11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Classic production of a Dickens classic
28 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I had wanted to see this David Lean film for years, having been a huge fan of his 1948 production of Oliver Twist. I was very taken with the opening ten minutes... gorgeous B&W cinematography of bleak landscapes and a very stark graveyard. The young actor portraying Pip captures all the fear and surprise of the situation. Finley Currie gives one of the best performances as Magwich: brutal and threatening in the opening scenes, but transformed into a loving father by the end. Jean Simmons gives perhaps the strongest performance of the film as the selfish, often cruel and arrogant Estella. This was her first film appearance and she is unforgettable. Martita Hunt is the definitive jilted-at-the-altar Miss Havisham, not the caricature other actresses have created. She is not overtly cruel, perhaps even capable of love - however well hidden it may be - but definitely not sane.

Now we come to the problems with this movie: the casting of adult Pip and adult Estella. There is definitely a jolt when young Pip is suddenly a 20 yr old Pip... but he's portrayed by 38 yr old John Mills, looking every one of his years. But he's a great actor and almost convinces us of the character's youth, but it took me 45 minutes to fully accept him. We have a reaction almost as jolting when we see Estella, now a young woman. Valerie Hobson looks quite different from Jean Simmons, and not as beautiful. We imagined what Estella would look look like at 22 or 23 but for me Hobson isn't it. Beyond that her speaking voice and delivery are too different from Simmons. Some have speculated that Simmons could have also played the adult Estella, but - uh - big problem: John Mills would have looked even older seeing the two of them paired. So we can only fantasize about these casting questions.

Other performances are very fine, especially Frances L. Sullivan in the pivotal role of Mr Jaggers. This is largely a characterization not calling for humor, so it's fun seeing him deliver out and out laughs in Oliver Twist two years later! ("The law is a ass!")

In one of his earliest film performances it is wonderful to see Alec Guiness as Herbert Pockett. At 32 he was also portraying a 20 yr old and almost pulls it off thru shear acting talent. The earlier scene between Pip and Herbert Pockett boxing each other in a garden is one of the most memorable in the film.

David Lean's pacing and direction are most impressive through the first 45 minutes. The central section in London bogs down a bit as Pip evolves into something of a bore and feels sorrier and sorrier for himself. We just wish he'd take control of his life and move on. But perhaps this makes sense as he living off the generosity of some unknown figure and really is not in control of his life. He clearly loves (or is just obsessed?) with Estella, even though she warns him she has no heart and is incapable of love. It if finally the sudden appearance of his secret benefactor and jolts Pip into action.

The concluding third of the film portrays the melodrama Dickens concocted, and there is excitement and plenty of tears as relationships are revealed. The closing sequence back in the grand country home of Miss Havisham allows Pip and Estella to finally come to full terms with each other. This scene is thrilling and exhilarating, as only great filmmakers are able of creating! Few will watch this without shedding some tears. I only wish it had not been so brief.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Force Majeure (2014)
5/10
L'Aventura meets a ski resort in the Alps.
19 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Force Majeure has 45 minutes of impressive filmmaking. The story follows a young couple as they vacation at a ski resort with their two young children. An unexpected incident results in the couple doubting the legitimacy of their marriage and their love for each other. This happens within the first 45 minutes. Up to this point the viewer is kept intrigued by imaginative framing and editing of shots leaving a sense of something unpleasant going on beneath the surface. Jean-Luc Godard or Kubrick might have admired the director's technique. But movies have to hold the viewer's attention and this movie's snowmaking guns start to run out of water less than halfway thru its two hour length. After that it becomes Scenes from a Marriage: the husband collapses in a corner laughing/crying uncontrollably for a minute and a half, people stare into mirrors blankly for thirty seconds, there is family tooth brushing (electric brushes only) while staring into mirrors, existential detail shots of ski lift cables and mechanisms chattering in the blank white atmosphere, a woman wanders off the ski trail to pull her suit down and pee into the snow. By the time the family's vacation has ended and they go marching away I was ready to do the same.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ambulance (2022)
5/10
Too long by 45 minutes
2 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The first 30 minutes was typical crime drama fare with the added spice of Gyllenhaal's exceptionally annoying lead character. I had the impression Michael Bay never quite decided who that character was. He's psycho, and comedic (in completely inappropriate ways), as embodied in Gyllenhaal's self-indulgent performance. Did Jake really need the paycheck? I did not enjoy seeing him play a villain, and especially one who so enjoyed being a villain.

The movie starts to drag a third of the way in which is remarkable since it's a non-stop action flick. Trouble is there is nothing action and chase, and it becomes monotonous. The movie does have a beginning, a middle and an end. But the middle is almost the entire bulk of the movie with action peak after action peak after action peak... you get the idea. It becomes simply too draining. Along with endless maniacal reaction shots and 'joking' of Gyllenhaal.

The LA police are portrayed as either incompetent or stupid, or both. Why did they cooperate with this production? No respect is shown for the dozens of intentional and unintentional lives that would have lost during all this mayhem, except two people.

The conclusion of Ambulance is quite brief considering how exceptionally long the middle was, but it is turned maudlin by revealing Gyllenhaal's character and his partner in crime had been life-long friends from early childhood. But it's far too late to have any sympathy for Gyllenhaal's sociopath character. I could barely wait for the movie to grind to its end and did not watch the credits.

Special comment is called for regarding the wild, twisting drone photography that is edited in continually thru the movie and was shot - reportedly - by a drone racing specialist. It does blend with the non-stop action but ultimately adds little to the experience, perhaps even detracting from it.

Certainly not the best effort from either Michael Bay or Jake Gyllenhaal. Onward and upward.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Purge with Meaning
31 May 2022
I found this edition in the series the most meaningful, the one with actual intent beyond to shock (which it also does). The subject is both class resentment and hatred/suspicion of other racial groups. As someone who grew up and lives in the American southwest I appreciated the desert and El Paso TX locations all of which are handled very well. It was great seeing the Mexican actors in primary roles, rare for mainstream Hollywood productions. Entire cast is excellent. Production values very high. This time the violence has meaning behind it. As it concluded I found myself thinking far right-wing nut culture are hating and cursing this movie. The opposite of my response. Highly recommend for those who can handle ultra-violence combined with serious social commentary. Especially relevant following the increasingly frequent mass murders, usually involving minorities.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Marksman (2021)
6/10
Impressive Cinematography
29 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The cinematography and quality of the light was actually what first grabbed my attention with this mid-level action film. Kudos to Mark Patten. I'm a pro photographer and this guy knows what he's doing! He has the resume to prove it.

The plot is honestly Mexican swiss cheese, there are so many holes mixed together with just as many improbabilities. Despite the contrived plot and predictable characters it was exciting enough to hold my attention and I did care about the little boy and his mother.

Katheryn Winnick's character is underdeveloped. Needed to have been brought back in the final fifteen minutes, or at least a closing scene.

One of the most memorable characterizations is that of the chief villain, a Mexican drug cartel enforcer played with 100% commitment by Juan Pablo Raba. He's scary, and cruel, but with a bit of mystery lurking somewhere inside.

Not much to say about Liam Neeson here. He's fully professional and mostly convincing, but his barking angry retorts become tiresome. He's also very Irish, not making much effort to lose the accent while playing an American rancher in Arizona.

Jacob Perez very good as the young boy who is the target of the cartel's bad guys.

If you're a student of state-of-the-art digital cinematography watch this movie to study Mark Patten's very fine work.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Noah (2014)
5/10
And the reason for?
23 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Watched all of this the other night, but for the last 12 minutes or so when I realized I was no longer interested. I kept asking myself what the reason Aronofsky wanted to make this movie? In order to appreciate I would need to overcome my natural antipathy to the stern unforgiving father figure model of religion and morality. Noah is shown continually as representing this, in place of the character of God, who is not represented in the film. More symbolic representations of supernatural events is generally more effective, as when DeMille showed God in the form of the burning bush, as it was actually described. The rather ridiculous animated rock creatures (a la the 'horda' that appeared in a famous Star Trek episode) were over-the-top and I laughed out loud when Noah yelled out to one 'where is my son?' and the creature answered 'he already got thru' (or something to that effect. In other words some of the dialog is straight out of an Afghanistan US army rescue movie. Did Aronofsky not recognize the potential hilarity of these situations and writing?

The plight of the animals supposedly housed within the arc is completely ignored, other than showing several having been slaughtered by the head 'baddie'.

The interpersonal soap opera dramas between Noah's wife, her daughter-in-law, he son and Noah himself seemed almost completely out of place and far too modern.

I think I preferred John Huston's much simpler presentation of the Noah story in his 1960s 'The Bible'.

Is this movie another example of too large a purse being handed to a writer/director with fuzzy intentions? It is one of recurring situations Hollywood studios dealt with since the earliest years.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vienna Blood (2019– )
5/10
Doesn't hold my attention
17 January 2022
Watched S1 episodes 1 and 2. Did not hold my attention. It seems underwritten, plot twists are unconvincing, as are the final revelations. The actors do try so they get a thumbs up for that, but it can't make up for second rate writing and directing.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Macbeth (II) (2018)
7/10
Worthwhile Macbeth Production
17 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This 2018 Macbeth movie places each scene in a theatrical fantasy setting, actually the same approach the 2021 Joel Cohen film takes, but with a very different look. This production uses very young talent, but that doesn't mean they are not skilled and effective actors... they are. Mark Rowley takes on Macbeth with energy and passion. As to passion, I admire the effective exploration of the erotic relationship between him and Lady Macbeth, something Joel Cohen completely left out of his 2021 film, and it suffered for it. I think Shakespeare wanted that erotic love to be a part of the bond that the couple hold, and makes it easier to understand Lady Macbeth's manipulation.

Production values in this 2018 film are very high with fascinating transitions from scene to scene. You are not presented with a realistic setting at all and if you are open to going along with it it's a fun ride.

The grand dinner scene is played out much more thoroughly than in Cohen's film. This is when Lady Macbeth learns that her husband has had Banquo murdered and you can see in her response that she sees everything falling apart. The scene lasts ten minutes here and less than three in Cohen's version.

I really think Joel Cohen watched this movie, there are numerous similarities in the approach and even the framing of key shots.

All the scenes are presented as if wrapped into a giant, transparent 'Globe' and there is the figure of an older man, a writer in his study, who observes everything, sometimes with apparent surprise. I am supposing this is the author himself? All in all this 2018 is worth watching and I admire the efforts of all who were involved.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A memorable drama based on history
1 January 2022
I've watched this movie three times, and three is the magic number! These three incredible actresses are what make this movie so engrossing and moving. I'm aware while I'm watching that I'm being just a little bit manipulated, but it's done in a way that does not pander, and you WANT to see these people to succeed, to have recognition for their abilities and accomplishments. You CARE about their lives.

I've been brought to tears each time at the conclusion when the movie characters are shown with their historical counterparts. If you are your family are looking a quality movie that truly entertains while also offering deep meaning you cannot go wrong with this one. Highly recommend!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Superior Low Budget SciFi
26 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Came upon this online knowing nothing about it. The name intrigued me and I began watching. Within ten minutes I was definitely hooked by the story and performances. There are monsters, but not aliens. All CGI, of course, but believable and quite scary.

Brett Tutor effectively portrays the lead protagonist. He is charismatic and your eye is drawn to him in every scene. I read that he was a stuntman and his physical skills are called upon throughout.

Neil McDonough does his usual evil villain routine, but few do it better.

Special praise for the child actors. Very fine!

I was very satisfied with the conclusion of this movie. I definitely recommend and look forward to what this director, writer and actors do next! Low budget does not have to mean low quality. The entertainment level of this movie is high.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Midway (2019)
7/10
Better than...
26 December 2021
I had skipped seeing this in theaters after hearing it was not that great. Came upon it the other night for streaming on IMDB TV. Just some quick thoughts: It's a great looking movie with spectacular visuals throughout. Occasionally aerial dog fights are a bit overdone but the dramatic drive of the movie is strong. Character development is above average for this type of movie and I cared about the characters. The writers chose to make this almost a documentary and many key characters are referenced in their real lives at the movie's close. One of my few disappointments was the moviemaker's choice not to fully explain the battle of Midway and how it finally played out, as the Japanese came back a day or two later and took out another carrier. But this would have strung out the movie and perhaps prevented a satisfying conclusion.

The Japanese are well presented and played by skilled actors, from the high command down to soldiers and pilots. They are not one-dimensional but have the same emotions and patriotic intentions as the American characters. Yamamoto is especially well filled out as a character. The very brutal aspects of Japanese war crimes is also presented, and it comes as a shock.

Yes, I recommend this movie!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed