Inhumane (II) (2018) User Reviews

boring

[speershenry · 2/10 · 12 July 2018]

A waste of time noting explained and everything was predictable. 2 for decent premise. kept hoping it would get better and it does that stupid thing where a character asks a question at the end but the camera cuts before an answer is given.

Waste of time.

[yosoyelgerman · 2/10 · 2 March 2018]

The plot was interesting, but slow. Bad ending too.

It wasn't SO bad but please explain the ending?

[OohLaLlama · 4/10 · 7 March 2018]

The film is, to begin with, watchable. It's slow, but I get that with the plot. The lead, as lovely looking as she is, is pretty poor in this-especially towards the end.

So, you get the plot, decide whether you want to watch it and when you leave a review can you explain the end to me as I literally have no clue?! Thanks

Low-budget rubbish

[mark-jeffery-38705 · 1/10 · 4 July 2018]

A terrible script with even worse acting. The story goes nowhere and has no ending. The guns look like toys from a $2 shop. Don't bother. Go stare at the wall for 80 minutes, it will be more productive and interesting.

Don't waste your time

[bnapa · 1/10 · 25 January 2019]

Acting is horrendous! Especially Justin Armstrong. He needs to quit it already. Have seen several movies he's in and they all are trash.

Very boring start, then violence for violence sake.

[apjc · 5/10 · 27 February 2018]

I got so bored after 40 minutes I started skipping along the play bar, then I got run of the mill violence. Was there a story behind this experiment, was the violence somehow explainable. Did I even care, it might appeal to some, but on what level I just don't know, and again don't care. Gave it 5 as it had a promising idea and the cast did the best they could with it.

So terrible with a nothing ending

[carriegreenslade · 1/10 · 25 June 2018]

I've never gone so far as to actually write a review of a film but this one was truly terrible; the protagonist is completely unlikeable and two dimensional, with the supporting roles being equally flat and adding nothing to the "story" if you can really call it that. Of course there was an awkward semi romance shoe horned in between two characters who go from completely disliking each other to having sex in the space of about 10 minutes, and it was even more unnecessary and awkward than when it is usually used; it was very obviously an attempt to thicken an extremely thin plot and to humanise an extremely lazily written character. The scenes with the prisoners made for the most interesting viewing, even if their stories were barely (and in some cases not at all) explored. The story feels like it was written by a very unenthusiastic teen for their english class; so much of it was vague and ill explained, not for effect or to add tension, but seemingly because no one involved had any interest in explaining anything. Ever. Even for a film with a fairly short run time (around 80 mins) this movie was embarrassingly poor and lacking detail. The ending showed no form of resolution and, once again like a teen in english class, seemed like a careless afterthought that comes from a lack of direction or planning. Do not. Watch. This movie. Not even to laugh at how bad it is because you wont laugh. There is no way to enjoy this film even ironically. Spare yourself the frustration you will feel during every second and do literally anything else with your time because nothing will be as bad as sitting through this movie. I will say that the concept is good but in order to work it would definitely need a completely different writer, director, producer and lead actor.

TERRIBLE ACTING ! Terrible plot . BORING

[almightynaty · 1/10 · 2 April 2018]

Worst movie worst act worst actors. dont watch 1 star

This text filed can't be empty, but Inhumane was.

[rendsvig · 1/10 · 14 August 2018]

There is nothing good to say about this movie. For details, Carrie's review is accurate ( https://www.imdb.com/review/rw4215753/)

It is a waste

[crr-94872 · 1/10 · 2 March 2018]

Never ever allow yourself to even watch the trailer of this movie , it is a rubbish.

Entertaining

[AmandaFerris85 · 9/10 · 28 February 2018]

I thought it was entertaining. Not sure why some thought the acting was bad, I thought it was one of the best parts of the movie. Idea was there for the movie but dialogue was...idk. Could've simplified it a bit more, tried to do too much. The drug didn't make sense. But the cinematography, music, and most of the acting was pretty great I thought!

Worst piece of sh-- !!!!

[kimfarina · 7 March 2018]

Don't waste you time ! Writing this comment was even a waste of time .

I Dont Bore Easily. This is a lower budgeted movie but NOT amaturish!

[tdwillis-26273 · 7/10 · 20 July 2018]

There are some real amaturish attempts of movie making out there and I have seen my share of them. One hand held shaky camera and grade school-ish, over acting, sound too high or too low and one close up after another with the long shots used to cover up bad settings, or scenes. This movie "Inhumane" is NOTHING like that. It was obvious to me that there was some real talent in the making of this movie in all aspects. From acting to editing, sound and choreography the results of their work shows! This is a slow burn. There is no violence in this one hour and 20 minute movie, until past the hour mark, and then it was a very appropriate scene that lasted 30 seconds to a minute and did not dwell on it, or show a bunch of blood or gore. The last 20 minutes is when the climax hits. I enjoyed this movie. Watching it, you can tell it isn't Hollywood made, but I am ok with that. This one is worth a try if you dont bore easily, dont mind slow burns, and dont need a movie with a large budget.

Dont waste your time

[jmattioli-51371 · 1/10 · 28 February 2018]

TERRIBLE ACTING ! High School plays are better actors. Terrible plot . BORING

Really why movie?

[abhijeetrmisal · 1/10 · 19 September 2018]

Why they have produced such boring moving movie. Why why why

Bad bad bad

[jfost75 · 1/10 · 28 July 2019]

To say this movie felt like a film students senior project would be an insult to film students. The sets were awful, the dialogue felt like it was being read off the pages of a terrible writer and the acting was...less than good. I got the impression this movie was nobody's passion project, more likebsomeonebowed a favor or lost a bet. The main actress was great on the eyes, but that's where her appeal stopped. The rest of the cast was unmentionable at best.

Terrible.

[metallicagnr56 · 1/10 · 13 December 2018]

This was a terrible film. The acting was hard to watch especially from the main doctor and the blonde patient. I don't recommend this film.

Trash tier

[elisaclalberts · 1/10 · 15 November 2022]

Hypothetic excuse of a movie filled with racism and stereotypes. The protagonist is in no way likeable. She screams at one point to lure zombies. You never feel like rooting for the pathetic female lead.

Could of been a cool concept about what happens when you are on a bus during zombie apocalypse. Instead turns into poorly developed characters baised on stereotypes of high school that are undated.

The story plot makes no sense in end on how characters develop and act. Just the writer is needs to review the basics. Also mysterious wounds disappear...it makes you ask what was director doing.

Maybe someone else will do better next ty.

Time waster

[coflorida · 1/10 · 27 August 2020]

I'm sure everyone who watched this crap thought the same as me waiting for it to get better.... IT NEVER DID

This was worse than watching a goldfish swim around in a circle for 2 hours straight... in fact....I think the goldfish would be more entertaining....