Change Your Image
Scott-Antes
Reviews
7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)
Definitely worth a look
Perhaps if Peter Sellers (George Pal's original choice for the lead here) had played Dr. Lao in this film, it would have done much better at the box office when released, and the film would be seen by more than a cult following today. Sellers would become the hotter 1960s box office draw, but Tony Randall does an outstanding job as Dr. Lao, and this movie is definitely worth anyone's viewing. The make-up work in this film is terrific, by any standard, and the special effects--especially for 1964--are terrific. *The 7 Faces of Dr. Lao* has something for everyone: fantasy, romance, comedy, drama, minimal violence--even a few minutes of Barbara Eden's sexual passion heating up. Again, for anyone who hasn't enjoyed watching it, it's definitely worth a look. For many who have already seen it, it's worth another.
Harry in Your Pocket (1973)
Pros get the short end of the stick.
I liked this film, but contemporary viewers might find it somewhat less than exciting. Viewers who weren't around in the early '70s are liable to be distracted by the bad fashions and bad hair of the day, even though this film is relatively conservative in that respect. Sex and violence do exist in the film, but by today's standards are extremely mild. The main characters, in any case, are portrayed superbly. All four actors who play these roles are charismatic, each in his or her own way. I thought the ending of the film was a little disappointing, although it undoubtedly was meant to send a message. This is a film that needs to be rated according to the standards of the time. While categorized as a comedy, it is far more serious than amusing.
The Third Man (1949)
A *must* for film fans!
The Third Man is a must see, must have, for all film fans. The script, the setting, the cast, the acting, the cinematography, all are superior. I particularly like two things about the film: One is the post-WW II venue, which contributes to the story's intrigue as well as providing historical, cultural, and scenic value. Another is the fact that the story is not as predictable as the viewer might expect. Those of us who critique every film we see always will find something--however minor--to criticize, but this film is well done in every respect. It's a definite classic, one that belongs in every film buff's library. I prefer the British version to the American, just because it's the original, but either way it's hard to go wrong on The Third Man.