4.4/10
3,573
43 user 47 critic

The Girl in the Photographs (2015)

Trailer
1:57 | Trailer
A bored young woman in a sleepy community called Spearfish starts receiving photographs of brutally murdered young women. Are they real or staged? The culprit is either a serial killer or some creep with a sick sense of humour.

Director:

Nick Simon
1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Kal Penn ... Peter Hemmings
Claudia Lee ... Colleen
Kenny Wormald ... Chris
Toby Hemingway ... Ben
Luke Baines ... Tom
Miranda Rae Mayo ... Rose
Katharine Isabelle ... Janet
Mitch Pileggi ... Sheriff Porter
Toby Levins ... Deputy Daniels
Christy Carlson Romano ... Brittany
Oliver Seitz Oliver Seitz ... Trip
Autumn Kendrick ... Victoria
Corey Schmitt ... Gerry
Eva Bourne ... Jill
Kathryn Kirkpatrick ... Denise
Edit

Storyline

A bored young woman in a sleepy community called Spearfish starts receiving photographs of brutally murdered young women. Are they real or staged? The culprit is either a serial killer or some creep with a sick sense of humour.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Crime | Horror | Thriller

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for strong bloody violence, sexuality/nudity, language throughout and some drug use | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Although actors Toby Hemingway and Kenny Wormald portray Colleen's ex-boyfriend and love interest, respectively, both actors are roughly 12 to 13 years older than co star Claudia Lee. See more »

Quotes

Peter Hemmings: Why does it goddamn feel like such a chore to be chosen?
Peter Hemmings: Best case scenario that guy keeps sending you those nasty dirty photos... worse case scenario... you end up IN ONE OF THOSE dirty nasty photos
See more »

Crazy Credits

In the final seconds of the credits, the sound of a camera flash can be heard. See more »

Connections

References Eyes of Laura Mars (1978) See more »

Soundtracks

Diner Magic
Written by Jay Weigel
Performed by Jay Weigel
Courtesy of Carondelet Music Group, LLC
See more »

User Reviews

 
I want a slasher revival to happen so bad. This is not helping the cause.
18 September 2015 | by horrorinpureformSee all my reviews

After having just seen the other Oz Perkins-written 2015 horror film February, and adoring it, I was hoping for a similarly well-crafted film here, with a nuanced screenplay which dares to contribute to the horror genre in new ways. Got the opposite - an extremely low-concept, poor execution slasher. I hope he follows the path of that other film in the future.

A grocery store checkout clerk keeps having mysterious photographs of murdered and mutilated women left for her to find around her workplace and other locations. Seven of them so far. The cops think it is "art" so they don't bother doing absolutely anything about it (what?) at any point, even after the girl is stalked (what?). Then some famous photographer and his posse of models comes to town because he's "inspired" by these photographs, and wants to recreate them. Then slasher.

I'll just get the biggest problem out of the way - this slasher has absolutely zero tension. I feel like it tries to heavily borrow from better films, but achieves only lifeless recreations which fail to understand how to create tension. Most obviously this was clearly inspired by the Strangers, down to the masks. So expect a LOT of scenes that make zero sense if examined from a "why would anyone do this other than for the camera" perspective. Like the villains just lurking randomly in the background and appearing and disappearing and so on and so forth. On top of that, the setups are SO common that the viewer is always five seconds ahead of the characters in peril - you will be able to, with 100% accuracy, predict every single time a villain will appear and disappear in the background. Every, single, time.

The characters were supposed to be funny (I think), but weren't my cup of tea. The secondary cast were decent actors, just not given much to work with. The main actress just looked annoyed throughout the entire film. Her range was "very angry" to "only moderately angry". The villains were just awful. Were they going for farcical? They seemed to do random creepy things for the sake of it. It was just an amalgamation of one dimensional "gross" ideas to try to convince us of how deranged the characters are, which just made them comical and a parody.

The nail in the coffin was the final scene."Horror 101", obvious from the beginning, standard "last chill". This movie did not take itself seriously at all and it did not bode well for the concept. It wouldn't be a bad concept if developed further, but should have tried for a serious and tense tone, because it could have been far more interesting.

Upsides? Decent gore, and two or three funny lines hanging on for dear life in an otherwise mostly-witless sea of dialogue.


33 of 55 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 43 user reviews »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

official site

Country:

USA | Canada

Language:

English

Release Date:

1 April 2016 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

The Girl in the Photographs See more »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Alghanim Entertainment See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

2.39:1
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed