Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Wuchakk's profile image

Wuchakk

Joined Dec 2004
Write me at: dltoes@msn.com

My All-Time Favorite Movies: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/

Film Axioms:

  • No genre is beyond redemption or above contempt.


  • Just because a movie's good doesn't mean you'll like it; just because you like it doesn't mean it's good.


  • Italians have been making the worst movies for a hundred years.


  • Howard Hawks supplied the simplest definition of a good movie: "Three great scenes. No bad scenes."


  • Nine out of ten times when there's a bar scene in a movie there's a fight.


  • Every great auteur/actor has a bad or dubious film; but, remember, even God created the cockroach.


  • People who go overboard with criticism -- e.g. "This is the worst film ever!" or "I'd give this 0/10 if I could!" -- lose credibility as reviewers. The same goes with overrating a movie.


  • Honest reviewers must resist the influence of mass hype when a popular film debuts. Separating it from the initial epidemic fervor is mandatory in determining it's true worth. (Remember when Roger Ebert gave Peter Jackson's "King Kong" a perfect rating of 4/4 Stars? Why sure!).


  • Movies are life with the boring bits taken out.


  • A movie can be technically well-made, but void of depth. The reverse is also true: A movie can be technically deficient (usually due to low-budget), but thematically wealthy. Whereas the ideal is to have both, sometimes a movie's budget doesn't allow for top-notch filmmaking, but it can still soar in the realm of worthy mindfood. Some excellent examples from my reviews include "From Within," "Billy Jack" and "Tribes." Many episodes of the original Star Trek TV series are great examples as well, such as "Space Seed," "The Naked Time" or "The City on the Edge of Forever."


  • Movies must be critiqued and graded according to what they are and aspire to achieve. For instance, 1998's "Godzilla" is a colossal-creature movie and should therefore be reviewed on that level. Compared to the original "Apocalypse Now" it's dreck, but how does it stack-up to other gigantic-monster movies?


  • Reviewers who intentionally say false things about a film reveal a personal vendetta against it and lose all credibility as reviewers. Don't even give these types of "reviewers" and their "reviews" the time of day.


  • Movies are the modern-day campfire tales of centuries past. They entertain, amuse, inspire and mentor. Generally speaking, they provide the mythology that helps the modern world cope with reality.


  • I see a lot of reviewers giving movies 10/10 Stars or 1/10 Stars when, the reality is, most movies fall between 5/10 Stars and 7/10 Stars.


  • Disregarding profits, the main purpose of a movie is to entertain; the secondary purpose is to convey a message. The better the entertainment and message, the better the movie. The reverse is also true.


  • In 99 out of 100 movies, if something doesn't happen by the end of the first reel, nothing's gonna happen (at least nothing compelling, effective, original or inspiring).


  • Popularity at the box office is very important for people who's opinion of an artistic work needs validated by others (rolling my eyes).


  • A movie that doesn't do well at the box office isn't always an indicator that it's bad; it could mean something interesting is going on that's too far out of the norm for mass consumption. "Watchmen" and (believe it or not) "The Wizard of Oz" are good examples ("Wizard" bombed when it debuted in 1939).


  • Watching a movie is like seeing someone else's hallucination. You have to be willing to enter into the film's 'world' to appreciate it. If you can't, you won't.


  • The rating of a movie is irrelevant (G, PG, PG-13, R). Does more gore, more nudity, more cussing, more overt sexual situations determine the worthiness of a film? Maybe for 13 year-olds. Is "The Wizard of OZ" a lousy film because it's rated G? How about the original "Planet of the Apes"?


  • While good movies can be made with big budgets, big names, big stunts and incredible F/X, they can also be made with small budgets, creative writers & directors and no-name-but-quality actors.


  • No one sets out to make a bad movie.


  • It's always preferable to watch an entertaining mess over a competent bore-fest.


  • Art (including film) is not meant to be an imitation of reality, but rather an interpretation of it.


  • Never watch a movie starring Jean-Claude Van Damme.

=========================

RATING GUIDE:

10/10 Stars: A+ (Top-of-the-line)
9/10 Stars: A (Excellent)
8/10 Stars: A- (Breaks the threshold of greatness)
7/10 Stars: B+ or B (Very good or, at least, good)
6/10 Stars: B or B- (Marginal "thumbs up")
5/10 Stars: C+ or C (Too flawed to recommend, but some worthwhile aspects)
4/10 Stars: C or C- (Severely mediocre or flawed)
3/10 Stars: D+ or D (Cinematic flotsam)
2/10 Stars: D or D- ("Brain and brain, what is brain?")
1/10 Star: F (Worthless garbage for one important reason or another)

Note: Like everyone else, I tend to watch movies I think I might like, which explains my numerous positive ratings.

=========================

Favorite Film of All Time:

Apocalypse Now

TV Axiom:

  • Every ten years or so a TV show comes along that doesn't suck.
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.

Ratings3.3K

Wuchakk's rating
Follow the River
6.27
Follow the River
Death Defying Acts
5.86
Death Defying Acts
Run the Wild Fields
7.18
Run the Wild Fields
The Wrong Daughter
4.86
The Wrong Daughter
The Invisible Man
7.15
The Invisible Man
The Invisible Man
7.67
The Invisible Man
Wolf Man
5.66
Wolf Man
The Notebook
7.87
The Notebook
Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace
6.37
Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace
Carnal Knowledge
6.96
Carnal Knowledge
The Shadow of Chikara
5.36
The Shadow of Chikara
The Castle of the Living Dead
5.77
The Castle of the Living Dead
A Bridge Too Far
7.47
A Bridge Too Far
Meridian
5.05
Meridian
In the Devil's Garden
5.56
In the Devil's Garden
The Boys from Brazil
7.08
The Boys from Brazil
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow
5.17
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow
I, Monster
5.76
I, Monster
Wolfcop
5.67
Wolfcop
The Truman Show
8.26
The Truman Show
Shadow Lake
5.17
Shadow Lake
Sweetwater
6.27
Sweetwater
The Night of the Grizzly
6.57
The Night of the Grizzly
Kill Switch
3.87
Kill Switch
The Patriot
4.26
The Patriot

Lists17

  • Marlon Brando and Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now (1979)
    Memorable Movie Lines
    • 207 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Apr 09, 2025
  • Marlon Brando and Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now (1979)
    Francis Ford Coppola's Movies Favorite-to-Least-Favorite
    • 24 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Feb 26, 2025
  • Kevin Costner in Dances with Wolves (1990)
    Best Westerns
    • 92 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Nov 08, 2024
  • Marilyn Eastman, Duane Jones, and Judith Ridley in Night of the Living Dead (1968)
    Cult Movies That Don't SUCK
    • 116 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Jul 16, 2024
See all lists

Reviews3.2K

Wuchakk's rating
Follow the River

Follow the River

6.2
7
  • May 11, 2025
  • Settlers vs Shawnee in the heart of Appalachia, 1755

    After a raid at Draper's Meadow settlement in what is now the Virginia Tech campus in Blacksburg, several Caucasians are taken captive and brought northwest to the Shawnee village in what is present-day South Portsmouth in northeast Kentucky, and, later, to Big Bone Lick, which is further west. The resilient Mary Ingles (Sheryl Lee) hatches a plan with an older German captive (Ellen Burstyn) to possibly find their way back over the 350 miles of wilderness. Eric Schweig plays the chief warrior.

    "Follow the River" (1995) is an American settler survival adventure with the general milieu of "The Last of the Mohicans" (1992) except with a budget and tone closer to the later "Battle of the Brave" or "The Sign of the Beaver," aka "Keeping the Promise." It's very similar to "Alone Yet Not Alone," which came out eighteen years after, and concerned a similar raid, also in 1755, albeit by the Delaware (Lenape) 275 miles to the northeast in central Pennsylvania.

    You'll be inspired to look up the historical account. The movie has heart and should be commended for keeping the gist accurate, although what happens at the close is glaring fiction (you'll know what I mean). Nevertheless, the flick gives you a good peak at what it was like in the wilderness of Appalachia in the mid-1700s when the French and Indian War was starting (and lasted from 1754-1763).

    It runs 1 hour, 31 minutes, and was shot in Sapphire and Turtleback Falls in southwest North Carolina, both about a 1.5 hour drive west of Charlotte.

    GRADE: B.
    Death Defying Acts

    Death Defying Acts

    5.8
    6
  • May 10, 2025
  • Part factual, part fictional accounting of Houdini's final months in 1926

    The showman (Guy Pearce) visits Edinburgh, Scotland, where he meets a psychic woman and her daughter, who are out to con him (Catherine Zeta-Jones and Saoirse Ronan). Timothy Spall is on hand as Harry's protective tour manager.

    "Death Defying Acts" (2007) is not a biopic of Houdini, but rather historical fiction, aka 'faction.' Assuming Harry was faithful to his beloved Bessie, it's offensive to have him romancing a fake spiritualist. All we have are a few words in a diary and no physical evidence of any such encounters. Walking a woman to a carriage, as was witnessed, doesn't mean much; after all, he was an actor with twinkling eyes and one of the most famous people of the era. On the other hand, it's not out of the realm of possibility that he had a secret affair (or affairs) since he was famous and gone from home for weeks on end, touring the world. The movie simply explores this prospect.

    If you're in the mood for cobblestone streets, music hall entertainment, mystery, and cockney women (Edinburgh's version of them, anyway) it's worth checking out. While it takes place in a post-Victorian milieu, it's reminiscent in ways to the nigh excellent "The Limehouse Golem," and even "From Hell" and "Sherlock Holmes," although it's more dramatic than thrilling, not to mention lacks the horrific bits.

    It inspires interest in the master escape artist, who died prematurely at the age of 52 due to a ruptured appendix.

    The flick runs 1 hour, 37 minutes, and was shot in London and Edinburgh, as well as Pinewood Studios in Buckinghamshire, just west of London.

    GRADE: B-
    Run the Wild Fields

    Run the Wild Fields

    7.1
    8
  • May 9, 2025
  • Hidden gem about life in rural America in the last year of WW2

    A woman in North Carolina (Joanne Whalley) awaits the return of her husband from the Pacific, who's missing in action. She hires a disreputable transient to work the farm (Sean Patrick Flanery) and he bonds with her 10 years-old daughter (Alexa PenaVega).

    "Run the Wild Fields" (2000) was based on a play and contains elements of films like "Of Mice and Men," "Places in the Heart," "The Man in the Moon" and "Lawn Dogs." The story has room to breathe as it fleshes-out the characters and refuses to go over-the-top, which works for me. There is one cliched scene, but the flick makes up for it with an unexpected turn.

    It runs 1 hour, 41 minutes, and was shot north of Toronto in Whitchurch-Stouffville.

    GRADE: A-
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.