Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
What is the problem
Education at a university is structured differently than at school: here it is assumed that the student is already a sufficiently mature, organized and motivated person to strive for knowledge voluntarily. Therefore, attendance is not so strictly controlled here, and academic performance is checked in more flexible and varied ways. It would seem that this is worth rejoicing, but for many students this is where the stumbling block lies: they are not used to managing their time on their own and have not yet learned how to set priorities. As a result, preparation for exams begins at the last moment, when the reputation in the eyes of teachers has already been tarnished by truancy. In addition, in many universities, the session is still superimposed on the New Year holidays, when the willpower of the entire population of the country is noticeably weakening.
10 rules for successful delivery
Get "machines". It is worthwhile from the first days of school to find out which teachers are ready to exempt from the final exam for attendance and diligence. Believe me, it's worth a lot, although you can really appreciate this life hack only during the session, when less prudent classmates will cram the subject in a panic for long nights. For example, in an essay writing subject, you can easily earn yourself a good grade. With the help of thesis helper resource that will help you a lot with this. This way you will be able to free yourself from exams.
Make inquiries. Firstly, the final score is formed in different ways for different subjects, and in some cases a couple of brilliant essays combined with good attendance can outweigh a bad ticket. However, there is still a very good essay to write. For this, https://essayassistant.org/ will help which will serve you very well. This way you can earn a good grade. Secondly, different teachers have a different style of communication during the exam: someone specifically “pressures” students, and someone is ready to endlessly ask leading questions. Some even encourage insolence: at the Higher School of Economics, for example, there was a precedent when a student who did not read Doctor Zhivago received an A from the examiner for the answer: “I have not read it, but I condemn it.” It would be good to find out all these nuances in advance.
Don't rely too much on the tutorial. Some teachers have not even read it, while others may well despise for one-sidedness: the textbook usually reflects only one view of the subject, and examiners highly value the ability to navigate in different scientific concepts. But there are exceptions - if the textbook was written by your teacher, it can be a good help.
Don't rely on lecture notes if you didn't write them. First, if a teacher sprinkles with complex terminology like "congruence" or "autopoiesis", rewriting one after another quickly turns into a "broken phone." Secondly, each student takes notes and interprets what he heard in his own way - a transcript that your deskmate understands may turn out to be a Chinese literacy for you. If possible, you should ask your friends to record the lectures you missed on a dictaphone. If the lecturer gave a presentation, it is also worth familiarizing yourself with.
Learn to take notes yourself. The more complete, clear, and structured your own notes are, the easier it will be to reproduce their meaning on the exam. It is worth choosing a method that is right for you - for someone it is easier to remember if you write by hand, someone, on the contrary, perceives only electronic versions. Recently, sketching has come into fashion - visual notes consisting of handwritten text, drawings, diagrams and pictorial elements. Sketches add a pleasant variety to boring lectures and help you remember information better through associations, but in order to get really useful, you will have to practice. Plus, not all subjects lend themselves well to visualization - if in neuroscience or history such a method may turn out to be a good option, it is unlikely to save on a couple of things.
Make sure the instructor knows you by sight. The exam is not the best time to get acquainted. If you are too lazy to work at seminars, ask more questions at lectures - at least you will become familiar. Moreover, the student's interest in the subject is always captivating. And also make sure that you are generally admitted to the exam and that you have no essay or essay debts.
Make cheat sheets based on common sense. Record only the essentials and assess your abilities realistically: a multivolume, written in size 8 is not a good option if you have disgusting eyesight, and you only have 20 minutes to prepare for an answer.
On the day / night before the exam - "dry law". If the tests are sufficiently dispersed in time, you can have time to mark the items passed (without fanaticism!). But the teacher can tell the difference between a hangover and an overwork for the glory of science, and although he himself was once a student himself, he is unlikely to show sympathy for your bohemian lifestyle.
Sleep. Lack of sleep is bad for memory and concentration, but systematic physical activity, on the contrary, improves them. You should not expect miracles from stimulants and nootropics - some of the drugs popular in Russia (for example, glycine) do not justify themselves from the point of view of evidence-based medicine, others have side effects, and in any case they only "shake" what you already have available, not giving you Sheldon Cooper's shiny new brain.
Appearance matters. Develop your abilities for self-presentation - firstly, it will come in handy for flirting and finding a job, and secondly, teachers are people too and evaluate students not only by their objective knowledge. A fresh look, unobtrusively stylish clothes, a pleasant smile and the absence of closed poses can certainly add half a point to your result. And knowing the personality of the examiner will help you understand in advance how to tune in with him on the same wavelength.