My Son (2017) Poster

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Not Your Typical Vigilante Movie
larrys319 September 2019
Not your typical vigilante revenge film with its deliberate pacing. But the tension does grow as the movie progresses and I certainly wanted to know how this was all going to turn out. Unfortunately, not all of the plot elements are thoroughly explained either adding to the film's detriment.

Guillaume Canet stars as Julien, who gets a call from his ex-wife (Melanie Laurent) that their 7-year-old son has mysteriously disappeared from a 4 day long nature camp. The impulsive and emotional Julien will try and use home videos to get clues as to what actually happened. Eventually, he will go full vigilante and do whatever he deems necessary to locate his son.

Certainly not the best revenge thriller I've ever seen, but there was enough here in this French drama to keep me engaged.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pretty boring
RickManhattan17 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I can believe this low-budget thriller was shot in 6 days, as is stated in the trivia. The slight interest is from the scenes of frantic search and discovery for the allegedly missing child, but too many leaps of faith are required. We are expected to believe in the protagonist's insight since we follow him the whole time, knowing he will succeed in his quest. There are too many implausibilities and loose ends in the chance discoveries. Just as an example, how come this abandoned resort is still lighted and well-maintained if it's only a place for crooks to keep their kidnapped children? How come the authorities haven't monitored such an institution? Why was the protagonist not prosecuted for assaulting an innocent man, the former wife's present boyfriend? The questions the gendarme puts to the protagonist would never pass legal muster. I could go on. It's fun to watch if you know it's going to have a happy ending, even if those final scenes are pretty sappy.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My Son, the original suspense
JohnRayPeterson12 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I can't think of another instance when a director has taken on two projects, two movies, based on the very same story, but there's one; director Christian Carion who wrote the script for the first movie 'Mon Garçon', French for 'My Son', in 2017, did the remake this time in English, in 2021 (released in Sep-2021). Carion was nominated in 2005 by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for the best 2004 foreign language film, an Oscar, for the movie Joyeux Noël/Merry Christmas, but lost to Gavin Hood for the film Tsotsi. I took it upon myself to watch the original as well as the remake (yes I do that sort of thing) and here's my take.

There's a definite suspense in the story and how it develops. The IMDb movie synopsis of the 2021 version is a far better one than the 2017 one, though it's the very same story. Go figure! Based on that synopsis, before I watched both movies I expected a suspense and that's what it is. There are known actors, with 'creds', in both versions, that was another reason for me to see them both. Claire Foy plays the mother in the 2021 take while Mélanie Laurent has that role in the 2017 original. I had a marked preference for Mélanie Laurent, not just because she has starred in both French and English movies and series, but I just prefer her acting skills. However, the 2017 original had many audio shortfalls (you have to listen very closely just to hear some of the dialogue, and that annoys me) the 2021 one didn't; still, the intensity of the mother in the 2017 original outshines that of the dad, by far. I don't have a language bias to alter my appreciation, I'm perfectly bilingual, so it is the acting. The father has the predominate role, in both films because it's the same story. The dads, Guillaume Canet, who plays Julien, and James McAvoy who plays Edmond, have the better roles and I do like McAvoy slightly more, if not because I've seen more of his work, but because he delivers, to my taste, a better and believable character.

In the 2017 original, there is little involvement of Marie, the mother's character, in the rescuing of the son, while Joan the 2021 counterpart does, and it helps fill some gaps the2017 sort of leaves us with. As much as I was tantalized by Mélanie Laurent's beautiful naked body in a brief scene of Julien's imagination, I preferred Claire Foy's involvement in the rescue. I will assume the director/screenwriter Christian Carion corrected that gap in the latter version, or perhaps it was a cultural perspective thing about men and women in the two countries, I can't say for sure. Supporting roles of the 'Lieutenant' and the 'Inspector', respectively played by Mohamed Brikat and Gary Lewis in the original and remake, are important roles as supporting characters go. Hands down Gary Lewis is my favourite and he benefited from a few more scenes of greater importance; of course I'm more familiar with his many roles over the years than I was with a relatively newcomer, plus I always liked Lewis.

The panoramic views of the areas where the two movies were filmed make for an aspect that greatly enhance the viewing experience in both movies, in Vercors, France and in the Scottish Highlands; I really loved the cinematography in both; it's almost as if the panoramas were characters. The different climate or season of the year when the movies were made also allowed the director to take advantage of circumstances to provide interesting nuances; that, in addition to the more wordy French original and the colder English version (the 2017 was made in winter, the 2021 wasn't, ironically) made it worth it for me to see both.

The IMDb synopsis already mentions the plot revolves around the kidnaping of a young boy and the movie focuses much on finding the child and rescuing him; that alone provides a natural suspense element, but I dearly wished a bit more had been covered as to the motive of the kidnaping. We have to make do with inferences and a bare minimum to explain what it wasn't rather than what it was about; had this been a book of fiction I'd have thought it was incomplete, but I suppose elaborating on the motive in a 95 minute movie would have taken too much away from what the characters bring to the story. I enjoyed the movie(s) because I felt it draws you in and gets you involved psychologically, and I'm not even a father so I can just imagine how it will impact parents watching these movies. I liked the ending but I don't want to spoil it for you; I'll just say it(they) is(are) not a Hollywood sort of ending, but that's a good thing here, really is.

After seeing both movies and pondering as to why director Carion chose to remake the movie, I can only conclude that it was a very good idea. The English speaking audience can better relate to English actors in Scotland than it would with French ones in France, in my opinion. A dubbed version just would not deliver the same audience involvement in the story, and I can say this having seen both in their original format. I feel the same way about Spanish movies and series which I admit I need sub-titles to help me through as my Spanish leaves much to be desired. If you can get the French 2017 movie with English subs and get what I get with Spanish flics, and especially if you have the time, watch both.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The searcher
searchanddestroy-123 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Two years ago, we discovered THE COWBOYS, a film about a desperate father searching his wayward daughter. Now, we have a divorced father in search for his kid boy who suddenly disappeared. In both movies, you have some tiny links to the western genre; just watch out very closely. I highly prefer the 2015 film, far darker and more bitter than this one because of a so so ending...Good acting and directing, some unbearable torture sequence and unfortunately some elements are not explained, such as (SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS= why the hell those gangsters kidnapped ordinary kids? Why?
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good and thrilling drama
lareval28 August 2021
Thrilling and strong drama filled with suspense. The performances are fine and the excecution is totally credible. While this movie stands great on its own, I´m waiting the remake being directed by the same director and with Claire Foy and James McAvoy starring. Despite the talents involved, they have shoes to fill in comparison with this.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
On an experimental basis.
dbdumonteil27 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The thriller based on child abduction has undergone some changes since André Cayatte days ;they try to treat it in a more realistic way,by concentrating on the relationship between the parents ;and here,sadly ,we run into the hip cliché :the parents are separated ,but they still love each other,in spite of it all .Fortunately the wife's new partner is not cardboard .And the scene between the two rivals,which begins in a genial way , ends up in violence ,from whispers to screams is a good moment;the best scene of an "experimental" movie, maybe an impromptu performance , it takes advantage of a relevant detail: the wife's miscarriage ,as she was pregnant by her new companion :"you did not forgive her (me),so you have abducted and probably killed my own boy!"you're only concerned by your new shack ,your own happiness!"

The police are present ,but their role is so insignificant the viewer is wondering why he pays taxes to be protected by them!

The word is "experimental": Guillaume Canet had not read the screenplay and thus did not know the ending ; his co-stars did though(after all ,Henri Georges Clouzot regretted that Simone Signoret had read "Les diaboliques" screenplay for he did not like the way she played her character).

I thoroughly agree with the precedent users : too many implausibilities , the psychological drama turns into soft Rambo stuff ,in which Canet ,an intellectual geologist world-traveler (why are you never here when your son needs you? his wife screams ,quite rightly so) shows what he's made of.Single --handedly,yes sir! The flashbacks , now real ones ,thanks to mobiles and computers ,make the difference with the thrillers of yore .But it makes Julien's quest look like a video game :aren't the first (enormous) clues given by the computer?The police are too dumb to have noticed the license plate -anyway it's so implausible that we think it's a wrong track.

A movie which starts well,but gets bogged down along the way; too much filler( both final sequences could be a nice commercial : "a good day begins with a good breakfast :the cereals X......make all the difference!") too many flashbacks which do not make up for the plot holes .
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
misses a number of opportunities
myriamlenys22 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
A man gets a panicked call from his ex-wife, who tells him that their young son has disappeared from the tepee camp where he was supposed to enjoy a nice vacation. When it becomes clear that the boy has been abducted, the increasingly desperate father uses all means fair and foul in order to find his child. Anything goes, including torture and manslaughter...

Viewed as a thriller, "Mon garçon" is watchable, although it would have benefitted from a few additional twist and turns or from a few additional red herrings. (The movie, by the way, takes a dim view of the French police and gendarmerie, who seem to be as useful as a woollen blanket in a heatwave. Now I may be foolishly optimistic, but I would expect that the sudden disappearance of a young child, especially in a quiet region without major problems, would warrant the full attention and skill of some seriously competent investigators.) Viewed as a drama, "Mon garçon" starts out in a remarkably truthful and life-like fashion, only in order to become more shallow and implausible.

This is a pity, since the movie, at least in the beginning, contains some impressive scenes which ring true. For instance there's the scene where the shaken father, who hasn't got a clue about what might have happened to his son, meets the new partner of his ex-wife. The new partner turns out to be a self-centered fool who prattles and burbles happily about the niceness of his own life : he's found his soul mate, he's going to build her a dream house and that dream house is going to look stunning. And nah, he isn't too bothered about the kid, he'll turn up... Unsurprisingly the conversation, which began in a reasonably civilized manner, derails with the speed of a runaway train.

In a certain sense "Mon garçon" represents a wish fulfillment dream for many divorced men, especially divorced men who feel hard-done-by or who still carry a torch for their ex. An emergency arises ; dad is called to the rescue ; stepdad proves totally useless ; thanks to his resourcefulness and courage dad saves the day ; both the ex and the child fall weeping into dad's arms, recognizing him as their saviour and as the one true captain of their little ship.

Just watch the ending and then tell me if I'm wrong...
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
too many ''approximations'' Warning: Spoilers
You can feel the movie was written and filmed in a short time.

why doesnt the police investigate the father in law? in those cases he is always the first suspect, he lives nearby while the real father lives so far away, however they investigate the father and not the father in law?

after he burns the kidnapper and knows where the kid is, why doesnt he tell the police?
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Now, that's a dad!
donaldricco17 February 2020
Well done! While the father didn't do exactly what I'd do, I sure do understand what he did - and why! And Mélanie Laurent is absolutely terrific! Gorgeous exterior settings too! I would have given this a full ten stars, but the ending, ending was much too ambiguous for me. I needed a more flushed out resolution. But, this is a good 'taken' movie for sure!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed