Rebecca must unlock the terror behind her little brother's experiences that once tested her sanity, bringing her face to face with a supernatural spirit attached to their mother.Rebecca must unlock the terror behind her little brother's experiences that once tested her sanity, bringing her face to face with a supernatural spirit attached to their mother.Rebecca must unlock the terror behind her little brother's experiences that once tested her sanity, bringing her face to face with a supernatural spirit attached to their mother.
- Director
- Writers
- Eric Heisserer(screenplay)
- David F. Sandberg(based on the short film by)
- Stars
Top credits
- Director
- Writers
- Eric Heisserer(screenplay)
- David F. Sandberg(based on the short film by)
- Stars
- Awards
- 3 wins & 9 nominations
Videos17
Ariel Dupin
- Young Dianaas Young Diana
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- Eric Heisserer(screenplay)
- David F. Sandberg(based on the short film by)
- All cast & crew
- See more cast details at IMDbPro
Storyline
A man called Paul is working after hours and is murdered by a supernatural entity in the shadow. When his son, the boy Martin, is frightened by the same creature, he sees his mother Sophie talking to an imaginary friend called Diana in the shadow of her room. Martin does not sleep anymore during the night. His older step sister Rebecca who lives alone is summoned by the social assistant. She brings Martin home and recalls her own experience with Diana years ago when she was young. Rebecca and her boyfriend Bret investigate the connection of Sophie with Diana and come up to a scary revelation about their past. —Claudio Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Taglines
- You were right to be afraid of the dark.
- Genres
- Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)
- Rated PG-13 for terror throughout, violence including disturbing images, some thematic material and brief drug content
- Parents guide
Did you know
- TriviaTeresa Palmer hadn't seen the design of Diana before filming, until she filmed her first scene with her on a completely dark set. This was an intentional directorial choice so as to provoke a genuine reaction of fear when first seeing the design. Alicia Vela-Bailey, the woman in the costume, was previously Palmer's stunt double on I Am Number Four (2011), it would have ruined the effect had she seen her prior as she would have recognized her therefore losing the authentic expression of fear.
- GoofsThe condition Diana has is called Xeroderma pigmentosum, which makes the skin hyper sensitive to the Ultraviolet rays of the light. But in the movie we see Diana being okay with Blacklight/Pure UV light. UV light should be rather more dangerous to her with that condition than normal light.
- Crazy creditsNo person or entity associated with this film received payment or anything of value, or entered into an agreement, in connection with the depiction of tobacco products.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Hollywood Express: Episode #14.32 (2016)
- SoundtracksEnemy
Written by Bret Autrey
Performed by Bret Autrey (as Blue Stahli)
Courtesy of FIXT Music/Position Music
Top review
Creepy and satisfying
Lights Out takes some queues from Japanese-styled ghost stories, so it will be attractive to that audience. It has a strong chill-factor but a somewhat average formula, and it could have used fewer back-story explanations to make it more mysterious, especially since those elements did not feel original.
Based on chill factor alone, it ranks higher than Dark Water, The Forest, Paranormal Activity, The Others, The Babadook, and The Boy, and lower than The Ring, Ju-On / The Grudge, and other Japanese-styled ghost stories, as well as any horror James Wan himself directs. Comparing it to masterpieces like The Exorcist and Poltergeist has no value.
I would say its chills rank somewhat evenly with The Woman in Black and It Follows, without being as original as the latter.
The ghost itself is creepy enough, but the overall movie didn't have the creative twists that we enjoyed from movies like The Boy, The Others, The Sixth Sense, and 10 Cloverfield Lane. It also didn't have the storytelling chemistry of James Wan's own Insideous or The Conjuring movies.
I am a fairly difficult person to frighten. I have been seeing horror movies at the theater since the 70's, and I am usually only interested in the ones that have a supernatural or fantastical element to them. So I am very critical of them, and the only ones I collect on disc are either fun (Tremors), scary (the Grudge), or both (An American Werewolf in London). I will collect this one.
Ghost stories are done to death. It is very difficult to come out with anything scary that is original. I think Lights Out could have used the guided hand of a third-party master horror writer, mostly revising the back-story revelations and using the character relationships to build suspense and mystery surrounding what is going on. Then, perhaps working up to a punch line at the end so that suddenly the back- story rushes in on the audience in one moment, with one simple revelation. It is very difficult to think of how that can be done, but other movies have done it, and the payoff is huge.
I think Lights Out tried to do that a little but got confusing in the attempt.
But all-in-all it's a nice little scary movie with a smaller production value but a satisfying ghost.
Based on chill factor alone, it ranks higher than Dark Water, The Forest, Paranormal Activity, The Others, The Babadook, and The Boy, and lower than The Ring, Ju-On / The Grudge, and other Japanese-styled ghost stories, as well as any horror James Wan himself directs. Comparing it to masterpieces like The Exorcist and Poltergeist has no value.
I would say its chills rank somewhat evenly with The Woman in Black and It Follows, without being as original as the latter.
The ghost itself is creepy enough, but the overall movie didn't have the creative twists that we enjoyed from movies like The Boy, The Others, The Sixth Sense, and 10 Cloverfield Lane. It also didn't have the storytelling chemistry of James Wan's own Insideous or The Conjuring movies.
I am a fairly difficult person to frighten. I have been seeing horror movies at the theater since the 70's, and I am usually only interested in the ones that have a supernatural or fantastical element to them. So I am very critical of them, and the only ones I collect on disc are either fun (Tremors), scary (the Grudge), or both (An American Werewolf in London). I will collect this one.
Ghost stories are done to death. It is very difficult to come out with anything scary that is original. I think Lights Out could have used the guided hand of a third-party master horror writer, mostly revising the back-story revelations and using the character relationships to build suspense and mystery surrounding what is going on. Then, perhaps working up to a punch line at the end so that suddenly the back- story rushes in on the audience in one moment, with one simple revelation. It is very difficult to think of how that can be done, but other movies have done it, and the payoff is huge.
I think Lights Out tried to do that a little but got confusing in the attempt.
But all-in-all it's a nice little scary movie with a smaller production value but a satisfying ghost.
helpful•12559
- CSHaviland
- Jul 13, 2016
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Untitled New Line Horror Film
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $4,900,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $67,268,835
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $21,688,103
- Jul 24, 2016
- Gross worldwide
- $148,868,835
- Runtime
- 1h 21min
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

Recently viewed
Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.






















































