Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Movers & Shakers

  • 1985
  • PG
  • 1h 20m
IMDb RATING
4.2/10
605
YOUR RATING
Movers & Shakers (1985)
Studio head promises his dying producer and mentor, to adapt a popular sex manual into a film, despite his better judgment. Unable to figure out how to turn the nonfiction book into a narrative movie, Mulholland enlists the services of a screenwriter of popular romantic films with a bad marriage, and volatile director Sid Spokane to help him create a movie.
Play trailer1:48
1 Video
18 Photos
SatireComedy

Joe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a... Read allJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a best-selling sex manual "Love in Sex". Enlisting the help of depressed screenwriter Herb ... Read allJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a best-selling sex manual "Love in Sex". Enlisting the help of depressed screenwriter Herb Derman and rather off-centre director Sid Spokane to try and come up with an idea or two, ... Read all

  • Director
    • William Asher
  • Writer
    • Charles Grodin
  • Stars
    • Walter Matthau
    • Charles Grodin
    • Vincent Gardenia
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.2/10
    605
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • William Asher
    • Writer
      • Charles Grodin
    • Stars
      • Walter Matthau
      • Charles Grodin
      • Vincent Gardenia
    • 12User reviews
    • 4Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 1:48
    Trailer

    Photos17

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 11
    View Poster

    Top cast31

    Edit
    Walter Matthau
    Walter Matthau
    • Joe Mulholland
    Charles Grodin
    Charles Grodin
    • Herb Derman
    Vincent Gardenia
    Vincent Gardenia
    • Saul Gritz
    Tyne Daly
    Tyne Daly
    • Nancy Derman
    Bill Macy
    Bill Macy
    • Sid Spokane
    Gilda Radner
    Gilda Radner
    • Livia Machado
    Earl Boen
    Earl Boen
    • Marshall
    Michael Lerner
    Michael Lerner
    • Arnie
    Joe Mantell
    Joe Mantell
    • Larry
    William Prince
    William Prince
    • Louis Martin
    Nita Talbot
    Nita Talbot
    • Dorothy
    Sandy Ward
    Sandy Ward
    • Doctor
    Judah Katz
    Judah Katz
    • Freddie
    Peter Marc Jacobson
    • Robin
    • (as Peter Marc)
    Sam Anderson
    Sam Anderson
    • Ray Berg
    Frances Bay
    Frances Bay
    • Betty Gritz
    Luana Anders
    Luana Anders
    • Violette
    Gene Dynarski
    Gene Dynarski
    • Board Member
    • Director
      • William Asher
    • Writer
      • Charles Grodin
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews12

    4.2605
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    4planktonrules

    Decent acting but a film that couldn't help but fail at the box office.

    "Movers & Shakers" is a film written by Charles Grodin and he also produced and starred in the movie. In many ways, it reminds me of "The Player", as it's a look at some of the insiders who run Hollywood. However, the film is no where nearly as clever or enjoyable at "The Player"...in fact, it seems to have little sense of direction as well.

    The story is about a film project whose pedigree is odd. On a friend's deathbed, Joe (Walter Matthau) promises to make a movie using the same title as a famous sex book! The rest of the story is about the process...where the producers, director and writer all hash out what the film will be. Sadly, apart from the title, there's really not much more to their film.

    Again and again, I kept hoping this movie would get better and funnier. It seemed like the folks who MADE the film thought it was clever....but it never translated to the audience and is therefore a directionless and mostly unfunny comedy with some good acting.
    5theowinthrop

    A Strange Misfire Comedy.

    I am only giving this film a "5" out of respect for it's cast headed by Walter Matthau, Charles Grodin, Steve Martin, Bill Macy, Tyne Daly, Gilda Radner, Penny Marshall, and Vincent Gardenia. Otherwise it is a peculiar satire on Hollywood that never quite works.

    Walter Matthau works at a large studio, now run by William Prince. Matthau is a successful producer there, but his mentor was Gardenia, who was once a great producer. But Gardenia has been going downhill, both creatively and physically. He has wasted millions of dollars on a film about the prehistoric world, and has even set up a huge dinosaur from the film on the grounds of the studio (much to a fed up Prince's anger). But Gardenia is taken off all other projects. He is now dying, and Matthau goes to see him. Gardenia, on the death bed, forces Matthau to do a film on a book he has just bought: a sexual guidebook. Matthau says he will, knowing it is a ridiculous promise.

    After Gardenia's death Matthau takes a close look into the sex book. This is the most popular sex guide in America, but the point is brought out in the film that if one thinks of sex lightly, as a powerful explosion from the emotion of love, it is easy to show in film, on stage, on television, on radio, in novels and short stories, or in paintings and sculpture. But if the actual physical activities involved were to be studied in a film (not a pornography film, by the way), it becomes boring.

    Still Matthau tries. He consults with Macy, a fabled film director (involved in a torrid and complicated affair with Radner - it ends when they wound each other in a shoot out). Macy's approach is to remind us of all the great film lovers of the past (Bogart among them) and how "dependable" they were. Matthau talks to Grodin, a leading screenplay writer. Grodin can't see where the drama needed for the film will come in. Matthau is advised to see the last of the great silent film lovers, the "ageless" Martin (once a rival of Valentino). He keeps talking of decades old romantic moments - but all is for naught when Matthau and Grodin and Macy see Martin is now henpecked by his harridan wife (Marshall).

    As you can see the film certainly had great direction in the script, except that despite the energy of the cast it just never rose above the one point: that discussing the physical activity of sex on film is not going to make a good movie. Somehow the script dropped a somewhat promising element: that a desperate Matthau might start dropping away from what Gardenia wished and produced a film that was a sex comedy. But for that to have fully worked, Gardenia's wacko character would have had to be alive throughout the film, and he would have had to keep the sense of taking the credit for the success of Matthau's changing the production plan to save the project. That never happens.

    I think the film tried to be philosophical but never got beyond presenting the main argument. It was a poor choice to make. MOVERS & SHAKERS may never have been a promisingly great film, but it might have been an amusing one. It is not too amusing now. Definitely not worthy of it's cast's energies at all.
    1aberlour36

    A Golden Turkey

    This is surely one of the worst movies ever made. A comedy without a single laugh. The stupidity of the script, blame Charles Grodin for the entire film, is amazing. Steve Martin's performance was low, even for him. In short, awful and without redeeming features.
    1OtherDaryl

    Bottom Rung Grodin

    This aired on TCM last night, selected by guest programmer/star/screenwriter Charles Grodin. Classic? Hardly! He seems fairly proud of this pic, though, which allows an extremely talented cast to either overplay or underplay to agonizing effect. Director Asher (an Emmy winner for Bewitched) was better in the half hour television format. A complete waste of time. I think it's supposed to satirize the dying Hollywood studio system. It was movies like this that killed it. Pairing Bill Macy and Gilda Radner as a couple? Penny Marshall is credited and we hear her voice, but to my recollection only ever actually see her feet. Tyne Daly stands around with nothing substantive to do but be ticked off.
    7imseeg

    A movie about depressing people, who work in depressing jobs, have depressing relationships and have depressing ideas. Quite funny (at moments...)

    The good: leave it to Charles Grodin to write a story that is full of subtle, sarcastic observations of life. This story is mondane and humbling. But very humanlike! And that's the point!

    Lack of love, lack of communication is a perfect synopsis of how many relationships turn out to be in real life, but which isnt often shown in Hollywood movies. For good reason: people dont like to watch mondane, depressing stories in movies, because they get to experience that in everyday life, every hour of the day.

    But that's the strength of Charles Grodin' sense of (sarcastic) humor, he is capable of making ordinary and depressing situations seem funny.

    The bad; Charles Grodin mentioned on David Leterman that Movers and Shakers is not a slapstick movie, but that's it's weak point: it kinda is slapstick at moments. An even more serious approach would have increased the comedy effect.

    I loved the Charles Grodin scenes though and Walther Matthau is always a charm to watch, but many of the other supporting actors were OVERacting, although just a bit, but I never like it when comedy actors dont take their roles seriously.

    Something is less funny to me, when it is SUPPOSE to be funny, like Steve Martin is acting so plain silly that it smothers the comedy effect.

    This movie was cheaply made, because no one in Hollywood wanted to invest in a movie that was attacking Hollywood itself. So Charles Grodin put his own money in it and a lot of the actors took a paycut because they were befriended with Grodin and wanted to see this picture being made.

    In the end I would not recommend this movie, but it might be of interest for the true fans of this particular dry and sarcastic humor of Charles Grodin. I'll still rate it 7 stars because I am such a fan of Charles Grodin as well...(for non Charles Grodin fans I would rate it a 6).

    More like this

    The Lonely Guy
    6.2
    The Lonely Guy
    First Family
    4.3
    First Family
    Hanky Panky
    5.6
    Hanky Panky
    Haunted Honeymoon
    5.7
    Haunted Honeymoon
    Pennies from Heaven
    6.5
    Pennies from Heaven
    I Ought to Be in Pictures
    6.1
    I Ought to Be in Pictures
    Joe Gould's Secret
    6.6
    Joe Gould's Secret
    The Man with Two Brains
    6.4
    The Man with Two Brains
    Another Nice Mess
    5.8
    Another Nice Mess
    Twilight Theatre
    6.7
    Twilight Theatre
    All of Me
    6.7
    All of Me
    The Absent-Minded Waiter
    7.3
    The Absent-Minded Waiter

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Charles Grodin got some of his actors friends involved in trying to pitch the film. Himself, Steve Martin, Gilda Radner, Penny Marshall and Tyne Daly all agreed to work for the least amount of money the union allowed.did so without even reading the script. When the film was finally green-lit, Grodin received no salary for writing or producing the film, only the minimum for working five weeks as an actor: about five thousand dollars for two years of work (seven years in total since the inception of the project).
    • Goofs
      The huge prop dinosaur that is mounted on the lawn of the movie studio lot changes position in respect to nearby buildings several times throughout the film.
    • Connections
      Featured in At the Movies: Secret Admirer/The Goonies/Prizzi's Honor/Movers and Shakers (1985)
    • Soundtracks
      Can't We Go Home Again
      Words and Music by Mitzie Welch and Ken Welch

      Performed by Stephen Bishop

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ15

    • How long is Movers & Shakers?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 31, 1988 (Italy)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official site
      • MGM
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Dreamers
    • Filming locations
      • California, USA(Location.)
    • Production companies
      • Asher-Grodin Productions
      • United Artists
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $372,438
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $9,580
      • May 5, 1985
    • Gross worldwide
      • $372,438
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 20 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Mono
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Movers & Shakers (1985)
    Top Gap
    What is the English language plot outline for Movers & Shakers (1985)?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.