49
Metascore
10 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75Chicago ReaderDave KehrChicago ReaderDave KehrAltogether, an unusually honorable achievement in a form (the remake) where originality is a dirty word.
- 63Miami HeraldBill CosfordMiami HeraldBill CosfordThe original was good enough so that a residue of curiosity about the Freelings remains; we want to know what happened next. But a sequel is a sequel is a sequel, and this amiable movie is very much a II. [23 May 1986, p.D1]
- 60Los Angeles TimesMichael WilmingtonLos Angeles TimesMichael WilmingtonThe second film never has the hardness or urgency of the first. Its best moments, perhaps happily, tend to come from the actors rather than the story or Richard Edlund's effects: especially newcomers Geraldine Fitzgerald and Julian Beck. [23 May 1986]
- 60The New YorkerThe New YorkerThe film offers some spectacular special effects and excellent ensemble acting, including two virtuoso performances by Geraldine Fitzgerald and the late Julian Beck. But the movie, like most sequels, has no reason for existing beyond the desire to duplicate a financial success.
- 50Time OutTime OutThis sequel, sans Spielberg but obedient to his spirit, simply fails to regenerate the original's gut-grinding fears that make you dread ever scratching a spot again. And the contribution of Giger's design work has only added one near-unwatchable sequence.
- 50TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineAlthough an improvement thematically over the first film (the childlike awe of the original has been replaced by a very adult fear of impotence), Poltergeist II is terribly disjointed and dramatically unfulfilling.
- 50NewsweekDavid AnsenNewsweekDavid AnsenIt groans under the burden of explanations and exposition, not to mention moral homilies. Family love can conquer evil, according to director Brian Gibson's sequel, which is very nice to know but not why anybody will plunk down money to see this movie. [02 June 1986, p.75]
- 25Chicago TribuneGene SiskelChicago TribuneGene SiskelPoltergeist II offers no fresh hooting interest. To put it simply, there is nothing to like about Poltergeist II.
- 25Washington PostPaul AttanasioWashington PostPaul AttanasioThere are movies that make you want to mince words, and then there's Poltergeist II: The Other Side, a movie so ineffably bad, you can't even find the words to mince. [23 May 1986, p.D2]