¿Quién lo mató?

Very well done docudrama based on a true story.. En Español y Ingles dub. English dub voice over doesn't match English subtitles but the general message is same or those who are not bilingual. I know very little Spanish but I Enjoyed it, nonetheless. Thino Jerry Springer/Geraldo Rivera or Jenny Jones beiing murdered in broad daylight in the mid 90's. A popular variety TV host is assassinated. He is obnoxious, abusive, a junkie and successful and famous. The list of suspects is huge, The way it is filmed we get to see the crime from many character's pespective..I enjoyedit very much as an Anglo despite it being originally in Spanish. The story was worth it.

My wife is Mexican and was the one to choose this one. I didn't know anything about this crime before start watching it. I really enjoyed.

First, the cast is superb. I know Luis Gerardo Mendez from Narcos Mexico and Club de Cuervos. He's a talented actor. To add, all the other cast are great too. Most of them are pretty similar to real people.

Second, I have enjoyed the whole story divided by characters. I think it's quite original and interesting to understand all the main characters.

Last, the conclusion is great. I love how they have created this series trying to respect the intelligence from the viewers.

Anyway, I recommend this one if you love Mexican crime pretty well done series.

Plot and Authenticity: The series grapples with the challenge of balancing fact and fiction. While it's difficult to ascertain the absolute truth behind Paco Stanley's death, the creators have skillfully woven a captivating storyline. By introducing fictional characters and events, they add layers of intrigue and suspense. Viewers are left questioning what's real and what's embellished, which adds to the show's allure.

Performances: The standout feature of "Quien lo mató" lies in its exceptional performances. The entire cast delivers stellar acting, bringing their characters to life. Whether portraying real-life figures or fictional counterparts, the actors immerse themselves fully. The emotional depth and authenticity they bring to the screen elevate the viewing experience.

Characterization: The decision to introduce fictional characters alongside real ones is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it allows for creative liberties and unexpected plot twists. On the other, it risks blurring the line between reality and imagination. However, the character development remains consistent, and each actor shines in their role.

Entertainment Value: Despite the somber subject matter-the tragic loss of a beloved entertainer-the series manages to be entertaining. The pacing keeps viewers engaged, and the suspense builds steadily. The exploration of Paco Stanley's life, career, and relationships adds depth, making it more than just a crime drama.

Emotional Impact: For those who remember Paco Stanley's impact on Mexican television, watching "Quien lo mató" can be emotionally challenging. It revisits a painful chapter in the country's entertainment history, evoking nostalgia and sadness. The show serves as a poignant reminder of the fragility of fame and the human condition.

Conclusion: "Quien lo mató" successfully blends fact and fiction, paying homage to Paco Stanley while weaving an intriguing narrative. It's a series that invites viewers to question, empathize, and reflect. Whether you're a fan of true crime, drama, or character-driven storytelling, this show is worth a watch.

Note: As with any dramatization of real events, viewers should approach "Quien lo mató" with an open mind and appreciate it as a work of fiction inspired by true events.

This is a very well written and enacted series. I am not Mexican and I have never heard of any of these people. The idea about showing different perspectives in each episode was interesting. Each actor - main and small role - has acted very well. Especially, I liked the prison scenes. It wasn't filled with animal-like people, but was full of good and bad people who are mostly struggling in life like the rest of us - struggling for power, struggling for 3 meals a day, struggling for justice and for some peace of mind. It's a story that is relevant even today - people with money and power (try to) control the narrative everywhere, in Mexico or where I am from, in India.

But then, one thing has changed. Technology is throwing brighter and wider beacons of light on the current Pacos and Villareals.

It's amazing this title's getting the "raving" reviews it has, obviously they've set a lot of people to write them, you start reading them and you realize they idolize him as if he had been Johnny Carson or David Letterman.

Paco's Stanley was just a show for people who had nothing to do, nor did they want to see anything constructive or educational, and by that I don't mean people should do that all the time, watching any movie or show with real substance is part of that constructive content... Yet, he had the same "push" that they gave Tv shows like "Hoy" or Chapoy's gossip shows.

Having grown during his time, and being a teenager, unfortunately, my mother indeed had nothing else o do and she would leaving playing as "companionship" or listening to anything that was familiar to her... So i remember the show well enough. They should ad re-runs in Youtube so you could just take a look and realize just how irrelevant and ignorance-provoking tv show pushed by Televisa (go wonder) A real waste of space and a perpetuation of the idea that all Mexicans are as ignorant.