avatar-02652
Joined Jul 2022
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews8
avatar-02652's rating
The Rock (1996), directed by Michael Bay, stands as one of the most electrifying and expertly crafted action films of the 1990s. It not only set new standards for the genre but also delivered a cinematic experience that remains thrilling, intelligent, and emotionally resonant to this day.
Sean Connery gives one of the most charismatic performances of his post-Bond career, embodying a mysterious yet deeply likable character. Paired with Nicolas Cage's quirky yet brilliant portrayal of a chemical weapons specialist, the duo creates an unexpected and captivating chemistry that carries the film with both tension and humor.
The plot, centered around a high-stakes hostage situation on Alcatraz Island, is tight and exhilarating. Each scene is meticulously crafted to maintain momentum and suspense, while still allowing moments of character development and emotional depth. The cinematography is bold, and for its time, the visual effects were groundbreaking-an impressive feat that still holds up remarkably well.
Hans Zimmer's powerful and iconic score elevates the film to another level, giving it a pulse-pounding rhythm that perfectly matches the on-screen chaos and heroism. It's not just background music-it becomes part of the narrative's heartbeat.
What truly sets The Rock apart is its willingness to explore themes of patriotism, sacrifice, and moral ambiguity without losing its entertainment value. It's an action film with a conscience-one that respects its audience's intelligence while delivering edge-of-your-seat thrills.
Ultimately, The Rock is not just one of Michael Bay's finest films-it's a modern classic of the action genre. With unforgettable performances, a razor-sharp script, and masterful direction, it remains a shining example of how to balance blockbuster spectacle with smart, compelling storytelling. A must-watch, again and again.
Sean Connery gives one of the most charismatic performances of his post-Bond career, embodying a mysterious yet deeply likable character. Paired with Nicolas Cage's quirky yet brilliant portrayal of a chemical weapons specialist, the duo creates an unexpected and captivating chemistry that carries the film with both tension and humor.
The plot, centered around a high-stakes hostage situation on Alcatraz Island, is tight and exhilarating. Each scene is meticulously crafted to maintain momentum and suspense, while still allowing moments of character development and emotional depth. The cinematography is bold, and for its time, the visual effects were groundbreaking-an impressive feat that still holds up remarkably well.
Hans Zimmer's powerful and iconic score elevates the film to another level, giving it a pulse-pounding rhythm that perfectly matches the on-screen chaos and heroism. It's not just background music-it becomes part of the narrative's heartbeat.
What truly sets The Rock apart is its willingness to explore themes of patriotism, sacrifice, and moral ambiguity without losing its entertainment value. It's an action film with a conscience-one that respects its audience's intelligence while delivering edge-of-your-seat thrills.
Ultimately, The Rock is not just one of Michael Bay's finest films-it's a modern classic of the action genre. With unforgettable performances, a razor-sharp script, and masterful direction, it remains a shining example of how to balance blockbuster spectacle with smart, compelling storytelling. A must-watch, again and again.
Let me start by saying that I am a huge Ridley Scott fan. The original Alien is at the top of the list as a favorite. I've been waiting for Romulus for a long time, reading as much as I could about it while being careful not to go in without knowing the details. About the operation of spaceships gain! The film is full of wonderful homages to the original, nods and references galore
The characters are very one dimensional and the acting is very bad. You cannot possibly care about any character in this movie. The deaths are silly, the scenes aren't scary, and you don't feel any suspense at any point. There is no such thing as real action in this movie. Any of the old alien movie magic is missing here.
Let's start with the stupid producers who gave this project to Fede Alvarez, who has no real good movies on his resume. And he writes, produces and directs with the help of two other novice writers. I can't say that I'm surprised that it's really terrible. I don't know what brilliant mind put this man in charge of directing it, but someone made a terrible mistake! Over an hour into the movie and you've never seen the alien except for a few seconds The main character is not a good actor.. he is an android and he is a really bad actor.. one of the big problems is that the actors are young.. it takes years to develop acting skills. .. and because the actors are so young and unskilled, the director can't really get a good shot of the actors' faces because it ruins the movie even worse than it already is.
I wonder what the average age of the cast is, but it's certainly 15-20 years younger than the other movies, it doesn't feel real in my brain, it's almost played by kids. And when I see such movies, I know that a bigger person has written the dialogues. Another thing that comes to my mind is that it currently has a 7.5 rating which makes me think some group inflated the ratings using social media or something, 7.5 just doesn't match what I'm seeing .
The face huggers are so bad the bad game a lot of the scenes/sets look like a universal ride. Some effects are really bad. How can Ridley Scott stand behind this wedge. Was it greed??? Prometheus and Alien: Covenant are masterpieces. And the studio decided to go that way instead. Stupid nonsense. But in reality, Hollywood is dead.
I walked out of the theater sad and angry that I had spent $17.50 on a movie that felt like a slap in the face.
Let's start with the stupid producers who gave this project to Fede Alvarez, who has no real good movies on his resume. And he writes, produces and directs with the help of two other novice writers. I can't say that I'm surprised that it's really terrible. I don't know what brilliant mind put this man in charge of directing it, but someone made a terrible mistake! Over an hour into the movie and you've never seen the alien except for a few seconds The main character is not a good actor.. he is an android and he is a really bad actor.. one of the big problems is that the actors are young.. it takes years to develop acting skills. .. and because the actors are so young and unskilled, the director can't really get a good shot of the actors' faces because it ruins the movie even worse than it already is.
I wonder what the average age of the cast is, but it's certainly 15-20 years younger than the other movies, it doesn't feel real in my brain, it's almost played by kids. And when I see such movies, I know that a bigger person has written the dialogues. Another thing that comes to my mind is that it currently has a 7.5 rating which makes me think some group inflated the ratings using social media or something, 7.5 just doesn't match what I'm seeing .
The face huggers are so bad the bad game a lot of the scenes/sets look like a universal ride. Some effects are really bad. How can Ridley Scott stand behind this wedge. Was it greed??? Prometheus and Alien: Covenant are masterpieces. And the studio decided to go that way instead. Stupid nonsense. But in reality, Hollywood is dead.
I walked out of the theater sad and angry that I had spent $17.50 on a movie that felt like a slap in the face.
"Spy Kids: Armageddon," the much-anticipated reboot of the beloved franchise, is a catastrophic failure in every sense of the word. Roberto Rodriguez seems to have lost his touch entirely, delivering a film that not only tarnishes the legacy of the original movies but also leaves the audience questioning the very essence of storytelling.
From the beginning, it's evident that Rodriguez has abandoned the heart and soul of the Spy Kids series. The once-charming child spies, Juni and Carmen Cortez, are reduced to mere caricatures of their former selves. Their witty dialogues and endearing sibling dynamics are replaced by cringe-worthy one-liners and forced chemistry, making it painful for fans of the original films to watch.
The plot, if it can even be called that, is a convoluted mess. The storyline jumps erratically from one poorly executed action sequence to another, leaving the audience bewildered and disconnected. The introduction of new gadgets and gizmos feels forced and uninspired, lacking the innovation.
Rodriguez's direction further exacerbates the film's problems. The action scenes, which should have been the movie's saving grace, are plagued by shoddy choreography and sloppy editing. The once-impressive visual effects are now laughably outdated, making it seem like a desperate attempt to cash in on nostalgia without putting in the effort to update the film for modern audiences.
Moreover, the performances from the cast are uninspired at best. It's almost painful to watch talented actors sleepwalk through their roles, delivering lines with a lack of conviction that further emphasizes the overall lack of effort put into this project.
In conclusion, "Spy Kids: Armageddon" is a prime example of how not to revive a beloved franchise. Roberto Rodriguez's direction, paired with a lackluster script and uninspired performances, results in a film that is not only forgettable but also deeply disappointing for fans who were hoping for a worthy successor to the original Spy Kids movies. Instead of breathing new life into the series, Rodriguez has managed to bury it even deeper, leaving audiences to wonder why this ill-conceived reboot was ever made in the first place.
From the beginning, it's evident that Rodriguez has abandoned the heart and soul of the Spy Kids series. The once-charming child spies, Juni and Carmen Cortez, are reduced to mere caricatures of their former selves. Their witty dialogues and endearing sibling dynamics are replaced by cringe-worthy one-liners and forced chemistry, making it painful for fans of the original films to watch.
The plot, if it can even be called that, is a convoluted mess. The storyline jumps erratically from one poorly executed action sequence to another, leaving the audience bewildered and disconnected. The introduction of new gadgets and gizmos feels forced and uninspired, lacking the innovation.
Rodriguez's direction further exacerbates the film's problems. The action scenes, which should have been the movie's saving grace, are plagued by shoddy choreography and sloppy editing. The once-impressive visual effects are now laughably outdated, making it seem like a desperate attempt to cash in on nostalgia without putting in the effort to update the film for modern audiences.
Moreover, the performances from the cast are uninspired at best. It's almost painful to watch talented actors sleepwalk through their roles, delivering lines with a lack of conviction that further emphasizes the overall lack of effort put into this project.
In conclusion, "Spy Kids: Armageddon" is a prime example of how not to revive a beloved franchise. Roberto Rodriguez's direction, paired with a lackluster script and uninspired performances, results in a film that is not only forgettable but also deeply disappointing for fans who were hoping for a worthy successor to the original Spy Kids movies. Instead of breathing new life into the series, Rodriguez has managed to bury it even deeper, leaving audiences to wonder why this ill-conceived reboot was ever made in the first place.