Making Manson

This documentary is such a joke! A pathological liar continues to lie to gullible people (mostly ex - cons). Who are you going to believe, the people that were actually there and testified, or some 'friends' (ex - cons/ ex - cellmates) of Manson's that were NOT at the murders and the recordings of a deluded psychopath? Granted Bugliosi is also a pathological liar, however, Manson is the psychopath! Even in the tapes he admits he was at the house the second night and went in with Tex, then his 'friend' says he wasn't. There was also testimony from 3 of the murderers in various interviews over the years that Manson was there the first night, then left. This is just another mind - f of Manson's bs now being spouted after the dill weed is dead. He was a master manipulator that fed drugs to idiots and it was shown over and over again at the trial just how much control he had over said idiots. The worst part about all of this is Hollywood is still making money off of 8 people's murders, and one attempted murder; and the only murdered person that is ever talked about is Sharon Tate. There are even a few more murders that are never ever mentioned that happened at the Ranch. There are still family members of ALL the victims that are still having to deal with being re - traumatised every time some jack - a@@ wants to make money off Manson. Manson himself has told so many lies, and so many different versions of what happened over the years in multiple interviews that this is just more manipulation for new generations to keep up the hero worship of a psychopath. Nothing new here, folks. Don't waste your time.

I've always known the bullet points of the Manson story, but I'd never been compelled to dig in...until I saw the trailer for Making Manson. I binged the series, fascinated by the nuanced unpacking of someone continuously straddling the line between deranged and delirious, narcissistic and notoriously insecure. Manson is unequivocally a killer, and definitely has blood on his hands (especially as he newly admits to multiple killing in his younger days) -- but how much blood does he have on his hands, and how much of it just splattered near him?

Making Manson is true crime at its best. It doesn't glorify the killer or the crimes, but seeks to present new truths and study the man behind the character and the media circus he performed in.

Watch it, and you'll be enthralled from start to finish.

Not sure what these knuckleheads are complaining about giving it four stars. Probably butt hurt about another documentary that they probably didn't watch that they think is glorifying Manson. Feels like one of the first actual investigative approaches to a story that has been told ad nauseam for 50 years. Doc brings all of the well-worn storytellers of the Manson narrative into the room to interact with the tapes. It's a great documentary for both people who are very familiar with the case as well as people who know nothing about it. Looks great. Well shot. Great interviews and a couple admissions I had not heard before.

I've seen in other documentaries, and this one shows the same thing: If a kid is unloved, they grow up with no empathy, and create a sense of protective pride that doesn't make them accept they have made mistakes.

Manson was unloved by his parents, was put into a catholic orphanage that beat him, was never adopted, became a criminal to survive, got arrested multiple times, learned how to become worse in prison, and then all the other things happened.

Let abortions happen, and unwanted babies won't happen. If God existed, and had any problems with abortion, he'd make it impossible for abortions to happen.

What really stood out to me was how the story avoided sensationalism. It took a more factual, straightforward approach to the Manson murders, focusing on the observations and experiences of the people directly involved. That felt refreshing compared to the usual over-the-top portrayals in the media. I hadn't realized just how much the press sensationalized the case at the time or how Bugliosi turned his role as prosecutor into a way to profit from the whole thing-that was eye-opening.

I was also drawn to the way Jones' relationship with Manson evolved over time. It seemed like, as he got to know him, he started to question whether Manson was really as guilty as everyone believed. But that perspective seemed to change completely after their final phone call, like something about that conversation brought everything crashing down for him. It added a really human element to the story, showing how messy and complicated it all was for the people caught up in it.