3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Split (IX) (2016)
5/10
More evidence M Night Shyamalan has lost his way
24 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There seems to be an emerging narrative that he's back. Maybe because the budgets are smaller people now see M Night Shyamalan as some kind of underdog that we should be rooting for. And I do root for him because I think The Sixth Sense is a classic and Unbreakable, Signs and The Village had their moments. But a string of jaw-droppingly awful films - Lady in the Water, The Happening, The Last Airbender and After Earth – obliterated my confidence in him. Some reviewers hailed The Visit as a return to form, but despite a promising concept the idiotically implausible characterization of the boy, who literally can't move when he's afraid, killed it for me.

But that's Night. In nearly everything he does there is a critical plot point that is so contrived and ridiculous it takes me right out of the film and I can never get back in. It wouldn't be so bad if his tongue was in cheek and he had some fun with it. But it's always something banal presented in a profound, meaningful way as if it's some earth-shattering artistic insight. Add Split to the list.

The three central performances are strong. James McAvoy is wickedly convincing as the split-personality psychopath. Betty Buckley has quiet strength, dignity and great intelligence and compassion as his psychiatrist. Anya Taylor-Joy, so powerful in The Witch, pulls you in with her big soulful eyes and makes it impossible not to root for her. But I would argue that the only reason her two friends are taken hostage with her is as a pretext to film pretty girls in their underwear. They are completely superfluous, unless one buys the story's malarkey that the Beast personality needs to eat them to gain strength. (I didn't) Walling the girls off from each other early in the film is a waste. I was much more interested in how they might work together to outsmart their captor and escape.

Casey's (Taylor-Joy's) backstory told in flashbacks undercuts the suspense of the present-day storyline. (It's Night's overworked theme of everything, no matter how seemingly remote, eventually tying together.) It would have been far more interesting, and McAvoy's character much more sympathetic, if Casey had stumbled across him doing something incriminating and he had reluctantly taken her hostage and now doesn't know what to do. But of course that would have been a less sensational approach with less box office potential.

There are nods to The Village (sort of) and Unbreakable (big-time) at the end that are fun, but in the case of Unbreakable, make little sense when you think about it. Night longs for a fusion between the real, humdrum world and the supernatural that, while terrifying, forces us to confront our demons and gives life meaning and purpose. I'm down with that, but he pursues this artistic objective in such a repetitive, immature way it bores. He knows film school tricks and how to manipulate a camera (and sometimes an audience) but I'm always aware I'm watching a movie, I don't get lost in them. He tries too hard to impress and in so doing ties himself in narrative knots that he can only escape through clumsy magic-for-beginner tricks.

Split opened well at the box office on the strength of McAvoy's showy, "Next Hannibal Lecter" performance. And pretty girls in their underwear. But I would be willing to bet the next time Night is given a big budget he'll blow it. Because unlike truly great filmmakers, he just can't seem to think of anything original to say. But man, he keeps trying.
20 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Babadook (2014)
6/10
The Babadook is real
22 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is a movie I've wanted to see since it came out as it looked to be a fresh take on horror. In the trailers, the Babadook struck me as a terrifying new bogeyman sprung from some collective children's nightmare or the frightened child in us all. The first act of the film is great. It's got the spooky, misunderstood kid, the stressed out single mom barely holding it together and a sickening sense of their household inexorably slipping into the supernatural. The best scenes are where the mother reads from the mysterious children's book to her son about the Babadook and quickly realizes that she has unwittingly (or perhaps not so unwittingly) let a demonic force into their lives. The book itself is a delightfully dark and fiendishly clever creation, and one thinks, a building block for a Freddy-type franchise. (In fact, I would rate the book 10 stars, the movie 5.)

But then the movie turns inward and the mother becomes possessed by the Babadook, so for a long stretch we no longer see the entity. Instead we see the mother in the grips of possession. While this makes sense psychologically, watching someone being controlled by a demonic force is depressingly familiar territory. And watching a once-loving mother act abusively towards her small child is not only monotonous, it's not my idea of entertainment. The arty, ambiguous ending provides a lot of food for thought, though it will undoubtedly disappoint hardcore horror fans.

There's a lot of talk on the message board about whether the Babadook is indeed real or whether it's all in the mother and child's heads. There are good arguments on both sides, but I do believe it's real, if for no other reason than there's a lot of money to be made in potential Babadook sequels.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kultur Shock! (2013)
8/10
The Most Puzzling Movie Ever Made
21 January 2017
Still not quite sure what to make of this. I came across the DVD at a secondhand bookstore in the bargain bin. I like puzzles, and the tag-line "We want you to solve the puzzle" hooked me. I'm also a bit of a connoisseur of fringe micro-budget cinema of which this is surely an example.

It belongs to the emerging contained-story sub-genre popularized by movies like Cube, Exam, Devil, Buried and countless others. Three banged up prisoners who can't remember who they are or how they got there – a small windowless room vaguely resembling a retro grade-school classroom – are being brainwashed by an unseen tormentor who transmits its German-accented voice through a creepy looking Uncle Sam doll. Uncle Sam refers to them by the names Red, White and Blue. They try to escape but something outside wants to get in. Gee, think there is some subversive political commentary going on here that might be applicable to events of 2016? (Oddly, the movie was apparently completed in 2013.)

That's not the only thing that's weird about it. It doesn't fit into any genre. It pays homage to the German silent The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari with expressionistic camera-work and, rather unnecessarily, an actual Caligari movie poster. The classroom scenes are reminiscent of Terry Gilliam's childlike Time Bandits absurdity. I detected nods to Twelve Angry Men, with rebellious Blue trying to win first White, then Red over to his initially unpopular point of view of overthrowing Uncle Sam. The evil doll angle calls to mind the Puppet Master series and of course Saw and even going back to Anthony Hopkins in Magic. There are obvious parallels with The Twilight Zone in terms of suspense, an overall eerie aura you can't quite put your finger on and the final twist. And finally, its cinematic grandfather is none other than Alfred Hitchcock's Rope.

It isn't as good as any of those films, of course, but just the fact that it suggests them on a tiny fraction of their budgets is an achievement.

The performances are uneven. One gets the sense it was filmed off and on over a long time and the actors had trouble remembering their proper emotional states. Though it can be argued that because the characters all suffer from some form of brain damage this works to the film's advantage. Maureen O'Malley is appropriately enigmatic as Red. She does a good job of making the audience wonder what she's thinking with her heavy-lidded Bette Davis eyes. (One wishes the writer, Eric Paul Chapman, gave her more to do.) The camera likes Terry McNavage as the weak-willed White – he looks a bit like Daniel Day Lewis – though the actor drifts in and out of the role. Eric Paul Chapman also plays Blue. It's an intense if erratic performance. He rises to the occasion in his most important confrontations with Uncle Sam. David Hundertmark's snide voicing of the doll is particularly memorable. An actor named Jerry Pietrala makes a surprise appearance and has good camera presence in a tricky role.

The taut music score and rich, saturated photography are strengths. The production design leaves a bit to be desired, and there are what I like to charitably call "low-budget moments" where the challenges of filming got the better of the producers, particularly in the realm of special effects. Pacing would have benefited from trimming five or ten minutes.

It's a real curio, quite unlike anything I've seen. The twist at the end stuck with me. I'm ashamed to say I was not able to solve the puzzle, but picked up some important clues I missed the first time around on a second viewing. I'd be curious to see what the filmmakers could do with a decent budget.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed