Biblical epics are rarely any good, trying to balance dialogue written by screenwriters with Scripture, resulting in a bizarre manner of speaking that convinces no-one.
'Jesus of Nazareth' was an astonishing exception, but, although the production team is very similar to 'Jesus of Nazareth', the result is a confused mess, with the series attempting to simultaneously retell the Acts of the Apostles, remake 'I Claudius' and tell a love story at the same time.
The direction is dull, with only the episode endings, the beautifully constructed opening scene and the well-staged arena scenes being of any note. Few performances stand out- Denis Quilley makes an effective Peter, David Harris gives Thomas new life, and Cecil Humpries is impressive as Caleb, but Paul Sayer's Paul/Saul is breath-taking.
It is on the Roman side where things go downhill, almost every scene and actor unable to escape from the shadow of 'I Claudius' and, considering A.D. probably cost 20 times as much, this is a huge flaw, particularly in the case of the usually excellent Richard Kiley, who should have created his own interpretation of Claudius, instead of mimicking Derek Jacobi.
To summarise, it has little to interest the discerning viewer of the historical epic- those who appreciated 'Jesus of Nazareth's dynamic sense of wonder will find this version flat and empty. Those who appreciated 'I Claudius' for its intelligent writing, characterisation and acting (not to mention incest, gore and nudity) will find this somewhat castrated version dull.
'Jesus of Nazareth' was an astonishing exception, but, although the production team is very similar to 'Jesus of Nazareth', the result is a confused mess, with the series attempting to simultaneously retell the Acts of the Apostles, remake 'I Claudius' and tell a love story at the same time.
The direction is dull, with only the episode endings, the beautifully constructed opening scene and the well-staged arena scenes being of any note. Few performances stand out- Denis Quilley makes an effective Peter, David Harris gives Thomas new life, and Cecil Humpries is impressive as Caleb, but Paul Sayer's Paul/Saul is breath-taking.
It is on the Roman side where things go downhill, almost every scene and actor unable to escape from the shadow of 'I Claudius' and, considering A.D. probably cost 20 times as much, this is a huge flaw, particularly in the case of the usually excellent Richard Kiley, who should have created his own interpretation of Claudius, instead of mimicking Derek Jacobi.
To summarise, it has little to interest the discerning viewer of the historical epic- those who appreciated 'Jesus of Nazareth's dynamic sense of wonder will find this version flat and empty. Those who appreciated 'I Claudius' for its intelligent writing, characterisation and acting (not to mention incest, gore and nudity) will find this somewhat castrated version dull.
Tell Your Friends