I really have a problem with "nehbor"'s reviews, and don't believe he should be allowed to clutter up IMDb's user space. Other regular reviewers such as LittleSongBird have a similar boilerplate approach to their contributions, but, although it irritates me, their contributions are open minded and often helpful. In spite of his prologue, I don't believe that Mrs nehbor has much to say in the content of his contributions. In this episode, right from the start I have a problem. As his first unhappiness, he complains about pebbles in shoes. Who has not had that problem? I had to shake out my left shoe this morning because there was a piece of grit in it. Then he is apparently upset because SECNAV, whose daughter has just been kidnapped, repeatedly tries to contact her. Who would do anything different? He then descends through several layers of oddity to his Final Cut - that SECNAV is a traitor because she values her child above her job. Right. I'm sorry, but I can't help feeling that in writing this and other reviews nehbor has been somewhat acting under the alfluence of incahol. By the time he gets to damning the Founding Fathers to Hell, I'm fairly convinced of it. One of the things I am most set against in IMDb is ad hominem attacks: any public presentation is the result of a team: actor, director, makeup, hair, costuming and many others. So what the audience sees is not the character of any one element of that team, and should not be judged as any one individual within it. However, this is someone attacking from the outside. This is someone who seems to be determined to dislike anything he sees. "nehbor" is insensitive, misogynistic, and a bully. When his wife decides to flee from him, she will have my support.
