Camilo, Mechas, Manu, Ana and Pipa are five friends going through that blended trance of intense unrest, astonishment, contained tenderness and manifested rage that is typical of the end of... See full summary »
Juan Sebastian Mesa
Maria Camila Castrillón,
Maria Angélica Puerta
Lita witnesses the murder of her own father, a university professor. Frustrated over the local police she and her family starts to investigate the murder themselves. Located at the dark and... See full summary »
Magallanes, a former army soldier (Damian Alcazar) drives a taxi and eventually a driver of a retired colonel (Federico Luppi), who was in command of his troops in times of struggle against... See full summary »
A lonely private investigator is contacted by a mysterious woman who pulls him into a mind game known as 'telephone walking'. Fascinated by her voice, Aloys discovers an imaginary universe that allows him to break out of his isolation.
Tilde von Overbeck,
A young woman living on a Caribbean island is searching for her father who is lost at sea. When her estranged family come to help, she must confront their dark past and this new family she never expected to embrace.
Viviana Gómez Echeverry
Elsa Whitaker Sanchez,
A couple in a troubled marriage locate a meteorite, initiating an encounter with a mysterious creature. Their lives are turned upside down by the discovery of the creature, which is a source of both pleasure and destruction.
Three women trying to survive in a world full or violence of war. The emphasis on sounds and visuals without any useful dialog prevented me from following the story lines
Saw this movie at the Rotterdam film festival (IFFR.NL) 2016. It was presented as part of the official Competition section, which this year was confined to only eight movies. The latter inevitably gives rise to expectations, but whatever qualities are completely lost on me, even when I had remembered the synopsis better. Now, having re-read the plot after having seen the movie, I can confirm three women as main protagonists, each with her own independent story yet sporadically crossing the survivalistic struggles of the other two. Disregarding the fact that I lost track on their respective stories altogether, the movie on itself looks technically well made. Nevertheless, is a story not crucial to grasp and to allow us following it without having consulted the announcement beforehand?
Reading the festival announcement in retrospect, the festival programmer who wrote the announcement considered it a novel approach. If it is, I don't find it a way forward. He/she stresses the lack of dialog and the emphasis on sounds and visual images. Be that as it may, dialogues can serve much better to outline each one's motives and may provide background information that cannot be derived from the visuals. I know they say a picture tells more than a thousand words, but it does not work all the time. Anyway, in this case it is completely lost on me, so I declare it a failure.
Of course, it is a daring undertaking to survive in a hostile environment, be it a man or a woman, but it is particularly daunting for women who are alone and with no obvious way to defend themselves. The IMDb score of 7.4 can be explained probably as coming from sympathy with the three women in difficult circumstances, each of them coming much farther than could be expected upfront. Apparently the festival visitors thought along similar lines, as this movie received a relatively high average score of 3.85 (out of 5) and thus ended as 79th (out of 178) for the audience award. My low score when leaving the theater got probably lost in the high scores from the voting majority.
4 of 8 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this