Reviews

847 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Book Club (I) (2018)
6/10
A sweet, group romantic comedy
12 June 2019
A sweet, group romantic comedy, with an all-star cast. The cast are all Very accomplished actors and actresses, and it shows. Like all rom-coms, some aspects are formulaic, but hey, what do you expect? I was particularly impressed with Mary Steenburgen and Candice Bergen. Not a movie I would buy, but worth a look on cable, or a Netflix rental.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A thoroughly decent drama with an all-star cast
21 May 2019
A thoroughly decent drama with an all-star cast. While none of the male characters were fleshed out, that simply wasn't the focus of the movie, and I understand that in the source play, none of them ever appeared on-stage. The women were all very strong, if sometimes foolish, and the acting was first-rate. Nice photography of Natchitoches.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Meg (2018)
5/10
Nothing really redeeming here
11 May 2019
Nothing really redeeming here. It is a semi science-fiction/monster movie. I didn't know of Jason Statham, and he didn't show me anything. Bingbing Li and Ruby Rose were as good as the material allowed. The megaladon was scary enough, but I guess the next time someone tries to make a shark movie, they'll have to top this and make it 120 feet long. It's really not worth your time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Constance Wu was terrific
3 May 2019
Constance Wu was terrific. Michelle Yeoh was very good also. Otherwise, we have a fairly formulaic romantic comedy, and there's nothing wrong with that. The film does subtly show that the characters that are fabulously wealthy aren't necessarily any happier than middle class folks. Nice photography and direction.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A wonderful suspense-filled spy caper
12 April 2019
Among Hitchcock's best, which is saying a lot. I was long under the belief that this was a black-and-white movie, but I realize now that I thought that because I first saw it on television in the Sixties, before my family had a color TV. Cary Grant largely plays Cary Grant, which was fine for this film. Eva Marie Saint and James Mason were highly sophisticated in their evil...or not. A wonderful suspense-filled spy caper.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Imaginative, visually striking, but boring
5 April 2019
I'm not sure what the target demographic was for this film, but apparently it isn't me. It seems rather too dark for children, though I suppose older children would maybe enjoy it. It is imaginative, and visually striking, but honestly, I was bored by it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stallone is an average actor at best
30 March 2019
Stallone is an average actor at best, and usually somewhat annoying. That holds true here. The fighting scenes are somewhat cartoonish, deliberately so, I think. The fish-out-of-water aspect was mildly amusing. The only real appeal was the earnest and beautiful Sandra Bullock. Can't really recommend this film to anyone.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stale Allen humor
22 March 2019
Have to say that this one is better-plotted than most Woody Allen films. Allen and Diane Keaton reprise, if not the characters, then their personas from Annie Hall. Everyone acted well, but often the characters talked over one another, making some of the dialog hard to follow. In the Seventies, Allen's wry commentary was different and fresh, and funny, but still doing the exact same thing has become stale and only a little amusing. Cannot recommend.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Has flaws, but enjoyable nonetheless
18 March 2019
In spite of some flaws, I liked this movie pretty well. Yes, some of the plot turns were highly predictable, but I don't spend my time with a movie trying to predict what's going to happen. I just enjoy it (hopefully). Dennis Quaid was Ok here. I've never cared for him that much, but he is playing a taciturn character, and people always criticize that as bad acting. I disagree. Meg Ryan looked adorable, as always, and played her complicated role very well. I say check it out.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disobedience (2017)
6/10
Pretty good, as a psychosexual drama
9 March 2019
I thought it was pretty good, as a psychosexual drama. It took a respectful tone to the Orthodox Jewish community, even as it completely rebelled against its strictures. Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams performed very well in the two leads, and most of the rest of the cast rang true, especially Alessandro Nivola.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Engrossing and entertaining
25 February 2019
A Howard Hawks/Cary Grant collaboration with which I was unfamiliar. I found it engrossing and entertaining. For its time, the aircraft special effects were very good. Grant's character was largely unlikeable, a bit of a departure for him. I wasn't very familiar with Jean Arthur, but she looked great, and came off very well. I might not have recognized the young Rita Hayworth. It had a good story, and told it well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Sparrow (2018)
8/10
Pretty good film
23 February 2019
A lot of commenters are trashing this movie for no obvious reason. I thought it was pretty good. Jennifer Lawrence was quite good, whether she completely mastered a Russian accent or not. Good work as well by Charlotte Rampling, Joely Richardson, and Mary-Louise Parker. Lawrence's character, Dominika, was passionate, but highly controlled, and came off quite stoic. This makes sense for someone who could rise to a high level in world-class ballet.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Braveheart (1995)
8/10
Checks all the boxes for a "historical" epic
13 February 2019
I saw this film in the '90's, and really didn't remember liking it all that much. But viewing it again the other day, I found it quite enjoyable. It checks all the boxes for a "historical" epic. Yes, the MANY historical inaccuracies are a concern, since so many simple folk consider these sort of movies their education in history. But putting that aside, it is well worth watching for its entertainment value. Special kudos to Sophie Marceau and especially Catherine McCormack on their performances and their beauty.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fist Fight (2017)
6/10
Jillian Bell was the best part of this movie
8 February 2019
A thoroughly middling comedy. Production values, direction, photography are all fine. I don't know if better writing might have made it funnier or not. Although her part was a bit small, Jillian Bell stole the show when she was onscreen with her deadpan delivery of very sexually charged lines. THAT was funny.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Naked (1993)
6/10
A truly dark film
4 February 2019
A truly dark film. The main character, Johnny, is a seemingly well-educated, yet thoroughly despicable, misogynistic to the point of rape, character who is unsuited for modern life, basically a criminal who would never stoop to honest work. He is contrasted with an upper class character who is even more hateful, and even more cruel to women. There are some very good performances in this movie, but no one is at all likeable. I'm sure that this was the point, but it makes the film more like medicine than entertainment. I don't know whether I would recommend this movie or not.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Campy rather than just simply bad
30 January 2019
Well, this film is what it is. Some of the criticism is a bit overwrought. Yes, the plot is odd, and the production values are low. I would describe it as campy rather than just simply bad. The filmmakers cannot be oblivious to what they are putting on the screen. In the sword fighting scenes, the actors don't really even try to make it look real. Lana Clarkson looked so beautiful here, and that is sort of the point, not the medieval plot and staging. I had forgotten that Miss Clarkson was the actress murdered by Phil Spector. So sad.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't bother
26 January 2019
The reviews for this movie are bad, and they are right. Sandra Bullock was OK, and she looked nice, but she could not salvage this clunker. Craig Sheffer played a very unlikeable character very badly. He was extremely annoying. He plays a part which combines the quintessential "ugly American" with the pushy journalist. Amazingly, he seems to have had a long acting career. Don't bother with this one.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Faux noir
21 January 2019
This film checks off all the boxes of old cine noir, the narration, the grittiness, the flawed point-of-view character (couldn't call him a hero), the femme fatale. Maybe it tries a little too hard. This film was apparently not very successful, even with an A-list cast. Lena Olin was very good, as were the other two main actresses. (Juliette Lewis and Annabella Sciorra). Overall, pretty good, not great. By the way, isn't it interesting that the characters in movies can always find places in New York City that are utterly deserted, even in the middle of the day?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harder for me to get into than it was in 1980
18 January 2019
Viewed this one again recently. While I still liked it, it didn't seem as awesome now. Maybe I've outgrown the mysticism, and definitely outgrown experimenting with psychoactive drugs. While I can still suspend disbelief, and enjoy science fiction, I was unable to immerse myself in it. Still the film had excellent performances by William Hurt and Blair Brown. Some of the trippy sequences seemed to be an homage to 2001. I'd say it's still worth seeing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty good for often impenetrable French cinema
7 January 2019
A pretty good film, somewhat distant. I wouldn't have recognized Isabelle Huppert if I hadn't known that she would be in the film. Many of the previous comments were incisive and erudite. I don't have much to add, so check those out if you are so inclined.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Fields' best
22 December 2018
This is not the Great Man's best work. Part of the issue may be the style of comedy in the day, but the various situations are dragged out much too long. It had me checking the time in the middle of the film. However there is a lot to like here, if you have the patience for it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghostbusters (1984)
7/10
Still pretty good
20 December 2018
Many comedies age poorly, but I thought that this one has held up pretty well. Lots of special effects (which have also held up pretty well) but the comedy does not get lost in them. Murray does his absurd deadpan, Ramis his low-key deadpan, and Ackroyd his high-energy weirdness. Sigourney Weaver proves that she has comedic chops. Still pretty good, not great.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I've seen worse
19 December 2018
Wrapping up the Fifty Shades trilogy. It was OK, I guess. Jamie Dornan reprises his role as the priapic perverted billionaire. In my review of the first film, I wrote that he "Plays his role with all of the feeling and emotion of a terminator." In this one he attempted emotional range. But it was still quite wooden. The good part of the film was Dakota Johnson. Wile she certainly looks awesome in her birthday suit, she has the screen presence and charisma of a movie star. Even when they made her kind of mousy. (More in the first film than this one.) May be her bloodlines. If you watched the first two, you might as well watch this one.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A quite powerful film
15 December 2018
A quite powerful film. Kubrick films always hold one's interest, and he usually has something to say beyond mere entertainment. R. Lee Ermey was fantastic as the drill instructor. I've never seen him in any other dramatic role, so this performance sort of defines him. Matthew Modine and Vincent D'Onofrio put in their best career performances by far, as did Adam Baldwin. The rest of the cast is fairly obscure, but there was never a false note throughout.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blockers (2018)
6/10
A somewhat better-than-average comedy
10 December 2018
A somewhat better-than-average comedy. Nice comedic timing from the three leads. John Cena is becoming an acceptable actor, which makes me think that acting isn't all that difficult. I got a number of smiles and chuckles, and a couple of laugh-out-louds, which is better than a lot of modern comedies. Kudos to a couple of the young actresses, Geraldine Viswanathan and Gideon Adlon.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed