We follow three couples that are about to get married. The only catch is that they never meet their spouse before.We follow three couples that are about to get married. The only catch is that they never meet their spouse before.We follow three couples that are about to get married. The only catch is that they never meet their spouse before.
- Nominated for 2 BAFTA Awards
- 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
First I will say about the show. Me and wife have watched since it has started but this year seemed different then other years like they have taken a laid-back attitude which has had a negative impact on the people involved in the process I mean bringing back ella and jj. Talk about moral values someone who texts another wife's man behind there back with the intentions she had is cheating I don't care what anyone says and then letting them back on the show I mean how disrespectful to the other two that were basically shunted I feel for them. Now on to Peggy and George I feel for that man so much he technically has been broken down and emotionally tortured for having a hobby and interests that don't match Peggy and her family's ambitions.i mean Peggy listened to her mum and George is basically gone and peggys mum is always right I mean thirty something and still leaving at home yea right good advice that women got . George if you read this you had a lucky escape there mate go and find someone who loves you for you peace brother and rozz your evil how dare you treat Thomas like that what a sound bloke and you treat him like a yoyo your just toy with up and down emotionally.
Reality TV shows can be fun to watch, but are the contestants taking part to gain TV exposure or to find a husband/wife? I'm not sure.
The participants do seem to be selected to benefit the show i.e. In the current series there are white couples, a black couple, a mixed race couple, a lesbian couple and even a disabled chap. So clearly selection is being made based on certain criteria, not just the best match. Although there are no age gap couples (>10 year difference).
In the current series the "experts" criticise two of the men (in front of everyone else) for not being attracted to the two overweight women they have been "matched" with.
A study of which physical aspects men and women most favour in a partner, found that for women height is most important and men it is body shape.
Western countries have a problem with obesity, yet this programme is trying to normalise it. Shows like this should be promoting healthy life styles not ridiculing men for a lack of attraction.
The participants do seem to be selected to benefit the show i.e. In the current series there are white couples, a black couple, a mixed race couple, a lesbian couple and even a disabled chap. So clearly selection is being made based on certain criteria, not just the best match. Although there are no age gap couples (>10 year difference).
In the current series the "experts" criticise two of the men (in front of everyone else) for not being attracted to the two overweight women they have been "matched" with.
A study of which physical aspects men and women most favour in a partner, found that for women height is most important and men it is body shape.
Western countries have a problem with obesity, yet this programme is trying to normalise it. Shows like this should be promoting healthy life styles not ridiculing men for a lack of attraction.
Might as well be wife swap. People disrespect the "experiment" and "experts" and get rewarded for it! People get humiliated by partners cheating, but the cheating partner gets another opportunity all cox they say its for love. Absolutely awful. Doesn't restore any justice for the victim from peoples abusive and manipulative behaviour, but instead encourages it. Feel so disappointed and hurt by how they handle cheating and spiteful people who couldn't care less about the experience, only want to be on it for the fame. Seems to be no sort of protection from gaslighting, abuse, and overall toxic relationships, just because its "good TV"
Married at First Sight UK is a fascinating mix of social experiment, romance, and reality TV chaos. While the concept of strangers marrying sight unseen is undeniably wild, it makes for incredibly entertaining viewing. The show thrives on its mix of genuine connections, dramatic clashes, and expert interventions, keeping you hooked from start to finish.
There's a solid balance between heartfelt moments and explosive confrontations, making it both engaging and unpredictable. Some couples genuinely try to make things work, while others seem more drawn to the drama than the relationship, but that's part of what makes it so watchable. The format is well-paced, with commitment ceremonies and dinner parties adding to the intensity.
While it sometimes leans into reality TV tropes, MAFS UK remains an enjoyable watch for those who love relationship dynamics and a bit of guilty-pleasure drama. A solid 7/10 for its addictive nature and emotional highs and lows!
There's a solid balance between heartfelt moments and explosive confrontations, making it both engaging and unpredictable. Some couples genuinely try to make things work, while others seem more drawn to the drama than the relationship, but that's part of what makes it so watchable. The format is well-paced, with commitment ceremonies and dinner parties adding to the intensity.
While it sometimes leans into reality TV tropes, MAFS UK remains an enjoyable watch for those who love relationship dynamics and a bit of guilty-pleasure drama. A solid 7/10 for its addictive nature and emotional highs and lows!
This would be quite an interesting premise - if people really were marrying for good and all, and you saw them in their real lives. But since the marriages are even flimsier than a registry office 'Ming the Merciless' deal ('until such time as your majesty grows tired of her'), with the participants given the chance to opt out every week, it sadly only brings the institution into further disrepute.
But the biggest problem is that nothing happens. In Love Island the friction of living as a group - duly and judiciously aggravated by the show's producers - generally creates enough incident to keep things moving. In this show they don't actually do *anything*, so the only possibility is to keep nitpicking endlessly over every tiny little issue that disturbs their precious, entitled minds. It soon feels like living in a time loop. Having that bizarre panel of pseudo-experts watching on, nitpicking over the nitpicking, doesn't help - in fact without a voiceover like Iain Stirling's or Rob Beckett's to deflate some of the pomposity, it is hard to stomach.
As has become standard in this type of show, there's a massive double standard. Women can backbite, tell tales, stir it, poke their nose in, confront - that's all fine, in fact great (girl power!) and to criticise it is misogyny. But if the men do the same sort of thing there is an immediate furrowing of brows, followed by a hiss of disapproval, and if they persist - well, again, it's misogyny. Look forward to it becoming a hate crime folks! It's sad and actually a little disturbing to see the men, who mostly seem decent enough young lads, feeling they must invariably roll over and beg for the women who are mostly narcissistic, flaky and immature, and a million miles away from being ready to make a go of marriage.
But the biggest problem is that nothing happens. In Love Island the friction of living as a group - duly and judiciously aggravated by the show's producers - generally creates enough incident to keep things moving. In this show they don't actually do *anything*, so the only possibility is to keep nitpicking endlessly over every tiny little issue that disturbs their precious, entitled minds. It soon feels like living in a time loop. Having that bizarre panel of pseudo-experts watching on, nitpicking over the nitpicking, doesn't help - in fact without a voiceover like Iain Stirling's or Rob Beckett's to deflate some of the pomposity, it is hard to stomach.
As has become standard in this type of show, there's a massive double standard. Women can backbite, tell tales, stir it, poke their nose in, confront - that's all fine, in fact great (girl power!) and to criticise it is misogyny. But if the men do the same sort of thing there is an immediate furrowing of brows, followed by a hiss of disapproval, and if they persist - well, again, it's misogyny. Look forward to it becoming a hate crime folks! It's sad and actually a little disturbing to see the men, who mostly seem decent enough young lads, feeling they must invariably roll over and beg for the women who are mostly narcissistic, flaky and immature, and a million miles away from being ready to make a go of marriage.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe British version of the programme will return for a sixth series in 2021. However, there are major changes planned for series six. The show will switch from Channel 4 to Channel 4 Television's youth-orientated channel E4, series six will consist of 20-episodes rather than the much shorter broadcast runs of previous series and the format will change to copy the Australian version of the programme.
- ConnectionsVersion of Gift ved første blik (2013)
- How many seasons does Married at First Sight UK have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

Top Gap
By what name was Married at First Sight UK (2015) officially released in India in English?
Answer