User reviews

City of Gold is proof that writers should not do drugs while working. This convoluted mess, complete with cheesy cartoons throughout could have been not half bad, but just seemed to be written either on the fly with no regard for coherence or under a drug induced haze. Do not recommend

A piece of cheap movie. Direction, Acting, Script, Story, Sound, name it... all are worst. Only scenic beauty is good. Please don't waste tour time watching this. You will regret, like me.

This movie was shot in just 14 days, and it shows. Stiff acting, no chemistry, no suspense, and no redemption for the film. If you're hoping to see Peru, you're out of luck as it was shot in Hawaii. Looking forward to a bit of history? Try elsewhere, as there's virtually none of it here other than the most general of details. The final credits were the most enjoyable part of this flick.

There is nothing remotely good about this. The acting is terrible, the plot makes no sense and it is absolutely boring.

All the cast and crews have written the good reviews for this piece of trash. One of the worst movies I have seen in a long time. The writing sucks, the acting sucks, the directing sucks. Do you get the idea that this entire ting sucks? It's more painful to watch this movie than dig my eyes out with a rusty fork.

Not worth the time , this movie sucks Its not Allan Quatermain and golden city its ten times worse.

This is terrible, I don't understand why people even release such garbage

Don't watch, it's mere waste of time. Very stupid story with thin plots.

This movie, this is ACTION. Not just as a genre but by the people who put this movie together. The acting is solid! Branscombe Richmond, one of the most underrated actors of all time, is awesome here as usual. Vernon "Wez" Wells is absolutely engaging as the big bad guy here, and even Razzie award winner Chris Atkins makes a great appearance here. The unknown faces also are solid additions, the two lead kids have great chemistry, and the female mercenary on the motorcycle also brings heat. It's a fun ride, and I enjoyed it greatly. Is the movie perfect? Definitely not. But I look forward to seeing what this crew does next.

The story begins with almost experimental indie fervere, and raises an eyebrow of interest from the start. The acting is blended, some moments read smoothly while others come off contrived or over-stated. Still, Locke maintains control enough to create an interesting enough story, and the scenes are rich with melodrama and theatrics. There isn'tmuch originality present but the almost graphic novel style of story telling adds a better quality to "City Of Gold.

The special effects are mixed bag choices, cheap CGI and some practical choices create enough thrills to help get the film to action adventure lecels. Budget restrains are obvious and Locke's film pushes the limit with effectiveness. Still all things considered the action and effects scenes work. The real winner is the locations and cinematography. Overall "City Of Gold" is an okay film, just don't go in with blockbuster expectations.

This movie banner are wrong (erroneous) Movie are Idle

Complete waste of time. Bizarre plot that makes no sense and some of the worst acting I have ever seen. Not sure what the writer and director were thinking.