Captain Muller struggles to survive fighting overwhelming Russian forces. Wounded, he is sent to Normandy as our Americans Lee and Trey are preparing for D-day. Soon score is settled and bat... Read allCaptain Muller struggles to survive fighting overwhelming Russian forces. Wounded, he is sent to Normandy as our Americans Lee and Trey are preparing for D-day. Soon score is settled and battle brings our GIs and Germans on the same path.Captain Muller struggles to survive fighting overwhelming Russian forces. Wounded, he is sent to Normandy as our Americans Lee and Trey are preparing for D-day. Soon score is settled and battle brings our GIs and Germans on the same path.
Jack Dimich
- General Grosswald
- (as a different name)
Featured reviews
Whatever qualities the move may either have or lack, the listing shows Odessa, Russia, as the filming location. It's Odessa, Ukraine, despite Putin's efforts to make it part of Russia.
Hands down the worst WWII film I've ever seen. Acting and script stale and cliche at best. Unless you are in prison and forced to watch, skip over this waste of time.
Let's say it is a well made re-enactment show with sloppy CGs and some acting. Then, you will not be disappointed. Quite a lot of ww2 vehicles and equipment. Don't expect more than that!
A bunch of jumbled division patches on the shoulders of GIs with all kinds of mixed uniforms in an unknown beach, ranger, 29th, big red one, 4th and airborne but it is true they were in Normandy anyway... Nice try, though! Nice to see the real tanks, tank destroyers, jeeps, m8 greyhounds and halftracks.
4 stars to the movie, 8 stars to the director. I can even sympathize with the his agony and hard work for the low-budgeted war movie.
A bunch of jumbled division patches on the shoulders of GIs with all kinds of mixed uniforms in an unknown beach, ranger, 29th, big red one, 4th and airborne but it is true they were in Normandy anyway... Nice try, though! Nice to see the real tanks, tank destroyers, jeeps, m8 greyhounds and halftracks.
4 stars to the movie, 8 stars to the director. I can even sympathize with the his agony and hard work for the low-budgeted war movie.
I like war movies and I'm very lenient, but this one is just too terrible. Reverse angle on the filing, and the numbers are backwards... Bad acting... obvious he actors never fired a gun before... bad special effects...
I tried... I tried really hard, but I only lasted 10 minutes before I gave up on this one.
I tried... I tried really hard, but I only lasted 10 minutes before I gave up on this one.
Another WW2 film that takes footage from a fairly impressive large scale re-enactment and attempts to edit it into a film. Yes, there are a bunch of these littered around streaming services. This one is pretty much par for the course; you have a sort of boring, poorly acted story crafted around fairly elaborate staged battle scenes.
On one hand a lot of effort was definitely put in by the re-enactors. There are lots of actual WW2 vehicles and equipment on display, which is actually pretty neat. Unfortunately this is supposed to be a film and none of it really 'feels' real. The soldiers often move sort of clumsily, uniforms are pristine clean, and the editing often makes things something of a mishmashes mess. It really is sort of uncanny watching a scene where some elements look convincing and then you have someone fall down in what can be best described as real time slow motion. There is also a combination of fairly impressive re-enactment pyrotechnics combined with some far less convincing after effects style ones. Technically it is really all over the place. Besides the confused editing at times, you can watch a 2 minute scene of this film with color grading that is different in almost every shot. It is all very jarring.
My relative is a re-enactor and I can understand the thought process. We look like WW2 soldiers (basically act as them) and have all this equipment, how hard can making a film be. Sort of ignoring the fact that writing a convincing script let alone convincingly performing it are what actually constitutes a convincing movie. I can respect the effort put into the battle scenes on a sort of technical level. They are at least from a scale/equipment perspective something. Unfortunately some re-enactment footage alone does not a good film make. Really, when you see that the lead actor is also the producer, director, etc. It becomes quite clear. One fairly amateur auteur is spread way too thin on his passion project. Unless you want to watch a bunch of re-enactors live out their own little WW2 German war scenario for almost 2 hours, you can do much better. This would have been MUCH better served as a short film that was tightly edited. Land that before attempting a feature film.
On one hand a lot of effort was definitely put in by the re-enactors. There are lots of actual WW2 vehicles and equipment on display, which is actually pretty neat. Unfortunately this is supposed to be a film and none of it really 'feels' real. The soldiers often move sort of clumsily, uniforms are pristine clean, and the editing often makes things something of a mishmashes mess. It really is sort of uncanny watching a scene where some elements look convincing and then you have someone fall down in what can be best described as real time slow motion. There is also a combination of fairly impressive re-enactment pyrotechnics combined with some far less convincing after effects style ones. Technically it is really all over the place. Besides the confused editing at times, you can watch a 2 minute scene of this film with color grading that is different in almost every shot. It is all very jarring.
My relative is a re-enactor and I can understand the thought process. We look like WW2 soldiers (basically act as them) and have all this equipment, how hard can making a film be. Sort of ignoring the fact that writing a convincing script let alone convincingly performing it are what actually constitutes a convincing movie. I can respect the effort put into the battle scenes on a sort of technical level. They are at least from a scale/equipment perspective something. Unfortunately some re-enactment footage alone does not a good film make. Really, when you see that the lead actor is also the producer, director, etc. It becomes quite clear. One fairly amateur auteur is spread way too thin on his passion project. Unless you want to watch a bunch of re-enactors live out their own little WW2 German war scenario for almost 2 hours, you can do much better. This would have been MUCH better served as a short film that was tightly edited. Land that before attempting a feature film.
Did you know
- TriviaA competently produced film with some factual errors. As the US army was segregated, the black front line soldiers are out of place. As penicillin was a closely guarded secret by the allies, the German doctor would not have known about it, let alone asked the nurse about it.
- GoofsThe insignia on the uniforms of the German officers are printed. In reality they were embroidered.
- How long is Iron Cross: The Road to Normandy?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- 아이언 크로스: 노르망디 상륙작전
- Filming locations
- Odessa, Ukraine(Odessa, Ukraine)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
