Change Your Image
TheLittleSongbird
Had a major operation on my back in March 2011 to improve my scoliosis. I also have Aspergers Syndrome (hence why I get very overly passionate and hot-headed when something, especially reviewers resorting to condescension and with the inability to tell the difference between fact and opinion, annoys me) and primary epilepsy, both of which I'm coping with but there are also days that are a struggle with the epilepsy getting worse overtime. Also a problem in recent years has been an on and off weight problem, with a lot of losing weight in a short space of time because my insecurities and anxiety have been issues for a while.
Am a massive film, of all genres and decades, animation and classical music/opera lover. All of which helped me relax and kept me going when I was going through rough patches (namely health problems, stress and bullying) and had moments where I felt like giving up.
It is for those reasons as to why I have watched as much as I have and why I have contributed so heavily here. Furthermore, I enjoy it, doing the reviews has broadened my film knowledge significantly and has improved my writing skills and how I express myself.
A lot of my reviews (especially those for concert/opera ballet productions), during particularly prolific years, have been through watching things related to my course and during some lengthy breaks from studying. Just to clarify for those wondering, or even suspicious of (having been accused of being a liar a sometimes, a few of which got personal), how I have contributed as much as I have and why. Most of my reviews too have been for individual episodes for shows seen in my spare time and as a child so there is nothing suspicious about wanting to review individual episodes and cartoons watched from a young age and over-time.
Being part of IMDb has not been without its downsides and annoyances, but the friends and admirers I've garnered through being a user has given me a lot of confidence. I also wish to thank everybody who have contacted me, with praise for my reviews and wishing me well, it means a lot. Apologies too for any slow or non responses, I can be very busy to reply or shy, it's not because I'm rude.
Ratings for films:
10. Outstanding
9. Near-masterpiece
8. Very good
7. Worth watching
6. Good
5. Average
4. Passable
3. Pretty lame
2. Very poor
1. Terrible
Mrs White: Life after death is as improbable as sex after marriage. (Clue)
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: At Midnight in Manhattan (2019)
In the right direction
'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' "At Midnight in Manhattan" (2019)
Opening thoughts: Season 21 did not get off to a great start. The season opener was respectable but the next three episodes were very disappointing, especially "The Burden of Our Lives". On first watch, my overall thoughts were on the most part positive, the character writing is wanting for some characters but there is a major improvement in the story departments, compared to the previous episodes. Plus it was one of the few Season 21 episodes where there were no issues with the victims.
"At Midnight in Manhattan" is a major step in the right direction and the first good episode. Was not that impressed by Season 21 on the whole, but it did still have some good and more episodes and "At Midnight in Manhattan" is one of them. It isn't great and has imperfections in some of the character writing and occasionally the dialogue, but the episode also contains the first consistently compelling story that wasn't heavily problematic and again one aspect really surprised me in a good way.
Good things: Photography and such as usual are fully professional, the slickness still remaining. The music is used sparingly and is haunting and non-overwrought when it is used, and it's mainly used when a crucial revelation or plot development is revealed. The direction has pulse while also letting things breathe, stylistically also it isn't flashy or gimmicky while also not being leaden. Most of the acting is very good, with only one exception.
The episode also has a mostly punchy and gritty script that flows well and is not too soapy. The personal life drama on the whole didn't get too much and really appreciated that the episode tried to do more than one average or less story over-stretched and instead having more than one story tied together neatly (while not too neat) that didn't feel over-stuffed or disjointed. It was a good decision to not focus too much on one or two specific characters and underuse the others, like some episodes in the season did. The victims were also ones worth caring about.
Bad things: It isn't a perfect episode though. Didn't like Rollins' treatment of Carisi and she comes over as rather selfish and aggressive. While it is nice that Tamin is headstrong and is not a weak personality, she is also not very likeable and is too opinionated with the inability to listen to others.
Jamie Gray Hyder's acting is rather flat. Didn't like some of Olivia's dialogue, which came over as patronising (i.e. What she says about women being stronger than men, what possessed her to say that and certainly considering the case).
Closing thoughts: On the whole, for the season at this point this was impressive.
7/10.
The Royal Nanny (2022)
Royally surprised
'The Royal Nanny' (2022)
Opening thoughts: Christmas films can go either way, which has been my experience watching overtime the festive output of Lifetime and Hallmark. They can either be well-meaning, charming, warm-hearted and don't feel too heavy. Or they can be too over-sentimental, cheesy, contrived and bland. There have been many films of theirs that have fallen in both camps and in the camp where there is a bit of both. And ''The Royal Nanny' did have the sort of premise where the execution could have gone either way.
Am generally not a fan of the royalty-themed Hallmark films. There have definitely been some pleasant surprises, but they tend to be very more of the same, with cliches galore done badly and very cheesy, a lot with bad acting and lacking in intedeating or/and likeable characters. 'The Royal Nanny' is one of the pleasant surprises, and as far as the royalty-themed Hallmark films go (especially for the ones ser at Christmas) it is for me easily one of the best. With it feeling fresh and that it was a lot less formulaic than usual.
Bad things: 'The Royal Nanny' isn't perfect. It did feel too short and also a bit over-crowded, which made the film feel rushed. Particularly in the final act.
Good things: Everything else is fine. The two leads carry 'The Royal Nanny' with down to earth charm and wit, looking as if they were having fun while not over-compensating. Their chemistry is good natured and sweet, and it looked natural. The supporting cast are fine, with a nice dignified turn from Greta Scacchi. The characters are familiar in type but they have a lot of fresh personality and are not annoying.
Furthermore, the film is attractive and slick looking, the locations are beautiful to look at. The music fits well and didn't sound over-bearing or intrusive. The script is witty and doesn't ramble or come over as awkward and cheesy, the latter extreme has been the case with a lot of Hallmark's royal themed films. The story felt fresh and is a lot less formulaic than usual, while also going at a pace that has liveliness in some places and gentility in others. It is very cosy and feel good, with a lot of heart and charm, while not being over serious or too spoof-like.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, very well done.
8/10.
The Nutshack (2007)
Very poor, but have seen a lot worse
'The Nutshack' (2007-2011)
Opening thoughts: Absolutely adore animation, something that has been the case as a child and it is frequently seen still. Have always aimed to at least appreciate all kinds of humour, and have seen crude humour done well (the early seasons of 'Rick and Morty' for instance) and animated shows that broke boundaries and were ahead of their time (i.e. 'South Park'). Have though seen quite a number of bad and worse animated shows, such as 'Red Ape Family' and 'Mega Babies' in recent weeks.
'The Nutshack' (saw the whole thing by the way) is another show that is proof that not all animation is good. It is very poor and a vast majority of elements are done awfully, but actually this reviewer has seen a lot worse. As lazy and lacking in effort 'The Nutshack' was, it at least didn't offend me as such as 'Red Ape Family', 'Mega Babies' and 'High Guardian Spice' for instances. For anybody asking why people who hated this while praising 'South Park', regardless of how much it can shock, the latter at least is well made, had jokes that were witty and original, broke boundaries and had fun characters. Other than the bold boundary breaking with the diversity for 2007, 'The Nutshack' has none of that.
Good things: Did think there were good things. Chita did have some likeability and was gamely voiced.
It was great to see some diverse representation and it was a lot more tasteful and accurate than the diversity seen in 'High Guardian Spice'.
Bad things: So much is really poorly done. Including some of the worst flash animation to ever exist. There is no colour vibrancy, everything just looks flat and garish, editing is not tight enough and is often dizzying, the backgrounds lack imagination or smoothness, almost always looking static. The character designs fare the worst, some of the ugliest easily of any animated show. The music never fits and sounds at least a decade out of date. The theme tune is one of the most annoying in animation.
Nothing is funny or clever here, there is too much over-reliance on crude gross out humour that would offend even younger viewers and make parents question the target audience. The humour sounds very recycled and has no originality or subtlety whatsoever. Emotionally, there is nothing. No depth, no pathos or heart, there is not even enough emotion to be remotely sentimental. The storytelling in all the episodes is as unoriginal as one can get (very rehashed feeling actually), the world building is not immersive and is never fully fleshed out and it is very dull by the numbers in execution.
With the sole exception of Chita, the characters are obnoxious with the show going well overboard on making Phil as jerk-ish as possible. The voice acting is a mix of uninterested and hammy, the worst offenders being for Phil and Horats. That for Chita is the one exception. While the diversity is not as distasteful or as caricatured as feared (this aspect is done far better than in 'High Guardian Spice', that surprisingly was written by a trans person but written in a way that was indicative of bigotry) and enough of it is accurate, it still felt too stereotyped and simplistic.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, very poor but have seen a lot worse.
2/10.
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: The Burden of Our Choices (2019)
Carrying a burden
'Law and Order: Special Victim's Unit' "The Burden of Our Lives" (2019)
Opening thoughts: Abortion is one of the most controversial subjects there is, with very strong views on both sides. The subject has been tackled many times in the 'Law and Order' franchise, most of them on the original 'Law and Order'. Mostly very well too might this reviewer add. 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' proved many times that it could handle controversial and sensitive topics and in a way that doesn't trivialise while being tactful. Did find though that on first watch "The Burden of Our Choices" was not one of those episodes.
On recent rewatch, it still isn't. Season 21 had been pretty disappointing up to this point, though it did show improvement with the next episode thankfully, and "The Burden of Our Choices" is the fourth disappointing episode in a row. Of all the franchise's episodes that explored abortion, this is probably the least tactful and least interesting one and it was one of the ones that showed the most potential on paper. One of those episodes that promises more than it delivers and is a good representation of what went wrong with a vast majority of the season.
Good things: "The Burden of Our Choices" isn't all bad. The production values are suitably slick and gritty, with photography that is reliant on close ups that have an intimacy without being too claustrophobic. The music is didn't come over as too melodramatic or like it was emphasising the emotion too much.
Considering what was given to them, the actors did a good job. Peter Scanivino particularly. The episode did start off very well and thoughtfully, it also started off as presenting it from more than one stance and trying to show that abortion is a complex issue with extreme views on either side rather than being too much of one view.
Bad things: Unfortunately, "The Burden of Our Choices" is an example of an episode that starts off very well but falls apart too early and doesn't recover. It should have approached the subject in a much more tactful and balanced way, the final third especially is incredibly preachy, the relevant but not subtle message having a beat round the head quality, and presented in too much of a "this side of the argument is right and the other wrong" way. The case is very predictable, with the truth being obvious very early on (from the get go in my case). The investigating is routine and loses tension too and then the legal portion comes over as melodramatic and nonsensical (like the last minute arrival of the lawyer in the manner they do).
Writing-wise, "The Burden of Our Choices" is a misfire and most of the character writing fails too. The dialogue is very over-heated and too much of it is very preachy. Especially in the last act and most of Tamin's dialogue, which was latter seasons Olivia 2.0 level. Carisi's speech was incredibly forced. Really didn't like the writing for the supporting characters, being more stereotyped cartoons than real. Even worse is Tamin, she has some spunkiness but comes over as too opinionated and abrasive in how she expresses her views, actually agreed with her point of view rather than Carisi's and her reasons but disliked how she expressed them. One of the reasons as to why the episode came over the way it did. Jamie Gray Hyder is really bland as her.
Closing thoughts: Didn't work for me and one of the season's weakest episodes all in all.
4/10.
In Merry Measure (2022)
Measure that could have been merrier
'In Merry Measure' (2022)
Opening thoughts: Hallmark have been responsible for many good Christmas films, including from 2022. They have also been responsible for some real misfires, again also from 2022. The premise is one of those could go either way ones, potentially light hearted and cosy but also potentially a film with difficult to like characters judging from the early parts of the plot synopsis. Brendan Penny's, the most familiar name to me, films and performances for me have always been hit and miss, and it has been very dependent on how his characters are written and used (variable on both counts).
'In Merry Measure' is one of those films that people will consider light hearted and warm glow in the heart-inducing. At the same time, it is not for those that like characters to be likeable and easy to connect with regardless of their flaws, or if they are wanting anything fresh. To me, 'In Merry Measure' fitted in both extremes and was one of those mixed feelings, slightly above average films. Hallmark definitely did much worse in 2022, including in the Christmas output. They also did a lot better, with the year containing some of their best ever work in particularly the Hallmark Movies and Mysteries block.
Good things: There is a good deal to like in 'In Merry Measure'. The best thing about it is Penny, reading about the film part of me was expecting to be annoyed and/or bored by his character, but he succeeds in making an initially flawed character grow realistically and gives a charming and subtly charismatic performance that deserved a more consistent film. Also liked very much the performances of a funny and sassy Jennifer Robertson and beyond her years Cassidy Reichmann.
Despite the story being uneven, there are good scenes with a strong highlight being the amusing and charming scene between the two sisters. It is nicely made, love the scenery, and directed with competence. Also did like the music, which is catchy and beautiful with a real Christmas feel. It is also surprisingly well performed with no affectations, overuse of unnecessary interpolations and auto-tune, all of which tend to be distracting for me. Mostly, the story is very cosy and can warm the heart. And there is a lovely positive message delivered with sincerity and no preachiness.
Bad things: Viewers here are divided by the performance of Patti Murin, count me in as one of those who didn't care for her. Murin over-compensates badly throughout the film and comes over as annoying, found it very difficult to connect with her insensitive and judgemental character. There is very little chemistry between her and Penny, which is both bland and forced.
On the most part, the script is too talky. The film starts off really rough, with very awkward and cheesy dialogue and both lead characters are extremely unlikeable because of the overwritten character flaws. At least Penny's character grows though, Murin's though does not. Not to mention the too pat and unearned ending.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, above average if very uneven.
6/10.
Color My World with Love (2022)
In love with this film
'Color My World with Love' (2022)
Opening thoughts: The 2022 Hallmark Movies and Mysteries block was hit and miss, most were pretty good and more, 'North to Home', 'The Presence of Love' and 'Rip in Time'. It also had the disastrous 'Cut, Color, Murder', which was one of the worst 2022 Hallmark films. A year that was expectedly and understandably variable (like all the previous years). Hallmark have done many relationship and family drama and serious themed films before, often very well but sometimes have also missed the mark.
'Color My World with Love' is in the former category, but it not only did relationship and family drama and its serious theme more than very well it also actually bowled me over. It is for me by far the best 2022 Hallmark Movies and Mysteries film (and overall) and the best 2022 Hallmark film, as well as a very strong contender for the best film that Hallmark has ever done. No other film of theirs touched me or warmed my heart in this way, and no other was this relatable. Before 'Color My World with Love', this reviewer found flaws with all of Hallmark's films (in many only a few but in even more of them a lot of flaws), but 'Color My World with Love' is a rarity of finding next to nothing wrong.
Bad things: Perhaps it could have gotten going a little quicker but this is very nit-picky. Also can't quite place it on the same level as all the films that was given the best possible rating.
Good things: Everything else was done right and brilliantly. The acting is some of the best of any Hallmark film, with Erica Durance and Benjamin Ayres giving honest, heartfelt performances that felt very personal. Have not seen either of them either, plus their chemistry was beautiful. The acting standout is Lilly D. Moore, who moved me to tears as one of the most relatable characters in any Hallmark film. Am disabled myself (though not with Downs Syndrome), so the portrayal of Downs Syndrome and how it affects the family resonated with me a lot and not too far off my and my family's struggles. The characters came over as real people and were so easy to relate to.
Furthermore, the script sounds natural and has real sincerity throughout, it doesn't sugar coat the serious themes and there is nothing simplistic or over-generalised. Have seen both with portrayals of various disabilities elsewhere, so that was appreciated. How the adversity affects the family and the relationships also had depth and weren't simplified or too general. One feels the struggles with the film not shying away from how difficult it is for everybody involved rather than showing it from one person's perspective, but also the love and support.
The story is extremely touching and warms the heart, with everything done with a lot of honesty. The drama is not too soapy or over sentimental and it doesn't feel forced or dragged out. The subject is handled sincerely and sensitively, while not taking itself too seriously or coming over as melodramatic or over sappy. The production values are strong and had no issue with the placement or tone of the music.
Closing thoughts: Overall, one of the very few great Hallmark films.
9/10.
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: Down Low in Hell's Kitchen (2019)
Lukewarm target
'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' "Down Low in Hell's Kitchen" (2019)
Opening thoughts: First impressions of Season 21's third episode "Down Low in Hell's Kitchen" on first watch when the season first aired were not great. Actually didn't care for it all that much. It did a great job with Fin, but it was spoiled by the lack of a compelling story and characters worth investing time in (one of them in fact played a big role in why the episode didn't work on first watch). The subject is a tough one, and the show has proven frequently that it can do tough subjects well, and the set up was intriguing.
"Down Low in Hell's Kitchen" is one of those episodes that is not terrible, apart from having things that don't work at all, but promises a lot more than it delivers. There was an interesting episode somewhere in "Down Low in Hell's Kitchen", but it is a case of the execution being a lot less interesting or insightful than it sounded on paper. As far as Season 21 goes, it's not one of the very worst but it's in the lesser half and does little to improve upon the previous disappointments.
Good things: There are good things, have never seen an irredeemably bad 'Special Victims Unit' episode (some have come close). It is as ever shot with the right amount of intimacy without feeling too up close, even with a reliance of close up camerawork. That the editing has become increasingly tighter over-time is great too. The music isn't over-scored, manipulative or used too much. The regulars are on the whole fine, with one exception, and most of the performances likewise.
Really liked what "Down Low in Hell's Kitchen" did with Fin, too many of the latter season episodes had him as underused window dressing but here he plays an active role and sees him steely and sympathetic and the only character who seems to care about the situation. The episode is a promising introduction to Garland and Carisi has settled well into his new role.
Bad things: However, a lot doesn't work. The story feels really tired and needed a much tighter pace and more tension. The down low set up is out of date and none of the supporting characters feel like real people and come over too much like stereotypes. The subject is a tough one but it is done that is not done well here, instead of the uncompromisingly harrowing, emotional and tense it could have been it came over as ham handed and mundane with nothing really insightful.
My intense dislike of Hadid was a massive problem as well and actually unbalanced the episode. It did feel like the writers tried too hard to make us dislike her and it came over as affected, far too cold and insensitive and the junk in their hands comment was offensive and beyond unprofessional. Too much of the team are underused, Olivia's role in the case should have been bigger, and it came over to me like they were not that interested in or cared about the case (only Fin seemed like he properly cared)
The Noah subplot is too sandwiched in and adds absolutely nothing.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, another underwhelming effort.
5/10.
Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!: Silver Scream (2017)
Scooby goes to Hollywood
'Be Cool Scooby Doo' "Silver Scream" (2017)
Opening thoughts: 'Be Cool Scooby Doo' really did not appeal to me on paper at first, having been put off by the animation style. Like has been said before though, this reviewer is glad that she gave it a chance as a big fan of the Scooby Doo franchise, as despite taking a bit of time to find its feet and with no episode being perfect it for me is quite a lot of fun with plenty to like about most of the episodes. Did like the premise for "Silver Scream" quite a bit, which is always a big interest point for me watching anything.
Season 2 was a much more settled season than the first, though there are better episodes from it than "Silver Scream". Don't get me wrong, it is still a thoroughly enjoyable and very well done episode and a joy for classic film fans like me, with a great setting and villain in particular. Other episodes, including the previous two episodes (both among the best 'Be Cool Scooby Doo'), had though much stronger mysteries (those mysteries were great, this one was a case of it being vastly over-shadowed by everything else). The franchise has had many fine episodes centered around film, and overall "Silver Scream" is another good example.
Good things: What immediately stands out in "Silver Scream" is the very cool and original villain that has the right amount of freakiness. Loved the very clever character design too, which is by far the standout of the animation and the only great thing visually. Standing out also are the affectionate and authentic Hollywood setting that had a classic film vibe.
There are numerous clever and nostalgic film references, namely to silent ones (a treat for anybody who appreciates them like me) and past episodes. They didn't feel shoehorned, overused or gimmicky. As well as lots of funny lines from Shaggy as well as when the real gang are hiding behind the fake one. Scooby and Shaggy are fun. Daphne's quirk is very cute and suitably quirky. The very nice energy does make up for the lacking mystery.
Bad things: A couple of things bring "Silver Scream" down on the other hand. As said, the mystery is very standard and not very memorable or unique. There is little surprising, including the reveal.
Not unexpectedly, the animation is not to my taste. After such an improvement in the previous two episodes, it is back to the psychedelic, rushed looking and off model eyesore quality seen in most episodes. Only the villain's design is appealing.
Closing thoughts: On the whole though, thoroughly enjoyable.
8/10.
Ultimate Book of Spells: Fire with Fire (2001)
Fire with Fire
'Ultimate Book of Spells' "Fire with Fire" (2001)
Opening thoughts: 'Ultimate Book of Spells' first aired when this reviewer was 9. Liked it a lot back then, and have revisited it a number of times since as a fan of animation. It is far from ground-breaking or one of the best shows, animated and not, ever made, but it also does not deserve its now relatively forgotten status. Thank goodness for good old Youtube. Can totally see the criticisms it garners for being closely indebted to Harry Potter (only picked up upon some while after the show first aired), and there are elements throughout that are very similar and clearly inspired, but this viewer considers it more of a love letter rather than a rip off.
All the previous episodes are well worth watching and more, especially "Time and Again", though neither are full on great episodes. Neither is "Fire with Fire". Actually didn't remember it very much as a child, but seeing it again a few times through older eyes it is better than remembered. Thanks to some great dialogue, great setting and an adventurous story once it gets going, after starting off a little shaky. Not one of the best 'Ultimate Book of Spells' episodes, but also not one of the worst.
Bad things: Did think that the beginning, or the first three minutes, went on for too long and served very little relevance to the story. Plus it was not much different from the beginning of "Time and Again", except with a harp instead of a rug, Snerret and Rowce having a bigger role and a slightly less evil Zarlak.
Snerret and Rowce are as unfunny and annoying as ever and none of their material is interesting.
Good things: However, a lot works well. Am continuing to love the distinct personalities of Cassy, Gus and Verne and their chemistry together. Really did feel sorry for Gus and really enjoyed their medieval guises, very interesting to see Cassy as a princess. UBOS continues to be wise, firm and amusing and Zarlak suitably sinister. Once again, a great job is done with the two settings, Vonderland already feels magical and immersive and the dark medieval setting is very foreboding. The animation is crisp and colourful and the music fits well and doesn't sound out of date.
Most of the voice acting is fine and the story benefits from its setting, the fun adventure atmosphere that makes one nostalgic for adventure books set in the medieval/Renaissance period and the fun and tense (if a little easily foreseeable) climax. There is a less Harry Potter influence here compared to a few of the previous episodes. Best of all is the dialogue, which continues to be not too juvenile or complicated, but even more so there are some very funny lines here. The scream like a helpless maiden exchange was priceless, and one of my favourite ever lines from the frog prince is his insult in regard to Cassy's personality.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, good fun.
8/10.
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: The Darkest Journey Home (2019)
The bland journey home
'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' "The Darkest Journey Home" (2019)
Opening thoughts: "The Darkest Journey Home" was watched with mixed expectations. It is one of those premises that is very 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit', but it is one of those that has been done many times and can go either way. It has also been executed both ways of harrowing, emotional and tactful and unfortunately in the latter seasons predictable, bland and heavy handed with unsympathetic characters. Have seen both extremes in Season 21 for all the topics explored, too often the latter extreme.
While having flashes of the former, "The Darkest Journey Home" is too much of the latter. It does start off very well and has an excellent guest performance, but it is also full of issues story wise and the character writing for one crucial character was way off. It did have potential to be better than the previous episode but was actually worse and is sadly a strong representation of what was wrong with too much of Season 21. There are worse episodes of the season than "The Dark Journey Home", but it is one of the lesser ones.
Good things: Of course there are good things. Mariska Hargitay is steely and sympathetic and Olivia is thankfully not the character that she too often was in Seasons 17-20. The other acting standout is Ariel Winter, despite having serious problems with her character Winter's acting is excellent in my view and has the right amount of intensity and emotion. The chemistry between her and Hargitay is great.
Also thought that the opening scene was very promising and that the episode generally started off very strongly and intriguingly. The production values as ever have slickness and grit, with an intimacy without being claustrophobic. The music has presence when it's used but does so without being intrusive, some of it is quite haunting too. Carisi has settled very well in his new role on the other side of the law.
Bad things: However, too much of the story felt too slight for the running time and has nothing surprising or unique. Also thought that it was really lacking in tension and feels over-stretched due to the draggy pace and the flimsiness of the story. Really disliked the character writing for the victim, who is one of the most unsympathetic and most difficult to feel anything for victims of the season.
Furthermore, the dialogue is mundane at best and the chemistry is very disconnected, the large amount of change has unsettled the team dynamic. The rest of the regulars come over as bland and their roles underwritten, Jamie Gray Hyder is not registering still and this never really improved. The ending is rushed.
Closing thoughts: In summary, underwhelming.
5/10.
Alfred Hitchcock Presents: Dead Weight (1959)
Not a dead weight
'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' "Dead Weight" (1959)
Opening thoughts: Did like the premise quite a lot, very Hitchcockian which was a joy for someone who considers Hitchcock one of her favourite directors. "Dead Weight" is the first of five 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' directed by Stuart Rosenberg. As well as the third and last appearance in the series (after the classic "Breakdown" and very good "Together") of Joseph Cotten in a type of role that he was familiar with and played very well.
While not an 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' classic, "Dead Weight" is a very good episode and one of the better ones of Season 5's mostly solid first half (where only two episodes disappointed). It is a very promising series debut for Rosenberg, one of his better episodes and better than most series debuts of directors who made more than one episode. It also shows how much Cotten excelled as the type of character he plays here.
Only two things weren't so good, and some may find them on the nit-picky side. While she is still good, Julie Adams in my view is underused.
The bigger problem is the twist, it didn't make much sense to me either and a longer amount of time was needed to explain it.
Good things: Cotten on the other hand is terrific, very ominous and it is chilling to watch both as a cad and when his character darkens. Adams is alluring and they work well together. It is very assuredly directed by Rosenberg, directing more tightly and more suspensefully than most series regular directors in their series debut episodes.
Production values are not lavish (not that that was expected), but they have nice moody style that can be suitably noir-ish. The theme music continues to be suitably devillish and the bookending amusingly ironic. There is a thought provoking script that doesn't hold back while also being fun. As well as an absorbing and unsettling story that has enough dark suspense.
Closing thoughts: Overall, very good.
8/10.
The Ant and the Aardvark: Science Friction (1972)
Fun with zoology
'The Ant and the Aardvark' "Science Friction" (1970)
Opening thoughts: Even the worst the Ant and the Aardvark cartoons didn't belong anywhere near the worst of DePatie-Freleng Enterprises' very interesting but also somewhat frustratingly uneven output, in what was one of the studio's better and deservedly most popular theatrical series alongside prime-Pink Panther and The Inspector (even they in retrospect were completely consistent either). Some Ant and the Aardvark cartoons are better than others but all are worth a look at least once.
'Science Friction' is not one of the series' best. That does not mean in any way that it is a bad cartoon, it's not. Actually think it is still a pretty good one, better than the present rating here, but there was room for improvement. The premise was actually one of the series' more intriguing ones, 'Science Friction' though could have done even more with it and up to this point of the series, it is one of the weakest. That's not even meant in a bad way, just that the best outings are very good to great.
Bad things: Like 'Ants in the Pantry', also from 1970, there is actually not an awful lot wrong with 'Science Friction'. A lot is done well and everything is present and correct. At the same time it did feel like something was missing. Despite the welcome presence of the zoologist, proving himself to be another worthy supporting/secondary character, it just needed a little more freshness and spark.
While most of the animation was a long way from bad, the opposite of that in fact, the drawing again could have had more finesse and looked less rushed-looking, my opinion in this regard of course.
Good things: However, the rich and varied use of colour helped make the abstract backgrounds more interesting as did the simple but never cheap-looking designs for the ant and the aardvark and the expressions and reactions for the aardvark. The music as ever is superb, from the opening note of the very memorable main theme it really puts you in a good mood. It works perfectly with the action but also would work well on its own.
The Ant and the Aardvark cartoons never failed to be funny, despite being nothing special on a story level and feeling it lacked freshness 'Science Friction' still delivered on the humour. Although the Ant and the Aardvark series always excelled in the physical and verbal comedy, it's the latter that has always shone more. There is one frequent kind of gag that can get a bit on the repetitious side but it has seldom been to unfunny effect and there have always been attempts to vary it. Two lines are especially great, both coming from the aardvark, "well this is what you call, sneaking for a snack" and "and he almost ruined my whole body!". Two great examples of a witticism and how to break the fourth wall.
While the ant is an always amusing character and the zoologist is worthy support, it is the aardvark, partly because he has the best lines, that steals the cartoon. Love the chemistry, as well as John Byner's ever terrific and very versatile voice acting.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, not bad by any stretch, the opposite, but could have been even better.
7/10.
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: I'm Going To Make You a Star (2019)
A star is born
'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' "I'm Going to Make You a Star" (2019)
Opening thoughts: 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit's' Season 21 is very like its previous season, in that it did have some good episodes but on the whole it didn't leave me impressed. It also introduced the character of Kat Tamin, who never really did it for me as a character nor did Jamie Gray Hyder's acting work in the role. For me she was one of the season's most persistent problems. Some may disagree with me here, and that's fine, but that's just my respectful and un-vitriolic opinion.
"I'm Going to Make You a Star" is a respectable if very uneven first episode to Season 21. It is not one of the best episodes of the season, nor is it one of the worst. Personally put it in the higher end of the in between category. There are better season openers of 'Special Victims Unit', as well as worse. Again, "I'm Going to Make You a Star" is one of the in betweeners. While not in raving about it or recommending it without hesitation mode, this is a long way from being a must avoid.
Am going to begin with mentioning the good. The photography is intimate but not claustrophobic. The music when used is not too over-emphatic and has a melancholic edge that is quite haunting. The direction is sympathetic enough without being leaden, while having enough momentum to make the drama sing in its atmosphere. There is a good deal of thought provoking writing.
There is a lot of change in "I'm Going to Make You a Star", including Tamin's introduction and Carisi in a different role, and it is handled a lot better than expected on the whole. Carisi's transition into his new role is a smooth one and like he was in it for ages. The regulars are all very good and Peter Gallagher brings a lot of authority to his role. Also effective is Ian McShane, the role is not subtle at all but McShane is genuinely unsettling.
Bad things: However, "I'm Going to Make You a Star" could have been a good deal better. On the whole, the story contains rather by the numbers execution of a pretty done to death premise, needed a lot more tension
Also felt like there was too much packed in, a lot goes on and with not enough time to explore it properly. This would have been a lot better as a two parter.
Moreover, Tamin makes very little of a first impression, actually found her very bland and Hyder's acting lifeless. Barth's role didn't make sense to me, just didn't buy that someone of her calibre would represent someone so overtly guilty.
Closing thoughts: Respectable episode but wildly uneven and a long way from great.
6/10.
Alfred Hitchcock Presents: The Blessington Method (1959)
In the distant future
'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' "The Blessington Method" (1959)
Opening thoughts: Herschel Daugherty was responsible for some exceptional 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes, standouts being "The Creeper", "Little White Frock" and "The Last Dark Step". He was though also responsible for the disappointing "Father and Son" and the big time miss "Sylvia" (one of my least favourites of the series). He really excelled in the creepier episodes and he also excelled in the few that had more of an emotional impact, less so in the slighter plotted, more soapy ones.
"The Blessington Method" is not one of his best episodes or as good as his previous episode "Coyote Moon", also from Season 5. It is still very good, uncompromising and entertaining as well as well acted, even if it loses its way at the end. When it comes to Daughety's 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes, "The Blessington Method" is not as good as "The Creeper", "Little White Frock" and "The Last Dark Step". It is in my mind closer to their level than to "Father and Son" and "Sylvia" thankfully.
Bad things: Flaws are very few actually, but as said it did for my tastes lose its way at the end. The twist very predictable.
Also felt that the ending did lack suspense and felt rushed.
Good things: So much is done incredibly well however. It is very well acted, especially Dick York who is very creepy as the most colourful character. The chemistry between the leads never comes over as static or undercooked, neither does it come over as melodramatic. Daugherty's direction also raised the episode's quality. He was clearly having fun with the material, while mostly not losing control of it, no signs of indifference.
While not lavish, the production values are still atmospheric and set the lively and (when needed) suspenseful tone well. "Funeral March of a Marionette" is suitably macabre and is an inspired choice for theme music. As ever, Hitchcock's bookending amuses and love its irony.
Moreover, the pull no punches and tight script is a major asset, never did it feel too talky and this was a type of episode where this trap could have been fallen into. As is the nicely paced, mostly suspenseful and uncompromisingly heartless story.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, very good.
8/10.
National Theatre at Home: Mosquitoes (2017)
Fascinating
'National Theatre Live: Mosquitoes' (2017)
Opening thoughts: Have for a long time loved viewing the live cinema streamings of the National Theatre Live series. So many gems in the series and very few misses, and what strikes me about watching these productions are how they are made available so accessibly while making one feel like they are there. Am always up for seeing something different to Shakespeare and other theatre standards, and 'Mosquitoes' couldn't have been more different in concept or kind of play.
Was really not sure how a play about science (my least favourite subject in school, could not get my head around information that came over as very complicated) would be interesting or accessible. Remarkably, 'Mosquitoes' manages to be both interesting and accessible, as well as entertaining and poignant. It isn't perfect, with it trying to cover too many themes. This is a wonderful production that not only brings the play to life but also elevates it.
Bad things: Everything to do with the two protons colliding is laid on a little too thick and didn't need to be as prominent as it was at times.
Good things: Otherwise, 'Mosquitoes' was absolutely excellent. The acting is one of the biggest strengths, with the heart-wrenching Olivia Colman (have always had a high opinion of her since 'Broadchurch') as a character that speaks a good deal of sense if not always going about it the best way being the standout. Olivia Williams has the meatier, more complex role and plays her with confidence and vulnerability. Their chemistry is off the charts. Amanda Boxer amuses and touches, while Joseph Quinn captures his character's naivety beautifully and Paul Hilton has a good deal of intensity.
There are some great lines throughout, ones that are genuinely funny, ones that really touch the soul and ones that provide a lot of enlightening insight into the subject. The story absorbs hugely, despite so much going on it is balanced very skilfully in the detailed stage direction and there is no issue following it. The stage direction is very detailed and intelligent, showing no signs of being phased by the ambitious material. Especially shining in the sisters' interaction.
Furthermore, the production looks great with very imaginative production design (most striking being the formidably omnipresent occulus) and atmospheric lighting.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, excellent.
9/10.
Law & Order: Trial by Jury: Eros in the Upper Eighties (2006)
Love and death
'Law and Order: Trial by Jury' "Eros in the Upper Eighties" (2005)
Opening thoughts: When a show lasts for such a short period of time, in 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury's' case it lasted for only 13 episodes (which is only just over half a season's worth for a lot of American shows), one would understandably think that it is a bad show. Some short lived shows are bad, but others were not given enough of a chance due to bad ratings and being aired at times where most would be unlikely to be watching much television or watching something else on a more accessible channel. In my mind, 'Trial by Jury' was one of those shows.
It was far from perfect and did start off slow, with some good ideas not done enough with (i.e. "Vigilante" for example), but it did get a lot better while mostly not reaching greatness. "Bang and Blame" and "Day" were the two great episodes and "Skeleton" was close to great. "Eros in the Upper Eighties" is the final episode of 'Trial by Jury' and it is pretty good if never mind blowing on its own terms, but to me it was clear it was not intended to be the season finale as it didn't feel like one.
Bad things: "Eros in the Upper Eighties" is flawed. Sure, Scott Cohen is still flat as a character that never really gelled.
Also did find it rather routine and slow to begin with and that the case initially was quite flimsy.
Good things: However, there is a lot to like about "Eros in the Upper Eighties". The production values are slick and gritty, not trying to do too much or being dull. The music isn't overused or over-scored in my view and have always liked the theme tune (which was used again in the latter seasons of 'Criminal Intent'. The dialogue provokes thought and has the tightness that is necessary.
While "Eros in the Upper Eighties" is not ground breaking and is a bit of a slow starter, it executes the subject tactfully enough while not trivialising it. The acting is on the whole fine.
Closing thoughts: Overall, pretty good last episode though the early cancellation made it feel somewhat anti-climactic.
7/10.
Alfred Hitchcock Presents: Dry Run (1959)
Nothing dry here
'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' "Dry Run" (1959)
Opening thoughts: "Dry Run" is the third 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episode to be directed by John Brahm, who directed ten episodes of the series to a generally solid if not consistent (some being higher than others) standard. The previous two episodes of his being "Night with the Boys" and "Touche", both pretty good if not great. Also have a high opinion of Robert Vaughn and more so Walter Matthau and while 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' had its misfires it had many major winners.
One of those winners is "Dry Run". It is not one of the best episodes of the whole series, but it is one of Brahm's best episodes and his first great one. Season 5 was already hit and miss up to this still early point of Season 5, with "Appointment at Eleven" for example being one of the worst of the series (a contender for the worst actually), and "Dry Run" is one of the best up to this point. Not a masterpiece, but still absolutely excellent with hardly anything wrong.
Bad things: It is rather easy to figure out later on, but that is pretty much it with the not so good things.
Good things: Matthau and Vaughn are both excellent however, especially unsettling Matthau in a tailor-made role for him. The chemistry between them has the right amount of intensity and fun. The characters are very interesting, that are very flawed but the negative traits are not overdone, Art's naivety didn't come over as excessively stupid to me. Hitchcock's bookending is typically humorously ironic.
Furthermore, the script is thought provoking, hard boiled yet also entertaining. It also has a darkly suspenseful and lean story that is also fun, while not surprised by the end it is still very clever and interesting. The production values are strikng, very moody and stylish. It is expertly directed by Brahm, which shows a more mature style compared to his previous outings.
Have always loved the theme music, it is one of the best uses of pre-existing classical music as television theme music and all thanks to Hitchcock favourite Bernard Hermann. The macabre tone of "Funeral March of a Marionette" suits the series and episode perfectly.
Closing thoughts: Great episode all in all.
9/10.
WandaVision (2021)
Uneven but well worth seeing
'WandaVision' (2021)
Opening thoughts: Had heard a lot of good things about 'WandaVision', as well as some divisive opinions, and needed another show to binge watch in insolation. Have actually liked quite a lot of Marvel's previous work and have liked Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany in other things, with more familiarity with the latter. The mix of mystery and sitcoms with a mix of comedy and serious themes immediately sounded very intriguing, though did worry about it being a case of trying to do too much.
While not quite as good as has been said by others and do agree with some of the criticisms against against it, 'WandaVision' is a creative and bold show that is well worth seeing at least once. It isn't one of those shows that found its feet straightaway, taking about a third in before doing so, and ends underwhelmingly, but when it does get going 'WandaVision' at its best was absolutely excellent. There is a huge amount to admire even when at its weakest.
Bad things: Do agree about the first three episodes being rather unsettled, the pacing could have been tighter and while the mystery does intrigue it does feel odd and wasn't always easy to follow.
Also agree about the ending being incredibly flat and anti-climactic, something that was crying out for another season. 'WandaVision' was for most of its run very bold, very creative and very ambitious and for it to end in such a predictable, conventional, indifferent way with a what the heck-like reveal was really unfortunate.
Good things: However, there is a lot to admire here as said. Olsen is absolutely fantastic, the role requiring a lot of dimensions and being very chameleon-like and Olsen brings every single dimension out effortlessly. Bettany is a commanding presence throughout and also succeeds in giving his character complexity. Kathryn Hahn steals every scene she's in and the comic relief is genuinely funny and not overdone or obnoxious. The characters are well written and fleshed out, especially Vision and the show's depiction of grief and trauma.
Furthermore, the production values are excellent. Very stylish and vibrant. Meanwhile the music is atmospheric and quirky, evoking a good deal of nostalgia and doesn't come over as over-bearing. The writing is mostly a major success, the sitcom tropes feel fresh and nostalgic and the humour is funny and smart. Some critics found the sitcom element cheesy and gimmicky, this reviewer didn't. It surprisingly balances very well with the show's very realistic and movingly relatable depiction of grief, trauma and mental health (which all resonated with me), and also the affectionate superhero tropes. The conflict has fun, tension and thrills at its best and the storytelling is once 'WandaVision' very compelling, entertaining and powerful viewing.
Closing thoughts: Overall, uneven but well worth seeing.
7/10.
Law & Order: Trial by Jury: Boys Will Be Boys (2005)
A tangled web
'Law and Order: Trial by Jury' "Boys Will be Boys" (2005)
Opening thoughts: 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury' may have only lasted 13 episodes but to me actually it was a decent show that deserved a much better chance than it got, especially when by the time it was cancelled it had gotten quite a lot better. It is not one of the best 'Law and Order' shows, with it never quite reaching the brilliant heights that the best of the original 'Law and Order' particularly had. It is also not one of the worst, with none of the worst episodes being on the same level of 'Special Victims Unit' at its worst.
"Boys will be Boys" is on the whole a very well done episode. Not perfect by all means or one of the best representations of the 'Law and Order' shows, but as far as 'Trial by Jury' goes it's one of the better faring ones. And it is a shame that it is the penultimate episode when the show had started to grow and drastically so. Never does it reach the same level as 'Special Victims Unit' at its worst while not being on the same level of the three main shows in the franchise at their best.
Bad things: It is a bit of a slow starter where the first quarter is pretty routine and ordinary.
Maybe the very end is on the rushed and trying to fit too much in side. Plus Scott Cohen is bland.
Good things: However, a lot works incredibly well. The production values are slick and gritty, not trying to do too much or being dull. The music isn't overused or over-scored in my view and have always liked the theme tune (which was used again in the latter seasons of 'Criminal Intent'. The dialogue provokes thought and has the tightness that is necessary.
In terms of writing, "Boys will be Boys" is lean and thought provoking. Especially in the increasingly tense legal scenes. The story is very absorbing and has the right amount of tension. Most of the regulars are great.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, very well done.
8/10.
Monster of the Deep (1976)
Monstrously mediocre
'Monster of the Deep' (1976)
Opening thoughts: Not all DePatie-Freleng's output is below average or bad. In fact, the 1960s Pink Panther cartoons (and some of those from the early 70s) and the Inspector and Ant and the Aardvark theatrical series were very good and excellent at their best. And the Roland and Rattfink and Sherriff Hoot Kloot series, while uneven, had their good moments. So on the whole, generally the output was the opposite of bad, even if it declined quite badly in the mid-70s.
The Misterjaw theatrical series is one of the studio's weaker theatrical series, with none of the 34 cartoons being awful but also none of them good. It is not as bad as the Crazylegs Crane series, which failed in almost every area, but my overall feelings are similar to that of the Dogfather series in finding it rather mediocre and forgettable. Which sums up 'Monster of the Deep' very well, a few good things but also a lot of sigificant drawbacks done very badly.
Good things: There are good things here in 'Monster of the Deep'. The animation is surprisingly, considering the period for the studio where the quality of almost everything was noticeably cheaper, not bad at all. Some nice colours and good fluidity in the air action.
Did think too that the music had some nice character and that some of the voice acting has some spirit.
Bad things: Unfortunately the drawbacks are many and big, as well as impossible to ignore. It is for one thing very formulaic, with pretty much all the too few gaga being rather tired and predictable to the extent that remembering them long after is hard. Also badly lacking in variety. The catchphrases are very lame and corny to the point of groaning, a big problem when the writing is so reliant on them in a cartoon that feels very repetitive. The cartoon would have been a lot better without the canned laughter track, which sounded cheap and wasn't necessary in the slightest considering that the writing is not very sitcomish.
Furthermore, the story is paper thin yet also feels rushed product like and repetitive. It is also overly silly, even for a premise where serious suspension of disbelief is needed to begin with. The characters are very one note and bland in personality, and they are neither funny or endearing and instead too slapped together and product of the time like. With Misterjaw and Catfish, it was like seeing an even more bumbling Pug and even more annoying Louie from the Dogfather series in fish form. There is not an awful lot of chemistry between them and the ending is mean spirited and felt abrupt and incomplete.
Closing thoughts: Overall, mediocre.
4/10.
Two Tickets to Paradise (2022)
Love in paradise
'Two Tickets to Paradise' (2022)
Opening thoughts: The 2022 Summer Nights block was a mixed bag. Was mixed to positive on 'Hidden Gems', liked 'Caribbean Summer' quite a lot, but didn't care for 'Moriah's Lighthouse'. 'Two Tickets to Paradise' sounded very appealing premise-wise, one of the year's more appealing ones from Hallmark because despite its predictability it sounded really charming. Have liked Ashley Williams and Ryan Paevey (both Hallmark regulars) in other things, though the filmographies for both are very up and down as are their performances.
Of the 2022 Summer Nights films, 'Two Tickets to Paradise' is the best, by far, and it really does live up to its quite adorable title (that is not too corny this time). While it is not quite perfect, this reviewer liked it very much, found it one of the best 2022 Hallmark films and a very good representation of both Williams and Paevey. Both giving performances that are among their best. The story may not be mind-blowing in 'Two Tickets to Paradise', but even that aspect has a significant amount of charm.
Bad things: Did find the ending rather rushed and too pat, though the final act doesn't frustrate anywhere near as much as others in the 2022 Hallmark batch.
Also found some of the dialogue rather cheesy.
Good things: So much comes over well though. Really liked both Williams and Paevey in their roles. Williams brings a lot of perky energy to hers and it didn't come over as over the top, and while Paevey is more subtle he is very likeable and natural. Their chemistry is very at ease and sweet, with nothing forced, even if it does not quite scintillate. The supporting cast are all solid and the characters were all things worth connecting with, none annoying or boring me.
It is a very attractively photographed film with stunning scenery. Also pleasant is the music, which has presence without coming over as over-bearing or too constant. The direction shows a good deal of confidence and a sense that they knew what they were doing and trying to achieve. The script flows well on the whole and is light hearted while not coming over as too sappy. Even though rather typical, there is at least a story and it is one with charm and heart and is lively in pace.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, very well done.
8/10.
Law & Order: Trial by Jury: Day (2005)
"Night" continued
'Law and Order: Trial by Jury' "Day" (2005)
Opening thoughts: "Day" is the second crossover episode of 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury', the first being "Skeleton". Like that episode it is also a concluding part to a case from another 'Law and Order' show. With "Skeleton", it concluded Season 15's "Tombstone" from the original 'Law and Order', one of the best episodes of that season. With "Day", it is the second part of Season 6's "Night" from 'Special Victims Unit', one of the best episodes of that season and of the early seasons with two of the show's best ever guest turns.
While "Day" may not quite be as creepy as "Night", hence the slightly lower score, it is still an excellent episode with so many great performances and a story that drew me right in and didn't let go. As far as 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury' goes, "Day" gets my vote as the best episode due to being one of only two episodes of the show to be great and more. The other being "Bang and Blame", the rest ranging between average and very good. Have always felt that 'Trial by Jury' didn't get a proper chance and still do, and this is a great example of why it deserved better.
Bad things: Personally did feel that Scott Cohen was again rather bland.
Good things: However, everything else is great and more. The best aspect is the acting. While most of the 'Trial by Jury' regulars are strong and the 'Special Victims Unit' regulars even more so, it's the pretty exceptional supporting cast that make the bigger impression. Alfred Molina once again is at his most chilling, everything that was creepy about his performance in "Night" is every bit as much here, and Angela Lansbury has seldom been this frighteningly icy or beastly while also being very regal.
Script is tense, concise and beautifully balanced with no waffle. As usual there is a lot of dialogue to digest, and really provokes thought, disturbs and brings a lump to the throat. The story is suspenseful, quite dark in places and is suitably twisty. The moral dilemmas that come with prosecuting are always intriguing, how much Lansbury's character dominates providing a big amount of the tension.
"Day" is well made, intimately photographed and slick with no signs of under-budget or anything. The music didn't sound melodramatic or too constant and the direction is accommodating while still having pulse.
Closing thoughts: Overall, excellent.
9/10.
The High Note (2020)
Hits a high note
'The High Note' (2020)
Opening thoughts: 'The High Note' popped up as one of the films present on the film renting service while holidaying on a cruise last year. Although there is little new about the concept and not a fan of Dakota Johnson, it did sound cute, there are many good films centered around the music industry and it was interesting seeing the real life daughter of legendary Diana Ross in one of the lead roles.
Luckily, 'The High Note' exceeded my mixed expectations and is a lot better than its mixed critical reception. It is not perfect or great, but it was enjoyable, cute yet had more substance and grit than what was expected. Meaning it sounded like a frothy romantic comedy film with music playing a secondary role, but it was more than that actually and music features heavily and in a realistic way. It also shows that Johnson can be good when the material is good.
Bad things: Admittedly, there is very little new (quite typical romcom formula in places) with a too neat (where the conflict is too easily forgiven) and easily foreseeable ending. With a twist that is not that earth shattering.
Gail is also quite annoying and adds very little to the film. It can be quite corny.
Good things: However, Tracee Ellis Ross is terrific and attacks her meaty role with gusto. Her character is very diva-ish, but Ross doesn't overdo the negative character traits. Johnson also enjoys herself, appeals despite not liking what her character does and this is one of her better performances. Kelvin Harrison Jr is very charming and there is a real sweet honesty in his chemistry with Johnson.
Chemistry-wise, the witty and suspenseful one between Ross and Johnson is even better. Ice Cube brings empathy and sass to his role. 'The High Note'is very nicely made, especially the picturesque scenery and glamorous fashion styles of Ross. The soundtrack is very catchy and sung and performed beautifully. The script is very good natured and feel good, while not shying away from showing how demanding and judgemental the music industry often is. There is also an uplifting and charming story that shows the glamour of the industry while not glossing over the dark side. Actually thought that it handed the behind the scenes and follow your dreams aspects very well individually and that they were well balanced together. The messaging is inspiring. Characters come over as realistic and easy to connect with, was expecting to dislike Johnson's character from the plot synopsis but didn't.
Closing thoughts: Overall, very well done and hits a high note.
8/10.
Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo: Scooby at the Center of the World/Scooby's Trip to Oz/Dog Tag Scooby (1981)
Caverns, Oz and training courses
'Scooby Doo and Scrappy Doo' "Scooby at the Center of the World"/"Scooby's Trip to Oz"/"Dog Tag" (1981)
Opening thoughts: On the whole, 'Scooby Doo and Scrappy Doo' is one of the weakest of the Scooby Doo shows. It did though have a very watchable first season, with the best episodes actually being very good and only one episode being below average. After the first season, the show very quickly went downhill and never really got better despite some watchable shorts here and there. Shaggy and Scooby were always the most interesting characters and didn't mind that they were main protagonists, did mind though that the other protagonist is one of the main reasons as to why Season 2 onward did not work.
"Scooby Doo at the Center of the World"/ "Scooby's Trip to Oz"/"Dog Tag Scooby" is a watchable triple bill, thanks to one very well done short (the one that this reviewer knew would work). It is also though very average, as there is nothing really special about the other two, especially "Dog Tag Scooby" (at least the rock monsters were unique). Quite a lot of the usual faults are here, again especially in "Dog Tag Scooby", but there are also things that are improved upon.
Good things: The best of the three shorts by far is "Scooby's Trip to Oz". Let down by the flat, irregular animation. It is however very cute, has some actual amusing humour (more than usual and quite fun this time), the setting is very colourful and anybody who is a fan of 'The Wizard of Oz' will love the references. Which are affectionately done. Did love the designs and personalities of the Rock Monsters, the only thing that stand out in "Scooby Doo at the Center of the World".
Did like Scrappy's song in "Scooby's Dog Tag" and that short was interesting for the high number of costume changes. The theme song is catchy and the voice work from Don Messick and Casey Kasem is on point.
Bad things: Apart from the unique designs and personalities of the Rock Monsters, "Scooby Doo at the Center of the World" came over as very dull and weird. The trio picnicking in a dark cave does require some serious suspension of disbelief. "Scooby Dog Tag" is over-stretched, predictable and repetitive with little fun or tension in the conflict. The villain is very standard and not much of one.
Scrappy is overused to main character effect and very annoying from his negative traits being overdone, his ability to make things worse than they already are obvious throughout. The animation is very rushed looking and flat with very irregular character designs. The music is nice on its own but doesn't always gel with the action, some of it on the repetitive side. The dialogue tends to be too corny.
Closing thoughts: Concluding, not great but watchable.
5/10.
Law & Order: Trial by Jury: Blue Wall (2005)
Police brutality
'Law and Order: Trial by Jury' "Blue Wall" (2005)
Opening thoughts: The subject matter is not novel territory for the 'Law and Order' franchise, but that doesn't matter. It is a serious issue that is always worthy of addressing, one that was relevant at the time and one that has hardly gone away now. It was a perfect subject to address on 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury', which had already covered some difficult and relevant topics (such as vigilantism, killing of babies etc) with varied but actually mostly good success.
"Blue Wall" explores the subject very solidly. It may not say much that is illuminating or have much new, but it was interesting seeing it explored from the point of view of those involved in the legal case and it covering the moral dilemmas that come with prosecuting. "Blue Wall" is not an exceptional episode (few of the show's episodes fitted that distinction), but it is a very well done one and one of the better faring episodes of the undeservedly short lived 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury'.
Bad things: It would have made more impact though if the conflict between Kibre and Ravell was stronger, which is undone by Ravell being even more of a one dimensional jerk than usual and Scott Cohen being rather bland which dilutes the tension.
Did think it starts off a little on the routine side.
Good things: However, despite how all that sounds, there is a lot that "Blue Wall" does right. The production values are slick and sharp, without being too dark or overly-bright. The music is not over-emphasised or overused. The theme tune is one of the most memorable ones of the franchise. The writing is thought provoking and avoids heavy-handedness. Most of the acting is fine, Cohen excepted. Bebe Neuwirth and Amy Carlson are commanding and work beautifully together. Am not a fan of Fred Dalton Thompson usually in the franchise and usually find him one note, but thanks to his meaty material here he does give some of his best acting of the show.
Furthermore, the story is on the whole very absorbing and intricate. Most of the conflicts have intrigue and tension, especially that regarding the jurisdiction. The moral dilemmas of the case are tackled intelligently, are interesting and aren't simplistic or convoluted.
Closing thoughts: Overall, very well done.
7/10.