girl making the transition from girl to woman via the discovery of her hormones. While on a tropical vacation, Marie Gillain develops a crush on a local boy, and thinks pretending she's with her boyfriend instead of her dad will impress the older kid. I know, the premise is a little sick, but if you can take it for what it is-a comedy-you'll be fine.
Except... the 1991 original isn't a comedy. Yes, the water-skiing scene is still in there, and the "You have a daughter?" sequence is the same, but this version is a drama. Because of the very slight, but very crucial change, I didn't end up liking the movie, while the remake remains one of my favorites. The story is about a young girl first discovering romance who makes a gigantic mistake by lying and pretending she has experience when she hasn't. Once she confesses what she's done to her father, he's livid, but he agrees to go along with her lie-hence the title. The movie is called My Father, the Hero, not My Father, the Bad Parent. At the end of the movie, you're supposed to think he did the right thing, bonded with his daughter, and helped her transition out of adolescence with grace and courage. At the end of this movie, I thought the exact opposite. One small example of the difference: the closing lines of both films are exactly the same, but in 1994, Gérard laughed, and in 1991 he cried.
I'd recommend sticking with the Disney version. It's far more uplifting, and it greatly improved the story. With such an odd premise-pretending her dad is her boyfriend-you're going to need a total laugh-fest to get through it, and the original just makes you depressed.
Gérard Depardieu stars in both, as the father of a fourteen-year-old girl making the transition from girl to woman via the discovery of her hormones. While on a tropical vacation, Marie Gillain develops a crush on a local boy, and thinks pretending she's with her boyfriend instead of her dad will impress the older kid. I know, the premise is a little sick, but if you can take it for what it is-a comedy-you'll be fine.
Except... the 1991 original isn't a comedy. Yes, the water-skiing scene is still in there, and the "You have a daughter?" sequence is the same, but this version is a drama. Because of the very slight, but very crucial change, I didn't end up liking the movie, while the remake remains one of my favorites. The story is about a young girl first discovering romance who makes a gigantic mistake by lying and pretending she has experience when she hasn't. Once she confesses what she's done to her father, he's livid, but he agrees to go along with her lie-hence the title. The movie is called My Father, the Hero, not My Father, the Bad Parent. At the end of the movie, you're supposed to think he did the right thing, bonded with his daughter, and helped her transition out of adolescence with grace and courage. At the end of this movie, I thought the exact opposite. One small example of the difference: the closing lines of both films are exactly the same, but in 1994, Gérard laughed, and in 1991 he cried.
I'd recommend sticking with the Disney version. It's far more uplifting, and it greatly improved the story. With such an odd premise-pretending her dad is her boyfriend-you're going to need a total laugh-fest to get through it, and the original just makes you depressed.
This French movie was re-made only two years later by Disney (so this is as close as I've ever come to reviewing a Disney movie). The story is about a divorced French father (Gerard Depardieu) who takes his resentful adolescent daughter (Marie Gillain) on a beach vacation. It starts out as kind of a farce when his daughter tells everyone at the resort that her father is actually her much older lover, but it turns much more sentimental and sweet when she meets a boy close to her own age, and her father is forced to realize that she's growing up and he has to let her go. There's no doubt this movie is less saccharine and cloying than the American Disney version, but it is also much more innocent and "family-friendly" than most French "coming-of-age-on-the-beach" movies like Eric Rohmers "Pauline on the Breach" or Catherine Breillat's "Fillete 36". This movie is actually completely appropriate for teenagers--except that American teenagers, of course, cannot be called on to read subtitles, thus the unnecessary Hollywood re-make.
Gerard Depardieu (who also starred in the re-make) is quite good in the role of the father. It's quite easy to accept Depardieu as a kind of Gallic Robert Deniro, but his status as a sex symbol is perhaps a little more baffling. Here though at least he keeps his clothes on (thank god) and he doesn't really romance any improbably attractive women. Improbably attractive, however, is a good description of the actress, Marie Gillain, who plays the daughter. She was probably sixteen or seventeen here, but could have easily passed for twenty, and with the revealing swimwear she models, she would probably have a pack of slobbering guys following her everywhere even in France (or perhaps especially in France). It's a little hard therefore to buy her as a shy, awkward fourteen-year-old working up to her first kiss. She gives a game performance though, and whereas her equivalent in the American version, Katherine Heigl, would go onto "Gray's Anatomy" and many horrible Hollywood romantic comedies, each more horrible than the last, Gillain has had a more low-profile, but much more interesting career.
This would make a good companion piece either to other fairly "family-friendly" movies with Depardieu like "Cyrano", or to other Gallic teen flicks fit for a high school French class like "La Boum". Not my usual cup of tea, given the Disney connection, but I'd still recommend it.
Gerard Depardieu (who also starred in the re-make) is quite good in the role of the father. It's quite easy to accept Depardieu as a kind of Gallic Robert Deniro, but his status as a sex symbol is perhaps a little more baffling. Here though at least he keeps his clothes on (thank god) and he doesn't really romance any improbably attractive women. Improbably attractive, however, is a good description of the actress, Marie Gillain, who plays the daughter. She was probably sixteen or seventeen here, but could have easily passed for twenty, and with the revealing swimwear she models, she would probably have a pack of slobbering guys following her everywhere even in France (or perhaps especially in France). It's a little hard therefore to buy her as a shy, awkward fourteen-year-old working up to her first kiss. She gives a game performance though, and whereas her equivalent in the American version, Katherine Heigl, would go onto "Gray's Anatomy" and many horrible Hollywood romantic comedies, each more horrible than the last, Gillain has had a more low-profile, but much more interesting career.
This would make a good companion piece either to other fairly "family-friendly" movies with Depardieu like "Cyrano", or to other Gallic teen flicks fit for a high school French class like "La Boum". Not my usual cup of tea, given the Disney connection, but I'd still recommend it.
{quote by Nicholas}I actually discovered that there were two versions of this film, both by the same director, both including Gérard Depardieu, but in the first one, most of the actors are French and it is set on the Isle of Mauritius, and the second, the characters bar Depardieu are mostly American and the film is set in the West Indies or Bahamas but not Mauritius. Why make two films with the same plot ? I just don't know.
In my opinion, the better of the two was the first one which is set in Mauritius. Unfortunately, this one is NOT available on DVD and the other IS !! I bought the DVD, thinking I was getting the FIRST but got the SECOND ! Very confusing, especially when the main actor is the same person.
I preferred the characters in the first film and found it funnier..but that is of course just personal judgment. I was also pleased to see shots of Mauritius which is a lovely place. In the first film, Depardieu was speaking French, his native language, in the second he was speaking English ......he was obviously less at ease in the humorous situations !! To understand this you need to be able to speak French and, more important, heard Depardieu get irritated in his mother tongue. It's indescribably funny and cannot be translated into another language. That's what I think clinches it for this first of the two films !!
_________________________
Was Marie Gillain also in both movies ?
In my opinion, the better of the two was the first one which is set in Mauritius. Unfortunately, this one is NOT available on DVD and the other IS !! I bought the DVD, thinking I was getting the FIRST but got the SECOND ! Very confusing, especially when the main actor is the same person.
I preferred the characters in the first film and found it funnier..but that is of course just personal judgment. I was also pleased to see shots of Mauritius which is a lovely place. In the first film, Depardieu was speaking French, his native language, in the second he was speaking English ......he was obviously less at ease in the humorous situations !! To understand this you need to be able to speak French and, more important, heard Depardieu get irritated in his mother tongue. It's indescribably funny and cannot be translated into another language. That's what I think clinches it for this first of the two films !!
_________________________
Was Marie Gillain also in both movies ?
I actually discovered that there were two versions of this film, both by the same director, both including Gérard Depardieu, but in the first one, most of the actors are French and it is set on the Isle of Mauritius, and the second, the characters bar Depardieu are mostly American and the film is set in the West Indies or Bahamas but not Mauritius. Why make two films with the same plot ? I just don't know.
In my opinion, the better of the two was the first one which is set in Mauritius. Unfortunately, this one is NOT available on DVD and the other IS !! I bought the DVD, thinking I was getting the FIRST but got the SECOND ! Very confusing, especially when the main actor is the same person.
I preferred the characters in the first film and found it funnier..but that is of course just personal judgment. I was also pleased to see shots of Mauritius which is a lovely place. In the first film, Depardieu was speaking French, his native language, in the second he was speaking English ......he was obviously less at ease in the humorous situations !! To understand this you need to be able to speak French and, more important, heard Depardieu get irritated in his mother tongue. It's indescribably funny and cannot be translated into another language. That's what I think clinches it for this first of the two films !!
In my opinion, the better of the two was the first one which is set in Mauritius. Unfortunately, this one is NOT available on DVD and the other IS !! I bought the DVD, thinking I was getting the FIRST but got the SECOND ! Very confusing, especially when the main actor is the same person.
I preferred the characters in the first film and found it funnier..but that is of course just personal judgment. I was also pleased to see shots of Mauritius which is a lovely place. In the first film, Depardieu was speaking French, his native language, in the second he was speaking English ......he was obviously less at ease in the humorous situations !! To understand this you need to be able to speak French and, more important, heard Depardieu get irritated in his mother tongue. It's indescribably funny and cannot be translated into another language. That's what I think clinches it for this first of the two films !!
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaAfter working with Catherine Jacob on Merci La Vie (1991), Gérard Depardieu advice Gérard Lauzier to cast her in the movie.
- How long is My Father the Hero?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $25,480,000
- Runtime1 hour 45 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
